Geoscience and Policy Intersections

EIA Extends Monthly Oil & Gas Production Reporting for Three Years

Overview

The U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) has announced a three‑year extension of its monthly reporting form, EIA‑914, which tracks crude oil, lease condensate, and natural gas production and sales. The extension, approved under the Paperwork Reduction Act, will keep the current data collection schedule in place through 2029, ensuring continuity of the vital statistics that inform energy policy, market analysis, and environmental assessments.

The data gathered by EIA‑914 are critical for understanding the nation’s energy supply chain. By compiling monthly figures from 17 key states and federal offshore areas, the report provides real‑time insights into production trends, regional supply dynamics, and the economic health of the oil and gas sector. These statistics underpin federal energy planning, inform regulatory decisions, and support research in geoscience and natural resource management.

Respondents to the survey—primarily oil and gas producers—will incur an estimated 14,400 burden hours, translating to about $1.37 million in administrative costs. EIA estimates that no additional costs will be imposed beyond these hours, and it encourages public comment on the proposed collection. Comments must be submitted by September 8, 2026, and can be sent electronically to the EIA Clearance Officer with OMB control number 1905‑0205.

Key Elements

• Three‑year extension of Form EIA‑914 (Monthly Crude Oil and Lease Condensate, and Natural Gas Production Report).
  
• Data scope: monthly production and sales of natural gas, crude oil, and lease condensate from 17 states/areas (e.g., Texas, North Dakota, California) plus federal offshore Gulf and Pacific regions.
  
• Burden estimate: 14,400 respondent hours, costing approximately $1.37 million in administrative time.
  
• OMB control number: 1905‑0205, required for all submissions.
  
• Public comment deadline: September 8, 2026.
  
• Contact: Debra Coaxum, EIA Clearance Officer, (202) 586‑7876.
  
• Purpose: to maintain timely, accurate data that support energy policy, market forecasting, and environmental analysis.
  
• Compliance: the extension is authorized under the Paperwork Reduction Act and U.S. statutes 15 U.S.C. 772(b) and 42 U.S.C. 7101.

Coast Guard Seeks to Extend Oil‑Spill Response Data Collection, Invites Public Input

Overview
The U.S. Coast Guard is requesting a renewal of its approved information‑collection program under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. The program, identified by OMB Control Number 1625‑0042, gathers data on the lightering of oil and hazardous material cargoes and the advance notice of transfer of such cargoes. Lightering—removing cargo from a vessel to reduce its draft or to transfer it to a smaller vessel—plays a critical role in enabling rapid response to spills and minimizing environmental damage.

The Coast Guard’s collection allows the agency to monitor and regulate lightering activities, ensuring that vessels and facilities comply with safety and environmental standards. By collecting pre‑arrival notices, incident reports, and operating conditions, the Coast Guard can coordinate emergency responses, control spill locations, and maintain situational awareness during hazardous material transfers.

The agency has opened a 60‑day comment period, ending September 8, 2026, to solicit public feedback on the necessity, burden, and quality of the data collection. Comments can be submitted electronically through the Federal eRulemaking Portal or by mail. The Coast Guard estimates the annual burden at 913 hours, a modest increase from the previous 899 hours, reflecting a slight rise in the number of responses.

Key Elements

• Purpose: To support timely emergency response and environmental protection during oil and hazardous material lightering and transfer operations.
  
• Regulatory Basis: 46 U.S.C. 3715 and 46 U.S.C. 70011 authorize the Coast Guard to set lightering and advance‑notice regulations, codified in 33 CFR 156.200‑156.430 and 33 CFR 156.118.
  
• Data Collected: Pre‑arrival notices, incident reports, operating conditions, and advance transfer notifications from vessel masters, owners, agents, and facility representatives.
  
• Burden Estimate: 913 hours per year (up from 899), reflecting the time required for respondents to complete and submit the required forms.
  
• Public Participation: Comments are encouraged on the collection’s utility, burden accuracy, data quality, and potential use of automated or technology‑based collection methods.
  
• Submission Channels: Federal eRulemaking Portal, mail to the Office of Privacy Management, or via the Coast Guard docket (USCG‑2026‑0112).
  
• Outcome Possibilities: The Coast Guard may revise the ICR, maintain the status quo, or decide not to seek renewal based on public input.

EPA Releases Public Comments on Recent Environmental Impact Statements

Overview
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has issued a notice of availability for its comment letters on several federal Environmental Impact Statements (EISs). In accordance with Section 309(a) of the Clean Air Act and the Council on Environmental Quality guidance on 42 U.S.C. 4332, the EPA is required to publish its assessments of EISs prepared by other federal agencies. This notice informs the public that the agency’s comments are now accessible and outlines the specific projects addressed.

The primary focus of the comments is the Final Gulf‑River Region (GRR) SEIS covering the Mississippi River corridor from Baton Rouge to the Gulf of Mexico, as well as the Mississippi River‑Gulf Outlet and the Louisiana New Industrial Canal Lock and Connecting Channels Project. The review period for these projects concludes on August 10, 2026, and the EPA’s feedback is available for public scrutiny during this time.

The notice also provides contact information for EPA officials who can answer questions about the comment letters. The Deputy Director of the Federal Activities Division, Nancy Abrams, and Mark H. Lahare, the project contact, are listed with phone numbers for further inquiries.

Key Elements

• Purpose: Public release of EPA comment letters on federal EISs, fulfilling Clean Air Act Section 309(a) obligations.
  
• Projects Covered:
  
  • Final Gulf‑River Region SEIS (Mississippi River, Baton Rouge to Gulf of Mexico)
    
  • Mississippi River‑Gulf Outlet
    
  • Louisiana New Industrial Canal Lock and Connecting Channels Project
    
• Review Period: Ends August 10, 2026.
  
• Availability: Comments can be accessed through the EPA’s Office of Federal Activities, General Information.
  
• Contact Information:
  
  • Deputy Director, Nancy Abrams – 202‑993‑3272
    
  • Project Contact, Mark H. Lahare – 504‑862‑1344
    
• Document Details:
  
  • Document Number: 2026‑13961
    
  • Publication Date: July 10, 2026
    
  • Status: Active
    
  • Agency: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
    
• Regulatory Context: Guidance from the Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) under 42 U.S.C. 4332.

FERC Opens Public Review for New Wisconsin Hydroelectric Project

Overview
The U.S. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) has announced that the Northern States Power Company’s application for a new hydroelectric facility on the Namekagon River in Sawyer County, Wisconsin, is ready for environmental analysis. The notice invites the public, resource agencies, and other stakeholders to submit comments, recommendations, terms and conditions, and prescriptions through FERC’s electronic filing system or by mail. The review period runs from September 8 to October 20, 2026, with final amendments due by August 6, 2026.

The project, designated Project No. 2417‑067, proposes a 246.9‑acre reservoir, a 442‑foot concrete overflow dam, a small powerhouse housing a single 0.168‑MW Francis‑type turbine, and a 150‑foot underground transmission line. FERC’s notice emphasizes compliance with the Federal Power Act, water‑quality certification requirements, and the need to serve all intervenors and relevant resource agencies with submitted documents.

Stakeholders in geoscience, water‑resource management, and renewable energy will find particular interest in the environmental implications of altering river flow, potential impacts on local ecosystems, and the regulatory framework guiding the project’s development.

Key Elements

• Project Scope: 246.9‑acre reservoir, 442‑ft overflow dam, 18‑ft‑wide powerhouse, 0.168 MW turbine, 150‑ft underground line.
  
• Location: Namekagon River, Sawyer County, Wisconsin.
  
• Regulatory Basis: Federal Power Act (16 U.S.C. 791(a)‑825®), FERC Rules of Practice and Procedure, water‑quality certification under the Clean Water Act.
  
• Public Participation: Comment period September 8–October 20, 2026; final amendments due August 6, 2026.
  
• Submission Channels: eFiling system (eComment), paper mail to FERC Secretary, or other carriers to specified addresses.
  
• Service Requirements: Intervenors must serve copies to all listed parties and relevant resource agencies per 18 CFR 4.34(b).
  
• Environmental Analysis: Focus on reservoir impacts, dam construction, turbine operation, tailrace effects, and transmission line routing.
  
• Contact Points: Northern States Power representatives (Xcel Energy) for project details; FERC Online Support for filing assistance; Office of Public Participation for inquiries.

Trego River: New 1.2‑MW Hydropower Project Opens Public Review

Overview
The U.S. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) has accepted a hydroelectric application from Northern States Power Company (Xcel Energy) for the Trego Hydroelectric Project on Wisconsin’s Namekagon River. The project will create a 435‑acre reservoir behind a 642‑foot concrete dam, house a 1.2‑MW powerhouse with two Francis turbines, and include a 49‑foot transmission line. The application is now ready for environmental analysis under the Federal Power Act, and the Commission is inviting public comments, recommendations, and prescriptions.

The notice outlines the project’s technical specifications, environmental requirements, and the procedural steps for stakeholders. It emphasizes that the application must be reviewed for water‑quality certification and that final amendments are due by August 6, 2026. The Commission encourages electronic submissions but also provides mailing addresses for paper filings.

Stakeholders have until September 8, 2026 to submit initial comments and until October 20, 2026 to reply to comments. The notice provides contact details for the applicant’s environmental analyst, FERC’s online support, and the Office of Public Participation, ensuring that interested parties can engage in the review process.

Key Elements

• Project: Trego Hydroelectric Project, 1.2 MW capacity, 435‑acre reservoir, 642‑ft dam, 59.5‑ft powerhouse, 49‑ft transmission line.
  
• Location: Namekagon River, Washburn County, Wisconsin.
  
• Regulatory Framework: Federal Power Act, 18 CFR 2.1, 18 CFR 385.2001‑385.2005.
  
• Environmental Analysis: Application accepted for environmental review; requires water‑quality certification or waiver.
  
• Public Comment Periods:
  
  • Initial comments: until 5:00 p.m. ET, September 8, 2026.
    
  • Reply comments: until 5:00 p.m. ET, October 20, 2026.
    
• Submission Methods: Electronic filing via FERC eFiling/eComment; paper filings to Secretary Debbie‑Anne A. Reese, FERC.
  
• Contact Information:
  
  • Northern States Power (Xcel Energy) – Donald Hartinger, Director of Renewable Operation‑Hydro; Matthew Miller, Environmental Analyst.
    
  • FERC Online Support: 866‑208‑3676 (toll‑free) or 202‑502‑8659 (TTY).
    
  • Office of Public Participation: 202‑502‑6595.
    
• Filing Requirements: Must include docket number P‑2711‑025, title (“COMMENTS”, “REPLY COMMENTS”, etc.), applicant name, project number, evidentiary basis, and proof of service to all listed parties.
  
• Final Amendments Deadline: 5:00 p.m. ET, August 6, 2026.

NOAA Calls for Public Input on Revamping Two Iconic Marine Sanctuaries

Overview

The U.S. Department of Commerce’s National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) has begun a comprehensive review of the management plans for the Greater Farallones and Cordell Bank National Marine Sanctuaries (GFNMS/CBNMS). The goal is to assess progress toward each sanctuary’s conservation objectives and to develop a single, unified management plan that will guide future protection and use of these critical marine ecosystems. NOAA is soliciting written and oral comments from individuals, organizations, tribes, and government agencies, but does not anticipate any immediate regulatory changes as part of this review.

The sanctuaries cover more than 4,500 square miles of California’s coastal and offshore waters, including kelp forests, rocky reefs, deep‑sea canyons, and important migratory routes for seabirds, marine mammals, and fish. NOAA’s recent condition reports (June 2024 for GFNMS and June 2023 for CBNMS) highlight ongoing challenges such as kelp loss, shoreline erosion, marine debris, and data gaps in deep‑sea habitats. The review will incorporate these findings, align with overlapping federal, state, and tribal responsibilities, and consider environmental, historical, and cultural impacts under NEPA, the Endangered Species Act, and other statutes.

Public participation is central to the process. Written comments are due by 5 p.m. PDT on August 24, 2026, and an oral comment session will be held at the advisory council meeting on July 31, 2026, in San Francisco. NOAA specifically requests input on priority activities—ranging from kelp restoration and deep‑sea mapping to open‑ocean monitoring, wildlife disturbance mitigation, and public outreach—so that the unified plan reflects the needs and values of the broader community.

Key Elements

• Unified Management Plan: NOAA will merge the two sanctuaries’ plans into a single document, while maintaining their legal distinctiveness.
  
• No Immediate Rulemaking: The review is not expected to trigger regulatory changes at this stage.
  
• Public Comment Period:
  
  • Written comments: due August 24, 2026.
    
  • Oral comments: July 31, 2026, 10 a.m.–1 p.m. PDT, San Francisco.
    
• Priority Activities for Feedback:
  
  • Kelp restoration and shoreline erosion mitigation.
    
  • Deep‑sea habitat mapping and monitoring of rare corals and sponges.
    
  • Long‑term open‑ocean monitoring (oceanographic and acoustic moorings).
    
  • Wildlife disturbance reduction (overflights, ship strikes, oil spills).
    
  • Public education, outreach, and sustainable use initiatives.
    
  • Estuarine stressor management (land‑use impacts, marine debris, invasive species).
    
• Consultation and Compliance: NOAA will address obligations under the Endangered Species Act, Magnuson‑Stevens Act, National Historic Preservation Act, Coastal Zone Management Act, and Executive Order 13175.
  
• NEPA Considerations: The agency will determine whether an Environmental Assessment or Impact Statement is required for the unified plan.
  
• Stakeholder Engagement: Input is welcomed from tribes, federal partners (e.g., Interior, EPA, USFWS), state agencies, and the public to ensure a holistic, science‑based management strategy.

HUD Reverses Floodplain Rules, Keeping Some Flexibility for Builders and Wetland Protection

Overview

The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) has issued a proposed rule to rescind its 2024 floodplain management and wetlands protection regulations. The move follows Executive Order 14148, which revoked an earlier executive order that underpinned the 2024 rule. HUD’s new proposal aims to restore the regulatory framework to its pre‑2024 state while preserving certain flexibilities that were introduced in the final rule.

The proposal keeps the 2024‑era provisions that allow for more streamlined decision‑making in floodway areas, categorical exclusions for low‑risk projects, and specific exemptions from Part 55 (the federal flood risk management standard). Minor wording changes are also included to improve clarity. The rule is currently open for public comment until September 8, 2026.

For developers, homeowners, and local governments, the change means that many of the stricter requirements introduced in 2024—such as higher elevation standards for new construction and tighter wetland protection mandates—will no longer apply. However, the retained flexibilities will still influence how floodplain and wetland regulations are applied in practice, potentially affecting building permits, insurance premiums, and environmental assessments.

Key Elements

• Restoration of Pre‑2024 Regulations – HUD will revert floodplain and wetland rules to the state they were in before the April 23, 2024 final rule.
  
• Retention of 2024 Flexibilities – The proposal keeps the following 2024 provisions:
  
  • Floodway definitions that allow for more nuanced zoning.
    
  • Categorical exclusions for projects deemed low risk.
    
  • Exemptions from Part 55 applicability for certain developments.
    
  • Streamlined decision‑making processes for floodplain assessments.
    
• Minor Clarity Revisions – Small wording changes to improve understanding of the regulations.
  
• Impact on Building Standards – The federal flood risk management standard will no longer require the higher elevation or design criteria introduced in 2024, but the retained flexibilities may still influence local building codes.
  
• Wetland Protection – Existing wetland protection requirements remain largely unchanged, but the removal of the 2024 rule may reduce the scope of certain categorical exclusions.
  
• Public Comment Period – Stakeholders can submit comments through the Federal eRulemaking Portal or by mail until September 8, 2026.
  
• Relevance to Geoscience and Natural Resource Fields – The rule affects floodplain mapping, hydrologic modeling, wetland conservation, and land‑use planning, all of which are critical to geoscientists, environmental engineers, and natural resource managers.

Building Safer Homes: The 2025 Disaster Resiliency Act Puts Grants and Tax Credits in the Hands of Households

The Disaster Resiliency and Coverage Act of 2025 amends the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act to create a new Individual Household Disaster Mitigation Program. The program directs the President to award grants to states and Indian tribal governments for pre‑disaster mitigation projects that protect individual residential properties in high‑risk areas. By tying funding to specific, science‑based mitigation standards and requiring technical assistance and periodic review, the bill seeks to make homes more resilient to floods, wildfires, hurricanes, and other natural hazards.

Key to the bill is its focus on insurance incentives. States must develop plans that assess homeowner insurance availability and affordability, and the program will provide guidance to insurers and consumers on how mitigation activities can lower premiums or unlock coverage. The legislation also establishes a multi‑tiered set of mitigation standards, drawing on existing industry and government guidelines, and creates a hazard‑mitigation advisory committee that includes insurers, builders, and environmental groups to keep the program aligned with emerging technologies and best practices.

Beyond the grant program, the Act introduces significant tax provisions. It removes disaster‑mitigation payments from taxable income, offers a 30 % tax credit for qualifying mitigation expenditures, and clarifies exclusions for state‑based catastrophe programs and certain agricultural assistance. Together, these measures aim to reduce the financial burden on homeowners, encourage widespread adoption of resilience measures, and ultimately lower the long‑term costs of disaster recovery.

Key Elements

• Program Establishment – President must create a grant program for states and tribal governments to fund household‑level mitigation in identified high‑risk areas.
  
• Eligibility & Review – Eligible disaster areas are defined with scientific input and reviewed every five years; states must submit detailed plans covering insurance availability, mitigation activities, and funding limits.
  
• Mitigation Activities – Grants cover a wide range of actions: roof strengthening, flood barriers, fire‑resistant construction, storm shelters, lightning protection, vegetation management, and more, all aligned with federal and industry standards.
  
• Insurance Incentives – States provide guidance to insurers on how mitigation can lower premiums, increase coverage options, and offer rebates or credits to homeowners.
  
• Tax Treatment – Disaster‑mitigation payments are excluded from gross income; a 30 % tax credit is available for qualifying expenditures, with special rules for state reimbursements and agricultural assistance.
  
• Advisory Committee – A 50‑member committee of insurers, builders, emergency managers, academics, and environmental groups advises the President on emerging mitigation technologies and standards.
  
• Funding Limits – Individual households receive no more than $10 000 (adjusted annually for inflation) per mitigation project, ensuring equitable distribution of resources.
  
• No Preemption of State Insurance Regulation – The Act explicitly states it does not alter state insurance regulation or require insurers to change underwriting practices.

Making Disaster Aid Transparent: The Post‑Disaster Assistance Online Accountability Act

Overview

The Post‑Disaster Assistance Online Accountability Act (PDAOAA) seeks to create a publicly accessible, machine‑readable repository that details how federal disaster funds are distributed and spent. By mandating that covered agencies—such as FEMA, the Small Business Administration, and the Department of Housing and Urban Development—publish quarterly summaries and project‑level data on a subpage of the existing Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency website, the bill aims to improve oversight and enable researchers, policymakers, and citizens to track the flow of aid after natural disasters.

The Act requires each agency to report the total assistance disbursed, the portion expended or obligated, and a detailed list of projects, including names, descriptions, completion status, award numbers, FEMA catalog numbers, ZIP‑code locations, and any additional reporting requirements. Data must be released within 30 days of each calendar quarter’s end and be available in a machine‑readable format to facilitate analysis and integration with other datasets.

For the geoscience and natural‑resource communities, the PDAOAA provides a rich, standardized source of information on post‑disaster recovery efforts, project locations, and funding allocations. This transparency can support studies on the effectiveness of mitigation strategies, the socioeconomic impacts of disasters, and the allocation of resources across affected regions.

Key Elements

• Online Repository: Establishes a dedicated subpage on the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency website for disaster‑assistance data.
  
• Quarterly Reporting: Covered agencies must submit data within 30 days of each calendar quarter’s end.
  
• Machine‑Readable Data: All submitted information must be provided in a format that can be easily parsed and analyzed.
  
• Detailed Project Information: Reports must include project name, description, completion status, award ID, FEMA catalog number, ZIP‑code location, and any additional agency‑specific reporting requirements.
  
• Agency Guidance: Covered agencies, in coordination with the Office of Management and Budget and the Treasury, must issue guidance to ensure compliance.
  
• Private‑Sector Collaboration: The OMB Director may partner with nonprofits or other private entities to develop the required subpage.
  
• Covered Agencies: Includes any agency providing assistance under the Robert T. Stafford Act, the Small Business Administration, and the Department of Housing and Urban Development.
  
• Definitions: Clarifies terms such as “disaster assistance,” “eligible recipient,” and “specified natural disaster” to ensure consistent reporting across agencies.
  
• Transparency Goals: Enhances public oversight, supports research, and promotes accountability in the use of federal disaster funds.

POWER Act of 2025: Boosting Electric Resilience Through Hazard Mitigation

Overview

The POWER Act of 2025 amends the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act to explicitly authorize federal agencies to provide essential assistance for hazard mitigation to electric utilities. By adding a new subsection to Section 403, the bill allows utilities to undertake cost‑effective mitigation projects—such as underground cabling, vegetation management, and grid hardening—either alone or in conjunction with emergency power restoration efforts.

The Act ensures that a utility receiving emergency restoration aid is not barred from accessing additional hazard‑mitigation funds under Section 406, thereby encouraging a more integrated approach to disaster preparedness and recovery. This dual‑support framework is designed to reduce the frequency and severity of power outages caused by natural hazards, protect critical infrastructure, and safeguard communities during extreme weather events.

As the bill has been received, read twice, and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs, it is currently in the early stages of legislative review. Its passage would provide a clearer federal policy path for utilities to secure funding for resilience projects, potentially accelerating investments in grid modernization and climate‑adapted infrastructure.

Key Elements

• Amendment to Section 403: Adds a new subsection for electric utilities, enabling federal assistance for hazard mitigation activities.
  
• Dual‑purpose Funding: Allows utilities to combine mitigation projects with emergency restoration efforts under the same assistance program.
  
• Eligibility Safeguard: Guarantees that receiving emergency restoration aid does not disqualify a utility from subsequent hazard‑mitigation assistance under Section 406.
  
• Applicability: The new provisions apply only to appropriations made after the Act’s enactment, ensuring that funding is directed toward current and future resilience projects.
  
• Legislative Status: Referred to the Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs, indicating the next steps for debate, amendment, and potential passage.
  
• Implications for Geoscience and Natural Resources: Provides a framework for utilities to incorporate hazard‑risk assessments, climate projections, and geological data into planning and investment decisions.

Reclaiming the Coal Legacy: New Partnerships to Restore Mining Lands and Waters

The Community Reclamation Partnerships Act of 2025 seeks to modernize the Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act of 1977 by opening the door for states to collaborate with nongovernmental organizations on the cleanup of abandoned coal mines that predate the 1977 cutoff. By authorizing “Community Reclaimers” – entities that did not create the mining damage and are free of outstanding violations – the bill encourages fresh expertise and resources to tackle long‑standing environmental problems in former mining regions.

Key provisions require states to draft memoranda of understanding with federal or state agencies that outline concrete strategies for treating mine drainage, monitoring water quality, and maintaining treatment systems. These memoranda must be publicly reviewed and approved by the Environmental Protection Agency within 120 days. Once approved, a Community Reclaimer can receive federal approval to execute remediation projects on sites listed in the federal inventory, provided the state assumes responsibility for costs and damages (except for gross negligence) and demonstrates sufficient technical and financial capacity.

The Act also clarifies state liability for mine‑drainage projects, permits limited reprocessing of historic mine residue for cost recovery, and sets a sunset date of September 30, 2032. With the bill now in the Senate and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources, stakeholders in geoscience, environmental restoration, and natural resource management are poised to shape the next chapter of coal‑mine reclamation in the United States.

Key Elements

• State Memoranda of Understanding (MOUs) for mine‑drainage remediation, requiring public comment, monitoring plans, and EPA/Administrator approval within 120 days.
  
• Community Reclaimer Partnerships: NGOs or companies that did not cause the damage and have no outstanding violations can partner with states to remediate abandoned mine lands.
  
• Approval Process: States submit detailed project plans, cost estimates, and contingency plans; the Secretary of the Interior approves projects that meet technical, financial, and environmental criteria.
  
• Public Participation: Mandatory public meetings and comment periods before project approval and implementation.
  
• Reprocessing of Historic Mine Residue: Allowed only if approved by the land‑management agency, with proceeds used to offset remediation costs or reimburse federal agencies.
  
• State Liability Clarification: States are not liable for mine‑drainage control unless it follows an approved MOU.
  
• Sunset Provision: The Act remains in effect until September 30, 2032, providing a defined timeframe for implementation and review.
  
• Committee Referral: The bill is now under the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources, where further deliberations and amendments will occur.

MAPWaters Act: Making Federal Waterway Rules Transparent and Accessible

The Modernizing Access to our Public Waters Act of 2025 (MAPWaters Act) was signed into law to streamline how federal agencies share information about recreational use of federal waterways. By creating a single, interoperable data framework, the Act aims to give anglers, boaters, hikers, and scientists reliable, up‑to‑date maps and restrictions that were previously scattered across multiple agencies.

Within five years, the Secretaries of Agriculture and Interior will digitize and publish GIS datasets that detail when and where federal waterways are open, closed, or subject to specific use limits—such as motor‑propulsion restrictions, anchoring zones, or seasonal closures. The Act also requires the same level of detail for fishing restrictions, including no‑take zones, gear limits, and catch‑release rules, and mandates regular updates (at least twice a year for most data, real‑time for fishing limits).

Beyond data publication, MAPWaters Act encourages collaboration with state, tribal, private, and nonprofit partners, and allows the U.S. Geological Survey to assist in data collection and standardization. Annual progress reports to congressional committees ensure transparency, while the law explicitly preserves existing state and federal regulatory authority over navigable waters and fisheries.

Key Elements

• Interagency Standards: Within 30 months, agencies must adopt common data standards for geospatial information on federal waterways and fishing restrictions.
  
• Public GIS Data: By year five, agencies will make online, downloadable GIS layers showing:
  • Waterway access status, seasonal closures, and propulsion limits.
    
  • Anchoring, wake, speed, and directional travel restrictions.
    
  • Allowed recreational activities (canoes, motorboats, personal watercraft, etc.).
    
  • Locations of boat ramps, portages, and fishing access sites with operating dates.
    
  • Bathymetric data where feasible.
    
  • Fishing restriction boundaries, gear limits, and catch‑release requirements.
    
• Update Cadence: Data must be refreshed at least twice yearly, with fishing restriction changes posted in real time.
  
• Public Engagement: A formal process for public comments on the released data is required.
  
• Partnerships: Agencies may partner with state/tribal agencies, tech firms, and data‑science experts, and may contract third parties to fulfill the Act’s mandates.
  
• USGS Collaboration: The Secretaries may work with the U.S. Geological Survey to aggregate and publish data.
  
• Legal Safeguards: The Act does not alter definitions of navigable waters, state or federal jurisdiction, or existing fisheries management authority.
  
• Reporting: Annual reports to multiple House and Senate committees track implementation progress through 2034.

Finishing the Arkansas Valley Conduit: New Repayment Rules and Maintenance Mandates

Overview

The Finish the Arkansas Valley Conduit Act (H.R. 131) amends the 1977 Public Law 87‑590 to streamline the financing and operation of the Arkansas Valley Conduit in Colorado. The bill clarifies that the conduit’s repayment contract will require a payment equal to 35 % of the total cost, regardless of other reclamation statutes. This payment is to be sourced from construction funding provided by non‑federal entities and, where necessary, from the Secretary’s determination of financial hardship. The remaining balance will be repaid over a maximum of 75 years at a simple interest rate set at 50 % of the Treasury’s rate, with additional revenue from excess capacity or exchange contracts at the Fryingpan‑Arkansas project facilities.

The Act also redefines the operational responsibilities of the parties involved. It mandates that contracting parties assume full care, operation, maintenance, and eventual replacement of the conduit, thereby ensuring long‑term sustainability and reducing federal oversight. By tying repayment to financial hardship and incorporating revenue from ancillary projects, the legislation seeks to balance fiscal feasibility for local communities with the need for reliable domestic water supplies.

The House has passed the bill and the Chair has directed the Clerk to notify the Senate, marking the next step in the legislative process. If enacted, the Act will provide a clearer, more flexible framework for completing the Arkansas Valley Conduit and securing its ongoing functionality.

Key Elements

• 35 % Cost Payment: The repayment contract requires a payment equal to 35 % of the conduit’s total cost, irrespective of other reclamation laws.
  
• Funding Sources:
  
  • Construction funding from non‑federal entities.
    
  • Repayment of the remaining balance based on a financial‑hardship assessment by the Secretary.
    
• Repayment Terms:
  
  • Maximum 75‑year repayment period.
    
  • Simple interest at 50 % of the Treasury’s rate (as determined by the Secretary of the Treasury).
    
  • Inclusion of revenue from contracts for excess capacity or exchange contracts at the Fryingpan‑Arkansas project facilities.
    
• Operations & Maintenance: Contracting parties are required to assume responsibility for the conduit’s care, operation, maintenance, and eventual replacement.
  
• Amendment to Public Law 87‑590: The bill modifies specific subsections of the original law to incorporate the new repayment and operational provisions.
  
• Legislative Status: Passed by the House; Senate has been notified and the bill awaits further consideration.

ACRES Act: Mandating Transparent Reporting on Federal Wildfire Fuel‑Reduction Efforts

The Accurately Counting Risk Elimination Solutions (ACRES) Act requires the Secretaries of Agriculture and Interior to submit detailed, annual reports on hazardous fuels reduction activities performed on federal lands. Beginning the fiscal year after enactment, each Secretary must disclose the number of acres treated, their location relative to the wildland‑urban interface, wildfire risk levels, types of treatments, costs, and measured effectiveness. The reports are to be made publicly available on the respective department websites, ensuring that policymakers and the public can track progress in reducing wildfire hazards.

In addition to reporting, the Act mandates the development of standardized data‑tracking procedures within 90 days of enactment. These procedures must include regular data reviews, verification methods, and analyses of short‑ and long‑term effectiveness. Within two weeks of implementation, the Secretaries must submit a description of these procedures and policy recommendations to Congress. A GAO study, to be completed within two years, will evaluate the implementation of the Act and identify any limitations in reporting or data tracking.

Overall, the ACRES Act strengthens accountability for federal wildfire mitigation efforts without authorizing new funding. By requiring precise, transparent data and systematic evaluation, it aims to improve decision‑making in land management, wildfire risk reduction, and resource allocation across the National Forest System, public lands, and national parks.

Key Elements

• Annual Hazardous Fuels Reduction Report

  • Must include acres treated, wildland‑urban interface status, wildfire risk level, treatment type (mechanical or prescribed burn), cost per acre, region/system unit, and effectiveness assessment.
    
  • Reports to be submitted with the President’s budget and posted publicly.

• Standardized Data‑Tracking Procedures

  • Implemented within 90 days; include regular data reviews, verification methods, effectiveness analysis, and distinction of interface vs. non‑interface acres.
    
  • A follow‑up report to Congress within two weeks detailing procedures and policy recommendations.

• GAO Evaluation

  • Conducted within two years; assesses implementation, reporting accuracy, and data tracking limitations; results submitted to Congress.

• Definitions Clarified

  • Hazardous fuels reduction activity: any vegetation management (mechanical or prescribed burn) excluding contract awards.
    
  • Federal lands: lands under the Interior or Agriculture Secretaries.
    
  • Wildland‑urban interface defined per the Healthy Forests Restoration Act.

• Funding Constraints

  • No additional funds authorized; activities rely on existing appropriations.

• Implications for Geoscience & Natural Resources

  • Provides granular, science‑based data on wildfire risk mitigation.
    
  • Enhances transparency for land‑use planning, ecological restoration, and fire‑management research.
    
  • Supports evidence‑based policy decisions across federal land management agencies.

EPA Seeks Public Input on Extended Source Water Protection Data Collection

Overview
The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing to extend its current information‑collection request (ICR) on source water protection for community water systems (CWSs). The extension, which is currently approved through September 30, 2026, will allow the agency to continue gathering voluntary data from state agencies on how they are implementing source‑water protection strategies. By collecting this information, EPA aims to monitor progress toward reducing risks to drinking water supplies and to support states in meeting federal water‑quality goals.

The notice invites the public to comment on the proposed collection for a 60‑day period ending September 8, 2026. EPA will use the feedback to refine the ICR, potentially lowering the reporting burden and improving the clarity and usefulness of the data. Once finalized, the ICR will be resubmitted to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for approval under the Paperwork Reduction Act.

Key Elements
- ICR Extension: EPA ICR 1816.09 (OMB Control 2040‑0197) extended through 2029.
- Voluntary State Reporting: States submit source‑water protection data directly to the Safe Drinking Water Information System (SDWIS).
- Reduced Burden: Estimated 102 hours of annual reporting per state, with a cost of $6,608 per year—lower than the current ICR.
- Public Access: Data will be available on EPA’s Drinking Water Mapping Application (DWMAPS) and SDWIS for community use.
- Comment Period: 60 days (until September 8, 2026) for stakeholders to provide input on the collection’s necessity, accuracy, and burden.
- Purpose: Track progress toward increasing the percentage of CWSs where source‑water risks are minimized, supporting better protection of drinking water resources.

FEMA Seeks Public Input on Updated Flood Hazard Maps for Georgia Communities

Overview

The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) has issued a notice inviting comments on proposed flood hazard determinations for several communities in Fannin, Towns, and Union counties, Georgia. The proposed changes may adjust Base Flood Elevations (BFEs), base flood depths, Special Flood Hazard Area (SFHA) boundaries, or regulatory floodway designations on the Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRMs) and, where applicable, the supporting Flood Insurance Study (FIS) reports. These maps and studies form the basis of floodplain management requirements that communities must meet to qualify for the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP).

The notice provides a 30‑day comment period ending October 7, 2026, and outlines procedures for communities to appeal any revisions. Appeals can be resolved through a Scientific Resolution Panel (SRP) after a 60‑day collaborative consultation with FEMA. Communities are also encouraged to adopt stricter floodplain ordinances if desired, beyond the minimum requirements set by FEMA.

Ultimately, the updated FIRMs and FIS reports will influence insurance premiums, development approvals, and land‑use planning for residents and businesses in the affected areas. The public comment process allows stakeholders—including geoscientists, planners, and property owners—to shape how flood risk is mapped and managed in these Georgia communities.

Key Elements

• Scope of Changes: Potential adjustments to BFEs, flood depths, SFHA boundaries, and regulatory floodway designations on FIRMs and FIS reports.
  
• Comment Period: Public comments accepted until October 7, 2026; submissions must reference Docket No. FEMA‑B‑2615.
  
• Appeal Process: Communities may file appeals under 44 CFR 67.6(b); unresolved disputes may be reviewed by an independent Scientific Resolution Panel after 60 days of consultation.
  
• NFIP Compliance: Updated maps determine the floodplain management measures communities must adopt or demonstrate to remain eligible for NFIP coverage.
  
• Community Autonomy: Communities may enact stricter ordinances than those required by FEMA, providing additional protection or higher insurance costs.
  
• Impact on Land Use: Revised flood hazard determinations affect zoning, development approvals, and insurance rates, influencing economic and environmental planning.
  
• Access to Information: Preliminary and current FIRMs/FIS reports are available online via FEMA’s Map Service Center and the FEMA Mapping and Insurance eXchange (FMIX).

FEMA Updates Flood Maps Nationwide: New Data Drives Revised Hazard Zones

Overview
The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) has issued a notice (Document 2026‑13900) announcing updated flood hazard determinations for dozens of communities across the United States. The revisions—based on new scientific and technical data—alter Base Flood Elevations (BFEs), base flood depths, Special Flood Hazard Area (SFHA) boundaries, zone designations, and regulatory floodway definitions as shown on Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRMs) and, where applicable, Flood Insurance Study (FIS) reports. These changes are formalized through Letters of Map Revision (LOMRs) and take effect on the dates listed in the notice.

The updated maps affect floodplain management, building codes, and eligibility for the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP). Property owners, developers, insurers, and local governments must use the new community numbers and revised maps for all new insurance policies, renewals, and construction permits. The notice also provides a 90‑day window for stakeholders to request reconsideration of the changes through the community’s Chief Executive Officer.

Information on the revised maps, effective dates, and contact details for each affected jurisdiction is available online via FEMA’s Map Service Center and local community map repositories. Stakeholders are encouraged to review the updated data, assess impacts on their projects or insurance coverage, and submit comments or appeals within the allotted period.

Key Elements

• Scope of Updates

  • Over 200 communities across 20 states (Florida, Massachusetts, Michigan, Nebraska, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, Virginia, Wisconsin, etc.) have revised flood hazard determinations.
    
  • Updates include changes to BFEs, base flood depths, SFHA boundaries, zone designations, and regulatory floodway limits.

• Regulatory Basis

  • Changes are made pursuant to the Flood Disaster Protection Act of 1973, the National Flood Insurance Act of 1968, and 44 CFR part 65.
    
  • Revised maps serve as the minimum floodplain management criteria required for NFIP participation.

• Effective Dates & Reconsideration

  • Each community’s revised map becomes effective on the date listed in the notice (e.g., September 8, 2026 for Panama City, FL).
    
  • A 90‑day period begins after the second local newspaper publication, during which stakeholders may request reconsideration of the changes.

• Access to Updated Information

  • Revised FIRMs and FIS reports are available online through FEMA’s Map Service Center and the community’s local map repository.
    
  • Contact information for each community’s Chief Executive Officer is provided for appeals and comments.

• Implications for Stakeholders

  • Insurance premiums, coverage eligibility, and underwriting criteria may change with the new BFEs and zone designations.
    
  • Building and zoning regulations may need to be updated to align with the revised floodplain boundaries.
    
  • Developers and property owners should reassess flood risk and potential mitigation requirements.

• Next Steps for Communities

  • Update local floodplain management ordinances to reflect the new FEMA determinations.
    
  • Communicate changes to residents, builders, and insurers.
    
  • Monitor the 90‑day reconsideration window for any appeals or requests for additional data.

Updated Flood Maps: New Science Drives Revised Flood Hazard Zones Across 20+ U.S. Communities

Overview

The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) has issued a notice updating flood hazard determinations for a broad set of communities in Arizona, California, Colorado, Idaho, Montana, Oregon, Washington, and other states. These updates—based on the latest scientific and technical data—alter Base Flood Elevations (BFEs), base flood depths, Special Flood Hazard Area (SFHA) boundaries, zone designations, and regulatory floodway definitions as shown on Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRMs) and Flood Insurance Study (FIS) reports. The changes are formalized through Letters of Map Revision (LOMRs) and take effect on the dates listed in the notice.

For residents, developers, and insurers, the revised maps can affect building codes, insurance premiums, and eligibility for the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP). Properties that fall within newly defined SFHA zones may face higher insurance costs or stricter construction requirements, while some areas may see reduced flood risk designations, potentially lowering premiums and permitting more flexible land use.

Stakeholders have a 90‑day window, beginning after the second local newspaper publication, to request reconsideration of the changes. Updated maps and supporting documents are available online via FEMA’s Map Service Center and local community repositories, and comments or appeals must be directed to the community’s chief executive officer as listed in the notice.

Key Elements

• Revised Flood Hazard Data – Updated BFEs, flood depths, SFHA boundaries, zone designations, and floodway limits based on new scientific evidence.
  
• Formalization Process – Changes are enacted through Letters of Map Revision (LOMRs) in accordance with 44 CFR 65.4 and the Flood Disaster Protection Act.
  
• Impact on NFIP Participation – Communities must maintain or demonstrate compliance with updated floodplain management criteria to qualify for NFIP coverage.
  
• Appeal Window – A 90‑day period for stakeholders to request reconsideration after the second local newspaper notice.
  
• Access to Updated Maps – All revised FIRMs and FIS reports are publicly available online and through local community map repositories.
  
• Community‑Specific Contact Points – Each affected municipality lists a designated official (e.g., mayor, county manager) for appeals and inquiries.
  
• No Implied Ordinance Changes – The notice clarifies that communities may retain or adopt stricter local floodplain regulations beyond the minimum federal requirements.
  
• Broad Geographic Scope – The update covers 20+ communities across 10 states, including major urban areas such as Buckeye, Chandler, Seattle, and San Mateo.

FEMA Finalizes Updated Flood Hazard Maps for 30+ Communities

Overview

The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) has issued a notice confirming the finalization of new or revised flood hazard determinations—known as Letter of Map Revision (LOMR) documents—for a broad array of communities across the United States. These updates include changes to Base Flood Elevations (BFEs), base flood depths, Special Flood Hazard Area (SFHA) boundaries, zone designations, and regulatory floodways. The affected areas span Arizona, California, Colorado, Idaho, Nevada, Oregon, Washington, and several other states, covering both incorporated cities and unincorporated counties.

These revisions are part of FEMA’s ongoing effort to keep flood insurance rate maps (FIRMs) and flood insurance studies (FIS) current, reflecting new hydrologic data, updated topography, and recent flood events. The changes directly influence floodplain management requirements, building codes, and the eligibility of properties for the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP). Communities must adopt or demonstrate compliance with the updated floodplain criteria to maintain NFIP participation, which in turn affects insurance premiums and development approvals.

Property owners, developers, and local governments are encouraged to review the finalized maps—available online through the FEMA Map Service Center or at local community repositories—to understand how the new boundaries and elevations may impact land use, construction, and insurance costs. FEMA has resolved any appeals related to these revisions, and the notice marks the official end of the public comment period.

Key Elements

• Finalized LOMRs: Updated flood hazard determinations for 30+ communities, including new BFEs, SFHA boundaries, and regulatory floodways.
  
• NFIP Eligibility: Communities must adopt or prove compliance with the updated floodplain management criteria to remain eligible for NFIP participation.
  
• Insurance Implications: Changes can alter flood insurance premiums, coverage eligibility, and required mitigation measures for property owners.
  
• Public Access: Updated maps are publicly available online via the FEMA Map Service Center and at local community repositories.
  
• Appeals Resolved: FEMA has addressed all appeals related to these revisions, finalizing the process.
  
• Geographic Scope: Affected areas include major cities and counties in Arizona, California, Colorado, Idaho, Nevada, Oregon, Washington, and additional states.
  
• Regulatory Impact: Municipalities may need to update zoning ordinances, building codes, and land‑use plans to align with the new flood hazard information.
  
• Data Basis: Determinations are based on the Flood Disaster Protection Act of 1973, the National Flood Insurance Act of 1968, and relevant federal regulations (44 CFR parts 65 and 60).

FEMA Finalizes Updated Flood Hazard Maps for 70+ U.S. Communities

Overview

The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) has issued a notice confirming the finalization of new or revised flood hazard determinations—Base Flood Elevations (BFEs), base flood depths, Special Flood Hazard Area (SFHA) boundaries, zone designations, and regulatory floodways—for more than 70 communities across 20 states. These updates are part of the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) and are based on the latest hydrologic and geologic data, ensuring that floodplain maps reflect current risk levels.

The notice confirms that all required public notifications have been published, a 90‑day waiting period has elapsed, and any appeals have been resolved. The updated maps now serve as the legal basis for floodplain management requirements, insurance underwriting, and building code enforcement in each affected jurisdiction. Communities may adopt stricter local ordinances, but the new FEMA determinations represent the minimum standards for NFIP participation.

For residents, developers, and insurers, the changes can affect property values, insurance premiums, and eligibility for federal flood insurance. The updated maps are available for inspection at local community repositories and online through FEMA’s Map Service Center, allowing stakeholders to review the specific alterations for their area.

Key Elements

• Finalized Flood Hazard Determinations: Updated BFEs, base flood depths, SFHA boundaries, zone designations, and regulatory floodways for each listed community.
  
• Legal Basis for NFIP: These determinations are the minimum requirements for a community to remain qualified for the National Flood Insurance Program.
  
• Appeals Process Completed: All appeals related to the changes have been resolved, and the final determinations are now enforceable.
  
• Public Availability: Updated maps can be accessed at community repositories and online via FEMA’s Map Service Center.
  
• Implications for Insurance and Development: Changes may alter flood insurance premiums, building permit requirements, and land‑use planning decisions.
  
• Community Flexibility: Local governments may adopt stricter floodplain regulations beyond the FEMA minimums if desired.
  
• Scope of Impact: Over 70 communities across 20 states, including major urban and rural areas, have received updated flood hazard information.
  
• Reference Documentation: The notice cites the Flood Disaster Protection Act of 1973, the National Flood Insurance Act of 1968, and relevant CFR sections governing floodplain management.

BLM Holds Steady: 2026 Oil & Gas Penalties Stay at 2025 Levels

Overview
The Bureau of Land Management (BLM) has issued a notice confirming that the civil monetary penalties for onshore oil and gas operations and coal trespass will remain unchanged for 2026. This decision follows the Federal Civil Penalties Inflation Adjustment Act Improvements Act of 2015, which normally requires agencies to adjust penalty amounts annually based on the Consumer Price Index. However, an Office of Management and Budget (OMB) memorandum (M‑26‑11) canceled the 2026 inflation adjustment because the necessary CPI data were not yet available. Consequently, the BLM will continue to use the penalty levels set in 2025.

The notice lists specific penalty amounts for various violations, such as failure to comply with regulations, failure to permit inspections, and false documentation. These figures are drawn from the BLM’s regulations (43 CFR 3163.2 and 43 CFR 9239.5‑3) and are intended to deter non‑compliance and protect public lands. The BLM also provides contact information for its Fluid and Solid Minerals divisions for further inquiries.

For operators, the unchanged penalties mean that the financial risk associated with violations remains the same as in the previous year. The BLM’s transparency in publishing the amounts and the rationale behind the decision helps stakeholders understand enforcement expectations and plan compliance strategies accordingly.

Key Elements

• No 2026 inflation adjustment – OMB Memorandum M‑26‑11 canceled the 2026 penalty increase due to missing CPI data.
  
• Penalty amounts (2025 levels)
  
  • Failure to comply: $1,368
    
  • Failure to take corrective action: $13,690
    
  • Transporter fails to permit inspection: $1,368
    
  • Failure to permit inspection or notify: $27,378
    
  • False or inaccurate documents, unlawful transfer/purchase: $68,445
    
  • Coal exploration without license: $5,125
    
• Regulatory basis – 43 CFR 3163.2 (oil & gas) and 43 CFR 9239.5‑3 (coal).
  
• Legal authority – 25 U.S.C. 396d, 2107; 30 U.S.C. 189, 306, 359, 1751; 43 U.S.C. 1732‑1740, 1201; and the 2015 Act.
  
• Contact points – Fluid Minerals Division (John Ajak) and Solid Minerals Division (Indra Dahal) for program‑specific questions.
  
• Implications for stakeholders – Operators should maintain compliance with existing penalty thresholds; enforcement expectations remain unchanged for 2026.

US Trade Commission Tightens Scrutiny on Silicon Metal from Australia and Norway

Overview
The U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) has issued a supplemental schedule for the final phase of its investigations into imports of silicon metal from Australia and Norway. This follows earlier determinations by the Department of Commerce that these imports may be subsidized or sold at less than fair value, potentially harming U.S. industries that rely on silicon for electronics, solar panels, and other high‑tech applications. The ITC’s action is part of a broader effort to ensure fair competition in the global silicon market, which is critical for energy‑efficient technologies and the emerging green economy.

The notice sets a firm deadline of July 10, 2026 for parties to file supplemental comments on the Commerce Department’s final antidumping and countervailing duty determinations. Comments must be concise (no more than five pages) and cannot introduce new facts. The ITC will publish a non‑public staff report on July 27, 2026, followed by a public version. All filings must be made electronically through the Commission’s EDIS system; paper submissions are not accepted during this period.

For stakeholders—manufacturers, suppliers, and researchers in geoscience, energy, and mineral resources—this schedule signals that the U.S. is actively monitoring and potentially imposing duties on silicon imports that could affect supply chains, pricing, and the adoption of silicon‑based technologies in clean energy and advanced materials.

Key Elements

• Scope of Investigation: Final phase focuses on silicon metal from Australia and Norway, following earlier investigations into Angola, Laos, Thailand, and other countries.
  
• Legal Basis: Conducted under Title VII of the Tariff Act of 1930; notice published pursuant to ITC Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 201, 207).
  
• Deadlines:
  
  • Supplemental party comments due 5:15 p.m. on July 10, 2026.
    
  • Staff report to be placed in non‑public record on July 27, 2026.
    
• Filing Requirements:
  
  • Electronic submissions only via EDIS.
    
  • Must include a certificate of service to all parties.
    
  • Comments limited to five pages and cannot contain new factual information.
    
• Implications for U.S. Industry:
  
  • Potential antidumping or countervailing duties could raise costs for U.S. manufacturers of electronics, solar panels, and other silicon‑dependent products.
    
  • May influence investment decisions in domestic silicon production and research into alternative materials.
    
• Broader Context:
  
  • Part of a coordinated U.S. effort to address subsidies and unfair pricing in the global silicon market, which is essential for energy‑efficient technologies and the transition to a low‑carbon economy.

Dahowa Hydroelectric Project Gets a New Timeline: What It Means for Energy and the Environment

Overview
The U.S. Department of Energy and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) have issued a revised procedural schedule for the Dahowa Hydroelectric Project’s final license application (Project No. 4644). The updated timetable sets specific dates for key milestones—an acceptance letter, a scoping notice for public comments, and a notice that the environmental analysis is ready—spanning from September to November 2026. This schedule reflects the agencies’ intent to streamline the licensing process while ensuring that all regulatory requirements are met.

The notice underscores that the schedule is subject to further revisions as needed, indicating flexibility in response to emerging information or stakeholder input. By establishing clear deadlines, the agencies aim to reduce uncertainty for the project developer, investors, and local communities, while maintaining rigorous environmental oversight. The procedural updates also signal the project’s progression toward final approval, a critical step for securing the necessary permits and financing.

For stakeholders in geoscience, energy, and natural resource fields, the revised timeline highlights the importance of timely data collection, environmental impact assessments, and public engagement. It also illustrates how federal agencies balance project development with environmental protection, ensuring that hydroelectric projects meet both energy goals and ecological standards.

Key Elements

• Acceptance Letter Issued: September 2026 – formal acknowledgment of the final license application.
  
• Scoping Notice for Comments: October 2026 – opens a period for public and stakeholder input on the project’s scope and environmental concerns.
  
• Ready for Environmental Analysis Notice: November 2026 – signals that the environmental review is prepared for final assessment.
  
• Authority: 18 CFR 2.1 governs the procedural framework.
  
• Flexibility: The schedule may be revised as appropriate to accommodate new information or stakeholder feedback.
  
• Project Identification: Dahowa Hydroelectric Project, Project No. 4644, under DOE and FERC jurisdiction.
  
• Implications for Geoscience: Emphasis on hydrological, geological, and ecological data collection to support the environmental analysis.
  
• Implications for Energy & Mineral Resources: Timely licensing supports continued investment in renewable hydroelectric capacity.

FERC Opens Public Scoping for Transwestern’s Desert Southwest Pipeline Expansion

Overview

The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) has begun the scoping phase for Transwestern Pipeline Company’s planned Desert Southwest Expansion Project, which will add a 48‑inch mainline, several lateral lines, compressor and meter stations, and other facilities across Texas, New Mexico, and Arizona. The project aims to transport up to 2.3 billion cubic feet of natural gas per day from the Permian Basin to serve growing demand for gas‑powered electricity and local distribution networks in the Southwest.

FERC’s notice invites public and agency input on the environmental issues that should be addressed in the forthcoming environmental document. Comments are due by 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on August 5, 2026, and can be submitted electronically, by mail, or orally at a series of in‑person and virtual scoping sessions scheduled through late July and early August. The goal is to focus the analysis on the most significant environmental concerns and to identify reasonable alternatives or mitigation measures.

Key environmental topics highlighted by FERC include water use and aquifer impacts, safety and emergency response, light and noise pollution, effects on wildlife and threatened species, cultural resources, and potential impacts on sensitive areas such as wilderness zones and the San Pedro River Valley. The comments will shape the scope of the Environmental Assessment or Environmental Impact Statement that will be prepared once a formal application is filed.

Key Elements

• Project Scope: 526.5 mi of 48‑inch mainline, 181.5 mi of lateral lines, 8 new compressor stations, 26 new meter stations, and related infrastructure.
  
• Geographic Reach: Texas, New Mexico, and Arizona, with construction right‑of‑way up to 150 ft wide for the mainline.
  
• Public Participation:
  
  • Written comments due August 5, 2026.
    
  • Five in‑person scoping sessions (July 21–30) and two virtual sessions (July 30–August 3).
    
  • Multiple electronic filing options (eComment, eFiling) and paper mail.
    
• Environmental Focus Areas: geology, soils, water resources, wetlands, vegetation, wildlife, endangered species, cultural resources, socioeconomics, land use, visual resources, air quality, noise, and reliability/safety.
  
• Eminent Domain: If easements are not negotiated, Transwestern may invoke eminent domain under the Natural Gas Act; compensation would be determined by state courts.
  
• NEPA Process: Pre‑filing review underway; potential for an Environmental Assessment (EA) or Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) once a formal application is submitted.
  
• Cooperating Agencies: FERC seeks formal cooperation from federal, state, and local agencies, tribes, and other stakeholders with expertise in the identified environmental issues.
  
• Section 106 Consultation: FERC is initiating consultation with State Historic Preservation Offices to assess impacts on historic properties.
  
• Intervention: Formal intervention rights will be available only after a formal application is filed; current notice does not accept intervention requests.

Maine’s Machias Dike Bridge Revamp: A Call for Public Input on Environmental Impact

Overview

The Federal Highway Administration, acting for the Maine Department of Transportation, has announced that an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) will be prepared for proposed improvements to the Machias Dike Bridge on U.S. Route 1 in Machias, Maine. The bridge, a 92‑year‑old structure of four box culverts with tide gates, currently has a structural condition rating of 4 and requires urgent repairs to prevent safety hazards and maintain traffic flow. The project’s primary goal is to restore the bridge to a “Good” condition rating (≥ 7) while preserving the adjacent Calais Branch Rail Corridor in accordance with the State Railroad Preservation Act.

The EIS will evaluate a range of alternatives—including no action, fully gated replacement culverts, partially gated culverts, and a bridge‑span replacement—alongside their social, economic, and environmental effects. Key environmental issues identified include wetlands, historic resources, endangered species, fish habitat, tidal exchange, and the impact on the Downeast Sunrise Trail. The project will require permits from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, the Maine Department of Environmental Protection, and other state agencies, and will involve coordination with federal agencies such as the EPA, National Marine Fisheries Service, and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.

Public participation is central to the process. Comments on the project’s purpose, need, and alternatives must be submitted by October 31, 2026. MaineDOT will conduct scoping meetings, publish a Draft EIS, hold a public hearing, and ultimately issue a Final EIS and Record of Decision, all in compliance with NEPA and related federal, state, and local regulations.

Key Elements

• NEPA Lead Agency: MaineDOT, with FHWA oversight, will prepare the EIS and Record of Decision.
• Project Purpose: Restore bridge to a “Good” structural condition (rating ≥ 7) and maintain traffic on Route 1 while protecting the Calais Branch Rail Corridor.
• Alternatives Considered:
  1. No action
  2. Fully gated replacement culverts
  3. Partially gated replacement culverts
  4. Bridge‑span replacement
• Environmental Issues:
  • Wetlands and Waters of the United States
  • Historic resources and Section 4(f) resources
  • Endangered species and essential fish habitat
  • Tidal exchange and fish passage
  • Property impacts, municipal landfill, and community use of the causeway
  • Transportation resiliency and the Downeast Sunrise Trail
• Permitting Requirements: Section 404 Clean Water Act permit (USACE), Natural Resources Protection Act permit, Clean Water Act Section 401 certification (Maine DEP), Coastal Zone Consistency Determination (Maine Coastal Program).
• Cooperating Agencies: USACE, EPA, National Marine Fisheries Service, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, U.S. Coast Guard, and others.
• Public Participation Timeline:
  • July 15–October 31, 2026: Scoping and comment period
  • Draft EIS release for public and agency review
  • Public hearing (minimum 15‑day notice)
  • Final EIS and Record of Decision issuance
• Comment Submission: Online via the Federal eRulemaking Portal or project website, or by mail to MaineDOT Environmental Office, Augusta, ME.

Revamping Nogales’ Border Crossing: A New Environmental Review for a Modernized Port of Entry

Overview
The U.S. General Services Administration (GSA) has announced that it will prepare an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for the modernization and expansion of the Nogales DeConcini Land Port of Entry (LPOE) in Nogales, Arizona. The current facility, built in the 1930s and largely renovated in the 1990s, is no longer adequate to handle increasing traffic, mixed vehicle and pedestrian flows, and safety concerns. The proposed project would replace existing buildings (except the historic U.S. Custom House and Morley Gate), expand the site from about five acres to roughly 25.5 acres, and introduce new traffic lanes, pedestrian pathways, and security features such as SENTRI and Trusted Traveler lanes.

The EIS will evaluate three alternatives: two action plans that differ mainly in the number of inbound vehicle lanes and the extent of infrastructure, and a no‑action alternative that maintains the status quo. Environmental impacts to be assessed include air quality, geology and soils, water resources and flooding, cultural and historic resources, noise, utilities, and socioeconomic effects on downtown Nogales. A public scoping period has begun, with written comments due by August 8, 2026, and an open‑house meeting scheduled for July 22, 2026.

Key Elements

• Scope of the project: Replacement of all current LPOE buildings (except historic structures), expansion to ~25.5 acres, addition of 8 outbound and 17 inbound vehicle lanes, ~16 pedestrian lanes, and reconstruction of the pedestrian bridge.
  
• Alternative 1: Modernization with potential rooftop solar, 5 additional inbound lanes for future use, and a 300‑foot separation from the border for advanced security technology.
  
• Alternative 2: Similar to Alternative 1 but adds 22 inbound vehicle lanes to accommodate long‑term demand.
  
• No‑action alternative: Continue operating under current conditions.
  
• Environmental focus areas: Air quality during construction and operation; geology, soils, and hazardous materials; water resources, hydrology, and flood risk; cultural and historic resource protection; noise, utilities, and traffic impacts; socioeconomic effects on the local community.
  
• Public participation: Scoping period from July 9 to August 8, 2026; open‑house meeting July 22, 2026; comments submitted to GSA’s NEPA Project Manager.
  
• Historic preservation: Compliance with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act, with potential involvement of historic property owners.
  
• Timeline: EIS preparation to follow the scoping period, with subsequent public comment and decision phases.

US Small Business Administration Releases Monthly Disaster Request Ledger: A Snapshot of 2026’s Climate‑Driven Crises

Overview

The Small Business Administration (SBA) has issued a public notice summarizing all requests received in Fiscal Year 2026 for federal disaster declarations from states, territories, and tribes. The list, mandated by the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2026, provides a transparent record of the SBA’s role in supporting small businesses affected by a wide range of natural and man‑made disasters.

The notice details each request’s geographic scope, the event that triggered it (e.g., flooding, wildfires, tornadoes, or hazardous material incidents), the date the request was submitted, and the date the SBA approved the declaration. It highlights the rapid response times—often within days or weeks—underscoring the agency’s commitment to timely assistance.

For geoscientists, energy, and natural‑resource professionals, the ledger offers a valuable dataset on the frequency, distribution, and severity of climate‑related hazards that impact small‑business communities across the United States.

Key Elements

• Legal Basis: Compliance with the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2026 (Public Law 119‑75) and the Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance (CFDA 59008).
• Scope of Requests: 45 distinct requests from 24 states, territories, and tribal entities covering events from September 2025 to June 2026.
• Types of Disasters: Flooding, severe storms, tornadoes, wildfires, landslides, mudslides, hazardous material incidents, and extreme winter weather.
• Approval Timeline: Most requests were approved within 1–3 weeks of submission, with the longest lag of about 30 days for certain winter‑storm cases.
• Transparency: The notice is published in the Federal Register, ensuring public access to the SBA’s decision‑making process and facilitating research on disaster impacts.
• Stakeholder Impact: Small businesses in affected areas receive federal assistance for recovery and resilience, helping to mitigate economic losses and support community stability.
• Data Utility: The ledger can be used by researchers to analyze spatial and temporal patterns of disaster risk, informing policy and resource allocation in geoscience, energy, and environmental sectors.

Wisconsin in Crisis: President Declares Major Disaster After Devastating Storms

Overview

On June 30 2026, the President declared a major disaster for the state of Wisconsin following a series of severe storms, tornadoes, and flooding that struck the region from mid‑April to late‑August. The declaration, issued under FEMA‑4923‑DR, authorizes federal assistance to help residents, businesses, and non‑profits recover from the widespread damage.

The U.S. Small Business Administration (SBA) has opened a disaster loan program to provide financial relief. Eligible applicants can apply for loans covering physical damage to homes and businesses, as well as economic injury losses. The SBA’s MySBA Loan Portal and local centers are the primary channels for submitting applications, with specific deadlines set for each type of assistance.

For geoscientists, environmental scientists, and natural‑resource professionals, the declaration underscores the vulnerability of Wisconsin’s landscapes to extreme weather events. The affected counties—spanning coastal, agricultural, and urban areas—highlight the need for resilient infrastructure, improved floodplain management, and better storm‑forecasting tools to mitigate future risks.

Key Elements

• Major Disaster Declaration – President’s declaration dated June 30 2026 (FEMA‑4923‑DR).
  
• Affected Areas – 17 counties listed for physical damage; additional 70+ counties for economic injury (including neighboring states).
  
• SBA Assistance – Disaster recovery loans under Catalog of Federal Assistance 59008.
  
• Loan Types
  
  • Physical Damage: Homeowners and businesses with/without existing credit.
    
  • Economic Injury: Businesses, small agricultural cooperatives, and non‑profits.
    
• Interest Rates
  
  • Homeowners with credit: 5.75 %; without credit: 2.875 %.
    
  • Businesses with credit: 8.00 %; without credit: 4.00 %.
    
  • Non‑profits: 3.625 % (both credit scenarios).
    
• Application Process – Online via MySBA Loan Portal or in person at designated local sites.
  
• Deadlines – April 13–23, 2026; August 31, 2026; March 30, 2027 (varies by loan type).
  
• Contact Information – SBA Disaster Assistance Customer Service (1‑800‑659‑2955) and Office of Disaster Recovery & Resilience (Jennifer Talarico, 409 3rd St SW, Suite 6050, Washington, DC).
  
• Implications for Land Use & Natural Resources – Highlights the need for improved storm‑resilience planning, floodplain mapping, and infrastructure upgrades to protect ecosystems and communities.

Mississippi in Crisis: Federal Disaster Declaration Opens Lifeline for Businesses and Communities

Overview

On June 30 2026, the President declared a major disaster for the state of Mississippi following a series of severe storms, straight‑line winds, tornadoes, and flooding. The U.S. Small Business Administration (SBA) issued a notice to inform residents and businesses that disaster assistance loans are now available to help repair physical damage and recover from economic injury. The declaration covers specific counties in Mississippi and adjacent Louisiana parishes, providing a clear geographic scope for relief efforts.

The SBA’s loan program offers competitive interest rates that vary by borrower type and credit availability, with lower rates for those without existing credit. Applications can be submitted online through the MySBA Loan Portal or at designated local sites, and the SBA has set a series of deadlines for loan applications and disbursements. The notice also supplies contact information for assistance, including a dedicated customer service line and accommodations for individuals with hearing or speech disabilities.

This declaration is part of a broader federal response to natural disasters, aiming to stabilize local economies, protect infrastructure, and support the resilience of communities affected by extreme weather events. It underscores the importance of coordinated disaster management and the role of federal agencies in facilitating rapid recovery.

Key Elements

• Major Disaster Declaration: President’s declaration dated June 30 2026 for Mississippi (FEMA‑4922‑DR).
  
• Affected Areas: Franklin, Lamar, Lawrence, Lincoln, Wilkinson counties (physical damage); additional counties in Mississippi and Louisiana for economic injury loans.
  
• Loan Program: SBA Disaster Assistance Loans (Physical Damage and Economic Injury) with specific interest rates (e.g., 5.750% for homeowners with credit, 4.000% for businesses without credit).
  
• Application Process: Online via MySBA Loan Portal or in person at local sites; deadlines include May 6–7 2026, August 31 2026, and March 30 2027.
  
• Contact Information: Sharon Henderson, Office of Disaster Recovery and Resilience, SBA; phone 1‑800‑659‑2955; email and relay services for accessibility.
  
• Funding Authority: Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance No. 59008, 13 CFR 123.3(b).
  
• Purpose: Provide financial assistance to repair damage, restore economic activity, and support small businesses, agricultural cooperatives, and non‑profits in the disaster‑affected regions.

EPA Seeks Public Input on Community Technical Assistance at Superfund Sites

Overview

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is renewing its request for information collection—“Technical Assistance Needs Assessments (TANAs) at Superfund Remedial or Removal Sites”—under the Paperwork Reduction Act. The renewal, currently approved through March 31 2027, will allow EPA to continue gathering community feedback on how technical information about contaminated sites is communicated and whether additional support is needed.

The proposed collection will involve about 100 interviews each year, with roughly 20 participants per site across five Superfund locations. Respondents include local, state, and tribal officials, potentially responsible parties, community organizations, businesses, and residents. The EPA estimates the total burden at 100 hours of interview time per year, with privacy protections under the Privacy Act.

EPA invites the public to comment on the necessity, burden, and clarity of this information collection by September 8 2026. Feedback will help refine the process, improve the quality of technical assistance, and ensure that community voices shape Superfund decision‑making from the earliest stages.

Key Elements

• Purpose: Assess community needs for technical assistance during Superfund remedial or removal actions.
• Scope: 5 sites, 20 interviews per site, ~100 interviews annually.
• Respondent Groups: Local/state/tribal officials, potentially responsible parties (PRPs), community organizations, businesses, and residents.
• Burden Estimate: 100 hours of interview time per year; $2,587 annual cost (no capital or O&M costs).
• Privacy: Respondent identities protected under the Privacy Act; participation is voluntary.
• Outcome: Data will inform a coordinated technical assistance blueprint, reduce service overlap, and enhance community engagement in cleanup decisions.
• Comment Period: 60 days, ending September 8 2026; comments submitted via EPA docket ID EPA‑HQ‑OLEM‑2026‑3268.

U.S. Grants Morocco Phosphate Fertilizer Duty‑Free Access to Feed American Farms

Overview
In a move aimed at safeguarding the U.S. food supply, the President declared an emergency on June 29 2026 and authorized the Department of Commerce to temporarily waive countervailing duties on phosphate fertilizers imported from Morocco. The waiver, effective July 8 2026, is intended to ensure that U.S. farmers receive a timely and sufficient supply of fertilizers during the critical planting and growing season.

The Commerce Department will consider written requests from exporters and importers for duty‑free entry of Moroccan phosphate fertilizers. Requests must be filed electronically through the ACCESS system and, if approved, the merchandise may enter the United States within 60 days of notification. The waiver applies to all physical forms of phosphate fertilizers—including solids, liquids, coated or additive‑enhanced products—produced in Morocco.

The temporary relief is set to last for an eight‑month period or the duration of the declared emergency, whichever is shorter. The Department will notify Customs and Border Protection to allow entry without countervailing duties and will publish determinations on its website. Interested parties may also file for disclosure under administrative protective orders and submit letters of appearance to be added to the public service list for this proceeding.

Key Elements

• Emergency Declaration – President’s declaration under §318(a) of the Tariff Act to secure fertilizer supply.
  
• Duty‑Free Waiver – Temporary exemption from countervailing duties on Moroccan phosphate fertilizers for up to eight months.
  
• Scope of Merchandise – All physical forms of phosphate fertilizers (solid, liquid, coated, additive‑enhanced) produced in Morocco.
  
• Request Process – Exporters/importers must submit written requests via the ACCESS electronic system.
  
• Filing Requirements – Requests must be placed on the 2026 administrative review segment (C‑714‑001) and include details per Appendix I of the implementing memorandum.
  
• Entry Window – Approved shipments must enter the U.S. within 60 days of Commerce’s notification; otherwise duties apply.
  
• Customs Notification – Commerce will instruct CBP to allow duty‑free entry and post determinations on its website.
  
• Public Participation – Interested parties may file letters of appearance and applications for disclosure under administrative protective orders.
  
• Administrative Review – Commerce may conduct an administrative review of the 2026 period, subject to §351.213 and §751 of the Act.

Central New York Forward: A Highway Upgrade Under Environmental Scrutiny

Overview

The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) and the New York State Department of Transportation (NYSDOT) have announced a Notice of Intent to prepare an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for the Central New York Forward Project. The project will upgrade and expand key corridors—NYS Route 31, US Route 11, Interstate 81, and NYS Route 481—within the towns of Cicero and Clay, Onondaga County. Its goals are to improve traffic flow, enhance safety, reduce truck congestion on local streets, and modernize aging bridge infrastructure while supporting multimodal transportation options for pedestrians and bicyclists.

The EIS will evaluate a range of alternatives, from a “No Action” baseline to three design concepts that vary in capacity upgrades and multimodal features. The review will consider impacts on a wide array of environmental resources, including freshwater wetlands, floodplains, endangered species, cultural sites, air quality, noise, and local economies. Public comments and agency input are actively solicited, with a comment period ending August 14, 2026, and a projected decision timeline that culminates in a Record of Decision by July 2028.

This initiative exemplifies the federal commitment to balancing infrastructure development with rigorous environmental stewardship, ensuring that transportation improvements meet regional needs while protecting natural and cultural resources.

Key Elements

• Project Scope: Upgrades to NYS Route 31, US Route 11, I‑81, and NYS Route 481, including interchanges and bridge rehabilitation.
• Alternatives:
  
  • No Action (baseline)
    
  • Concept 1: multimodal enhancements + capacity upgrades on Route 31 and US 11
    
  • Concept 2: multimodal upgrades + bridge improvements + capacity on US 11
    
  • Concept 3: multimodal upgrades + bridge improvements + capacity on Route 31 and US 11
• Environmental Focus:
  
  • Wetlands and surface waters (Oswego, Seneca, Oneida Rivers, etc.)
    
  • Floodplain analysis (FEMA Zone AE areas)
    
  • Endangered species (e.g., Indiana bat, eastern massasauga)
    
  • Cultural resources (archaeological sites, historic buildings)
    
  • Air quality (CO, NAAQS) and noise impacts
• Permitting & Coordination:
  
  • U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Section 404), U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service (Section 7), NYSDEC Water Quality Certification, and other state permits.
    
  • Collaboration with federal, state, tribal, and local agencies, including the Oneida and Onondaga Nations.
• Public Involvement:
  
  • Comment period (until Aug 14, 2026) and public scoping meeting (July 2026).
    
  • Ongoing public hearings and comment periods during the Draft EIS phase.
• Timeline:
  
  • NOI published July 2026 → Draft EIS available Nov 2027 → Final EIS & ROD July 2028 → Permits issued Oct 2028 (if build selected).

Duty‑Free Science: UChicago Argonne and Partners Seek U.S. Customs Exemptions for Cutting‑Edge Instruments

Overview

The U.S. Department of Commerce’s International Trade Administration has issued a public notice inviting comments on a series of applications for duty‑free entry of scientific instruments under Section 6© of the Educational, Scientific and Cultural Materials Importation Act. The applications, filed by UChicago Argonne LLC, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, and Iowa State University, cover a range of advanced research tools— from battery precursor reactors to cryogenic electron microscopes— that are currently manufactured abroad. The notice seeks to determine whether these instruments are produced in the United States; if not, they may qualify for duty‑free importation to support U.S. research and development.

The applications emphasize that no comparable instruments are available domestically, thereby justifying the duty‑free status. They span key areas of geoscience, energy storage, materials science, and environmental monitoring, including lithium‑ion battery cathode precursor production, high‑energy X‑ray interaction studies, groundwater isotopic analysis, and microgrid reliability simulations. By allowing these instruments to enter the U.S. without customs duties, the policy aims to accelerate scientific progress and maintain U.S. competitiveness in emerging technologies.

Comments on the applications are due by July 28, 2026, and must comply with 15 CFR 301.5(a)(3) and (4). The notice is currently active, providing an opportunity for stakeholders—researchers, manufacturers, and industry groups—to influence the importation process and ensure that critical scientific equipment can be accessed without unnecessary trade barriers.

Key Elements

• Policy Framework: Section 6© of the Educational, Scientific and Cultural Materials Importation Act; 15 CFR 301.5(a)(3) & (4).
  
• Purpose: Grant duty‑free entry to scientific instruments not manufactured in the U.S. to support advanced research.
  
• Stakeholders: UChicago Argonne LLC, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Iowa State University.
  
• Instrument Highlights
  
  • Taylor Reactor (Lithium‑ion/sodium‑ion battery precursor) – Manufacturer: Laminar Co. Ltd., Korea.
    
  • LS Spectrometer (Battery electrolyte & liquid crystal studies) – Manufacturer: LS Spectrometer, Switzerland.
    
  • JIB‑4700F Multi‑Beam System (Cell macromolecular organization) – Manufacturer: JEOL Ltd., Japan.
    
  • Gyrotron & DNP Probe (NMR upgrade) – Manufacturer: Bruker AG, Switzerland.
    
  • Cryoprobe (Enhanced NMR sensitivity) – Manufacturer: Bruker Biospin Corp., Switzerland.
    
  • Laser Rack System (Groundwater isotopic age) – Manufacturer: Toptica Photonics, Germany.
    
  • High Energy Small Pixel Detector (High‑energy X‑ray interactions) – Manufacturer: PI‑Tecnologia Ltda, Brazil.
    
  • JEM‑3300 CRYO Arm (Cryogenic electron microscopy) – Manufacturer: JEOL Ltd., Japan.
    
  • Control Platform & Accessories (Microgrid power hardware simulation) – Manufacturer: Imperix Ltd., Switzerland.
    
• Acceptance Dates: All applications were accepted by U.S. Customs between August 2025 and October 2025.
  
• Comment Deadline: July 28, 2026 (postmarked or emailed).
  
• Implications: Enables U.S. researchers to access state‑of‑the‑art equipment without customs duties, fostering innovation in battery technology, materials science, environmental monitoring, and energy infrastructure resilience.

US Opens the Ocean Floor to Space: BOEM Seeks Input on Offshore Launch Sites

Overview

The Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (BOEM) has issued a Request for Information (RFI) to explore the possibility of using the Outer Continental Shelf (OCS) for commercial space launch and re‑entry activities. The RFI, published on July 8 2026, invites comments from industry, academia, tribal, state, and federal stakeholders, as well as the general public, to assess technical, environmental, operational, legal, and interagency considerations before any policy or regulatory action is taken.

BOEM’s inquiry is driven by recent advances in commercial space transportation and the U.S. government’s renewed focus on expanding space capabilities. The agency is evaluating whether existing offshore oil and gas platforms—such as mobile offshore drilling units (MODUs) or fixed platforms—could be repurposed, or whether new purpose‑built facilities would be required, to support launch, re‑entry, and recovery operations on the OCS.

The RFI is not a solicitation for specific projects but a data‑gathering exercise. Information received will inform BOEM’s internal analysis, potential interagency coordination, and the development of guidance or policy that could enable safe, environmentally responsible, and legally compliant offshore space activities in the future.

Key Elements

• Potential Uses: Repurposing existing offshore platforms or constructing new launch/re‑entry facilities on the OCS.
  
• Legal Framework: Authority under the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act (OCSLA) § 8(p) and possible supplemental federal statutes.
  
• Environmental Review: Required assessments under NEPA, the Endangered Species Act, Marine Mammal Protection Act, and other applicable laws.
  
• Technical & Operational Needs: Infrastructure for launch support, safety zones, onshore facilities, vessel requirements, and operational timelines.
  
• Stakeholder Engagement: Input sought from commercial space companies, oil and gas operators, fisheries, navigation authorities, military, tribal governments, and the public.
  
• Interagency Coordination: Collaboration with NASA, FAA, NOAA, and other federal agencies to align space, maritime, and environmental policies.
  
• International Context: Consideration of foreign regulatory models, international agreements, and best practices for offshore space operations.
  
• Risk & Mitigation: Identification of environmental impacts (e.g., noise, debris, wildlife disturbance) and strategies to minimize them.
  
• Data Gaps & Research Needs: Calls for studies on oceanographic conditions, seabed suitability, and long‑term ecological effects.
  
• Timeline: Comments are due by August 7 2026; BOEM will publish responses and may use the information to shape future guidance or actions.

Gulf of America Lease Sale 3: A New Chapter in Offshore Energy Development

Overview

The Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (BOEM) has announced the third lease sale in the Gulf of America Outer Continental Shelf (GOA OCS) under the One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA). The sale, scheduled for August 12 2026, will offer all remaining unleased acreage in the GOA, providing a fresh opportunity for oil and gas companies to secure exploration and production rights.

The sale follows strict OBBBA requirements: identical lease forms, terms, and economic conditions as the 2020 Gulf of Mexico lease sale, a 10‑year primary lease term for deepwater blocks, and royalty rates capped between 12 % and 16 %. Bidders must submit sealed bids by August 11, with a one‑fifth bonus bid deposit required for any high bid.

For geoscientists and natural‑resource professionals, the sale underscores the importance of advanced seismic data and rigorous environmental safeguards. Detailed Geophysical Data and Information Statements (GDIS) are mandatory, and lease stipulations cover protected species, military areas, and rights‑of‑use for floating production facilities. The outcome will shape the region’s energy landscape, federal revenue streams, and environmental stewardship for years to come.

Key Elements

• Sale Area – All unleased GOA OCS acreage, excluding blocks withdrawn by presidential action or within protected marine sanctuaries.
  
• Lease Terms – Standard BOEM‑2005 lease form; 10‑year primary term for water depths ≥ 800 m; 5‑year primary term (extendable to 8 years) for shallower blocks if a well is spudded within the first 5 years.
  
• Royalty Rates – Minimum 12 % for all blocks; capped at 16 % for deeper water.
  
• Bonus Bid Minimums – $25 per acre for < 400 m depth; $100 per acre for ≥ 400 m depth.
  
• Rental Rates – Tiered rates ranging from $7 to $28 per acre per year, escalating with block depth and lease term.
  
• Royalty Suspension – Eligible for Royalty Suspension Volumes (RSVs) under 30 CFR 560, including a 35 billion‑cubic‑foot incentive for ultra‑deep gas wells.
  
• Lease Stipulations – Military areas, evacuation zones, protected species, topographic features, UN Convention on the Law of the Sea, and rights‑of‑use for floating production.
  
• Geophysical Data Requirements – Mandatory GDIS submission for any proprietary or fast‑track seismic data; detailed survey parameters and live‑trace maps required.
  
• Bidding Process – Sealed bids via parcel delivery or in‑person; bid opening streamed live; high bids subject to one‑fifth bonus deposit and bid‑adequacy review.
  
• Environmental & Safety – Information to Lessees covers navigation safety, ordnance disposal, artificial reefs, protected species, and compliance with federal environmental regulations.
  
• Revenue Sharing – Enhanced Gulf of Mexico Energy Security Act (GOMESA) revenue share increased to $650 million through 2034, with caps thereafter.
  

These provisions collectively set the framework for responsible resource development, ensuring that economic, environmental, and regulatory considerations are balanced in the GOA lease sale.

FAA Opens the Door: Dare County Airport to Reclaim 8.74 Acres for Public Works

Overview
The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) has issued a public notice inviting comments on a request by the Dare County Airport Authority (DCAA) to release 8.74 acres of land at the Dare County Regional Airport (MQI) in Manteo, North Carolina, from federal obligations. The land, originally transferred to the county by the U.S. government in 1947, is currently subject to deed restrictions that limit its use. By removing these restrictions, the county can redevelop the property as a county public‑works facility, supporting local infrastructure and services without compromising airport operations.

The FAA has determined that the release will not affect future aviation needs at the airport. The request is being considered under 49 U.S.C. 47107(h)(2), and the FAA may approve it no sooner than thirty days after this notice is published. Comments are due by August 7, 2026, and can be submitted electronically to the FAA’s Memphis Airport District Office or mailed to the Dare County Regional Airport.

This action reflects a broader trend of federal agencies streamlining surplus property to better serve local communities while maintaining essential aviation safety and infrastructure.

Key Elements

• Property Size & Location: 8.74 acres at Dare County Regional Airport (MQI), 410 Airport Road, Manteo, NC.
  
• Historical Transfer: Deeded to Dare County by the U.S. in 1947 under the Surplus Property Act of 1944.
  
• Purpose of Release: Remove federal deed restrictions so the county can redevelop the land for public‑works use.
  
• Impact on Aviation: FAA has confirmed no adverse effect on current or future airport operations.
  
• Public Comment Period: Open until August 7, 2026; comments can be emailed to FAA or mailed to the airport director.
  
• Approval Timeline: FAA may approve the release no earlier than 30 days after notice publication.
  
• Contact Information: FAA Lead Community Planner Jamal R. Stovall (Memphis Airport District Office) and Dare County Regional Airport Director Stacy Ambrose.

Freeport LNG to Strip Out Obsolete Regasification Facilities – Public Input Sought on Environmental Impact

Overview

Freeport LNG Development, L.P. proposes to decommission and remove its long‑unused regasification facilities on Quintana Island, Texas. The project, called the Regasification Terminal Disconnect Project, will last roughly 22 months, with 12 months of removal and modification work. The removal will affect about 13 acres within the terminal’s fenceline and will involve disconnecting regasification equipment, demolishing associated structures, and relocating some facilities needed for the terminal’s current liquefaction operations.

The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) has opened a scoping period under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) to gather public and agency input on the environmental issues that should be addressed in the forthcoming environmental document. Comments are due by 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on August 3, 2026, and can be submitted electronically via eComment or eFiling, or by paper mail. The scoping process will help FERC focus its analysis on the most significant environmental concerns and determine whether an Environmental Assessment (EA) or a full Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is required.

Key environmental considerations include potential impacts on air quality, water resources, coastal and marine habitats, noise, and historic properties. FERC is also coordinating with the U.S. Department of Transportation’s Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration and will consult State Historic Preservation Offices under Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act. The project’s environmental review will evaluate reasonable alternatives, mitigation measures, and opportunities to avoid or reduce adverse effects.

Key Elements

• Project Scope: Removal of regasification facilities, demolition of associated underground piping, foundations, and concrete; relocation of some liquefaction‑support equipment.
  
• Timeline & Operations: 22‑month schedule; 12 months of removal/modification; work mainly 7 a.m.–7 p.m., with possible overnight activities to maximize daytime efficiency.
  
• Land Disturbance: Approximately 13 acres within the terminal’s fenceline will be disturbed; post‑construction land will remain in use for liquefaction operations.
  
• NEPA Scoping: Public comments requested to identify environmental issues; deadline August 3, 2026.
  
• Public Participation: Three submission methods—eComment, eFiling, or paper mail; eSubscription available for updates.
  
• Cooperating Agencies: U.S. DOT’s Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration; potential for additional agencies to join.
  
• Historic Preservation: Section 106 consultation with State Historic Preservation Offices; assessment of impacts on historic properties.
  
• Potential Impacts: Air emissions, water discharge, noise, coastal and marine habitat disturbance, and cultural resource effects.
  
• Alternatives & Mitigation: Evaluation of reasonable alternatives, avoidance strategies, and mitigation measures to reduce environmental impacts.
  
• Future Documentation: Depending on scoping outcomes, FERC will prepare an Environmental Assessment or a full Environmental Impact Statement, each subject to public comment periods.

US Trade Commission Sets Expedited Review of Silicon Metal Duties from Four Countries

Overview

The U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) has announced that it will conduct expedited five‑year reviews of the antidumping and countervailing duty orders on silicon metal imported from Bosnia‑Herzegovina, Iceland, Kazakhstan, and Malaysia. The reviews will determine whether revoking these duties would likely lead to a continuation or recurrence of material injury to U.S. silicon producers within a reasonably foreseeable time.

The ITC’s notice indicates that domestic interested parties (e.g., U.S. silicon manufacturers) submitted adequate responses, while the respondents from the four exporting countries did not. Because of this imbalance, the Commission has chosen the expedited review route under Section 751©(3) of the Tariff Act of 1930, rather than a full review. Comments from interested parties are due by August 7, 2026, and the Commission may extend the review period by up to 90 days due to the complexity of the case.

If the ITC ultimately finds that revoking the duties would not cause material injury, the orders could be lifted, potentially lowering costs for U.S. silicon users such as semiconductor and solar‑panel manufacturers. Conversely, if injury is likely, the duties would remain in place, protecting domestic producers but possibly raising prices for downstream industries.

Key Elements

• Expedited Five‑Year Review: Conducted under the Tariff Act to assess future material injury from revoking duties.
• Adequacy Determination: Domestic parties’ responses deemed adequate; respondents’ responses inadequate, prompting expedited review.
• Comment Period: Interested parties must file comments by August 7, 2026; non‑parties may submit brief statements.
• Potential Extension: Review may be extended up to 90 days due to its complexity.
• Implications for Silicon Supply Chain: Outcomes could affect tariffs, pricing, and competitiveness of U.S. silicon‑dependent sectors such as electronics and renewable energy.
• Stakeholder Engagement: The notice invites input from industry, exporters, and the public, ensuring transparency in the decision‑making process.

Securing the Final Frontier: The Space Infrastructure Act Declares Space Systems Critical

Overview

The Space Infrastructure Act (H.R. 1154) seeks to formally recognize space systems, services, and technology as a critical infrastructure sector. Within 30 days of enactment, the Secretary of Homeland Security must designate the sector, and within 180 days issue detailed guidance on its scope, governance, and coordination. The guidance will define what constitutes the sector—satellites, launch facilities, space‑related production sites, and associated IT—and appoint a sector‑specific agency and advisory councils to oversee its protection.

The bill also requires a 90‑day report to Congress on the implementation of the guidance, ensuring transparency and accountability. By amending the Homeland Security Act to include “space systems, services, and technology” as a critical infrastructure category, the Act aligns space assets with other essential national systems such as energy, water, and communications.

For scientists, engineers, and resource managers, the Act underscores the strategic importance of space‑based data for Earth observation, climate monitoring, and resource exploration. It establishes a framework for safeguarding the satellites and ground infrastructure that underpin these capabilities, thereby enhancing resilience against cyber, physical, and geopolitical threats.

Key Elements

• Designation Deadline: Secretary must declare space systems a critical infrastructure sector within 30 days of enactment.
  
• Guidance Timeline: Guidance on scope, governance, and coordination to be issued within 180 days.
  
• Scope Definition: Includes satellites, space vehicles, launch infrastructure, space‑related production facilities, and associated IT systems.
  
• Sector‑Specific Agency: Appointment of an agency responsible for oversight and coordination of the space infrastructure sector.
  
• Advisory Councils: Establishment of Government Coordinating Councils and Sector Coordinating Councils to advise on policy and resilience.
  
• Reporting Requirement: 90‑day report to the House Homeland Security Committee and Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee on guidance implementation.
  
• Legislative Amendment: Adds “space systems, services, and technology” to the Homeland Security Act’s list of critical infrastructure sectors.
  
• Definitions: Clarifies terms such as “critical infrastructure,” “sector‑specific agency,” and “Executive Director” (Space Information Sharing and Analysis Center).
  
• Implications for Geoscience: Protects satellite‑based Earth observation and data services essential for climate science, natural resource monitoring, and disaster response.
  
• Implications for Energy & Minerals: Safeguards space‑derived data used in resource exploration, supply‑chain monitoring, and infrastructure resilience.

Montana Aluminum Plant to Pay $57 M for Clean‑Up, U.S. Holds Off Lawsuit

Overview
On July 2, 2026 the U.S. Department of Justice lodged a proposed consent decree with the District Court for the District of Montana to resolve federal and state claims against the Columbia Falls Aluminum Company (CFAC). The claims stem from the release of hazardous substances at the former Anaconda Aluminum Co. Columbia Falls Reduction Plant, a site listed on the National Priorities List. The decree requires CFAC to reimburse the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) $1.8 million for past cleanup costs and to cover all future response costs, including those that may be incurred by the Montana Department of Environmental Quality. EPA estimates the total cost of the required work at $57.6 million.

In exchange for CFAC’s financial and cleanup commitments, the United States and the State of Montana agree to a covenant not to sue under CERCLA and the Montana Comprehensive Environmental Cleanup and Responsibility Act. The decree also obligates CFAC to complete all cleanup activities outlined in EPA’s Record of Decision issued in January 2025. The notice invites public comment on the proposed terms, with a 30‑day window for submissions to the DOJ’s Environment and Natural Resources Division.

Key Elements

• Financial Responsibility

  • CFAC to reimburse EPA $1.8 million for past response costs.
    
  • CFAC to pay all future response costs at the site, estimated at $57.6 million.
    
  • CFAC to reimburse any future state response costs incurred by Montana’s Department of Environmental Quality.

• Cleanup Obligations

  • Completion of all cleanup work required under EPA’s Record of Decision (January 2025).
    
  • Work to address hazardous substance releases at the Columbia Falls Aluminum Company Site.

• Legal Settlements

  • U.S. covenant not to sue under CERCLA Sections 106 and 107(a).
    
  • Montana covenant not to sue under CECRA Sections 711, 715(2)(a), 722, and 726.

• Public Participation

  • 30‑day public comment period following the notice.
    
  • Comments directed to the Assistant Attorney General, Environment and Natural Resources Division (email: pubcomment‑ees.enrd@usdoj.gov).
    
  • Consent decree available for download on the DOJ website; assistance available for access.

• Administrative Details

  • Notice filed as FR Doc. 2026‑13721 on July 6, 2026.
    
  • Contact: Jason A. Dunn, Assistant Section Chief, Environmental Enforcement Section, DOJ.

Lewis Ridge Pumped Storage: One‑Year Deadline for Water Quality Certification

Overview

The U.S. Department of Energy and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) have issued a formal notice regarding Lewis Ridge Pumped Storage, LLC’s request for a Clean Water Act Section 401 water‑quality certification. The notice confirms that the Kentucky Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) received a complete certification application on June 12, 2026, and that the project is now subject to the statutory review process.

Under FERC regulations, the Kentucky DEP has a “reasonable period of time” of one year—until June 12, 2027—to review and act on the certification request. If the DEP fails to approve or deny the application by that date, the certification is deemed waived, allowing the project to proceed without a formal water‑quality determination.

This notice underscores the regulatory checkpoint that large energy infrastructure projects must clear before construction can begin. It highlights the interplay between federal energy oversight and state environmental authorities, ensuring that potential impacts on water resources are formally evaluated and documented.

Key Elements

• Project Identification: Lewis Ridge Pumped Storage, LLC (Project No. 15249‑002) – a pumped‑storage hydroelectric facility in Kentucky.
  
• Certification Request: Complete Clean Water Act Section 401(a)(1) application submitted to the Kentucky DEP on June 12, 2026.
  
• Regulatory Authority: Notice issued by the Department of Energy and FERC under 18 CFR 4.34(b)(5) and 18 CFR 2.1.
  
• Timeframe: Kentucky DEP has one year (June 12, 2026 – June 12, 2027) to act on the request.
  
• Waiver Provision: If the DEP does not act by the deadline, the certification is deemed waived under 33 U.S.C. 1341(a)(1), allowing the project to proceed without a formal water‑quality determination.
  
• Implications for Geoscience & Natural Resources: The certification process requires assessment of potential impacts on water quality, aquatic ecosystems, and related geoscientific factors, ensuring that the project’s environmental footprint is evaluated before construction.

U.S. Eyes Anthracite Coal Supply: Call for Public Input on National Security Investigation

Overview

On June 29 2026, the Secretary of Commerce launched a Section 232 investigation to evaluate how imports of anthracite coal affect U.S. national security. Anthracite, the highest‑grade coal used in electric‑arc‑furnace steelmaking, is critical for defense, infrastructure, and industrial production. The Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) is gathering data on domestic demand, production capacity, and foreign supply chains to determine whether trade measures—such as tariffs or quotas—are warranted.

The notice invites written comments, data, and analyses from industry, academia, and the public by July 21 2026. BIS specifically seeks information on supply concentration, foreign subsidies, potential export restrictions, and the feasibility of expanding U.S. anthracite production. The findings could shape future trade policy and impact the steel sector, manufacturing jobs, and energy security.

Key Elements

• Section 232 Framework: Investigation under the Trade Expansion Act of 1962, focusing on national‑security implications of imports.
  
• Scope of Coal: Includes HTSUS codes 2701.11.0000 (anthracite) and 2701.12.0010 (metallurgical bituminous coal).
  
• Strategic Role: Anthracite’s high carbon content and low volatiles make it essential for electric‑arc‑furnace steelmaking and other industrial processes.
  
• Public Comment Deadline: July 21 2026; submissions accepted via the federal rulemaking portal (ID BIS‑2026‑0298, XRIN 0694‑XC165).
  
• Key Issues for Input:
  1. Current and projected U.S. demand for anthracite.
     
  2. Domestic production capacity versus demand.
     
  3. Dependence on foreign suppliers and concentration of imports.
     
  4. Impact of foreign subsidies and predatory trade practices.
     
  5. Risks of price suppression and overproduction by state‑backed producers.
     
  6. Potential for foreign export restrictions or supply‑chain weaponization.
     
  7. Feasibility of expanding domestic anthracite production.
     
  8. Effect of existing trade policies on U.S. production and whether additional tariffs or quotas are needed.
     
  9. Employment implications for U.S. manufacturing.
     
  10. Future strategic importance of anthracite in national‑security‑related activities.
      
• Confidentiality Guidance: Business‑confidential information must be clearly marked and accompanied by a non‑confidential version; public comments are made available online.
  
• Potential Outcomes: Findings may lead to trade restrictions, tariffs, or support measures to bolster domestic anthracite supply and reduce strategic vulnerability.

Bridging the Columbia: Final Approval for I‑5 Bridge Replacement Boosts Transit and Protects Natural Resources

Overview

The U.S. Department of Transportation’s Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) and Federal Transit Administration (FTA) have issued final approvals for the Interstate Bridge Replacement (IBR) Program that will replace the existing I‑5 bridge between Portland, Oregon, and Vancouver, Washington. The project is a multimodal effort that will upgrade the highway and add high‑capacity transit options, improving regional mobility while reducing congestion and emissions.

The approvals come after a comprehensive environmental review, culminating in a Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement (FSEIS) and a Record of Decision (ROD). The analysis considered impacts on the Columbia River ecosystem, wetlands, endangered species, cultural resources, and air and water quality. Federal agencies such as NOAA, the National Park Service, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, the U.S. Coast Guard, and the EPA collaborated to ensure compliance with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and related statutes.

The notice also sets a deadline for judicial review: claims must be filed by December 4, 2026, or they will be barred. The project’s legal and environmental framework underscores the federal commitment to balancing infrastructure development with the protection of natural and cultural resources along the Columbia River corridor.

Key Elements

• Final Agency Actions: FHWA and FTA have granted licenses, permits, and approvals for the IBR Program, subject to 23 U.S.C. 139(l)(1).
  
• Multimodal Improvements: The project will replace the existing bridge and add high‑capacity transit lanes, enhancing both vehicular and public‑transport connectivity.
  
• Environmental Review: A Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement (FSEIS) and Record of Decision (ROD) were issued, addressing impacts on the Columbia River, wetlands, fish and wildlife, and cultural resources.
  
• Federal Agency Collaboration: NOAA, National Park Service, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, U.S. Coast Guard, and EPA participated in the environmental assessment.
  
• Legal Framework: The approvals comply with NEPA, the Clean Air Act, the Clean Water Act, the Endangered Species Act, the National Historic Preservation Act, and several executive orders related to wetlands, floodplain management, and cultural resources.
  
• Judicial Review Deadline: Claims for judicial review must be filed by December 4, 2026; otherwise, they will be barred.
  
• Public Access to Documents: The FSEIS, ROD, and related project documents are available online and through the IBR Program office in Vancouver, Washington.
  
• Implications for Geosciences: The project’s environmental analysis includes assessments of river hydrology, sediment transport, and habitat connectivity, providing a model for integrating geoscience data into large‑scale infrastructure planning.

Ares‑Eni Merger: A Simplified Path to Consolidate Energy and Investment Power

Overview

On 29 June 2026 the European Commission received a notification of a proposed concentration involving Ares Management Corporation (USA), Eni S.p.A. (Italy), and Eni Plenitude S.p.A. (Italy). The transaction would give Ares and Eni joint control of Eni Plenitude through a share purchase, potentially bringing together a global alternative‑investment manager with a major oil‑and‑gas group and a renewable‑energy‑focused subsidiary.

The Commission has preliminarily identified the deal as falling within the scope of the Merger Regulation, but has also flagged it as a candidate for a simplified procedure under a recent notice on certain concentrations. This means the review will be less extensive, provided the transaction meets the notice’s criteria. The main objective is to assess whether the merger would significantly impede competition in the relevant markets—particularly in the energy sector, where Eni and Eni Plenitude operate in exploration, production, refining, renewable electricity generation, and e‑mobility services.

The Commission is inviting third parties to submit observations within ten days of publication. Comments will be considered before a final decision is taken on whether the concentration can proceed under the simplified regime or requires a full merger review.

Key Elements

• Parties Involved

  • Ares Management Corp. – global alternative investment manager (credit, real estate, private equity, infrastructure).
    
  • Eni S.p.A. – Italian oil‑and‑gas group active in exploration, production, refining, marketing, electricity generation, and transition to alternative energy.
    
  • Eni Plenitude S.p.A. – renewable‑energy subsidiary focused on electricity from renewables, retail sales of electricity and gas, e‑mobility, and energy‑efficiency services.
    

• Nature of the Concentration

  • Share purchase that would give Ares and Eni joint control of Eni Plenitude (Article 3(1)(b) and 3(4) of the Merger Regulation).
    

• Sectoral Impact

  • Energy markets (oil, gas, electricity, renewables).
    
  • Investment and infrastructure financing linked to energy projects.
    

• Regulatory Status

  • Candidate for simplified procedure under the Commission’s Notice on simplified treatment for certain concentrations (C/2026/3615).
    
  • Preliminary assessment indicates potential scope under the Merger Regulation; final decision pending.
    

• Public Participation

  • Third parties may submit observations by 10 days after publication.
    
  • Observations must reference case M.12461 – ARES / ENI / PLENITUDE.
    
  • Contact: COMP‑MERGER‑REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu or postal address in Brussels.
    

• Implications for Geoscience and Natural Resources

  • Consolidation could influence investment flows into exploration and renewable projects.
    
  • Potential for increased coordination between traditional fossil‑fuel operations and renewable‑energy initiatives.
    
  • Monitoring of competition effects on resource extraction, energy transition, and market access for renewable technologies.

FERC Opens Public Scoping on West Virginia‑Pennsylvania Gas Storage Abandonment

Overview

The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) has announced a scoping period to gather public input on the environmental impacts of the proposed abandonment of the Majorsville‑Heard Storage Complex. Columbia Gas Transmission plans to retire 57 injection/withdrawal wells, 14 observation wells, the Majorsville Compressor Station, and all associated pipelines and above‑ground facilities across Marshall County, West Virginia, and Greene and Washington Counties, Pennsylvania. The project is intended to reduce operating and maintenance costs while maintaining system reliability, with a phased construction schedule that could span up to ten years.

The scoping process is part of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) review. FERC will use the comments to focus its forthcoming environmental document—either an Environmental Assessment (EA) or an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS)—on the most significant issues. Key resource areas to be examined include geology, soils, water and wetlands, wildlife, endangered species, cultural resources, socioeconomics, land use, air quality, noise, and reliability and safety. The agency also seeks cooperation from relevant state and federal agencies and will consult with the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation under Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act.

Comments are due by 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on July 30, 2026. FERC offers electronic filing through eComment and eFiling, as well as paper submissions. Landowners may be approached for easements; if no agreement is reached, eminent domain could be invoked. The notice invites all stakeholders—including landowners, environmental groups, and local officials—to participate in shaping the environmental assessment of this abandonment project.

Key Elements

• Project Scope: Abandonment of Majorsville Shallow/Deep Storage Fields and Heard Storage Field, including 57 injection/withdrawal wells, 14 observation wells, compressor station, pipelines, and above‑ground infrastructure.
  
• Timeline: Phased construction over up to ten years to minimize operational risk and ensure regulatory compliance.
  
• Land Use: Approximately 199 acres required for abandonment activities.
  
• NEPA Scoping: Focus on geology, soils, water resources, wetlands, wildlife, endangered species, cultural resources, socioeconomics, land use, air quality, noise, reliability, and safety.
  
• Public Comment Deadline: July 30, 2026 (5:00 p.m. ET).
  
• Comment Channels: eComment, eFiling, or paper mail to FERC’s Secretary.
  
• Eminent Domain: Potential for condemnation if easement agreements are not reached; compensation determined by state law courts.
  
• Cooperating Agencies: FERC seeks formal cooperation from agencies with jurisdiction over environmental issues.
  
• Historic Preservation: Consultation under Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act to assess impacts on historic properties.
  
• Stakeholder Engagement: Environmental mailing list includes federal, state, local officials, landowners, tribes, and public interest groups.

Louisiana’s New 44‑Billion‑Cubic‑Feet Gas Storage Hub Faces Public Review

Overview
Vinton Dome Storage Hub, LLC has filed a formal application with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) to build a large natural‑gas storage facility in Calcasieu Parish, Louisiana. The proposed hub would create five underground storage caverns with a total working capacity of about 44.5 billion cubic feet, a 55,000‑horsepower compressor station, and pipeline interconnections to existing and planned interstate lines. The company seeks a blanket construction certificate, open‑access transportation authorization, market‑based rate approval, tariff approval, and certain regulatory waivers.

The application triggers a mandatory environmental review under the Natural Gas Act. FERC staff will either complete an environmental assessment (EA) or issue a schedule for a full environmental impact statement (FEIS) within 90 days of the notice. The outcome of that review will determine the timing of all federal authorizations required for the project.

Public participation is a key part of the process. Stakeholders—including residents, businesses, and environmental groups—can file comments, protests, or motions to intervene. The deadline for intervention is 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on July 21, 2026. All filings must reference docket CP26‑544‑000 and can be submitted electronically via FERC’s eComment or eFiling systems, or by mail.

Key Elements

• Project Scope: 5 underground caverns, 44.5 billion cf working capacity, 55,000 hp compressor, pipeline interconnections.
• Location: Calcasieu Parish, Louisiana (Lake Charles area).
• Regulatory Requests:
  • Blanket construction certificate (Part 157, Subpart F).
  • Open‑access transportation authorization (Part 284, Subpart G).
  • Market‑based rate approval.
  • Approval of pro‑forma FERC gas tariff.
  • Waivers of certain regulatory requirements.
• Environmental Review: FERC staff to issue EA or FEIS schedule within 90 days; subsequent federal authorizations tied to completion of the environmental review.
• Public Participation:
  • Comments, protests, and motions to intervene accepted.
  • Intervention deadline: July 21, 2026, 5:00 p.m. ET.
  • Electronic filing encouraged; paper filings accepted.
• Contact Points:
  • FERC Office of Public Participation: (202) 502‑6595.
  • Applicant’s attorney: J. Gordon Pennington, (202) 365‑5996.
  • FERC Secretary for filings: Debbie‑Anne A. Reese, (202) 502‑8258.
• Tracking the Proceeding: Use FERC’s eLibrary and eSubscription services for updates on orders, filings, and environmental documents.

Steel Reef Pipelines Seeks Approval for Border‑Crossing Natural Gas Pipeline

Overview

Steel Reef Pipelines US LLC has filed a formal application with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) to construct a 0.65‑mile segment of the Flat Lake Access Pipeline, a 10‑inch gathering line that will export up to 80 million cubic feet per day of sour natural gas from a compressor station near Fortuna, North Dakota, into Canada. The pipeline will cross the U.S.–Canada border and connect to the Flat Lake Gas Plant in Saskatchewan, while also importing about 6 million cubic feet per day of fuel gas to power the compressor station. The project is part of a broader 8‑mile gathering system that will transport unprocessed sour gas across the international boundary.

The application triggers a comprehensive regulatory review under the Natural Gas Act. FERC staff will conduct an environmental assessment or prepare a final environmental impact statement within 90 days of the notice, after which federal and state agencies must complete their own reviews. The notice also outlines the procedural steps for public participation, including the filing of comments, protests, and motions to intervene, and specifies the deadlines for each action.

Public stakeholders—including landowners, local communities, environmental groups, and industry participants—have until 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on July 21, 2026, to file a motion to intervene. Comments and protests may be submitted by the same date, and all submissions must reference docket number CP26‑545‑000. The Commission encourages electronic filing and offers resources such as eLibrary and eSubscription to keep interested parties informed throughout the proceeding.

Key Elements

• Project Scope: 0.65‑mile, 10‑inch pipeline segment crossing the U.S.–Canada border; part of an 8‑mile gathering system exporting sour natural gas and importing fuel gas.
• Capacity: Up to 80 MMcf/d of sour gas export; 6 MMcf/d of fuel gas import.
• Regulatory Framework: Application filed under the Natural Gas Act (Section 3) and Part 153 of FERC regulations; requires environmental review (EA or FEIS) within 90 days.
• Public Participation: Three avenues—comments, protests, motions to intervene—each with a July 21, 2026 deadline.
• Intervention Process: Motion to intervene must state position and interest; unopposed motions are automatically granted; late filings require good cause.
• Information Access: Documents available in PDF and Word via FERC eLibrary; eComment and eFiling options for electronic submissions.
• Timeline: Application filed June 17, 2026; intervention deadline July 21, 2026; environmental review to be completed within 90 days of the notice.
• Stakeholder Contact: Jodi Wilson, Vice President and General Counsel, Steel Reef Pipelines; public inquiries handled by FERC Office of Public Participation.

Parr Dam Aims to Extend Turbine Venting for River Health – Public Comment Period Open

Overview

Dominion Energy South Carolina, Inc. has filed an amendment to the turbine venting plan for the Parr Hydroelectric Project on the Broad River in South Carolina. The proposed change would extend the seasonal venting window from the current June 15–August 31 period to June 15–October 31. This extension is intended to sustain higher dissolved‑oxygen levels downstream of Parr Shoals Dam, benefiting aquatic ecosystems and meeting state environmental agency requests.

The amendment also seeks to revise Article 401(b) of the project’s license, which governs venting‑window extensions beyond 30 days. By aligning the article with the new venting schedule, the company hopes to avoid the need for annual variance requests and streamline regulatory compliance.

The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) has opened a public comment period, inviting federal, state, local, and tribal agencies, as well as the general public, to submit comments, protests, or motions to intervene by July 30, 2026. Electronic filing is encouraged, with paper submissions accepted at specified addresses.

Key Elements

• Project: Parr Hydroelectric Project, Broad River, Newberry & Fairfield counties, South Carolina, on federal lands in Sumter National Forest.
  
• Current Venting Window: June 15 – August 31.
  
• Proposed Extension: June 15 – October 31 to improve downstream dissolved‑oxygen concentrations.
  
• Article 401(b) Amendment: Align license requirements with the extended venting period, eliminating the need for annual variance requests.
  
• Purpose: Support aquatic habitat, meet state environmental agency objectives, and maintain compliance with the Federal Power Act.
  
• Public Participation: Comments, protests, and motions to intervene due by July 30, 2026 (5 p.m. ET).
  
• Filing Methods: eFiling via FERC’s online system; paper filings accepted at Washington, DC or Rockville, MD addresses.
  
• Cooperating Agencies: Federal, state, local, and tribal agencies with environmental expertise may assist in preparing environmental documents but cannot intervene.
  
• Contact Information: Comments must include name and contact details; assistance available at (866) 208‑3676 or (202) 502‑8659 (TTY).

Colorado’s Salida Hydropower to Go: Company Seeks Environmental Assessment for Decommissioning

Overview

The Public Service Company of Colorado (PSCo) has filed to surrender its operating license for the Salida Hydro Nos. 1 & 2 project, a small hydropower system on the South Arkansas River and Fooses Creek in Chaffee County. The company plans to decommission and remove the remaining Salida U2 facilities—forebay, dam, penstock, and outbuildings—along with the already decommissioned Salida U1 powerhouse and adjacent substation. After removal, the site will be restored to its natural condition.

The project sits partly on federal land managed by the U.S. Forest Service within the Pike‑San Isabel National Forests, as well as on PSCo‑owned and privately owned parcels. No public comments were received following the February 23 notice soliciting input on the license surrender. The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) has announced its intent to prepare an Environmental Assessment (EA) under the National Environmental Policy Act, with a draft EA expected by October 20, 2026. A 30‑day public comment period will follow the EA release, and all comments will be considered in the final decision.

This action reflects a broader trend of decommissioning aging, low‑capacity hydropower facilities in favor of ecological restoration and reduced environmental impact. The EA will evaluate potential effects on water flow, fish and wildlife habitats, recreation, and downstream communities, ensuring that the decommissioning process aligns with federal environmental standards.

Key Elements

• License surrender: PSCo will relinquish its operating license for Salida Hydro Nos. 1 & 2.
  
• Decommissioning plan: Removal of forebay, dam, penstock, outbuildings, and the U1 powerhouse/substation.
  
• Site restoration: Post‑decommissioning restoration to natural conditions on federal, company, and private lands.
  
• Federal land involvement: Project partially on U.S. Forest Service land within Pike‑San Isabel National Forests.
  
• No public comments: February 23 notice received no comments on the surrender application.
  
• Environmental Assessment timeline: Draft EA due by October 20, 2026; 30‑day comment period to follow.
  
• Public participation: Comments, interventions, or protests can be filed through FERC’s Office of Public Participation (202‑502‑6595).
  
• Contact: Rebecca Martin (202‑502‑6012) for inquiries about the notice.

New Environmental Review Set for New Hampshire’s Weston Dam Relicensing

Overview

Powerhouse Systems, LLC has filed an application to relicense the 540‑kilowatt Weston Dam Hydroelectric Project on the Upper Ammonoosuc River in Coos County, New Hampshire. The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) has determined that licensing the project is unlikely to constitute a major federal action that would significantly affect the quality of the human environment. Consequently, FERC will prepare an Environmental Assessment (EA) to evaluate the potential environmental impacts of the relicensing.

The EA will be issued with a 30‑day public comment period, allowing stakeholders—including local residents, environmental groups, and industry representatives—to submit feedback. All comments will be reviewed and considered in FERC’s final licensing decision. The process follows the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) requirements, with a unique identification number assigned to the review documents.

This notice signals that the relicensing process is moving forward, but it also provides an opportunity for public participation and transparency. The outcome will determine whether the Weston Dam can continue operating under the new license, potentially affecting local water resources, wildlife habitats, and community energy supply.

Key Elements

• Project: 540‑kW Weston Dam Hydroelectric Project, Upper Ammonoosuc River, Coos County, NH.
  
• Applicant: Powerhouse Systems, LLC.
  
• Regulatory Body: U.S. Department of Energy & Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC).
  
• Current Status: Notice of Intent to Prepare an Environmental Assessment (EA) issued; EA to be released on April 30, 2027.
  
• Comment Period: 30 days following EA issuance; public can submit interventions, comments, or rehearing requests.
  
• Public Participation: Contact Office of Public Participation (202) 502‑6595; inquiries to Eric Fitzpatrick (202) 502‑8584.
  
• NEPA Compliance: Unique ID EAXX‑019‑20‑000‑1780577933; EA will be circulated for review and all comments considered in final licensing decision.
  
• Implications: Likely minimal environmental impact, but final decision will confirm whether the dam can continue operating under a new license.

New York Faces Flood‑Storm Disaster: SBA Opens Door to Relief Loans

Overview

On June 30 2026, the U.S. Small Business Administration (SBA) issued an administrative declaration of disaster for the state of New York, citing severe storms and flooding that have impacted several counties, including Queens, Bronx, Kings, Nassau, New York, and Richmond. The declaration authorizes the SBA to provide disaster assistance loans to affected homeowners, businesses, and non‑profit organizations, helping them repair physical damage and recover from economic injury.

The notice outlines the application process, deadlines, and contact information for applicants. Loans can be requested online through the MySBA Loan Portal or at local SBA offices, with assistance available via phone, email, and telecommunications relay services for those with hearing or speech disabilities. The SBA has set specific interest rates for different borrower categories and has designated separate disaster numbers for physical damage (216556) and economic injury (216560).

This administrative declaration is part of the federal response to the recent weather event, aiming to expedite financial relief and support the recovery of New York’s communities and businesses affected by the storm‑induced flooding.

Key Elements

• Administrative Declaration: SBA Disaster Declaration #21655 and #21656; New York Disaster Number NY‑20039.
• Affected Areas: Queens, Bronx, Kings, Nassau, New York, Richmond counties.
• Loan Types: Physical damage and economic injury assistance loans.
• Interest Rates:
  • Physical Damage: 5.750 % (homeowners with credit elsewhere), 2.875 % (homeowners without credit elsewhere), 8.000 % (businesses with credit elsewhere), 4.000 % (businesses without credit elsewhere), 3.625 % (private non‑profits).
  • Economic Injury: 4.000 % (businesses and small agricultural cooperatives without credit elsewhere), 3.625 % (private non‑profits).
• Application Process: Online via MySBA Loan Portal or in person at designated local locations.
• Key Dates: Notice issued June 30 2026; application window opens May 20 2026, closes August 31 2026, with final review by March 30 2027.
• Contact Information: Jennifer Talarico, Office of Disaster Recovery and Resilience, SBA; phone (202) 205‑6734, email (not provided), toll‑free 1‑800‑659‑2955, and 7‑1‑1 for relay services.
• Authority: 13 CFR 123.3(b); Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59008.

HUD Grants a Wave of Waivers to Boost Disaster Recovery, Affordable Housing, and Housing Stability

Overview

The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) released its quarterly notice of regulatory waivers for the fourth quarter of 2025, detailing 38 approvals that span community development, disaster recovery, flood‑resilient construction, and the transition of emergency housing voucher (EHV) families to long‑term rental assistance. The notice fulfills HUD’s Section 106 reporting requirement and highlights the agency’s flexibility in balancing federal regulations with local needs, especially in the wake of climate‑related disasters and rising housing costs.

Key waivers include: a relaxation of the 51 % low‑ and moderate‑income (LMI) requirement for Lee County’s Community Development Block Grant Disaster Recovery (CDBG‑DR) projects, allowing the county to count only the portion of infrastructure costs that benefit LMI residents; a Texas waiver that lets the state set its own area median income thresholds for disaster‑impacted counties; and a flood‑resilient senior housing conversion in Kansas that moves units above the 500‑year flood elevation while still meeting HUD’s flood‑plain standards. In addition, HUD granted a series of “good‑cause” waivers to numerous public housing agencies—NYCHA, Pensacola, Jefferson‑Parker, and many others—enabling them to automatically place EHV families onto the Housing Choice Voucher (HCV) waiting list without the usual individual application process, thereby reducing administrative burden and preventing potential homelessness as emergency funding expires.

These waivers illustrate HUD’s commitment to maintaining affordable housing supply, supporting disaster recovery in vulnerable communities, and ensuring that regulatory compliance does not become a barrier to timely assistance. By tailoring requirements to local contexts, HUD seeks to streamline program delivery while preserving the integrity of federal housing and community development objectives.

Key Elements

• CDBG‑DR Flexibility

  • Lee County: Waiver to count only LMI‑benefiting infrastructure costs, easing the 51 % LMI service‑area requirement.
    
  • Texas: Waiver to set AMI thresholds at the state level and apply an “upper‑quartile” exception for non‑entitlement counties.

• Flood‑Resilient Housing

  • Sunflower Flats, Kansas: Conversion of flood‑prone Section 8 units to a RAD project with all units above the 500‑year flood elevation, supported by a HUD waiver of elevation and floodproofing requirements.

• Housing Voucher Streamlining

  • NYCHA, Pensacola, Jefferson‑Parker, Houston, and dozens of other PHAs: “Good‑cause” waivers allowing automatic placement of EHV families onto the HCV waiting list, bypassing individual applications.
    
  • Waivers also cover transitions for families in Alaska, Westmoreland County, and other jurisdictions facing limited staff or technology access.

• Administrative Efficiency

  • Waivers reduce paperwork, staff time, and potential delays that could lead to loss of assistance for vulnerable households.
    
  • They preserve continuity of subsidy payments to landlords and prevent mass lease terminations.

• Compliance and Oversight

  • All waivers are documented with specific regulations cited, authority granted, and grounds for approval, ensuring transparency under Section 106 of the HUD Reform Act.
    
  • HUD maintains contact information for agencies to seek further details or clarification.

These provisions collectively enhance HUD’s ability to respond to climate‑related challenges, support affordable housing for seniors, and safeguard families from displacement during the transition from emergency to permanent assistance.

ONRR Seeks to Renew Oil & Gas Valuation Data Collection – A Call for Public Input

Overview

The Office of Natural Resources Revenue (ONRR) has issued a notice to renew its federal oil and gas valuation information collection under the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA). The renewal, identified by OMB Control Number 1012‑0005, will continue to gather data necessary for verifying royalty payments, assessing pre‑payment and accounting relief for marginal properties, and evaluating requests to exceed transportation and processing allowance limits on federal leases.

The collection relies on several key forms—most notably Form ONRR‑4393 for allowance‑exceedance requests and Form ONRR‑2014 for sales and royalty remittance reporting. It covers the regulatory framework set out in 30 CFR parts 1202, 1204, and 1206, which govern royalty calculation, marginal‑property relief, and product valuation. The agency estimates that each response will take an average of 70.8 hours, totaling roughly 7,788 hours of burden across about 110 annual submissions.

Comments from the public and other stakeholders are invited until August 5, 2026. ONRR encourages input on the necessity, accuracy, and potential simplification of the data collection, including the use of electronic submission methods, to reduce respondent burden while maintaining the integrity of federal oil and gas revenue reporting.

Key Elements

• Renewal under the Paperwork Reduction Act – OMB‑approved collection (Control No. 1012‑0005) for federal oil and gas lease valuation.
  
• Primary purposes:
  
  • Verify proper reporting and payment of royalties and other amounts due to the U.S.
    
  • Determine eligibility for pre‑payment, accounting, and auditing relief on marginal properties.
    
  • Evaluate requests to exceed transportation and processing allowance limits.
    
• Key forms used:
  
  • ONRR‑4393 – Request to Exceed Regulatory Allowance Limitation.
    
  • ONRR‑2014 – Report of Sales and Royalty Remittance (not included in this specific burden estimate).
    
• Regulatory scope: 30 CFR parts 1202 (royalties), 1204 (marginal‑property relief), and 1206 (product valuation).
  
• Estimated burden: ~70.8 hours per response; ~7,788 total hours annually across ~110 respondents.
  
• Public comment period: Open until August 5, 2026; comments must reference OMB Control No. 1012‑0005.
  
• Stakeholder engagement: ONRR seeks feedback on necessity, accuracy, and potential automation of the collection to minimize paperwork for lessees and related parties.

US Keeps Antidumping Duties on Global Aluminum Sheets to Protect Domestic Industry

Overview

The U.S. Department of Commerce has concluded that revoking the antidumping duty (AD) orders on common alloy aluminum sheet from 16 countries would likely lead to continued or renewed dumping of the product in the United States. The decision follows an expedited first sunset review, a statutory process that reassesses the necessity of existing AD orders every five years.

The review found that, if the orders were lifted, dumping margins could reach up to 242.8 % in Germany and 137.1 % in Brazil, with other countries showing significant margins ranging from 3.2 % in Croatia to 47.9 % in India. These figures represent the weighted-average price differences that would be expected between U.S. and foreign producers, indicating a substantial risk of unfair competition for U.S. manufacturers.

For the aluminum industry, the continuation of AD duties means that U.S. producers can maintain a competitive edge against cheaper imports, potentially supporting domestic jobs and encouraging investment in cleaner, more efficient production technologies. However, the duties also affect downstream users—such as construction, automotive, and aerospace sectors—by keeping aluminum prices higher than they might otherwise be in a fully open market.

Key Elements

• Scope of the Orders: Common alloy aluminum sheet from Bahrain, Brazil, Croatia, Egypt, Germany, India, Indonesia, Italy, Oman, Romania, Serbia, Slovenia, South Africa, Spain, Taiwan, and Turkey.
  
• Sunset Review Process: Expedited 120‑day review initiated in March 2026, with domestic interested parties (e.g., Aluminum Dynamics, the Aluminum Association) submitting substantive responses.
  
• Findings: Revocation would likely lead to dumping; estimated dumping margins range from 3.2 % (Croatia) to 242.8 % (Germany).
  
• Legal Basis: Sections 751© and 752© of the Tariff Act of 1930, and relevant CFR provisions governing antidumping duty orders.
  
• Implications for Trade: Maintains protective tariffs for U.S. aluminum producers, potentially influencing global supply chains and pricing dynamics.
  
• Administrative Protective Order (APO) Notice: Parties with APOs must return or destroy proprietary information, ensuring compliance with confidentiality requirements.
  
• Next Steps: The orders remain active; future reviews will occur every five years unless new evidence prompts earlier action.

BLM to File Survey Plats for Leech Lake Reservation Lands in Minnesota

Overview

The U.S. Bureau of Land Management (BLM) has announced that it will officially file a series of cadastral survey plats in its Eastern States State Office in Falls Church, Virginia, on August 5, 2026. These plats cover parcels in Cass County, Minnesota, and were prepared at the request of the U.S. Forest Service to satisfy the land‑transfer requirements of the Leech Lake Band of Ojibwe Reservation Restoration Act (LLBORRA). The filing marks the final administrative step in transferring specific federal lands back to the Leech Lake Band, thereby restoring portions of the historic reservation boundaries.

The notice provides a clear window for interested parties to protest the surveys. Written protests must be submitted to the BLM Eastern States Director within 30 calendar days of publication (by July 6, 2026). If a protest is received before the scheduled filing, the BLM will pause the filing until the protest is resolved. After the filing, the plats become part of the public record and will be available for review.

For geoscientists, natural resource managers, and local stakeholders, this filing signals a shift in land stewardship that could influence future land‑use planning, resource extraction, and conservation efforts in the region. The process underscores the importance of accurate cadastral data in managing public lands and honoring treaty‑based land‑restoration commitments.

Key Elements

• Scheduled Filing Date: August 5, 2026 (30 days after publication).
  
• Location of Filing: Bureau of Land Management, Eastern States State Office, Falls Church, Virginia.
  
• Purpose: Finalize transfer of federal lands to the Leech Lake Band under the LLBORRA.
  
• Affected Lands: Multiple townships in Cass County (T. 146 N., R. 27 W.; T. 145 N., R. 29 W.; T. 146 N., R. 29 W.; T. 142 N., R. 31 W.; T. 143 N., R. 31 W.; T. 145 N., R. 31 W.).
  
• Protest Process:
  
  • Written protests due within 30 days of publication.
    
  • Must be sent to the BLM Eastern States Director at 5275 Leesburg Pike, Suite 102‑A, Falls Church, VA.
    
  • Protest must be received during regular business hours; otherwise, it is considered filed the next business day.
    
  • Late protests (after the filing date) are not accepted.
    
• Contact Information:
  
  • Frank D. Radford, Chief Cadastral Surveyor, Eastern States.
    
  • Phone: (703) 558‑7759; Email: (not provided).
    
• Public Record: Completed plats will be placed in the open files and available to the public.
  
• Legal Authority: 43 U.S.C. Chap. 3.

DOE Launches Voluntary Nuclear Fuel‑Cycle Consortium to Strengthen U.S. Energy Security

Overview

The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) has announced a voluntary agreement under the Defense Production Act (DPA) to bring together industry, academia, and federal agencies in a coordinated effort to secure the nation’s nuclear fuel supply chain. The initiative, approved by the Secretary of Energy and vetted by the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission, is part of President E.O. 14302’s push to “reinvigorate the nuclear industrial base” and the national energy emergency declared in E.O. 14156.

The agreement creates a “Nuclear Fuel Cycle Consortium” that will form technical committees for each stage of the fuel cycle—from mining and milling to enrichment, conversion, fabrication, recycling, and waste management. Participants will develop “Plans of Action” (POAs) that outline specific projects, timelines, and resource needs. DOE will oversee the process, while the DOJ and FTC will monitor antitrust compliance, ensuring that collaboration does not create undue market power.

For the general public, the policy means a more resilient, domestically controlled nuclear fuel supply, potentially reducing reliance on foreign sources and enhancing national security. It also introduces strict confidentiality and data‑sharing protocols to protect commercially sensitive information, while allowing participants to benefit from antitrust defenses for coordinated actions that serve defense and energy objectives.

Key Elements

• Legal Basis: Section 708 of the Defense Production Act, supplemented by Executive Orders 14156 and 14302.
  
• Consortium Structure:
  
  • Committees organized by fuel‑cycle stage (mining, enrichment, conversion, etc.).
    
  • Advisory Forum of independent experts to provide technical guidance.
    
  • Governance led by DOE’s Assistant Secretary for Nuclear Energy, with oversight from DOJ and FTC.
    
• Participation:
  
  • Open to private‑sector companies, universities, national labs, and other eligible entities.
    
  • Participants may withdraw at any time, but must honor ongoing obligations and confidentiality.
    
• Plans of Action (POAs):
  
  • Documented methods for implementing the voluntary agreement.
    
  • Must receive written antitrust safe‑harbor approval from the Attorney General and FTC Chairman.
    
  • Include data‑sharing schedules, resource requirements, and milestones.
    
• Antitrust Safeguards:
  
  • Participants receive limited antitrust defense for actions taken under the agreement, provided they comply with DOE, DOJ, and FTC guidance.
    
  • Oversight ensures that collaboration does not create market dominance or price‑setting behavior.
    
• Information Management:
  
  • Competitively sensitive information (CSI) is protected; direct sharing is restricted to essential, DOJ/FTC‑approved exchanges.
    
  • Records must be maintained for five years and are subject to FOIA exemptions for trade secrets and confidential data.
    
• Compliance and Recordkeeping:
  
  • DOE will maintain meeting minutes, agendas, and participant lists.
    
  • Participants must keep detailed records of all POA‑related activities and submit them upon request.
    
• Funding:
  
  • The agreement does not provide federal funding; participants bear their own costs unless otherwise specified.
    
• Duration:
  
  • The voluntary agreement remains in effect until terminated by DOE or the participant, with a maximum five‑year term unless extended under DPA provisions.
    

This framework aims to accelerate domestic nuclear fuel capabilities while safeguarding competition and protecting sensitive information, thereby strengthening the United States’ energy independence and national defense posture.

Yuma Proving Ground Expansion: Federal Land Withdrawn for Military and Conservation Use

Overview

The bill amends the Military Land Withdrawals Act of 2013 to formally withdraw and reserve approximately 22,032 acres of federal land surrounding the Yuma Proving Ground in Arizona. The purpose is to secure the area for Army training and testing while preserving opportunities for wildlife conservation, cultural resource protection, and limited public recreation.

The withdrawn lands include a 21,783‑acre Highway 95 area and a 249‑acre Howard Cantonment zone, with the exception of about 800 acres of subsurface estate owned by the state. The lands are withdrawn from all public land, mining, and mineral‑leasing statutes, and are reserved for Army use under Public Land Order No. 848.

Management of the withdrawn area will be coordinated between the Department of the Interior and the Department of the Army. The Interior may assign management to the Army, and both agencies may issue leases or easements, subject to Army consent. The bill also establishes a utility corridor for critical regional‑grid infrastructure and sets the withdrawal in effect for an indefinite period or until the Army deems it no longer necessary.

Key Elements

• Land Withdrawal – ~22,032 acres (21,783 acres Highway 95 + 249 acres Howard Cantonment) withdrawn from public land, mining, and mineral‑leasing laws.
  
• Reservation – Lands reserved for Army use per Public Land Order No. 848 and Section 2914.
  
• Management – Interior manages the land, may assign responsibility to the Army; both agencies must coordinate on leases, easements, and permits.
  
• Allowed Activities – Conservation of wildlife and habitat, preservation of cultural resources, wild horse/burro management, predator control, recreation, hunting, and fire suppression.
  
• Utility Corridor – Interior may issue rights‑of‑way within the Parker‑Blaisdell Utility Corridor for critical grid infrastructure without Army consent, but with conditions to minimize military impact.
  
• Non‑Defense Uses – Any non‑defense use must meet conditions jointly set by Interior and Army to ensure compatibility with defense missions.
  
• Duration – Withdrawal is indefinite or until the Army determines the military need has ended.

FY 2027: $9.8 Billion for U.S. Diplomacy, Security, and Natural‑Resource Aid—New Oversight, Restrictions, and Climate‑Focused Funding

Overview

The 2027 National Security, Department of State, and Related Programs Appropriations Act authorizes $9.76 billion for the State Department and related national‑security agencies. The funding is split among human resources, overseas operations, diplomatic policy, and a large share earmarked for worldwide security protection, including embassy construction, consular services, and emergency response. A significant portion is also directed toward environmental and natural‑resource initiatives—such as water‑supply projects, climate‑resilient infrastructure, and support for the International Boundary and Water Commission with Mexico—reflecting a growing emphasis on geoscience and resource security.

The bill introduces stringent oversight and reporting requirements. Every agency receiving funds must submit quarterly reports on unobligated balances, obligated but unspent amounts, and Treasury account symbols. Reprogramming and intra‑agency transfers are limited to 5 % of the current year’s appropriation, and any changes must be notified to the Appropriations Committees. Restrictions on aid to regimes that support terrorism, violate human rights, or engage in prohibited mining or energy projects are codified, and funds cannot be used for propaganda or to support the Cuban or North Korean militaries. The Act also bars the use of appropriated money for abortion, involuntary sterilization, or any activity that would undermine U.S. democratic values.

Key provisions target natural‑resource security and climate resilience. The Act earmarks at least $338 million for water‑supply and sanitation projects, with half directed to sub‑Saharan Africa, and requires that any deviation from statutory minimums be reported to Congress. Funds for the International Boundary and Water Commission and for the International Joint Commission are subject to detailed operating plans and oversight. Additionally, the bill prohibits the use of appropriated funds for the Green Climate Fund or other multilateral climate mechanisms that conflict with Executive Order 14162, while directing resources toward domestic and international projects that enhance water security, sustainable energy, and mineral supply‑chain resilience.

Key Elements

• Total Appropriations: $9.76 billion for FY 2027, covering personnel, operations, diplomatic policy, and security activities.
  
• Geoscience & Natural‑Resource Funding:
  
  • $338 million for water‑supply and sanitation, with $169 million earmarked for sub‑Saharan Africa.
    
  • $82.9 million for salaries and expenses of the U.S. Section of the International Boundary and Water Commission with Mexico.
    
  • $22.3 million for the International Joint Commission (U.S.–Canada) and $75.4 million for international fisheries commissions.
    
• Oversight & Reporting: Quarterly reports on balances and obligations; 30‑day notification for reprogramming; 5 % cap on intra‑agency transfers.
  
• Restrictions on Use:
  
  • Prohibition of aid to Cuba, North Korea, Iran, and other sanctioned regimes unless a democratic government is restored.
    
  • No funding for propaganda, abortion, involuntary sterilization, or any activity violating Executive Orders 14151–14187.
    
  • Funds cannot support mining or energy projects that do not meet U.S. environmental or human‑rights standards.
    
• Climate & Environmental Provisions:
  
  • Ban on using appropriated money for the Green Climate Fund or other multilateral climate mechanisms conflicting with EO 14162.
    
  • Requirement to report any deviation from statutory minimums in water and sanitation funding.
    
• Security & Diplomatic Infrastructure:
  
  • Allocation for embassy construction, security upgrades, and emergency response.
    
  • Restrictions on moving U.S. embassies in Israel or Jerusalem beyond specified locations.
    
• Trade & Mineral Security:
  
  • Funds for the National Security Investment Programs can be directed to digital‑connectivity, cybersecurity, and critical mineral supply‑chain projects, subject to prior consultation with Appropriations Committees.
    
  • Prohibition on using funds to support mining activities unless U.S. mining standards are met.
    

This act balances expanded diplomatic and security spending with rigorous oversight, targeted natural‑resource support, and strict restrictions to ensure that U.S. foreign assistance aligns with national security, human‑rights, and environmental priorities.

FY 2027 Defense Bill: A Big Push for Modernization, Energy, and Supply‑Chain Resilience

Overview

The National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2027 (H.R. 8800) authorizes a $7.2 billion DoD budget that covers procurement, construction, research, and health‑care programs. The bill is organized into four main divisions:
1. DoD Authorizations – funding for new Virginia‑class submarines, Arleigh Burke destroyers, advanced aircraft (F‑35, F‑15EX, MQ‑9 Reaper), and small‑unmanned systems.
2. Military‑Construction Authorizations – worldwide upgrades to command‑and‑control facilities, underground transmission lines in Guam, and infrastructure projects in the Indo‑Pacific and U.S. bases.
3. DoE National‑Security Authorizations – research in cyber hardening, synthetic training, biomanufacturing, and the deployment of small modular reactors (SMRs) on warships.
4. Funding Tables – detailed appropriations and cost‑saving requirements for multiyear contracts.

The bill also tightens procurement rules, expands AI oversight, and introduces new supply‑chain safeguards for critical materials such as rare‑earth magnets and advanced alloys. Environmental and energy provisions—like the underground transmission mandate for Guam and the authorization of transportable nuclear microreactors—highlight a growing emphasis on resilience and sustainability in defense infrastructure.

Key Elements

• Modernization & Procurement

  • Multiyear contracts must deliver ≥5 % cost savings; readiness plans must be submitted before signing.
    
  • New aircraft procurement (F‑35, F‑15EX, MQ‑9) requires certification of cost, readiness, and future‑year funding.
    
  • Autonomous and humanoid robot procurement is restricted to non‑foreign‑controlled systems; exceptions only for isolated testing.
    

• Energy & Nuclear

  • Authorization for SMRs on U.S. warships and transportable nuclear microreactors for Indo‑Pacific operations.
    
  • Guam power‑generation transfer requires at least 50 % underground transmission lines; DoD funds may be used for upgrades, cybersecurity, and resiliency.
    

• Supply‑Chain & Critical Materials

  • Dual‑supplier rule for solid‑rocket motors and critical Tier 1/Tier 2 materials (neodymium‑iron‑boron, tungsten, tantalum).
    
  • Contractors must certify U.S. sourcing and maintain ten‑year records; preferred domestic manufacturers receive procurement advantages.
    

• Construction & Infrastructure

  • $1.2 billion in construction projects worldwide, including upgrades to Guam’s harbor, Pacific Warfighting Center, and U.S. naval shipyards.
    
  • Environmental reviews and underground transmission mandates are required for all construction projects.
    

• AI & Cyber Oversight

  • Rapid deployment framework for AI systems with mandatory security testing and version control.
    
  • Guidance to identify and remove “covered” AI companies from DoD systems within 90 days.
    

• Health & Medical Readiness

  • Mandatory neurocognitive testing for all service members every three years; pilots receive a neuro‑health registry.
    
  • Expanded medical readiness reporting and coordination with combatant commands.
    

• Workforce & Acquisition Talent

  • Creation of Chief Acquisition Talent Officer (CATO) and component officers (SCATO/CCATO) to align workforce skills with DoD priorities.
    
  • Annual reporting on acquisition workforce performance and talent gaps.
    

• Trade & Security Reporting

  • Secretary of Defense must publish a list of U.S. entities engaged with China, with definitions for assistance, formal, and informal associations.
    
  • New oversight for contracts involving foreign “sources of concern” for critical materials.
    

These provisions collectively aim to strengthen U.S. defense capabilities while ensuring that energy, environmental, and supply‑chain considerations are integrated into national security planning.

ESG Act of 2025: Pushing Climate Transparency into Municipal Bonds

Overview
The ESG Act of 2025 amends the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 to strengthen how investment advisers consider financial and non‑financial factors when advising clients. It requires the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) to conduct two studies: one on climate‑change and other environmental disclosures in the municipal bond market, and another on the effectiveness of rules that govern the solicitation of municipal securities business. The bill is currently referred to the House Committee on Financial Services.

The Act’s first major change is to the “best‑interest” standard. Pecuniary factors—those that materially affect risk or return—must be the default consideration unless a client explicitly consents to include non‑pecuniary factors. Advisers must disclose the expected and actual financial impacts of any non‑pecuniary considerations over a user‑chosen period, ensuring transparency for investors.

By mandating SEC studies, the Act seeks to clarify how municipal issuers disclose climate risks and how political influence may affect the sale of municipal securities. The findings will be reported to congressional committees within a year, potentially leading to new regulations that could reshape the municipal bond market—especially for infrastructure projects tied to energy, water, and other natural‑resource sectors.

Key Elements

• Best‑Interest Standard Revision

  • Pecuniary factors become the default basis for determining a client’s best interest.
    
  • Non‑pecuniary factors may only be considered with written informed consent.
    
  • Advisers must disclose expected and actual financial effects of non‑pecuniary factors over a period up to three years.

• SEC Study on Climate & Environmental Disclosures

  • Examine frequency, consistency, and investor use of climate‑related disclosures by municipal issuers.
    
  • Assess voluntary or mandatory disclosure standards and alignment across contexts.
    
  • Report findings, financial risk assessments, and regulatory recommendations to Senate and House committees within one year.

• SEC Study on Solicitation of Municipal Securities Business

  • Evaluate the effectiveness of covered rules (Rule G‑38 and Rule 206(4)-5) in preventing political influence over municipal securities sales.
    
  • Analyze enforcement actions, compliance policies, and impacts on small, minority, and women‑owned businesses.
    
  • Submit a comprehensive report with recommendations to Congress within one year.

• Implementation Timeline

  • SEC must issue rulemaking to implement the best‑interest amendment within 12 months of enactment.
    
  • The amendment applies to adviser actions 12 months after the Act’s enactment.

• Relevance to Geosciences & Natural Resources

  • Municipal bonds finance infrastructure such as water treatment, renewable energy projects, and climate‑resilient construction.
    
  • Enhanced climate disclosure will help investors assess environmental risks tied to these projects.
    
  • The study on solicitation practices may influence how municipal projects are marketed and funded, affecting the availability of capital for geoscience‑related initiatives.

May 2025 to Become National Wildfire Preparedness Month: A Call to Action

Overview

The U.S. Senate has formally designated May 2025 as National Wildfire Preparedness Month to spotlight the escalating threat of wildfires across the country. Recent data show a dramatic rise in both the number and size of fires, with 22,759 incidents burning nearly one million acres in the first two months of 2025—well above the 10‑year average. The resolution underscores that wildfires now span the entire year in many regions, including areas with little historical experience, and that human activity accounts for roughly 85 % of ignitions.

The resolution aims to raise public awareness, encourage proactive community and governmental planning, and promote evidence‑based mitigation strategies. It calls for increased investment in fire‑resistant construction, vegetation management, early warning systems, and evacuation protocols, while also highlighting the health risks to firefighters and the broader population from smoke exposure.

By designating a national month for wildfire preparedness, the Senate seeks to unify federal, state, tribal, and local efforts, mobilize resources, and foster educational initiatives that empower communities to reduce fire risk and protect lives, property, and ecosystems.

Key Elements

• Official designation of May 2025 as National Wildfire Preparedness Month.
  
• Statistical backdrop: 62,435 wildfires (2015‑2024) burned 7.5 million acres—over 700,000 acres above the 10‑year average; 22,759 fires burned 988,319 acres in Jan‑May 2025 alone.
  
• Economic impact: Federal suppression costs exceed $2.5 billion annually; total damage runs into tens or hundreds of billions.
  
• Human contribution: Nearly 85 % of wildland fires are human‑caused, emphasizing the need for prevention.
  
• Health concerns: Firefighters face elevated cancer and respiratory risks; wildfire smoke triggers asthma, heart attacks, strokes, and mortality.
  
• Preventive measures highlighted:
  
  1. Fire‑resistant building materials and yard vegetation management.
     
  2. Community planning to reduce exposure and improve firefighter access.
     
  3. Evacuation planning for people and pets.
     
  4. Vegetation and forest management to lower flammability.
     
  5. Limiting combustibles during high‑heat periods (e.g., fireworks, open flames).
     
• Federal encouragement: The resolution urges increased awareness and preparedness at all government levels, including Alaska Native and Native Hawaiian communities, and supports resources for education, early warning systems, and safe evacuation.
  
• Goal: Enhance public knowledge of lifesaving practices, promote community programming, and strengthen overall wildfire resilience across the United States.

EU Eyes Saudi Aramco‑PIF Merger: Simplified Review for Energy‑AI Powerhouse

Overview

The European Commission has received a notification of a proposed concentration involving Saudi Aramco Development Company (SADCO), the Public Investment Fund (PIF) of Saudi Arabia, and the AI‑focused company HUMAIN. Under Article 4 of the EU Merger Regulation, the Commission is assessing whether the transaction—where SADCO and PIF would jointly acquire control of HUMAIN—could affect competition within the EU market.

The transaction would bring together a major global oil and gas producer (Saudi Aramco), a sovereign wealth fund with diversified investments (PIF), and a newly established AI and infrastructure firm (HUMAIN). If approved, the combined entity could strengthen its position in hydrocarbon exploration, refining, and the emerging AI‑driven energy analytics sector.

The Commission has identified this case as a candidate for a simplified procedure, allowing a quicker assessment. Interested parties are invited to submit observations within ten days of publication, providing an opportunity for stakeholders to raise concerns or support before a final decision is made.

Key Elements

• Parties Involved

  • Saudi Aramco Development Company (SADCO) – Saudi Arabia’s flagship oil and gas company.
    
  • Public Investment Fund (PIF) – Saudi sovereign wealth fund with broad global investments.
    
  • HUMAIN – AI‑technology and infrastructure company controlled by PIF, launched in 2025.

• Nature of the Concentration

  • Joint acquisition of HUMAIN’s shares and assets by SADCO and PIF, creating joint control under Article 3(1)(b) and Article 3(4) of the Merger Regulation.

• Simplified Procedure

  • The case qualifies for a streamlined review under the Commission’s Notice on simplified treatment for certain concentrations, potentially speeding up the decision process.

• Observation Window

  • Third parties may submit written observations by email or post within 10 days of the publication, referencing “M.12417 – SAUDI ARAMCO / PIF / HUMAIN”.

• Potential Impact

  • Consolidation of significant hydrocarbon extraction and refining capabilities with advanced AI analytics could influence global energy markets, supply chains, and technological innovation in the EU.

• Regulatory Context

  • The notification falls under Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (Merger Regulation) and the EU’s competition policy framework.

Reauthorizing Cross‑Border Water Stewardship: The TAAP Act

Overview

The Transboundary Aquifer Assessment Program Act (TAAP Act) seeks to renew and expand the U.S.‑Mexico partnership that monitors shared groundwater resources along the southwestern border. By reauthorizing the program for fiscal years 2026‑2033, the bill ensures continued scientific assessment, data sharing, and collaborative management of aquifers that supply water to communities, agriculture, and ecosystems in both countries.

The act broadens the scope of priority aquifers to include Arizona in addition to New Mexico and Texas, reflecting the growing recognition of the Yuma groundwater basin’s importance for regional water security. This expansion acknowledges that Arizona’s aquifers are increasingly interconnected with Mexican water systems, especially in the Sonora region, and that coordinated monitoring is essential for sustainable use.

With a modest annual appropriation of $1.5 million, the TAAP Act provides a stable, long‑term funding stream for joint research, monitoring infrastructure, and data exchange. The sunset clause ties the program’s authority to the enactment of the Act itself, ensuring that the partnership remains legally grounded and subject to periodic review.

Key Elements

• Priority Aquifer Expansion – Adds Arizona (excluding the Yuma basin) to the list of aquifers requiring assessment, broadening cross‑border cooperation.
  
• Funding Commitment – Authorizes $1.5 million annually for fiscal years 2026‑2033, replacing the previous $50 million allocation for 2007‑2016.
  
• Program Sunset – Replaces the original sunset provision with a clause that ties the program’s authority to the enactment of the TAAP Act, ensuring continuity.
  
• Reauthorization Status – Currently referred to the House Committee on Natural Resources, awaiting further deliberation and potential passage.
  
• International Collaboration – Strengthens U.S.‑Mexico data sharing and joint research on aquifer health, water quality, and sustainable extraction practices.

Reauthorizing Cross‑Border Water Stewardship: The TAAP Act Extends U.S.–Mexico Aquifer Assessment into 2036

The Transboundary Aquifer Assessment Program Act (TAAP Act) renews a cooperative effort between the United States and Mexico to study and manage shared groundwater resources. By extending the program’s mandate through fiscal year 2036, the bill ensures continued scientific assessment, data sharing, and joint decision‑making for aquifers that cross the U.S.–Mexico border. The act also broadens the geographic scope of priority aquifers, adding Arizona to the list of states whose transboundary aquifers will receive focused attention.

For geoscientists, hydrologists, and natural‑resource managers, the TAAP Act provides a stable funding framework and a clear legal basis for cross‑border research. It encourages the development of integrated groundwater models, the monitoring of water quality and quantity, and the assessment of impacts from climate change and land‑use practices. The collaboration also supports the protection of water‑dependent ecosystems and the sustainable use of groundwater for agriculture, industry, and communities on both sides of the border.

Key Elements - Reauthorization Period: The program is funded for fiscal years 2026‑2036, replacing the previous 2007‑2016 funding window.
- Expanded Priority Aquifers: Arizona is added to the list of states (New Mexico, Texas, or Arizona) whose transboundary aquifers are designated for assessment, except for the Yuma groundwater basin under specific Arizona‑Sonora conditions.
- Funding Authorization: Section 8(a) now authorizes appropriations for the extended period, ensuring continued financial support for research, monitoring, and data exchange.
- Sunset Clause: The authority to operate the program is tied to the enactment of the TAAP Act itself, providing a clear endpoint unless further reauthorization is pursued.
- Cooperative Framework: The act reinforces the existing U.S.–Mexico partnership, facilitating joint scientific studies, shared data repositories, and coordinated management strategies for shared aquifers.

Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2026

A sweeping fiscal package that funds defense, infrastructure, and natural‑resource programs for the 2026‑2027 fiscal year

Overview

The Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2026 (Public Law 119‑75) consolidates federal funding for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026. It authorizes appropriations for a wide array of agencies—including Defense, Labor, Health & Human Services, Education, Transportation, Housing & Urban Development, Treasury, and the Executive Office of the President—along with related agencies and general government funds. The bill provides a detailed financial framework for personnel, operations, procurement, research, and environmental restoration across the Department of Defense and civilian agencies, while also setting out reporting, oversight, and transfer restrictions.

For the Department of Defense, the act authorizes $19.7 billion for active‑duty and reserve personnel pay, allowances, and related expenses, and $19.2 billion for the Military Retirement Fund. Operation‑and‑maintenance (O&M) budgets total $319 billion across the Army, Navy, Marine Corps, Air Force, Space Force, and defense‑wide activities, with capped emergency reserves for each service. Targeted programs—such as the APEX Accelerators, Defense Information Systems Agency upgrades, and counter‑ISIS Train‑and‑Equip support—receive earmarked funding, and the act imposes conditions on foreign assistance, procurement of U.S.‑made components, and reporting to Congress.

Beyond defense, the act allocates substantial resources to civilian agencies: $1.10 billion for shipbuilding and conversion, $8.9 billion for environmental restoration and cleanup of former defense sites, $101 million for overseas humanitarian aid, and $283 million for cooperative threat‑reduction assistance. It also provides funding for research and development—$16.7 billion for Army R&D, $28.1 billion for Navy R&D, $50.6 billion for Air Force R&D, $14.9 billion for Space Force R&D, and $35.2 billion for defense‑wide R&D—while earmarking $387.8 million for Mine Safety and Health Administration operations and $1.10 billion for equipment procurement in public and private plants. The bill includes provisions for transportation infrastructure, environmental remediation, workforce development, and health‑care programs, all subject to oversight and reporting requirements.

Key Elements

• Defense Personnel & Operations

  • $19.7 billion for active‑duty and reserve pay, allowances, and related expenses.
    
  • $19.2 billion for the Military Retirement Fund.
    
  • $319 billion in O&M budgets across all services, with capped emergency reserves.
    

• Targeted Defense Programs

  • $60 million for APEX Accelerators (advanced technology development).
    
  • $86.5 million for Defense Information Systems Agency network upgrades.
    
  • $342 million for counter‑ISIS Train‑and‑Equip support.
    

• Environmental Restoration & Cleanup

  • $8.9 million for environmental restoration of former defense sites.
    
  • $235 million for cleanup of former defense sites.
    
  • $101 million for overseas humanitarian, disaster, and civic aid.
    

• Research & Development

  • $16.7 billion (Army), $28.1 billion (Navy), $50.6 billion (Air Force), $14.9 billion (Space Force), $35.2 billion (defense‑wide).
    

• Shipbuilding & Conversion

  • $1.10 billion for procurement and installation of equipment in public and private plants.
    
  • $27.15 billion shipbuilding and conversion package covering submarines, carriers, destroyers, and auxiliary ships.
    

• Mine Safety & Health Administration

  • $387.8 million for MSHA operating costs, including mine rescue and first‑aid support.
    

• Transportation & Infrastructure

  • $74 million for FAA research and technology, $56 million for ARPA‑I bridge durability research, and $30 million for transportation resilience projects.
    

• Workforce Development

  • $3.1 billion for Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act (WIOA) programs across adult, youth, and dislocated‑worker initiatives.
    

• Health & Human Services

  • $1.18 billion for maternal and child health, $2.57 billion for Ryan White HIV/AIDS program, and $392 million for rural health.
    

• Environmental & Energy

  • $1.10 billion earmarked for equipment procurement in both public and private plants, supporting domestic production of critical minerals and energy‑related infrastructure.
    

• Oversight & Reporting

  • Mandatory quarterly reports to Congress on foreign contributions, training, and environmental restoration.
    
  • Restrictions on reprogramming and transfer of funds, with OMB approval required for significant changes.
    

These provisions collectively shape the federal budget for defense readiness, civilian infrastructure, natural‑resource stewardship, and workforce development, while embedding transparency and accountability mechanisms for the use of appropriated funds.

EU Boosts Armenian Trade Amid Russian Restrictions: A Two‑Year Duty‑Free Window

Overview

In July 2026 the European Commission proposed a regulation that temporarily suspends customs duties on a broad range of Armenian products. The measure is a direct response to Russia’s recent export bans and transit restrictions that have cut off key markets for Armenia’s agricultural, food‑processing, and mineral‑resource sectors. By removing ad‑valorem duties under the Generalised Scheme of Preferences Plus (GSP+) and eliminating tariffs on eight selected agricultural goods, the EU aims to restore market access, support small‑ and medium‑sized enterprises, and strengthen Armenia’s economic resilience.

The proposal is anchored in the Comprehensive and Enhanced Partnership Agreement and the Strategic Agenda for the EU‑Armenia partnership, both of which prioritize trade diversification, connectivity, and socio‑economic development. The regulation will be in force for two years, with the EU committing to monitor compliance and safeguard European market interests if necessary.

The policy reflects the EU’s broader strategy of using trade instruments to support partners facing external economic pressure, while upholding democratic principles, rule of law, and human‑rights standards as stipulated in the partnership agreement.

Key Elements

• Scope of Products

  • Includes a wide array of agricultural goods (fruits, nuts, dairy, spices), food‑processing items, and natural‑resource products such as minerals, metals, and chemical fertilizers.
    
  • Annex I lists over 200 CN codes; Annex II specifies eight agricultural products exempt from tariffs within tariff‑rate quotas.

• Duty‑Free Measures

  • Temporary suspension of ad‑valorem duties on all products in Annex I.
    
  • Removal of duties on the eight products in Annex II, subject to tariff‑rate quotas.

• Conditions for Eligibility

  • Compliance with rules of origin and administrative cooperation to prevent fraud.
    
  • Armenia must refrain from imposing new duties, quantitative restrictions, or discriminatory measures on EU imports.
    
  • Respect for democratic principles, rule of law, human rights, and non‑proliferation of weapons of mass destruction, as per Articles 2 and 9 of the partnership agreement.

• Safeguard and Suspension Powers

  • The Commission can suspend or adjust preferential arrangements if Armenia fails to meet conditions or if the measures adversely affect EU markets.
    
  • Member States may request temporary suspension; the Commission will assess and act within specified timeframes.

• Duration and Financial Impact

  • The regulation will apply for two years from the day after publication in the Official Journal.
    
  • Estimated loss of EU customs revenue is less than €3 million per year, with a total two‑year impact of about €5.4 million.

• Monitoring and Reporting

  • Trade flows and compliance will be monitored through existing customs and statistical systems.
    
  • Results will be reported to the EU‑Armenia partnership committee and made publicly available online.

• Alignment with EU External Action

  • The measure is consistent with the EU’s external policy objectives of supporting partners under economic pressure and promoting sustainable development.
    
  • It complements other EU initiatives such as the Resilience and Growth Plan for Armenia and the Connectivity Partnership.

This regulation represents a swift, targeted trade‑policy response designed to help Armenia navigate geopolitical challenges while reinforcing the EU’s commitment to partnership, rule of law, and economic resilience.

Shape the Future of the Grand Canyon: Call for Experts to Join Glen Canyon Dam Advisory Group

Overview
The U.S. Department of the Interior is inviting nominations for the Glen Canyon Dam Adaptive Management Work Group (AMWG), a federal advisory committee tasked with guiding the long‑term stewardship of the Grand Canyon National Park and Glen Canyon National Recreation Area. The AMWG will advise the Secretary of the Interior on environmental, cultural, and visitor‑use impacts of the dam, help develop monitoring and research plans, and ensure compliance with the Grand Canyon Protection Act and related environmental decisions.

The committee’s work is crucial for balancing water‑resource needs with the protection of the canyon’s natural and cultural values. By bringing together representatives from federal agencies, tribal governments, state governors, environmental groups, recreation stakeholders, and the public, the AMWG will provide a broad, balanced perspective on adaptive management strategies for the Colorado River Basin.

Nominations are open until August 3, 2026, and the selected members will serve three‑year terms, with the possibility of reappointment. The committee will meet twice a year in person and once via webinar, and members will be reimbursed for travel expenses while serving.

Key Elements
- Purpose & Scope
- Advise on protecting and improving Grand Canyon values per the Grand Canyon Protection Act.
- Review long‑term monitoring data, recommend research, and assess Adaptive Management Program (AMP) goals.
- Provide input on environmental decisions, permitting, and compliance with federal laws.

• Membership Composition

  • Chair: Secretary’s designee.
    
  • Representatives from:
    
  • Energy (Western Area Power Administration)
    
  • Arizona Game & Fish Department
    
  • Hopi, Hualapai, Navajo Nation, San Juan Southern Paiute, Southern Paiute Consortium, Pueblo of Zuni tribes
    
  • Governors of Arizona, California, Colorado, Nevada, New Mexico, Utah, Wyoming
    
  • Environmental organizations (2), recreation industry (2), contractors (2)
    
  • Ex‑officio non‑voting members from Bureau of Reclamation, Bureau of Indian Affairs, U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, National Park Service.
    

• Nomination Criteria

  • Strong advisory, teamwork, project‑management skills.
    
  • Expertise in natural or cultural resource management, stakeholder representation, and policy processes.
    
  • Balanced representation of viewpoints, regional knowledge, and community interests.
    

• Terms & Compensation

  • Three‑year terms; reappointment possible but not guaranteed.
    
  • Members serve without pay but may receive travel and per diem reimbursement.
    

• Meeting Schedule

  • Two in‑person meetings and one webinar per fiscal year.
    
  • Ongoing participation via conference calls and email.
    

• Application Process

  • Submit a résumé and nomination letter by August 3, 2026.
    
  • Nominations sent to Mr. Wayne Pullan, Bureau of Reclamation, Salt Lake City, or via email.
    
  • Governors must submit nominations on behalf of their states.
    

• Contact Information

  • Mr. William Stewart, Adaptive Management Group Chief, (385) 622‑2179 or email.
    
  • Tele‑relay services available for individuals with disabilities.

Alabama Power Seeks Approval for Coosa River Hydroelectric Expansion—Public Comment Window Opens

Overview
Alabama Power Company has filed a hydroelectric application with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) for the Coosa River Hydroelectric Project, specifically the Weiss Lake development in Cherokee County, Alabama. The application seeks authorization to use project lands and waters for new power generation facilities, and also includes a separate request for The Retreat at Spring Creek to build camper and utility pads, pole barns, and access roads. The notice invites federal, state, local, and tribal agencies with environmental expertise to cooperate in preparing environmental documents, while clarifying that cooperating agencies cannot intervene in the proceeding.

The filing is governed by the Federal Power Act and FERC’s Rules of Practice and Procedure. Comments, protests, and motions to intervene must be submitted electronically by July 29, 2026, 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time, or via paper mail. All submissions must include the docket number (P‑2146‑285) and comply with formatting and evidentiary requirements. FERC will consider all comments and protests, but only those who file a motion to intervene in accordance with the rules may become parties to the proceeding.

This notice underscores the importance of public participation and interagency collaboration in large-scale hydroelectric projects. It provides a clear timeline and procedural guidance for stakeholders to influence the project’s environmental and resource management outcomes.

Key Elements

• Project Scope: Coosa River Hydroelectric Project – Weiss Lake development; includes construction of eight camper pads, utility pads, concrete patios, two pole barns, and associated access roads and fencing.
  
• Docket Information: Project No. 2146‑285; application filed February 17, 2026; docket number P‑2146‑285.
  
• Public Participation:
  
  • Comments, protests, and motions to intervene must be filed by July 29, 2026, 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time.
    
  • Electronic filing via FERC eFiling system is strongly encouraged; paper filings accepted with specified mailing addresses.
    
  • Comments may be up to 6,000 characters; protests and interventions must include evidentiary basis.
    
• Intervention Rules: Only parties filing a motion to intervene per 18 CFR 385.210, 211, 214 may become parties; cooperating agencies cannot intervene.
  
• Agency Cooperation: Federal, state, local, and tribal agencies with environmental jurisdiction may assist in preparing environmental documents but must follow instructions in item k and cannot intervene.
  
• Compliance Requirements: All filings must bear the title “COMMENTS,” “PROTEST,” or “MOTION TO INTERVENE,” include applicant name, project number, contact information, and comply with 18 CFR 385.2001‑2005.
  
• Access to Documents: Application available on FERC’s website via the eLibrary link; agencies may obtain copies directly from the applicant.
  
• Contact Information: FERC Online Support (866‑208‑3676), TTY (202‑502‑8659); Office of Public Participation (202‑502‑6595).

Maine’s Penobscot River to Power Up: New Hydropower Project Opens Public Review

Overview

The U.S. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) has accepted a new major license application from Great Lakes Hydro America, LLC (GLHA) for the Penobscot Mills Hydroelectric Project. The project will be built on the West Branch of the Penobscot River and Millinocket Stream in Maine, comprising four run‑of‑river powerhouses, two storage impoundments, a fish passage facility, and battery energy storage. The total installed capacity is 67.9 MW, and the project is designed to operate as an integrated system with upstream storage projects such as the Ripogenus Project.

GLHA’s proposal includes a range of environmental and resource‑management commitments. These include maintaining minimum streamflows (60 cfs in Millinocket Stream and 2,000–3,000 cfs downstream of Shad Pond), operating a pool‑and‑weir fish passage at North Twin, preserving wetlands and wildlife habitat, and providing public access to lake level and streamflow data via an online portal. The company also plans to support eel passage studies, whitewater boating flows, and updated recreation and wildlife management plans.

The notice invites public participation. Comments, protests, motions to intervene, and preliminary fishway prescriptions must be filed by the specified deadlines (August 30 and October 12, 2026). Filings can be submitted electronically through FERC’s eFiling system or by paper. The Commission will review all submissions before proceeding with environmental analysis and further licensing steps.

Key Elements

• Applicant & Project: Great Lakes Hydro America, LLC; Penobscot Mills Hydroelectric Project (Project No. 2458‑273).
  
• Location: West Branch of the Penobscot River and Millinocket Stream, Piscataquis and Penobscot Counties, Maine.
  
• Capacity & Components:
  
  • Four run‑of‑river developments (North Twin, Millinocket, Dolby, East Millinocket).
    
  • Two storage impoundments (North Twin, Millinocket Lake Storage).
    
  • One pool‑and‑weir fish passage at North Twin.
    
  • Two battery energy storage sites.
    
  • Total rated capacity: 67.9 MW.
    
• Water‑Management Strategy:
  
  • Minimum flows: 60 cfs in Millinocket Stream; 2,000–3,000 cfs downstream of Shad Pond.
    
  • Seasonal storage elevations: North Twin (490.42 ft to 488.42 ft NGVD 29), Millinocket Lake Storage (470–480 ft).
    
• Environmental & Resource Commitments:
  
  • Operate and maintain fish passage and eel studies.
    
  • Preserve wetlands, wildlife habitat, and conservation buffers.
    
  • Provide public access to lake level and streamflow data.
    
  • Develop recreation, shoreline, and historic property management plans.
    
• Public Participation:
  
  • Filing deadlines: Aug 30 2026 (motions, protests, comments, etc.) and Oct 12 2026 (reply comments).
    
  • Electronic filing via FERC eFiling; paper filings accepted.
    
  • All submissions must include docket number P‑2458‑273 and comply with FERC rules.
    
• Next Steps: The application is now ready for environmental analysis; final amendments must be filed by July 29 2026.

FERC Opens the Floor: Public Input Needed on Wisconsin‑Michigan Natural Gas Pipeline Expansion

Overview
The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) has issued a notice to begin the scoping phase for the Northwoods Project, a proposed natural‑gas pipeline expansion by ANR Pipeline Company that would traverse 14 counties in Wisconsin and Iron County, Michigan. The scoping period invites comments on the environmental effects, alternatives, and mitigation measures that will shape the forthcoming environmental document, which FERC will use to decide whether the project is in the public convenience and necessity.

The project would add a 92‑mile, 36‑inch pipeline loop, a new compressor station, a meter station, and associated valves and pig launchers, disturbing roughly 1,526 acres during construction and maintaining about 633 acres thereafter. Most of the route parallels existing infrastructure, but the proposal includes crossings of federal and state lands, water bodies, wetlands, and habitats for threatened or endangered species. FERC’s environmental review will cover geology, soils, water resources, wildlife, cultural resources, land use, socioeconomics, air quality, noise, and pipeline reliability and safety.

Public participation is central to the process. Comments can be submitted electronically (eComment or eFiling), by mail, or orally at one of three scheduled scoping sessions in July. Landowners along the right‑of‑way may be approached for easements, and if agreements are not reached, eminent domain could be invoked. FERC also seeks cooperation from agencies with jurisdiction over environmental and historic resources and will consult under Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act.

Key Elements

• Scoping deadline: July 29, 2026, 5:00 p.m. ET.
  
• Comment methods: eComment, eFiling, mail, or oral scoping sessions (July 14–16, 2026).
  
• Project scope: 92 mi pipeline loop, 4,700‑hp compressor, meter station, valves, pig launchers/receivers, and modifications to 14 existing meter stations.
  
• Land disturbance: ~1,526 acres during construction; ~633 acres maintained permanently.
  
• Environmental focus areas: geology, soils, water resources, wetlands, vegetation, wildlife, threatened species, cultural resources, land use, recreation, visual resources, socioeconomics, air quality, noise, reliability, and safety.
  
• Eminent domain: ANR may seek condemnation if easement agreements fail; compensation determined by state law courts.
  
• Cooperating agencies: U.S. Forest Service, Wisconsin Department of Agriculture, Trade & Consumer Protection, and others invited to participate in the environmental document preparation.
  
• Section 106 consultation: FERC will engage state historic preservation offices and other stakeholders to assess impacts on historic properties.
  
• Intervention status: No intervenor requests accepted until ANR files a formal application; public can later become intervenors to challenge decisions.
  
• Information access: All documents, including the environmental document, will be available via FERC’s eLibrary and eSubscription services.

Ripogenus Hydroelectric Project Opens Public Review: A New Store‑and‑Release Facility on Maine’s Penobscot River

Overview
Great Lakes Hydro America, LLC (GLHA) has filed a new major license (Project No. 2572‑141) with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) for the Ripogenus Hydroelectric Project on the West Branch of the Penobscot River in Maine. The project will operate as a store‑and‑release facility, using a 795‑foot dam and a 29‑mile impoundment to store water and release it seasonally for power generation, flood control, and ecological flow maintenance. GLHA plans to maintain a 100‑cfs minimum flow during the summer, provide 400 cfs during generator outages, and support Atlantic salmon and brook trout habitat through a side channel and conservation buffers.

The application is now ready for environmental analysis under the Federal Power Act. FERC is soliciting motions to intervene, protests, comments, recommendations, preliminary terms and conditions, and preliminary fishway prescriptions. The public has until October 12, 2026 to submit written comments, and the agency will consider all submissions in its licensing decision. The project’s environmental and fishway plans are detailed in Exhibits A and B, and the full application is available on FERC’s eLibrary.

Key Elements

• Project Scope: 20.8‑mile impoundment, 29,270‑acre surface area, 688,705 acre‑feet usable storage, 44‑foot maximum drawdown.
  
• Power Generation: Three turbines totaling 37.5 MW, with a 29.4‑mile transmission line to the grid.
  
• Water Management: Seasonal minimum flow of 100 cfs (July 1–Sept 30), 12 cfs rest of year, 400 cfs during outages, 35–65 cfs diverted to Holbrook side channel for habitat.
  
• Environmental Measures: 200‑ft conservation buffer, 100‑ft vegetation buffer, maintenance of Umbazooksus Lake as wetland, U.S. Geological Survey flow gauge installation, public flow data on Brookfield Renewable’s SafeWaters website.
  
• Fishway Prescriptions: Preliminary fishway plans to be submitted; GLHA will provide habitat enhancements for Atlantic salmon and brook trout.
  
• Public Participation: Motions to intervene, protests, comments, recommendations, preliminary terms and conditions, and fishway prescriptions due by August 28, 2026; reply comments due October 12, 2026.
  
• Regulatory Framework: Filing under the Federal Power Act, compliance with FERC Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385), and water quality certification requirements.
  
• Timeline: Environmental analysis to commence immediately; final amendments due July 29, 2026; public comment period through October 2026.

Texas Border Expansion: DHS Waives Environmental Laws to Build New Barriers

Overview

The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has issued a determination under Section 102 of the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act (IIRIRA) to waive a broad array of federal, state, and local environmental, historic, and wildlife protection statutes. The waiver is aimed at expediting the construction of physical barriers and roads along a 120‑mile stretch of the U.S.–Mexico border in the Big Bend Sector of Texas, an area identified as having the highest rates of illegal crossings and drug smuggling in recent years.

The waiver covers key legislation such as the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), the Endangered Species Act, the Clean Water Act, the National Historic Preservation Act, and numerous other statutes that normally require environmental impact assessments, public comment, and compliance with wildlife and cultural resource protections. By suspending these requirements, DHS intends to accelerate the deployment of fencing, lighting, cameras, and sensors to achieve “operational control” of the border as mandated by Congress and the President’s Executive Order on Securing Our Borders.

For geoscientists, natural resource managers, and environmental professionals, the decision raises significant concerns about potential impacts on water resources, wildlife corridors, archaeological sites, and the broader ecological integrity of the region. The waiver also underscores the tension between national security priorities and environmental stewardship, a debate that will likely influence future policy and litigation in the field.

Key Elements

• Legal Authority: Section 102© of IIRIRA grants the Secretary the power to waive any legal requirements deemed necessary for expeditious border construction.
• Scope of Waiver: Includes NEPA, ESA, Clean Water Act, National Historic Preservation Act, Migratory Bird Acts, Clean Air Act, and numerous other federal statutes covering wildlife, cultural resources, and environmental protection.
• Project Area: Roughly 120 miles of the U.S.–Mexico border in the Big Bend Sector, Texas, defined by GPS coordinates 31.037623 N, 105.579877 W to 29.325866 N, 104.046466 W.
• Purpose: To install additional fencing, roads, lighting, cameras, and sensors to deter illegal crossings and drug smuggling, thereby achieving “operational control” of the border.
• Timeline: Determination effective July 2, 2026; construction to proceed without the usual environmental review or public comment periods.
• Implications for Natural Resources: Potential impacts on water flow, endangered species habitats, archaeological sites, and historic landmarks; removal of regulatory safeguards may accelerate ecological disturbance.
• Future Waivers: DHS reserves the right to issue additional waivers under Section 102 as needed, indicating a continuing strategy to prioritize border security over environmental compliance.

US Trade Commission Re‑examines Duties on Magnesia Carbon Bricks from China and Mexico

Overview

The U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) has launched its third five‑year review of the countervailing duty order on magnesia carbon bricks imported from China and the antidumping duty orders on bricks from both China and Mexico. The review, mandated by the Tariff Act of 1930, will assess whether revoking these duties would likely lead to continued or renewed material injury to U.S. producers within a foreseeable future. Magnesia carbon bricks—high‑purity magnesium oxide products used in refractory linings, steelmaking, and other industrial processes—have been subject to trade remedies since 2010 following concerns over unfair pricing and subsidies.

The ITC’s review process requires interested parties—including domestic producers, importers, exporters, unions, and trade associations—to submit detailed information by July 31, 2026. Comments on the adequacy of responses may be filed until September 8, 2026. All filings must be made electronically through the Commission’s Electronic Document Information System (EDIS). Failure to provide the requested data may result in adverse inferences against the party.

This review is significant for the geoscience and natural‑resource sectors because it directly affects the supply chain and pricing of a key mineral product used in high‑temperature industrial applications. The outcome will influence the competitiveness of U.S. manufacturers, the stability of the domestic magnesia market, and the broader trade dynamics with China and Mexico.

Key Elements

• Scope of Review

  • Countervailing duty order on magnesia carbon bricks from China.
    
  • Antidumping duty orders on bricks from China and Mexico.

• Legal Framework

  • Conducted under the Tariff Act of 1930, section 751©.
    
  • Third five‑year review following earlier reviews in 2016 and 2021.

• Timeline & Deadlines

  • Review instituted July 1, 2026.
    
  • Response deadline: July 31, 2026.
    
  • Comments on responses: September 8, 2026.

• Parties Involved

  • U.S. producers, importers, exporters of magnesia carbon bricks.
    
  • Unions, worker groups, trade/business associations.
    
  • Foreign producers and exporters of the product.

• Information Requested

  • Production, capacity, and sales data for 2025.
    
  • Import and export volumes and values.
    
  • Price effects, market demand, and supply conditions.
    
  • List of U.S. producers, importers, and major purchasers.

• Procedural Requirements

  • Electronic filings only via EDIS.
    
  • Certification of accuracy and completeness required.
    
  • Potential adverse inference if parties fail to respond.

• Implications for Geoscience & Natural Resources

  • Affects the availability and cost of magnesia, a critical mineral in refractory and steelmaking industries.
    
  • Influences domestic production capacity and competitiveness.
    
  • May alter trade flows and supply chain resilience for mineral‑based industrial products.

US Trade Commission Launches Five‑Year Review of Wind‑Tower Tariffs from India, Malaysia and Spain

Overview

The U.S. International Trade Commission (USITC) has announced a five‑year review of the countervailing and antidumping duty orders that were imposed on utility‑scale wind towers imported from India, Malaysia, and Spain. The review will assess whether revoking these duties would likely lead to continued or recurring material injury to the domestic wind‑tower industry. The orders, originally issued in 2021, cover the key structural components that support wind turbines in large‑scale wind farms.

Stakeholders—including U.S. wind‑tower manufacturers, importers, trade associations, and labor groups—are invited to submit detailed information by July 31, 2026. The Commission will evaluate the adequacy of responses and may conduct either an expedited or full review. Comments on the adequacy of submissions can be filed until September 8, 2026. The outcome of this review could reshape the U.S. supply chain for wind‑energy infrastructure, influencing costs, technology transfer, and the competitiveness of domestic producers.

For the renewable‑energy sector, the decision will determine whether foreign wind‑tower imports can continue to compete on price and technology, or whether protective duties will remain in place to safeguard U.S. manufacturing jobs and support the broader transition to clean energy.

Key Elements

• Scope of Review

  • Countervailing duty orders on wind towers from India and Malaysia.
    
  • Antidumping duty orders on wind towers from India, Malaysia, and Spain.
    

• Purpose

  • Determine if revoking the duties would cause material injury to the U.S. wind‑tower industry.
    

• Timeline

  • Review instituted July 1, 2026.
    
  • Responses due July 31, 2026.
    
  • Comments on adequacy due September 8, 2026.
    

• Who Can Participate

  • U.S. producers, importers, exporters, unions, trade associations, and other interested parties.
    

• Information Requested

  • Production, capacity, sales, and cost data for 2025.
    
  • Import volumes, values, and market share.
    
  • List of U.S. producers and importers, and major purchasers.
    
  • Analysis of supply‑side and demand‑side changes affecting wind‑tower markets.
    

• Process

  • Commission will assess adequacy of responses and decide between expedited or full review.
    
  • Findings will inform whether duties should be maintained, modified, or revoked.
    

• Implications for Geoscience & Energy Sectors

  • Potential impact on the availability and cost of wind‑tower components for large‑scale wind farms.
    
  • Influence on technology transfer and domestic manufacturing capacity.
    
  • Relevance to broader renewable‑energy policy and supply‑chain resilience.
    

• How to Respond

  • Submit electronic filings via the Commission’s Electronic Document Information System (EDIS).
    
  • Use the NOI worksheet template provided on the USITC website.
    

• Contact

  • Stamen Borisson, Office of Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW, Washington, DC 20436.
    

This review offers a critical opportunity for stakeholders in the wind‑energy and geoscience communities to shape U.S. trade policy and protect the domestic supply chain for renewable‑energy infrastructure.

USGS Seeks Public Input on Earth Mapping Data Collection for Mineral Resource Mapping

Overview

The U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) is renewing an information‑collection request under the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) to support the Earth Mapping Resources Initiative (Earth MRI). Earth MRI, authorized by the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (IIJA) and reinforced by Executive Order 14154, aims to modernize surface and subsurface geological mapping across the United States, with a focus on identifying critical mineral resources. The initiative is funded at $320 million per year for five years (FY 2022‑FY 2026) and involves cooperative agreements with state geological surveys.

The renewal request covers the data and reports that USGS must collect from state partners to monitor and manage these cooperative agreements. The information is required to ensure that funds are used in compliance with IIJA mandates and federal assistance regulations (2 CFR 200). The USGS estimates the total burden of this collection at roughly 2,600 hours of respondent effort, including preparation of three reports per state over a two‑year project period.

Comments on the proposed collection are invited until August 3, 2026. Stakeholders can submit feedback through the USGS docket system (USGS‑E&M‑2026‑0001) or by contacting the Information Collections Clearance Officer. The agency welcomes input on the necessity, accuracy, and potential burden‑reduction strategies for the data collection.

Key Elements

• Earth MRI Program – National effort to accelerate integrated geological, geochemical, and geophysical mapping for critical mineral discovery.
  
• Funding & Authority – $320 million annually (FY 2022‑FY 2026) under IIJA Section 40201; reinforced by Executive Order 14154.
  
• Cooperative Agreements – Competitive agreements with state geological surveys, each lasting up to two years, to carry out mine‑waste and mineral resource mapping.
  
• Information Collection – Renewal of OMB‑controlled collection (Control No. 1028‑0133) to track project progress, compliance, and outcomes.
  
• Burden Estimate – Approximately 2,600 respondent hours total, based on 25 states, three reports per state, and 8–20 hours per report.
  
• Compliance Requirements – Data collection supports adherence to IIJA mandates and federal assistance regulations (2 CFR 200).
  
• Public Comment Period – Open until August 3, 2026; submissions accepted via the USGS docket system or by contacting the Clearance Officer.
  
• Accessibility – Contact information provided for individuals with disabilities and international callers.

USGS Revamps Terrestrial Analog Survey to Better Serve Planetary Science Community

Overview

The U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) is renewing its “Terrestrial Analogs Survey,” a key information‑collection effort under the Paperwork Reduction Act. The survey gathers data on how scientists use Earth analog sites for planetary research, including field training, data sharing, and sample collection. By updating the questionnaire and revisiting the findings of the 2024 survey, the USGS aims to refine its support for the planetary science community and ensure that terrestrial analog resources meet evolving research needs.

The notice invites public and agency comments on the revised survey, its burden estimates, and potential improvements. Comments will be considered by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) when approving the collection. The deadline for submissions is August 31, 2026, and respondents can provide feedback through the USGS docket, mail, or email.

This renewal reflects the USGS’s commitment to reducing paperwork while enhancing the quality and relevance of data that informs geoscience, planetary exploration, and related natural‑resource research.

Key Elements

• OMB Control Number: 1028‑0140 (valid for the renewed collection).
  
• Survey Scope: 33 web‑based questions (<10 min to complete), covering respondent details, field analog use, data portal use, and geologic material collection.
  
• Response Volume: 248 participants in the previous cycle; the survey seeks to gauge current needs and assess the impact of earlier recommendations.
  
• Purpose: Evaluate the effectiveness of changes made after the 2024 survey and identify additional measures needed to support terrestrial analog research.
  
• Comment Period: Open to all by August 31, 2026; submissions accepted via the USGS docket (USGS‑2026‑0331), mail, or email (reference OMB number).
  
• Contact: Amber Gullikson, USGS Astrogeology Science Center, Flagstaff, AZ (phone 928‑556‑7009, email [redacted]).
  
• Accessibility: TTY/TDD services available for individuals with hearing or speech disabilities.
  
• Public Record: All comments become public; PII may be disclosed unless specifically requested to be withheld.
  
• Relevance: Findings will guide USGS policies on field site management, data portal enhancements, and sample collection protocols—critical for geoscientists, planetary scientists, and natural‑resource professionals.

Call for Stakeholder Voices: Missouri River Recovery Committee Seeks New Members

Overview

The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers’ Northwestern Division is inviting applications for stakeholder representative members of the Missouri River Recovery Implementation Committee (MRRIC). The MRRIC was created under the Water Resources Development Act of 2007 to advise the Corps on the Missouri River recovery and mitigation plan, coordinate policies and projects, and resolve interagency conflicts. The committee’s work supports flood control, navigation, conservation, and other interests across the Missouri River basin.

The Corps is accepting applications through July 31, 2026, for representatives in eight stakeholder categories: Agriculture, At‑Large, Conservation Districts, Flood Control, Irrigation, Local Government, Navigation, Recreation, and Water Supply. Applicants must submit a completed application, an endorsement letter, and a statement of expertise and commitment. Applications are reviewed by current committee members and forwarded to the Corps for appointment.

Stakeholder members serve three‑year terms (renewable) and are not compensated, though travel expenses are reimbursed. Applicants must disclose any conflicts of interest and agree to adhere to the MRRIC Charter, operating procedures, and collaboration training. The committee’s work is essential for balancing environmental, economic, and public‑interest goals along the Missouri River.

Key Elements

• Purpose of MRRIC: Advise on recovery/mitigation plan, coordinate policies, resolve conflicts, promote public‑interest goals.
  
• Stakeholder Categories: Agriculture, At‑Large, Conservation Districts, Flood Control, Irrigation, Local Government, Navigation, Recreation, Water Supply.
  
• Application Deadline: July 31, 2026 (close of business).
  
• Submission Requirements:
  
  1. Applicant name and stakeholder category.
     
  2. Statement of expertise and relevance.
     
  3. Statement of how participation fulfills MRRIC roles.
     
  4. Past collaborative experience and outcomes.
     
  5. Communication network plan.
     
  6. Endorsement letter from an organization or local government.
     
• Selection Criteria: Time commitment, balanced solutions, adherence to Charter, formal endorsement, communication network, willingness to attend collaboration training.
  
• Term Length: Three years, renewable without limit; incumbents need not re‑apply but must submit renewal requests.
  
• Compensation: None; travel expenses reimbursed.
  
• Conflict of Interest: Mandatory disclosure; members must avoid and disclose conflicts.
  
• Process: Applications forwarded to current MRRIC members, who recommend appointments to the Corps.
  
• Contact: Michelle McPherron, 402‑803‑0073, for additional information.

Topographic & Hydrography Data Grants: USGS Seeks Public Input on Renewed Information Collection

Overview

The U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) is renewing its information‑collection program that supports the 3D National Topography Model (3DNTM), a nationwide effort to modernize elevation and hydrography data. The 3DNTM builds on the 3D Elevation Program (3DEP) and the 3D Hydrography Program (3DHP), providing high‑resolution, freely accessible topographic and water‑way data for scientists, planners, and the public.

Under the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA), the USGS is inviting comments on the proposed collection, which will continue to gather details from applicants—federal agencies, state and local governments, tribal nations, academic institutions, and private sector partners—about their topographic data projects and cost‑sharing arrangements. The goal is to refine the data‑collection process, reduce respondent burden, and ensure the data remain useful for a broad range of geoscience and resource‑management applications.

The notice, effective July 2, 2026, offers a 60‑day comment period ending August 3, 2026. Respondents can submit feedback through the USGS docket system or directly to the Information Collections Clearance Officer. The USGS emphasizes that the collection is voluntary and seeks to streamline data submission, potentially through electronic or automated means.

Key Elements

• Renewal of Information Collection – The USGS is extending its existing PRA‑approved data‑collection request (OMB Control No. 1028‑0092).
  
• 3D National Topography Model (3DNTM) – A collaborative program that integrates 3DEP lidar and 3DHP hydrography data to deliver high‑resolution, publicly available topographic information.
  
• Grant Eligibility – Federal agencies, state/local governments, tribal nations, universities, and private entities can apply for topographic and hydrography data grants under the 3DNTM framework.
  
• Estimated Burden – The collection is estimated to require 80 hours of respondent effort annually, with an anticipated 3,280 responses.
  
• Voluntary Participation – Respondents are not required to submit information unless the collection has a valid OMB control number.
  
• Public Comment Period – Comments are solicited until August 3, 2026, via the USGS docket system or by contacting the Information Collections Clearance Officer.
  
• Data Utility – The program supports federal mandates such as the National Landslide Preparedness Act and the Geospatial Data Act of 2018, ensuring that geospatial data are shared, maintained, and preserved for broad scientific and operational use.
  
• Technology Integration – The USGS encourages the use of electronic, automated, or other technological methods to reduce paperwork and improve data quality.

U.S. Declares Fertilizer Emergency, Opens Door to Duty‑Free Imports from Morocco

Overview
The United States has declared a national emergency over the availability of phosphate fertilizers, a critical input for corn, soybeans, wheat, and other major crops. Recent disruptions in global supply chains—stemming from conflicts in fertilizer‑producing regions and trade actions by key exporters—have threatened to curtail the timely delivery of these nutrients to U.S. farms. With domestic production falling short of demand, the administration seeks to secure an alternative source to safeguard food production, economic stability, and national security.

To address the crisis, President Donald J. Trump invoked Section 318 of the Tariff Act of 1930, authorizing the Secretary of the Treasury and the Secretary of Commerce to permit duty‑free importation of phosphate fertilizers from Morocco for up to eight months or until the emergency ends. The proclamation empowers these officials to waive duties, extend processing times, and coordinate with Homeland Security to monitor the situation, while also requiring periodic reporting to Congress.

The move underscores the importance of diversified fertilizer supply chains and highlights the role of international trade policy in protecting domestic agriculture. It also signals a temporary but significant shift in U.S. import policy, allowing Morocco to become a key partner in meeting the nation’s fertilizer needs during a period of heightened global uncertainty.

Key Elements

• Emergency Declaration – Formal recognition of a threat to U.S. fertilizer supply under Section 318 of the Tariff Act.
  
• Duty‑Free Import Authorization – Permits the importation of Moroccan phosphate fertilizers without duties or deposits for up to eight months.
  
• Authority and Coordination – The Treasury and Commerce Secretaries, after consulting with Homeland Security, may issue regulations and extend processing times as needed.
  
• Monitoring and Reporting – Continuous assessment of the emergency’s status, with mandatory updates to the President and reporting to Congress.
  
• Domestic Production Gap – Acknowledges that U.S. fertilizer output cannot meet current demand, necessitating external sourcing.
  
• Supply Chain Diversification – Emphasizes the strategic need to reduce reliance on a single foreign supplier amid geopolitical and trade disruptions.
  
• Legal Framework – The proclamation supersedes conflicting prior orders and is subject to appropriations and existing statutory authority.

NASA Streamlines Environmental Review Rules to Keep Space and Earth Science Projects on Track

Overview

NASA has issued an interim final rule that revokes its old National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) implementing regulations and replaces them with a new set of procedures. The change was prompted by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s removal of its own NEPA rules and recent congressional amendments that clarified the statutory framework. By updating its regulations, NASA aims to eliminate confusion, provide clear guidance to project proponents—both federal and non‑federal—and ensure that environmental documents are prepared efficiently and consistently across the agency’s diverse portfolio of space, aeronautics, and Earth‑science activities.

The rule, effective August 17 2026, introduces a revised list of categorical exclusions, tighter page limits for environmental assessments and impact statements, and streamlined deadlines. It also codifies NASA’s approach to cooperating with other federal, state, tribal, and local agencies, and clarifies procedures for non‑federal sponsors who wish to prepare NEPA documents under NASA’s supervision. Comments are invited until July 31 2026, after which the rule will take effect.

For scientists, engineers, and stakeholders involved in NASA’s missions—from launch vehicle development to planetary sample return—this update means a more predictable and transparent environmental review process. The new regulations maintain NEPA’s core purpose—ensuring that environmental impacts are considered in decision‑making—while reducing administrative burden and aligning NASA’s practices with the latest statutory and executive‑order guidance.

Key Elements

• Rescission and Re‑promulgation – NASA’s previous NEPA rules are withdrawn and replaced with a new interim final rule that reflects the current statutory landscape.
  
• Updated Categorical Exclusions – The rule incorporates 19 exclusions adopted from other federal agencies (e.g., FRA, DOE, USCG) and removes two administrative exclusions that no longer meet NEPA’s definition of a major federal action.
  
• Procedural Clarity – Clear guidance on determining when NEPA applies, the appropriate level of review (categorical exclusion, environmental assessment, or impact statement), and the roles of lead, cooperating, and participating agencies.
  
• Page and Deadline Limits – Environmental assessments are capped at 75 pages; impact statements at 150 pages (300 for extraordinary complexity). Deadlines are set at one year for assessments and two years for impact statements, with provisions for extensions if necessary.
  
• Integration with Other Laws – NASA is required to coordinate NEPA reviews with other environmental statutes (e.g., Clean Water Act, Endangered Species Act) and to combine documents where feasible to reduce duplication.
  
• Non‑Federal Sponsor Procedures – Non‑federal entities can prepare NEPA documents under NASA’s supervision, with defined responsibilities for scope, public engagement, and mitigation.
  
• Emergency Provisions – NASA may take immediate action in emergencies, with a requirement to mitigate foreseeable impacts and to notify the Council on Environmental Quality if significant impacts are expected.
  
• Public Participation – Notices of intent, availability, and record of decision are to be posted on NASA’s public‑facing website, and public comments are solicited throughout the review process.
  
• Regulatory Compliance – The rule meets Executive Order 12866 and 13563 requirements, has no significant economic impact on small entities, and does not impose new mandates on states or tribes.
  

These provisions collectively aim to make NASA’s environmental review process more efficient, transparent, and aligned with the agency’s evolving mission in space exploration, aeronautics research, and Earth‑science studies.

Susquehanna Basin Commission Opens July 30 Hearing on Water Use Projects and Sustainable Fund Policy

Overview
The Susquehanna River Basin Commission (SRBC) will hold a public hearing on July 30, 2026, to solicit oral and written comments on a slate of water‑use projects and a proposed revision to its Sustainable Water Resources Fund Policy. The hearing will be conducted both in person at the SRBC office in Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, and via telephone, providing broad access for stakeholders across the basin.

The projects under review involve both groundwater withdrawals (ranging from 0.051 mgd to 1.300 mgd) and surface‑water withdrawals (up to 7.200 mgd) from a variety of users—including municipal authorities, private water companies, and industrial facilities—in Pennsylvania and New York. The SRBC will consider these applications at its next business meeting on September 16, 2026. The hearing is the sole opportunity for oral testimony; written comments must be submitted by August 10, 2026.

This notice underscores the Commission’s role in balancing water supply needs with sustainable basin management. The updated Sustainable Water Resources Fund Policy aims to replace the 2016 policy, potentially altering how water‑use fees and conservation incentives are structured for the basin’s stakeholders.

Key Elements

• Hearing details: July 30, 2026, 5:00 p.m.–8:00 p.m. (or until testimony ends); in person at 4423 N Front St., Harrisburg, PA, and by phone (toll‑free 1‑877‑304‑9269, passcode 2619070).
  
• Public participation: Oral comments only at this hearing; written comments due August 10, 2026 (mail or electronic).
  
• Projects reviewed:
  
  • Groundwater withdrawals up to 1.300 mgd (e.g., Mount Joy Borough Authority, Williamsport Municipal Water Authority).
    
  • Surface‑water withdrawals up to 7.200 mgd (e.g., Greek Peak Holdings, Expand Operating LLC).
    
  • Consumptive uses up to 1.584 mgd (e.g., Greek Peak Holdings).
    
  • A mix of municipal, industrial, and recreational users across PA and NY.
    
• Policy focus: Proposed revision of the Sustainable Water Resources Fund Policy, replacing the 2016 version to potentially adjust fee structures and conservation incentives.
  
• Decision timeline: Projects and policy to be addressed at the SRBC’s September 16, 2026 business meeting.
  
• Contact information: Andrew Zerby, Assistant Counsel (717‑238‑0423); further details on the SRBC website and the Water Application and Approval Viewer.

IRS Seeks Public Input on Oil & Gas Reserves Reporting Rules

Overview

The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) has issued a notice inviting comments on an information‑collection request related to the “Probable or Prospective Reserves Safe Harbor.” This safe‑harbor provision, established by Revenue Procedure 2004‑19, allows oil and gas producers to estimate the reserves of their properties for cost‑depletion calculations without conducting a full technical appraisal.

Under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, the IRS is asking the public—particularly those in the geoscience, energy, and natural‑resource sectors—to evaluate whether the current reporting requirements are necessary, practical, and efficient. The agency seeks feedback on the burden of the collection, potential improvements, and ways to reduce respondent effort through automation or other technologies.

The notice indicates that the existing collection will be extended without substantive changes, and that the estimated burden is 30 minutes per filing and 50 hours of total effort for respondents. Comments must be submitted by August 31, 2026, and will be made publicly available.

Key Elements

• Safe‑Harbor Election: Taxpayers may file an election statement to use the safe‑harbor method for estimating oil and gas reserves under § 611 of the Internal Revenue Code.
  
• No Change to Existing Collection: The IRS is merely extending the current information‑collection request; no new reporting requirements are being introduced.
  
• Estimated Burden: 30 minutes per filing, with an overall estimate of 50 hours of effort for respondents.
  
• Target Respondents: Business or other for‑profit organizations involved in oil and gas production.
  
• OMB Control Number: 1545‑1861 (Rev. Proc. 2004‑19).
  
• Comment Period: Written comments due by August 31, 2026; must include OMB control number in the subject line.
  
• Public Record: All comments will be publicly accessible; confidential information should not be included.
  
• Feedback Focus: Necessity and utility of the collection, accuracy of burden estimates, quality and clarity of information, burden‑reduction strategies (e.g., automation), and cost estimates for implementing the collection.
  
• Contact Information: Andres Garcia (mail) or email; additional inquiries to Marcus W. McCrary (phone).

U.S. Sanctions Target Rwandan Mining Firms Linked to DRC Conflict

The U.S. Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) has added several Rwandan individuals and mining companies to its Specially Designated Nationals and Blocked Persons (SDN) List. The action, issued on June 25 2026, blocks all property and interests in property under U.S. jurisdiction and prohibits U.S. persons from engaging in transactions with the designated parties. The sanctions are imposed under Executive Order 13413, amended to address the conflict in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC), and aim to curb illicit natural‑resource trade that fuels armed groups.

Key entities named include Gasabo Gold Refinery Ltd., a mining‑and‑refining firm, and several mining companies—Bugambira Mines Ltd., RwinkwavU Mining Corp., and Wolfram Mining & Processing Ltd.—all linked to individuals Jean Malic Kalima Karekezi and Bosco Kayobotsi. The designations cite ownership or control relationships, material support to the M23 rebel group, and involvement in the illicit trade of DRC natural resources. The notice also lists two individuals, both Rwandan nationals, who are connected to the same mining network.

For professionals in geoscience, energy, and natural‑resource sectors, the sanctions signal that any business dealings—direct or indirect—with these entities or their affiliates are prohibited under U.S. law. The SDN List and detailed sanctions information are publicly available on the OFAC website, and inquiries can be directed to OFAC’s Global Targeting, Licensing, or Sanctions Compliance offices.

Key Elements

• Designated Parties:

  • Individuals: Jean Malic Kalima Karekezi, Bosco Kayobotsi.
    
  • Entities: Gasabo Gold Refinery Ltd., Bugambira Mines Ltd., RwinkwavU Mining Corp., Wolfram Mining & Processing Ltd.

• Sector Focus: Mining and gold refining of non‑ferrous metals, with links to illicit trade in DRC natural resources.

• Legal Basis: Executive Order 13413 (and amendments), targeting persons contributing to the DRC conflict and supporting armed groups such as M23.

• Implications for U.S. Persons:

  • All property and interests in property under U.S. jurisdiction are blocked.
    
  • Prohibition on any transactions, including trade, investment, or financial services, with the designated parties.

• Geoscience & Natural‑Resource Relevance:

  • Highlights the role of natural‑resource exploitation in financing conflict.
    
  • Signals increased scrutiny for companies involved in mining operations in conflict‑affected regions.

• Contact & Resources:

  • OFAC Global Targeting: 202‑622‑2420
    
  • OFAC Licensing: 202‑622‑2480
    
  • OFAC Sanctions Compliance: 202‑622‑2490
    
  • SDN List available online at the OFAC website.

New Mississippi‑Alabama Pipeline Expansion Faces Environmental Review

Overview
The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) has released the final Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for two major natural‑gas projects: the Mississippi Crossing Project (MSX) and the South System Expansion 4 (SSE4). MSX will add roughly 208 miles of pipeline and associated compressor and meter stations across Mississippi and Alabama, while SSE4 will add about 291 miles of new pipeline loops and upgrade 14 existing compressor stations across Mississippi, Alabama, and Georgia. Both projects aim to increase the capacity of the regional gas transmission network to meet growing demand.

The EIS, prepared under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), evaluates the potential environmental effects of construction and operation, identifies reasonable alternatives, and recommends mitigation measures. The Commission concludes that, with the proposed avoidance, minimization, and mitigation actions, any adverse impacts would be less than significant. The document is available electronically on FERC’s website and is intended to inform the agency’s decision on whether the projects meet the public convenience and necessity standard under the Natural Gas Act.

Public participation is a key component of the review. FERC has distributed the EIS to federal, state, and local agencies, elected officials, environmental groups, Native American tribes, landowners, and the general public. Stakeholders can submit comments, interventions, or rehearing requests through FERC’s Office of Public Participation.

Key Elements

• Project Scope
  • MSX: ~208 miles of new 42‑inch and 36‑inch pipelines, 3 new compressor stations, 4 new meter stations, and related facilities in Mississippi and Alabama.
  • SSE4: ~291 miles of 22 new pipeline loops, upgrades to 14 existing compressor stations, 3 new meter stations, and modifications to 7 existing meters across Mississippi, Alabama, and Georgia.
• Environmental Assessment
  • NEPA‑compliant EIS identifies limited adverse effects; mitigation measures aim to keep impacts less than significant.
  • Cooperating agencies include the Army Corps of Engineers, EPA, Fish and Wildlife Service, National Park Service, NOAA, and state conservation departments.
• Regulatory Framework
  • FERC is the lead federal agency under the Natural Gas Act (NGA) for authorizing interstate transmission facilities and preparing the EIS.
  • The Commission will evaluate economic need and environmental effects before issuing a Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity.
• Public Involvement
  • EIS distributed to government entities, elected officials, environmental groups, tribes, landowners, and the public.
  • Comments and interventions can be submitted via FERC’s Office of Public Participation; eLibrary and eSubscription services provide ongoing updates.
• Mitigation Measures
  • Pipeline routing to avoid sensitive habitats, use of existing rights‑of‑way where possible.
  • Installation of compressor stations with specified horsepower limits and overpressure protection.
  • Abandonment of obsolete pipeline segments (e.g., 4.4 miles of SNG’s K Gen Lateral) to reduce legacy impacts.

Texas Gas Seeks Public Input on New Indiana‑Ohio Pipeline Lateral

Overview
Texas Gas Transmission, LLC has announced a scoping period to gather public and agency comments on the environmental impacts of its proposed Dearborn County Lateral Project. The project would build an approximately 12‑mile, 20‑inch natural‑gas pipeline and associated facilities across Dearborn County, Indiana; Boone County, Kentucky; and Hamilton County, Ohio. The pipeline would provide up to 265,000 dekatherms per day of firm transportation capacity to support the conversion of Vistra Corp.’s Miami‑Fort Power Plant from coal to natural gas.

The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) will use the scoping input to focus its National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) analysis on the most significant environmental issues. The Commission will prepare either an Environmental Assessment (EA) or an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) that will evaluate impacts on geology, soils, water resources, wetlands, wildlife, endangered species, cultural resources, land use, air quality, noise, and reliability and safety. Public comments are due by 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on July 27, 2026.

Land disturbance is expected to be about 199 acres during construction, with 76 acres retained for permanent operation. Texas Gas will negotiate easements with landowners, but if agreements cannot be reached, the company may invoke eminent domain under the Natural Gas Act. The project also triggers consultation under Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act to assess potential effects on historic properties.

Key Elements

• Project scope: 11.8‑mile, 20‑inch pipeline from Dearborn County, Indiana to Hamilton County, Ohio; tie‑ins, pig launcher, measurement station, and pig receiver.
• Capacity: Up to 265,000 dekatherms/day of firm natural‑gas transport.
• Geographic reach: Indiana, Kentucky, Ohio (Dearborn, Boone, Hamilton counties).
• Land use: ~199 acres disturbed; ~76 acres retained; remainder restored.
• NEPA focus areas: geology, soils, water resources, wetlands, vegetation, wildlife, endangered species, cultural resources, land use, air quality, noise, reliability, safety.
• Public comment deadline: July 27, 2026 (5:00 p.m. ET).
• Eminent domain: Potential for condemnation if easement agreements fail; compensation determined by state courts.
• Agency cooperation: FERC invites cooperating agencies to participate in environmental document preparation.
• Historic preservation: Section 106 consultation with state historic preservation offices and other stakeholders.
• Submission methods: eComment, eFiling, or paper mail to FERC; eSubscription available for updates.

Alaska’s Tyee Lake Hydroelectric Project Moves Forward: FERC Approves Traditional Licensing Path

The Southeast Alaska Power Agency (SEAPA) has announced its intent to file a new license application for the Tyee Lake Hydroelectric Project, a proposed power plant situated near the head of Bradfield Canal in the Tongass National Forest. The project will harness hydroelectric power on federal land managed by the U.S. Forest Service, aiming to expand renewable energy capacity in Southeast Alaska.

On April 29 2026, SEAPA submitted a request to use the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission’s (FERC) Traditional Licensing Process, a streamlined pathway that allows the agency to conduct informal consultations with federal and state partners before formal licensing. The request was publicly announced on June 22 2026, and the FERC Director approved it on June 25 2026. SEAPA has also filed a Pre‑Application Document (PAD) outlining its proposed process plan and schedule, which is publicly available through FERC’s eLibrary.

The notice triggers required consultations under the Endangered Species Act, the Magnuson‑Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act, and the National Historic Preservation Act. SEAPA will work with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, the National Marine Fisheries Service, and the Alaska State Historic Preservation Officer to assess environmental and historic impacts. The agency plans to submit a full license application by July 31 2029, 24 months before the current license expires, and invites public participation through FERC’s Office of Public Participation.

Key Elements

• Project: Tyee Lake Hydroelectric Project, 40 mi southeast of Wrangell, Alaska, on federal Tongass National Forest land.
  
• Agency: Southeast Alaska Power Agency (SEAPA).
  
• Licensing Path: Traditional Licensing Process approved by FERC (June 25 2026).
  
• Pre‑Application Document: Filed with FERC; includes process plan and schedule; accessible via FERC eLibrary.
  
• Consultations:
  
  • U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Section 7 ESA).
    
  • National Marine Fisheries Service (Section 305(b) Magnuson‑Stevens Act).
    
  • Alaska State Historic Preservation Officer (Section 106 NHPA).
    
• Timeline: Full license application due July 31 2029, 24 months before existing license expiration.
  
• Public Participation: Contact FERC Office of Public Participation (202‑502‑6595) for comments, interventions, or rehearing requests.
  
• Contact Information: SEAPA – Mark Hilson (907‑228‑2017); FERC Online Support – 866‑208‑3676 (toll‑free).

Saranac Lake’s Lake Flower Dam: A Community‑Powered Hydropower Review

Overview

The Village of Saranac Lake has filed a hydroelectric license with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) for the Lake Flower Dam on the Saranac River. The application, now open for environmental analysis, invites public comments, recommendations, terms and conditions, and prescriptions through August 25 – October 9, 2026. The filing is part of the village’s effort to continue operating the existing dam in a run‑of‑river mode while enhancing recreation and protecting local wildlife.

The proposed project centers on a 134‑foot‑long, 33‑foot‑high concrete dam that creates a 1,455‑acre reservoir at 1,528.67 ft NGVD 29. Water is diverted through a 200‑kW Kaplan turbine‑generator, then returned to the river via a tailrace. The power is fed into the grid through underground lines and a 13.2‑kV overhead segment. In addition to energy production, the village plans to maintain existing parks, develop a new whitewater park downstream, and implement comprehensive environmental plans for invasive species, bats, bald eagles, impoundment drawdown, and monitoring.

Stakeholders—including local residents, environmental groups, and industry participants—can access the full application online via FERC’s eLibrary or in person at the Saranac Free Library. Comments may be submitted electronically or by paper, with strict formatting and service‑list requirements. The village must also submit water‑quality certification documents by August 25, and any final amendments by July 26, ensuring compliance with federal regulations.

Key Elements

• Project Scope: Lake Flower Dam on the Saranac River, 134 ft long, 33 ft high, 49‑ft spillway, 1,455‑acre reservoir.
  
• Power Generation: 200‑kW Kaplan turbine‑generator, 13.2‑kV transmission line to the grid.
  
• Operational Mode: Run‑of‑river, maintaining reservoir at 1,528.67 ft NGVD 29, minimum downstream flow of 55 cfs.
  
• Recreation Facilities: Riverside, Hydropoint, Beaver, and River Walk parks; planned Boothe River whitewater park.
  
• Environmental Plans: Invasive species management, bat and bald eagle protection, impoundment drawdown, and compliance monitoring.
  
• Public Participation: Comment period from August 25 – October 9, 2026; electronic filing encouraged; paper submissions accepted.
  
• Documentation Requirements: Water‑quality certification or waiver, request for certification, proof of receipt, and final amendments due by July 26, 2026.
  
• Access to Records: Full application available on FERC’s eLibrary and at the Saranac Free Library.
  
• Regulatory Framework: Federal Power Act, FERC Rules of Practice and Procedure, and 18 CFR 385.2001‑385.2005.

U.S. EPA Eyes New Water‑Quality Watchdog: UCMR 6 Will Track 30+ Emerging Contaminants

Overview
The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has proposed the Sixth Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Rule (UCMR 6) under the Safe Drinking Water Act. The rule would expand national monitoring to include 30+ contaminants that are not yet regulated, such as ultrashort organofluorine compounds (including certain PFAS), pesticide metabolites, semivolatile organic compounds, and purgeable organics. By requiring public water systems to collect and share occurrence data, the EPA aims to build a comprehensive evidence base that can inform future regulatory decisions and protect public health.

The proposal targets community and non‑transient non‑community water systems serving 3,300 or more people, and a representative sample of smaller systems. Data collected will be publicly available, enabling researchers, policymakers, and the public to assess exposure risks and trends. The EPA is inviting comments by August 31, 2026, and will hold two virtual public meetings on August 11 and 12 to discuss the rule.

Key Elements
- Expanded contaminant list: 7 ultrashort organofluorine compounds, 3 pesticide metabolites, 13 semivolatile organics, 7 purgeable organics.
- Targeted systems: All community and non‑transient non‑community systems with ≥3,300 users; representative sampling of smaller systems.
- Data transparency: All monitoring results will be made publicly available, supporting scientific research and public awareness.
- Regulatory impact: While the contaminants are currently unregulated, the data will guide potential future primary drinking water regulations.
- Public engagement: Two virtual webinars (Aug 11 & 12) for stakeholder input; comments due Aug 31, 2026.
- Administrative details: Comments must reference docket ID EPA‑HQ‑OW‑2023‑0469; Paperwork Reduction Act submissions due Jul 31, 2026.

President Grants One‑Year Water‑Pollution Exemption for Air Force Golf Course Rehab

Overview
On June 26 2026, the President issued a determination exempting the Department of the Air Force’s rehabilitation and revitalization of the Joint Base Andrews Golf Course in Maryland from federal, state, interstate, and local water‑pollution control requirements for a one‑year period. The exemption applies to every effluent source associated with the project, allowing the Air Force to proceed without obtaining the usual permits under the Clean Water Act.

The determination is grounded in Section 313 of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (the Clean Water Act) and explicitly states that it does not waive other environmental obligations, including those under 33 U.S.C. 1316 and 1317. The exemption is limited to the specified timeframe (June 26 2026 – June 26 2027) and does not alter the applicability of other federal, state, or local environmental laws that may still apply to the project.

The Secretary of the Air Force is directed to publish this determination in the Federal Register, ensuring transparency and public notice. The decision reflects a temporary, targeted approach to facilitate the golf course’s rehabilitation while maintaining overall environmental oversight.

Key Elements

• Scope of Exemption – All effluent sources linked to the golf‑course rehabilitation are exempt from water‑pollution control requirements.
  
• Duration – One‑year period from June 26 2026 to June 26 2027.
  
• Legal Basis – Section 313 of the Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C. 1323).
  
• Exceptions – No exemption from the requirements of 33 U.S.C. 1316 and 1317 (permit and enforcement provisions).
  
• Preservation of Other Laws – The exemption does not waive other environmental regulations or permit obligations unrelated to water pollution control.
  
• Publication Requirement – The Secretary of the Air Force must publish the determination in the Federal Register.
  
• Administrative Authority – The exemption applies to federal, state, interstate, and local administrative authorities and sanctions concerning water‑pollution control.

EU’s Big Clean‑Up: Simplifying Rules to Boost Green Competitiveness

Overview

The European Economic and Social Committee (EESC) has issued an opinion on a sweeping package of legislative proposals aimed at reducing administrative burdens while preserving the EU’s high environmental standards. The initiative, part of the Commission’s “Simplifying for Sustainable Competitiveness” agenda, seeks to streamline a range of regulations that govern batteries, packaging, waste, industrial emissions, and environmental assessments. By amending existing directives and suspending certain obligations—such as the requirement for an authorised representative in extended producer responsibility (EPR) schemes—the EU intends to make compliance easier for businesses, especially small and medium‑sized enterprises (SMEs), and to accelerate the green transition.

The EESC stresses that simplification must not come at the cost of environmental protection. It calls for rigorous ex‑ante impact assessments, digital harmonisation of reporting systems, and the “once‑only” principle, whereby data are collected once and reused across multiple regulatory frameworks. The committee also highlights the need for clear guidance, adequate funding, and a focus on the internal market to avoid fragmentation and ensure that all Member States implement the rules consistently.

Overall, the proposal represents a coordinated effort to balance regulatory efficiency with the EU’s commitments to climate action, biodiversity protection, and responsible consumption and production (SDG 12 and SDG 15). The EESC’s recommendations aim to strengthen the policy’s effectiveness, safeguard worker and public health, and support the resilience of European industry in a rapidly evolving global market.

Key Elements

• Regulatory Amendments

  • Amend Regulation (EU) 2023/1542 and Regulation (EU) 2024/1244 to simplify reporting and reduce duplication.
    
  • Amend Directives 2008/98/EC, 2010/75/EU, ²⁰¹⁵⁄₂₁₉₃, and ²⁰²⁴⁄₁₇₈₅ to streamline requirements for waste, industrial emissions, and environmental assessments.
    

• Suspension of Authorised Representative Rules

  • Temporarily lift the requirement for an authorised representative in EPR schemes for batteries, packaging, waste, WEEE, and single‑use plastics, giving Member States flexibility until 2035.
    

• Speed‑Up Environmental Assessments

  • Introduce a new Regulation to accelerate the environmental assessment process while maintaining comprehensive project‑specific reviews.
    

• Digital and Reporting Simplification

  • Promote the “once‑only” principle and interoperable digital platforms to avoid multiple data submissions across different directives.
    

• Support for SMEs and Circular Economy

  • Provide technical and financial assistance, especially for SMEs, to meet new simplified obligations.
    
  • Recognise deposit‑return schemes and reuse initiatives in the hospitality sector to avoid duplication of packaging targets.
    

• EESC Recommendations

  • Require ex‑ante and ex‑post impact assessments covering climate, biodiversity, health, and competitiveness.
    
  • Ensure at least 12‑week public consultation periods and early, clear guidance from EU institutions.
    
  • Maintain high environmental standards while allowing proportionality and flexibility in permitting and authorisation procedures.
    

• Geoscience and Natural Resource Focus

  • Address industrial emissions, waste management, and packaging regulations that directly affect land use, soil, water, and mineral resources.
    
  • Encourage harmonised end‑of‑waste criteria and mutual recognition across Member States to reduce market fragmentation.
    

These provisions collectively aim to make EU environmental law more coherent, predictable, and business‑friendly, while keeping the Union on track to meet its climate and biodiversity targets.

Anti‑Dumping Probe into Chinese Alkaline Manganese‑Dioxide Batteries

Overview

The European Commission has opened an anti‑dumping investigation into primary cells and batteries made from alkaline manganese‑dioxide that are imported from the People’s Republic of China. The complaint, lodged by German battery maker VARTA, alleges that these products are sold in the EU at prices below their true cost, harming European manufacturers and potentially leading to job losses.

The investigation will cover imports from 1 July 2025 to 30 June 2026, with a broader trend analysis from 1 January 2023. It will assess whether dumping has occurred, whether it has injured the EU industry, and whether any raw‑material distortions (particularly in the supply of electrolytic manganese‑dioxide) warrant special treatment. The Commission will also evaluate whether imposing duties would be in the EU’s interest.

Stakeholders—including exporters, importers, EU producers, users, and consumer groups—can submit evidence, comment on the complaint, and request hearings. The Commission may sample companies to keep the investigation within statutory time limits and will register imports early, potentially leading to retroactive duties.

Key Elements

• Complaint basis: VARTA claims dumping and injury, citing significant price distortions linked to state influence in China’s battery sector.
• Dumping assessment: Uses a representative country (Thailand) to construct a normal value; dumping margins are expected to be substantial.
• Raw‑material distortions: Focus on electrolytic manganese‑dioxide (EMD), a key input costing >17 % of production, with evidence of VAT refund reductions and lower prices than in comparable markets.
• Injury and causation: Evidence of rising import volumes, market share gains, price pressure, and inventory build‑ups that hurt EU producers’ sales, profitability, and employment.
• Sampling procedures: Exporters, importers, and EU producers may be sampled to streamline data collection; non‑cooperative parties risk less favorable findings.
• Union interest test: The Commission will determine whether duties would benefit the EU, considering raw‑material supply chains and potential market distortions.
• Timeline: Investigation to conclude within 14 months; provisional duties could be imposed within 7–8 months; stakeholders have specific windows to comment and request hearings.
• Data and confidentiality: Parties must submit information via the TRON platform, with provisions for sensitive data and non‑disclosure agreements.
• Potential outcomes: If dumping and injury are confirmed, anti‑dumping duties may be levied; if raw‑material distortions are significant, duties could be adjusted accordingly.

This proceeding highlights the intersection of trade policy, industrial competitiveness, and the geoscience of critical raw materials—particularly manganese—central to battery technology and the broader transition to low‑carbon energy systems.

EU’s Battery Booster Strategy: A Call for Stronger Financing, Sustainability, and Worker Safety

The European Economic and Social Committee (EESC) has issued an opinion on the Commission’s Battery Booster Strategy, a €1.5 billion initiative aimed at securing the EU’s strategic autonomy in battery production. The strategy seeks to strengthen the entire battery value chain—from raw‑material extraction and chemical synthesis to cell manufacturing, energy‑storage systems, and recycling—while supporting the transition to climate‑neutral mobility and energy systems. The EESC welcomes the focus on financing and industrial resilience but stresses that the strategy must be backed by a credible, long‑term funding plan, broadened to include non‑electric‑vehicle batteries, and coupled with robust environmental, social, and safety standards.

Key elements highlighted by the EESC include:

• Enhanced EU Financing: Call for larger, predictable EU funding (e.g., through the Innovation Fund, Multiannual Financial Framework) and targeted support for critical raw‑material projects and battery‑critical chemicals.
• Holistic Value‑Chain Coverage: Inclusion of stationary battery energy‑storage systems (BESS), sodium‑based chemistries, and recycling infrastructure to reduce dependency on imported materials.
• SME and Circular Economy Support: Targeted assistance for small and medium‑sized enterprises, recycling operators, and second‑life applications, ensuring a balanced geographic distribution of investment.
• Technology Transfer and Local Content: Development of frameworks that mandate technology transfer, local R&D, and workforce skills in joint ventures and foreign investments to avoid becoming a mere assembly hub.
• Health, Safety, and Social Standards: Mandatory occupational safety measures, worker training, and social dialogue; conditional public funding on compliance with EU labour and environmental regulations.
• Recycling and Waste Management: Investment in next‑generation recycling technologies, harmonised collection systems, and enforcement of hazardous waste classification to secure a circular supply chain.
• Market‑Level Safety Standards: Dedicated workstreams for battery material safety (e.g., flammability tests, pack‑level propagation) and alignment with EU and international norms to prevent market fragmentation.

These provisions aim to transform the EU’s battery sector into a competitive, sustainable, and socially responsible industry that can meet climate targets while safeguarding workers and the environment.

Norway Opens 2026 Petroleum Licence Window on the Continental Shelf

Overview

Norway’s Ministry of Energy has announced a new round of petroleum production licences for the 2026 Awards in Predefined Areas on the Norwegian Continental Shelf (NCS). The invitation follows Directive 94/22/EC, which sets the legal framework for hydrocarbon exploration and production across the European Economic Area (EEA). The aim is to attract qualified operators, promote efficient resource management, and accelerate the development of remaining hydrocarbon fields while ensuring environmental and security safeguards.

The call is open to companies registered in Norway or any EEA member state, as well as natural persons domiciled in an EEA country. Applicants may submit individual or joint applications, and the Ministry retains the flexibility to re‑organise groups, appoint operators, and create joint ventures that reflect the best technical and financial fit for each block. Licences will be awarded in the first quarter of 2027, with a deadline of 1 September 2026 for electronic submissions.

Key aspects of the licence award process include strict technical and financial criteria, mandatory joint‑operating agreements, and specific requirements for operators in the Barents Sea, deep‑water, and high‑pressure/high‑temperature (HTHP) fields. The announcement also incorporates provisions for CO₂ storage and transport under the 2014 regulation, ensuring that future subsea infrastructure aligns with climate‑mitigation goals.

Key Elements

• Eligibility: Norwegian or EEA‑registered companies, or EEA‑domiciled natural persons; pre‑qualified non‑licensees may also apply.
• Application format: Individual or group submissions; the Ministry may re‑structure groups and appoint operators.
• Joint‑venture requirement: Licence holders must enter into a Joint Operating Agreement and Accounting Agreement; participation interests mirror licence shares.
• Operator criteria:
  • Barents Sea licences: operator must have drilled at least one well on the NCS or equivalent experience.
  • Deep‑water licences: both operator and at least one other licensee must have NCS drilling experience; one must have deep‑water drilling.
  • HTHP licences: similar dual‑experience requirement, with one licensee having drilled an HTHP well.
• Geological and technical competence: Applicants must demonstrate detailed geological understanding and efficient exploration plans for the specific area.
• Financial capacity: Satisfactory financial resources are mandatory to support exploration and production activities.
• Experience on the NCS: Prior drilling or equivalent operational experience is a key selection factor.
• Security considerations: Applicants controlled by non‑EEA states or citizens may be denied licence rights.
• Stratigraphic and CO₂ agreements: Licences that overlap stratigraphically or involve CO₂ storage must enter into additional joint‑operating agreements.
• Available blocks: Applications can target unlicensed blocks or relinquished acreage within predefined areas, as shown on the Norwegian Offshore Directorate’s interactive Factmaps.
• Submission: Electronic via L2S or the Offshore Directorate portal; deadline 12:00 noon, 1 September 2026.
• Award timeline: Licences to be awarded in Q1 2027, with detailed licence documents based on the 2025 Awards framework.

U.S. Imposes Countervailing Duties on Australian Silicon Metal: Final Determination

Overview

The U.S. Department of Commerce has concluded that Australian producers and exporters of silicon metal received countervailable subsidies during 2024. Silicon metal—an intermediate product used in electronics, solar panels, and high‑temperature alloys—was the subject of a formal investigation that began on January 1, 2024, and ended on December 31, 2024. The final determination, published on June 30, 2026, aligns with a parallel less‑than‑fair‑value investigation and confirms that the subsidies are both specific and beneficial to the Australian industry.

The Commerce Department calculated an estimated countervailable subsidy rate of 32.57 % for Simcoa Operations Pty Ltd., the only exporter individually examined. Because this rate is non‑zero and not based solely on general statutory provisions, the same rate applies to all other Australian silicon metal producers and exporters under the “all‑others” rule. The determination also includes a suspension of liquidation of U.S. customs entries for the affected merchandise, requiring cash deposits equal to the estimated duties until the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) decides whether the U.S. domestic industry is materially injured.

If the ITC finds injury, the U.S. will issue a countervailing duty (CVD) order that will enforce the 32.57 % duty on all future imports of Australian silicon metal. Conversely, if the ITC finds no injury, the suspension will be lifted and any deposits will be refunded. The decision is now open to the ITC for a 45‑day injury determination, after which the final trade remedy will be applied.

Key Elements

• Scope of the Investigation

  • Covers all silicon metal (85–99.99 % silicon, < 4 % iron) except semiconductor‑grade silicon.
    
  • Classified under HTSUS subheadings 2804.69.1000 and 2804.69.5000.

• Subsidy Findings

  • Countervailable subsidies identified in Australian mining, electricity, and tax incentive programs.
    
  • Estimated net subsidy rate: 32.57 % for Simcoa and all other Australian exporters.

• Suspension of Liquidation

  • CBP required cash deposits and halted liquidation of affected imports from September 26, 2025, until January 23, 2026.
    
  • Suspension will be reinstated if the ITC confirms material injury.

• ITC Process

  • ITC must determine within 45 days whether U.S. industry is injured or threatened with injury.
    
  • Positive injury finding triggers a CVD order; negative finding terminates the proceeding and refunds deposits.

• Administrative and Protective Measures

  • All calculations and supporting documents will be disclosed to interested parties within five days of publication.
    
  • Parties subject to an Administrative Protective Order (APO) must comply with destruction or conversion requirements.

• Implications for Geoscience and Energy Sectors

  • Affects Australian silicon mining operations, electricity supply contracts, and R&D tax incentives.
    
  • Potentially raises U.S. import costs for silicon metal used in semiconductor manufacturing, solar panel production, and high‑temperature alloy fabrication.

U.S. Keeps Duties on Russian Phosphate Fertilizers to Guard Against Subsidies

Overview

The U.S. Department of Commerce has concluded its first sunset review of the countervailing duty (CVD) order on phosphate fertilizers imported from Russia. The review found that revoking the duties would likely allow Russian producers to continue receiving subsidies that could distort the market. As a result, the order remains in effect, ensuring that U.S. farmers and fertilizer manufacturers are not disadvantaged by unfair foreign competition.

The decision underscores the U.S. commitment to enforcing trade rules that protect domestic industries from subsidized imports. By maintaining the duties, the government aims to preserve a level playing field for U.S. phosphate fertilizer producers and to prevent potential price inflation that could affect agriculture and related sectors.

The review process was expedited due to a lack of substantive responses from Russian respondents. Domestic interested parties—Mosaic and Simplot—participated and provided evidence supporting the continuation of the duties. The final net countervailable subsidy rates were calculated for major Russian producers and the broader industry.

Key Elements

• Continued Duties: The CVD order on Russian phosphate fertilizers remains active to prevent subsidy-driven market distortions.
  
• Subsidy Rates: Net countervailable subsidies are estimated at 24.11 % for EuroChem, 14.64 % for JSC Apatit, and 16.64 % for other Russian producers.
  
• Domestic Interest: U.S. fertilizer companies Mosaic and Simplot actively participated, providing data that reinforced the need for the duties.
  
• Expedited Review: The review was conducted over 120 days because Russia and its respondents did not submit substantive responses.
  
• Trade Fairness: The order protects U.S. producers from receiving an unfair advantage through foreign subsidies, supporting domestic agricultural competitiveness.
  
• Administrative Protective Order (APO): Parties with APOs must return or destroy proprietary information, ensuring compliance with confidentiality requirements.
  
• Implications for Agriculture: Maintaining duties helps stabilize fertilizer prices and supports the U.S. agricultural supply chain.

U.S. Energy Push: ONRR Proposes Streamlined Oil, Gas, and Coal Valuation Rules

Overview

The Office of Natural Resources Revenue (ONRR) has issued a proposed rule to revise federal oil, gas, and coal valuation regulations. The changes aim to simplify the calculation and reporting of royalties, clarify the standard of review for Director‑level appeals, and reduce administrative costs for both industry and the federal government. By making the valuation process more transparent and less burdensome, the rule seeks to encourage increased production and strengthen the United States’ position as a leading energy producer.

The proposal aligns with recent executive and Secretary orders that prioritize energy development. It is expected to lower compliance costs, shorten approval timelines, and provide clearer guidance for operators and royalty recipients. The rule also includes a public comment period, allowing stakeholders—including geoscientists, energy companies, and local communities—to influence the final regulations before they take effect.

Stakeholders are invited to submit comments by August 31, 2026. The ONRR will consider all feedback before finalizing the amendments, which will be published in the Federal Register once adopted.

Key Elements

• Amendments to Valuation Regulations – Updates 30 CFR Parts 1206 and 1290 to streamline royalty calculations for oil, gas, and coal.
• Standard of Review for Appeals – Establishes a clear, Director‑level review process for disputes over valuation determinations.
• Cost and Burden Reduction – Simplifies reporting requirements, reducing paperwork and administrative expenses for operators and the federal government.
• Production Incentives – Aims to lower barriers to development, potentially boosting domestic energy output and reinforcing U.S. energy dominance.
• Public Comment Period – Open to all interested parties until 11:59 p.m. EDT, August 31, 2026, with submissions accepted via the ONRR docket system or email.
• Transparency and Accessibility – All documents, background information, and comments will be publicly posted on the ONRR website for review.

EU‑Indonesia CEPA: A Trade Deal That Opens Markets, Protects Sustainability, and Sets New Rules for Goods, Services, and IP

Overview

The European Union and Indonesia have agreed to a Comprehensive Economic Partnership Agreement (CEPA) that will slash tariffs on more than 98 % of goods, liberalising 80 % of trade immediately and 96 % after a five‑year phase‑out. The pact builds on nine years of negotiations and is designed to boost bilateral trade—currently €28.9 bn in goods and €9.3 bn in services—while preserving each side’s regulatory autonomy.

Beyond tariff cuts, CEPA introduces a robust framework for sustainable development, competition, digital trade, and investment protection. It harmonises rules of origin, removes technical barriers, and protects geographical indications for 293 products. The agreement also sets clear procedures for sanitary and phytosanitary (SPS) measures, ensuring that health and environmental standards are maintained without creating unnecessary trade barriers.

For the geoscience, energy, and natural‑resource sectors, the deal contains specific provisions on minerals, metals, chemicals, and environmental goods. It establishes origin rules that allow Indonesia to treat materials from Japan and ASEAN as “Indonesian origin” when further processed, while setting limits on non‑originating inputs. The pact also includes detailed tariff schedules for minerals, metals, and related machinery, and it creates a joint framework for SPS compliance that protects human, animal, and plant health while keeping trade flows predictable.

Key Elements

• Tariff Liberalisation – 80 % of goods immediately tariff‑free; 96 % after five years; duty‑free quotas for Indonesian tuna, fish, wine, and spirits.
  
• Rules of Origin – Indonesia can classify materials from Japan/ASEAN as “Indonesian origin” with proof of origin; non‑originating inputs capped at 10–15 % of ex‑works price, with special tolerances for certain HS chapters.
  
• SPS & Technical Barriers – Joint framework for sanitary and phytosanitary measures; transparent communication, cooperation on animal welfare and antimicrobial resistance; WTO‑aligned standards.
  
• Services Access – Most services receive at least MFN treatment; quotas, monopolies, and economic‑needs tests largely prohibited; temporary entry rules for business visitors, installers, and independent professionals.
  
• Digital Trade & IP – Clear rules for e‑commerce, electronic signatures, and data flows; procurement chapter mandates transparent tendering; IP cooperation aligns with TRIPS, protects genetic resources, and establishes royalty collection mechanisms.
  
• Sustainable Development – Commitments to environmental protection, sustainable palm‑oil trade, and climate‑related measures; dispute‑resolution mechanisms for sustainable food systems.
  
• Geoscience & Mineral Provisions – Detailed tariff classifications for minerals, metals, and related machinery; origin rules that allow use of non‑originating materials within specified limits; joint SPS oversight for mineral‑related products.
  
• Dispute Settlement & Mediation – Confidential mediation process, trade committee oversight, and binding interpretations; clear timelines and cost‑sharing for dispute resolution.
  
• Trade‑Related Data & Transparency – Confidentiality clauses for origin statements; simplified documentation; reference numbers for exporters; clear procedures for verifying preferential treatment.
  

These provisions collectively aim to deepen economic ties, streamline trade procedures, and ensure that the partnership supports sustainable development and fair competition across the EU‑Indonesia economic landscape.

Florida’s Myakka River Gains National Wild & Scenic Status—A New Era of Protection

Overview
The Myakka Wild and Scenic River Act of 2025 designates a 34‑mile stretch of the Myakka River in Sarasota County, Florida, as part of the National Wild and Scenic Rivers System. The bill follows a federal study confirming the river’s eligibility and builds on Florida’s own 2024 state designation, reflecting strong public, local‑government, and stakeholder support. By adding the river to the national system, the Act seeks to preserve its ecological integrity, scenic beauty, and recreational value while ensuring that future development respects its natural character.

The Act establishes a collaborative framework between the U.S. Department of the Interior and the Myakka River Management Coordinating Council—a body that includes state, county, city, agricultural, and nonprofit representatives. A comprehensive management plan, already developed under Florida law, will guide long‑term protection, restoration, and public use. Cooperative agreements will allow the Interior Secretary to coordinate with local agencies without converting the river into a National Park Service unit, thereby preserving existing land‑ownership arrangements and preventing compulsory land acquisition.

For geoscientists, natural‑resource managers, and energy professionals, the designation signals a heightened regulatory environment that prioritizes watershed health, habitat conservation, and sustainable recreation. It also opens avenues for federal technical assistance and funding to support monitoring, restoration, and community‑based stewardship projects along the river corridor.

Key Elements

• Designation: 34 miles of the Myakka River in Sarasota County are officially added to the National Wild and Scenic Rivers System, with specific segments classified as scenic, wild, or recreational.
• Management Plan: The existing Myakka River Wild and Scenic Management Plan satisfies federal requirements and will be updated under federal guidance.
• Cooperative Agreements: The Secretary of the Interior may enter agreements with Florida’s Department of Environmental Protection, local governments, and non‑profits to administer the river while respecting existing land‑ownership and jurisdictional boundaries.
• Council Coordination: The Myakka River Management Coordinating Council will include a National Park Service representative and may expand to include additional stakeholders, ensuring broad input into river stewardship.
• Land‑Acquisition Limits: The Interior may acquire land only by donation or with owner consent; condemnation is prohibited, safeguarding private property rights.
• Technical Assistance: Federal support for staff, funding, and expertise will aid in implementing the management plan and enhancing river protection.
• Public Access and Recreation: Designated recreational segments will maintain public use while protecting sensitive habitats, balancing tourism with conservation.
• No National Park Status: The river will not be treated as a National Park System unit, preserving its unique local governance structure.

FERC Sets 2026 Deadline for Environmental Review of New 125‑Mile Natural Gas Pipeline

Overview
In June 2026, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) announced its plan to prepare an Environmental Assessment (EA) for the Constitution Pipeline and Wright Interconnect Projects, following petitions filed by Constitution Pipeline Company, LLC and Iroquois Gas Transmission System, L.P. The projects had previously been evaluated in a 2014 Environmental Impact Statement (EIS), but the pipeline was never completed. The new EA will reassess the environmental implications of the proposed 125‑mile, 30‑inch natural‑gas line and associated facilities.

The pipeline will traverse parts of Pennsylvania and New York, including Susquehanna County and several New York counties. Key components include new meter stations, communication towers, valves, a pig launcher/receiver, and an expansion of the existing Wright Compressor Station with an additional 22,000 horsepower of compression capacity. The project also involves modifications to delivery meters to the Tennessee Gas Pipeline.

FERC’s notice outlines a strict schedule: the EA will be issued on August 21, 2026, followed by a 90‑day federal authorization decision deadline of November 19, 2026. The agency has invited comments from landowners, federal and state agencies, Native American tribes, environmental groups, and the public, and will address all substantive feedback in the EA. The notice also provides guidance on how interested parties can track the review process and submit comments.

Key Elements

• Timeline

  • EA issuance: August 21, 2026
    
  • 90‑day decision deadline: November 19, 2026
    

• Project Scope

  • 125 miles of 30‑inch natural‑gas pipeline across PA and NY
    
  • New meter stations, communication towers, valves, pig launcher/receiver
    
  • Expansion of Wright Compressor Station (22,000 hp additional compression)
    
  • Delivery meter upgrades to Tennessee Gas Pipeline
    

• Regulatory Context

  • Re‑issuance of certificates of public convenience and necessity (originally granted 2014)
    
  • Compliance with the Natural Gas Act and Clean Water Act (water‑quality certification waiver in NY)
    

• Environmental Review

  • Transition from 2014 EIS to 2026 EA
    
  • Focus on wetland and waterbody crossings, forest clearing, habitat fragmentation, and previously cleared properties
    
  • Inclusion of alternatives and mitigation measures
    

• Stakeholder Engagement

  • Notice of Scoping sent to landowners, agencies, tribes, NGOs, and local media
    
  • Public comment period and mechanisms for interventions, comments, and rehearing requests
    
  • eSubscription service for real‑time updates on docket filings
    

• Tracking and Access

  • Unique NPA identification: EAXX‑019‑20‑000‑1780563178
    
  • eLibrary and eSubscription tools for document access and notifications
    
  • Contact information for public participation and assistance.

Northern Natural Gas Sets Timeline for Environmental Review of New Pipeline Expansion

Overview

Northern Natural Gas Company has filed a request for a Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity to build and operate a new pipeline segment in Iowa and Nebraska. The Central Mainline Corridor Expansion Project will add roughly 535,000 dekatherms per day of winter‑peak gas transport capacity, benefiting power plants and residential/commercial customers in the region.

The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) has announced that it will prepare an Environmental Assessment (EA) for the project, with the EA to be issued on December 7, 2026. A 30‑day public comment period will follow, and FERC requires all federal and state agencies involved in authorizations to make a final decision within 90 days of the EA’s release—by March 7, 2027.

Stakeholders—including landowners, state agencies, Native American tribes, and environmental groups—have already submitted comments on potential impacts to groundwater, agriculture, recreation, and wildlife. These concerns will be addressed in the forthcoming EA, which will guide the regulatory decision‑making process.

Key Elements

• Project Scope: ~26.2 miles of 20‑ and 30‑inch pipeline, new compressor station, upgrades to five existing stations, pipeline uprate, new meter facility, and related infrastructure across six Iowa and five Nebraska counties.
  
• Capacity Increase: Adds 535,360 dekatherms/day of winter‑peak, firm transportation service for power generation and residential/commercial use.
  
• Environmental Review Schedule:
  
  • EA issuance: December 7, 2026
    
  • 30‑day public comment period
    
  • Federal authorization decision deadline: March 7, 2027
    
• Regulatory Framework: FERC’s 90‑day decision rule under 18 CFR 157.22(a) applies to all federal and state agencies responsible for permits and approvals.
  
• Stakeholder Engagement: Comments received from landowners (groundwater, farming, recreation), Nebraska Department of Water, Energy, and Environment, Army Corps of Engineers, and environmental groups such as Our Children’s Trust.
  
• Tracking and Public Participation: FERC offers eSubscription for updates and provides contact information for public inquiries and interventions.

WBI’s 17‑Mile Pipeline Expansion: FERC Sets 90‑Day Decision Clock

Overview

WBI Energy Transmission Inc. has filed a request with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) to construct a 17‑mile, 24‑inch natural‑gas transmission line—known as the Line Section 32 Enhancement Project—in Williams County, North Dakota. The pipeline will deliver up to 190,000 dekatherms per day of firm transportation service to Basin Electric’s new Bison Generation Station, supporting the region’s growing power needs.

FERC has announced that it will issue an Environmental Assessment (EA) on November 23, 2026 and that all federal agencies involved in authorizing the project must make a final decision within 90 days of that issuance, by February 21, 2027. This deadline applies to federal, state, and local agencies that hold delegated authority under the Natural Gas Act, ensuring a coordinated and timely review process.

The project’s scoping notice, released on May 11, 2026, reached landowners, government agencies, tribal groups, and the public, but no comments were received. WBI’s plan includes upgrading an existing interconnection in McKenzie County and will be subject to the environmental and regulatory reviews outlined by the National Environmental Policy Act.

Key Elements

• Project Scope: 17‑mile, 24‑inch interstate natural‑gas pipeline plus interconnection upgrade.
  
• Capacity: Up to 190,000 dekatherms per day of firm transportation service.
  
• Location: Williams County (primary) and McKenzie County (interconnection upgrade), North Dakota.
  
• Regulatory Timeline:
  
  • EA issuance: Nov 23, 2026
    
  • 90‑day federal authorization decision deadline: Feb 21, 2027
    
• Environmental Review: FERC will prepare an Environmental Assessment (EA) under NEPA; unique ID EAXX‑019‑20‑000‑1778150426.
  
• Stakeholder Engagement: Scoping notice sent to landowners, agencies, tribes, and the public; no comments received to date.
  
• Public Participation: Opportunities to comment or intervene via FERC’s Office of Public Participation; eSubscription service available for updates.
  
• Implications for Geoscience & Energy: The pipeline will enhance regional gas transport infrastructure, potentially affecting local hydrogeology, land use, and emissions profiles, and will be a key component in supporting North Dakota’s renewable energy mix.

WesternGeco Granted Permission to Use Sound Surveys in Gulf of America, with Strict Marine Mammal Safeguards

Overview

The U.S. National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) has issued two Letters of Authorization (LOAs) to WesternGeco, LLC, allowing the company to conduct incidental marine‑mammal take during geophysical surveys related to oil and gas exploration in the Gulf of America (formerly the Gulf of Mexico). The LOAs are issued under the Marine Mammal Protection Act (MMPA) and its implementing regulations, which permit incidental take of small numbers of marine mammals if the activity is unlikely to have a significant impact on the species or stock.

The authorized surveys involve long‑offset, sparse ocean‑bottom‑node (OBN) acoustic surveys across 1,153–1,446 lease blocks, covering water depths from 100 to 3,370 m. WesternGeco may use either a low‑frequency Gemini airgun source or a conventional 28‑element airgun array with a tuned pulse source. Acoustic exposure modeling, based on prior analyses of similar sources, indicates that the expected Level B harassment takes are within the “small numbers” threshold for all affected species, including Rice’s whale, various dolphin and porpoise stocks, and beaked whales.

The LOAs require WesternGeco to follow strict mitigation, monitoring, and reporting protocols. These include real‑time monitoring of marine‑mammal presence, immediate shutdown of sound sources if a protected species is detected within a specified distance, and detailed post‑survey reporting of any take events. The authorization is effective from July 1 2026 to February 29 2027 for one LOA, and from August 1 2026 to March 31 2027 for the other, ensuring that the company’s operations remain compliant with federal conservation standards while supporting continued energy exploration.

Key Elements

• Authorization Scope

  • Two LOAs issued to WesternGeco for incidental take during geophysical surveys in the Gulf of America.
    
  • Effective periods: July 1 2026–Feb 29 2027 and Aug 1 2026–Mar 31 2027.
    

• Survey Design & Acoustic Sources

  • Long‑offset, sparse OBN surveys covering 1,153–1,446 lease blocks.
    
  • Depth range 100–3,370 m; survey area ~110 km² per day over ~140 days.
    
  • Source options: Gemini low‑frequency airgun or 28‑element airgun array with tuned pulse source.
    

• Take Estimates & Small‑Numbers Determination

  • Acoustic modeling predicts Level B harassment takes for multiple species (e.g., Rice’s whale, dolphins, beaked whales).
    
  • Estimated takes are less than one‑third of best‑available abundance estimates, meeting the “small numbers” criterion.
    

• Mitigation, Monitoring, and Reporting Requirements

  • Real‑time monitoring of marine‑mammal presence; shutdown of sound sources if a protected species is detected within a prescribed distance.
    
  • Detailed post‑survey reporting of any take events, including species, number, and circumstances.
    

• Regulatory Framework

  • Governed by the Marine Mammal Protection Act (MMPA) and NMFS regulations (50 CFR 217.180, 217.186).
    
  • LOAs are part of a broader incidental take regulation re‑implementation effective April 20 2026 through April 19 2031.
    

• Implications for Industry and Conservation

  • Enables continued geophysical surveying for oil and gas development while ensuring compliance with marine‑mammal protection standards.
    
  • Provides a transparent, science‑based approach to balancing resource development with ecological stewardship.

NMFS Grants TGS Limited‑Take Permits for Gulf Seismic Surveys

Overview

The U.S. National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) has issued three Letters of Authorization (LOAs) to the geophysical survey company TGS, allowing the incidental take of marine mammals during 3‑dimensional ocean‑bottom node (OBN) seismic surveys in the Gulf of America (GOA). The permits, effective from mid‑August 2026 to mid‑August 2027 and from early September 2026 to early September 2027, cover extensive survey areas across the Mississippi Canyon, De Soto Canyon, Atwater Valley, East Breaks, Alaminos Canyon, and Garden Banks lease blocks.

The LOAs are grounded in the Marine Mammal Protection Act (MMPA) and its implementing regulations, which permit incidental take only when the impact is negligible and the number of animals taken is “small.” NMFS conducted detailed acoustic exposure modeling, species‑specific density estimates, and a small‑numbers analysis to ensure that the projected take—primarily limited to a few individuals of species such as Rice’s whale—will not adversely affect marine mammal populations or subsistence uses.

These permits are part of a broader reimplementation of the incidental‑take framework that was updated in 2024 and 2026 to correct earlier take‑estimate errors. They enable TGS to continue its seismic surveys for oil and gas exploration while maintaining compliance with federal marine‑mammal protection standards and ensuring ongoing monitoring, mitigation, and reporting obligations.

Key Elements

• Authorized Parties & Scope

  • Letters issued to TGS for incidental take during 3‑D OBN surveys across 200–648 lease blocks in the GOA.
    
  • Surveys use conventional airgun arrays and the Gemini low‑frequency dual‑barbell source.

• Effective Periods

  • One LOA: Aug 15 2026 – Aug 15 2027.
    
  • Two LOAs: Sep 1 2026 – Sep 1 2027.

• Regulatory Basis

  • Marine Mammal Protection Act §101(a)(5)(A) & (D).
    
  • NMFS incidental‑take regulations (50 CFR 217.180–217.186).

• Impact Assessment

  • Acoustic modeling shows negligible impact on marine‑mammal populations.
    
  • Small‑numbers determination confirms take is less than one‑third of best‑available abundance estimates.

• Species & Take Limits

  • Rice’s whale: 2 individuals authorized.
    
  • Other species (e.g., Kogia spp., Atlantic spotted dolphin, bottlenose dolphin) receive no take authorization under these LOAs.

• Mitigation, Monitoring, Reporting

  • Mandatory real‑time monitoring of acoustic exposure.
    
  • Post‑survey reporting of any harassment incidents.
    
  • Compliance with NMFS monitoring protocols and data submission requirements.

• Purpose & Context

  • Supports oil and gas exploration activities in the GOA while protecting marine mammals.
    
  • Part of the 2026 reimplementation of incidental‑take regulations following earlier rulemaking corrections.

• Contact & Documentation

  • LOAs and supporting documents available online; contact Jenna Harlacher (OPR, NMFS) at (301) 427‑8401 for inquiries.

Uniting the Great Lakes: New Act Designates Regional Partnership to Protect Waterways

The Regional Great Lakes Partnership Act of 2026 formally designates the Great Lakes Commission as a Regional Great Lakes Partnership. By amending the James M. Inhofe National Defense Authorization Act, the bill adds the Commission—comprising Illinois, Indiana, Michigan, Minnesota, Wisconsin, New York, Ohio, and Pennsylvania—to the list of regional partnerships recognized by federal law. This designation is intended to strengthen collaboration among the eight Great Lakes states on issues ranging from water quality and ecosystem health to economic development and trade.

The Act’s primary goal is to create a unified framework for managing the Great Lakes Basin’s natural resources. With the Commission now officially recognized as a regional partnership, member states can coordinate research, share data, and align policies more effectively. The designation also opens avenues for federal funding and technical assistance, encouraging integrated approaches to climate resilience, pollution control, and sustainable resource extraction.

Beyond environmental stewardship, the partnership has implications for trade and commerce. By fostering consistent regulations across state lines, the Commission can streamline cross‑border shipping, fishing, and tourism, thereby boosting regional economies. The bill’s passage signals a commitment to collaborative governance that balances ecological protection with economic opportunity.

Key Elements

• Formal Designation: The Great Lakes Commission is officially recognized as a Regional Great Lakes Partnership under federal law.
  
• Eight‑State Membership: Illinois, Indiana, Michigan, Minnesota, Wisconsin, New York, Ohio, and Pennsylvania are the constituent states.
  
• Statutory Amendment: The bill amends the National Defense Authorization Act to include the Commission, linking environmental management to national security interests.
  
• Integrated Management: Enables coordinated research, data sharing, and policy alignment on water quality, habitat restoration, and climate adaptation.
  
• Funding Opportunities: Designation may unlock federal grants and technical assistance for basin‑wide projects.
  
• Economic Impact: Harmonized regulations can facilitate trade, shipping, fishing, and tourism across the Great Lakes region.
  
• Cross‑Sector Collaboration: Encourages partnerships among government, academia, industry, and Indigenous communities to address complex geoscience and resource challenges.

Geothermal Cost‑Recovery Authority Act of 2026: A New Funding Mechanism for U.S. Geothermal Development

Overview
The Geothermal Cost‑Recovery Authority Act of 2026 amends the 1970 Geothermal Steam Act to give the Department of the Interior the authority to collect fees from applicants and holders of geothermal leases. The goal is to reimburse the federal government for the administrative and inspection costs associated with leasing, permitting, and monitoring geothermal projects. The cost‑recovery period runs from the enactment of the bill through September 30, 2032, covering a wide range of activities—from application processing to well construction, operation, and reclamation.

The Act introduces flexibility for the Secretary of the Interior to adjust fees based on economic hardship or the need to promote broader geothermal use. Reimbursed amounts are earmarked for specific Interior funds that cover lease processing and inspection expenses. By creating a dedicated revenue stream, the legislation aims to reduce the financial burden on the Interior while ensuring that geothermal development proceeds with adequate oversight and environmental safeguards.

A five‑year report will be required, in consultation with industry stakeholders, to evaluate the impact of the new cost‑recovery mechanism and recommend whether the provision should be reauthorized or modified. This transparency requirement underscores the policy’s intent to balance fiscal responsibility with the promotion of renewable geothermal energy.

Key Elements

• Cost‑Recovery Authority – The Secretary may require lease applicants or holders to reimburse the U.S. for administrative and inspection costs related to geothermal leasing and operations.
• Coverage Scope – Fees apply to processing applications, permits, site licenses, construction permits, commercial use permits, and all inspection and monitoring activities (exploration, drilling, plugging, abandonment, construction, operation, termination, reclamation).
• Timeframe – The authority is effective from enactment until September 30, 2032.
• Adjustments for Hardship and Resource Promotion – The Secretary can reduce fees if full reimbursement would impose economic hardship or if a lower amount better promotes geothermal resource use.
• Use of Recovered Funds – Collected fees are credited to Interior appropriations, accounts, or funds specifically designated for lease processing and inspection activities.
• Reporting Requirement – Within five years, the Secretary must submit a report to both House and Senate committees, assessing the amendment’s impact, recommending reauthorization, and suggesting program updates.
• Stakeholder Consultation – The report and fee determinations must involve input from the geothermal industry and other stakeholders to ensure balanced decision‑making.

U.S.–Philippines Alliance Marks 80 Years of Friendship While Standing Firm Against China’s South China Sea Aggression

Overview

The Senate resolution celebrates three milestone anniversaries—80 years of diplomatic ties, 75 years of the Mutual Defense Treaty, and 10 years since the 2016 arbitral ruling that upheld Philippine sovereignty in the South China Sea. It underscores the deep historical, cultural, and strategic bonds that have guided the U.S. and Philippine partnership since World War II, including the shared commitment to peace, democracy, and economic cooperation.

Amid rising tensions in the South China Sea, the resolution condemns China’s continued violations of the 2016 ruling and its militarization of disputed features. It highlights recent incidents—ranging from aggressive coast guard actions to the construction of a massive floating barrier at Scarborough Shoal—and stresses that such conduct threatens regional stability, maritime safety, and the rule of law.

Looking forward, the resolution calls for expanded defense and economic collaboration. It supports the Enhanced Defense Cooperation Agreement, the Luzon Economic Corridor, and the Pax Silica initiative, all aimed at strengthening critical‑mineral supply chains, advanced manufacturing, energy infrastructure, and maritime logistics. The Senate also urges continued U.S. support for Philippine defense modernization, joint training, and multilateral partnerships with allies such as Japan, Australia, and South Korea.

Key Elements

• Anniversary Recognition – 80th anniversary of U.S.–Philippines diplomatic relations, 75th anniversary of the Mutual Defense Treaty, and 10th anniversary of the 2016 arbitral ruling.
• Historical Context – Emphasis on shared WWII sacrifices, the 1947 Military Bases Agreement, and the 1951 Mutual Defense Treaty as foundations of the alliance.
• Condemnation of China – Explicit rebuke of China’s refusal to accept the 2016 ruling, its militarization of artificial islands, and aggressive actions against Philippine vessels and fishermen.
• Enhanced Defense Cooperation – Support for the 2014 Enhanced Defense Cooperation Agreement, expansion to nine agreed locations, and increased U.S. military presence and training in the Philippines.
• Economic Security Initiatives – Promotion of the Luzon Economic Corridor and Pax Silica to secure critical minerals, advanced manufacturing, energy, and logistics infrastructure.
• Multilateral Engagement – Encouragement of broader partnerships with Japan, Australia, South Korea, and other allies to reinforce regional security and supply‑chain resilience.
• Freedom of Navigation – Reaffirmation of the U.S. commitment to free and open Indo‑Pacific maritime routes and adherence to international law.
• Future Defense Cooperation – Calls for continued U.S. deployment of advanced capabilities, joint cyber operations, and high‑level interoperability training with Philippine forces.

U.S. Pushes to Reshape Magnet Supply Chain, Cutting China Dependence

Overview
The Magnets Value Chain Support Act of 2026 seeks to reduce the United States’ strategic reliance on China for rare‑earth metals and permanent magnets that power electric motors, generators, robotics, and defense systems. By offering a suite of tax credits, the bill incentivizes domestic production of magnet metals, rare‑earth oxides, and finished permanent magnets, while encouraging U.S. manufacturers to adopt these materials in high‑performance applications. The legislation also establishes a “domestic magnet input usage credit” that rewards companies for spending on U.S.‑made magnets used in core powertrain and defense components.

The Act defines a hierarchy of magnet performance—rare‑earth‑free, high‑performance, and advanced high‑performance—each with specific credit rates ($20–$40 per kilogram) tied to the proportion of U.S. or partner‑country sourced inputs. It sets strict eligibility criteria, requiring taxpayers to certify that at least 3 % of their domestic production capacity is available for defense‑priority orders, and mandates that no credit be claimed for materials sourced from prohibited foreign entities. Partner countries include NATO members, Japan, Australia, South Korea, Canada, and Mexico, with the possibility of designating additional facilities that meet transparency and security standards.

The bill’s phased credit schedule begins in 2027, with the domestic magnet input usage credit starting at 15 % for expenditures before 2035 and tapering to 5 % by 2039. Reporting requirements compel companies to disclose supply‑chain origins, pricing, and offtake agreements, enabling the Secretary to monitor compliance and prevent double‑counting. The legislation is currently referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means, awaiting further deliberation.

Key Elements

• Tax Credits for Production

  • Permanent magnet production credit: $20–$40 per kilogram, scaled by magnet type and U.S./partner‑country input share.
  • Magnet metal production credit: $15–$25 per kilogram, based on 75–90 % U.S./partner‑country input.
  • Rare‑earth oxide production credit: $5 per kilogram, for U.S.‑produced oxides used in eligible steps.

• Eligibility & Certification

  • Taxpayers must certify ≥3 % of domestic production capacity is available for defense‑priority or high‑performance contracts. ‑ Credits cannot be claimed for materials sourced from prohibited foreign entities; waivers may be granted for limited periods.

• Partner Country Framework

  • Includes NATO members, Japan, Australia, South Korea, Canada, and Mexico.
  • Designated non‑partner facilities may qualify if they meet transparency and security criteria.

• Domestic Magnet Input Usage Credit

  • 15 % credit on qualified domestic magnet expenditures before 2035, decreasing to 5 % by 2039.
  • Applies to core powertrain and defense components; excludes low‑power consumer appliances.

• Reporting & Compliance

  • Detailed disclosure of material origins, suppliers, volumes, pricing, and offtake agreements.
  • Secretary to publish regulations, safeguard confidential data, and prevent double recovery of credits.

• Phase‑In and Termination

  • Credits effective for taxable years beginning after 2026.
  • Section 45BB and 45CC provisions expire after 2038, with potential extensions for specified magnets until 2031.

Natural Climate Solutions Research and Extension Act of 2026: A New Frontier for Carbon‑Sequestering Agriculture

Overview

The Natural Climate Solutions Research and Extension Act of 2026 seeks to expand federal support for land‑based practices that capture carbon, cut greenhouse‑gas emissions, and enhance ecosystem resilience. By amending the 1990 Food, Agriculture, Conservation, and Trade Act, the bill creates a dedicated grant stream—under Section 1672(d)—to fund research and outreach on innovative, nature‑based solutions across agricultural lands, grasslands, wetlands, and forests.

The legislation emphasizes practices rooted in traditional ecological knowledge, biodiversity promotion, and runoff reduction, ensuring that climate benefits are coupled with ecological stewardship. If enacted, the grants would empower scientists, extension agents, and farmers to test and scale techniques that simultaneously sequester carbon, protect water quality, and bolster climate resilience.

Currently, the bill is referred to the House Committee on Agriculture, where it will undergo review, potential amendments, and a vote before advancing to the full House and Senate for consideration.

Key Elements

• Amendment to Section 1672(d) of the 1990 Act, adding a new subsection (21) for natural climate solutions.
  
• Grant focus on research and extension projects that:
  
  • Store carbon or reduce greenhouse‑gas emissions in soils, grasslands, wetlands, and forests.
    
  • Incorporate traditional ecological knowledge.
    
  • Promote biodiversity and climate resilience.
    
  • Reduce surface runoff and improve water quality.
    
• Funding mechanism: USDA‑led grant program, leveraging existing infrastructure for agricultural research and extension.
  
• Targeted outcomes: increased carbon sequestration, lower emissions, enhanced ecosystem services, and strengthened climate adaptation for rural communities.
  
• Policy context: part of a broader federal effort to integrate nature‑based solutions into national climate strategy, aligning with USDA’s Sustainable Agriculture initiatives.

Boosting Nature’s Climate Power: New Bill Funds Research on Carbon‑Storing Land Practices

The Natural Climate Solutions Research and Extension Act of 2026 seeks to strengthen the United States’ climate‑mitigation toolkit by directing federal research and extension dollars toward land‑based practices that sequester carbon and cut greenhouse‑gas emissions. By amending the Food, Agriculture, Conservation, and Trade Act of 1990, the bill creates a new grant category that encourages scientists, farmers, ranchers, and forest managers to develop and implement strategies that store carbon in soils, grasslands, wetlands, and forests while also enhancing biodiversity and resilience to climate change. The legislation underscores the importance of traditional ecological knowledge, ensuring that time‑tested local practices are integrated into modern climate solutions.

If enacted, the Act would provide a dedicated funding stream for projects that combine ecological science with practical land‑management techniques. Grants would support research on how to optimize carbon storage, reduce runoff, and improve ecosystem health across a range of landscapes—from croplands to wetlands. Extension programs would translate research findings into actionable guidance for landowners and policymakers, fostering a collaborative approach to climate mitigation that balances environmental benefits with economic viability.

Key Elements

• Amendment to Section 1672(d) of the 1990 Act, adding a new subsection (21) for natural climate solutions.
  
• Grant eligibility: research and extension projects focused on land‑management practices that store carbon or reduce greenhouse‑gas emissions in agricultural lands, soils, grasslands, wetlands, and forests.
  
• Core criteria for supported practices:
  
  • Based on traditional ecological knowledge.
    
  • Promote biodiversity and climate‑change resilience.
    
  • Reduce runoff and associated environmental impacts.
    
• Funding focus: both research (scientific studies, pilot projects) and extension (knowledge transfer to landowners, stakeholders).
  
• Committee referral: the bill has been read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry, where it will undergo further review and potential amendment.
  
• Broader impact: aligns with national climate goals by leveraging natural ecosystems as a cost‑effective, scalable mitigation strategy while supporting rural economies and conservation efforts.

Arctic Security and Diplomacy Act: Tightening Control Over Science and Espionage in the North

Overview

The Arctic Security and Diplomacy Act is a U.S. congressional bill aimed at safeguarding national security in the Arctic by curbing espionage and influence operations from foreign adversaries—primarily China and Russia. It seeks to protect U.S. sovereignty over Arctic waters, limit the ability of hostile states to conduct covert research, and strengthen cooperation with allied Arctic nations.

The Act establishes a comprehensive framework that requires foreign scientists and vessels to obtain U.S. consent before conducting marine scientific research in U.S. waters. It defines “covered activities” (e.g., seabed mapping, hydrographic surveys, unmanned maritime systems) that pose dual‑use risks and prohibits covered vessels unless a national‑interest waiver is granted. The bill also mandates a coordinated strategy, reporting, and notification system to keep Congress and the public informed about espionage threats and U.S. counter‑measures.

By integrating diplomatic tools—such as public condemnations, sanctions, and multilateral pressure—the Act empowers the U.S. to enforce its Arctic security policy, ensuring that scientific collaboration does not become a conduit for foreign intelligence gathering or military advantage.

Key Elements

• Definitions and Scope

  • Clarifies “Arctic,” “covered activities,” “covered vessel,” and “foreign adversary.”
    
  • Focuses on dual‑use marine surveys and vessels linked to China or Russia.

• Consent Requirement for Marine Scientific Research

  • Foreign scientists must secure prior U.S. approval before operating in U.S. waters.
    
  • The Secretary of State, with intelligence and homeland security input, reviews applications.

• Prohibition on Covered Vessels

  • Covered vessels are barred from conducting research unless a national‑interest waiver is granted.
    
  • Waivers must be reported to Congress within five days.

• Strategic Planning and Coordination

  • Within 180 days of enactment, the Secretary of State must produce a strategy to identify and counter espionage.
    
  • Strategy includes diplomatic enforcement, allied engagement, and intelligence coordination.

• Reporting and Notification

  • Annual report to Congress on espionage activities, U.S. support for covered activities, and recommendations.
    
  • Immediate congressional notification of any violations of the consent requirement.

• Diplomatic Tools and Enforcement

  • Authorizes demarches, public condemnations, sanctions, and potential removal of offending countries from Arctic bodies.
    
  • Emphasizes multilateral cooperation with Nordic and other Arctic partners.

• Focus on China and Russia

  • Highlights the strategic threat posed by the “Polar Silk Road” and dual‑use research initiatives.
    
  • Aims to limit these powers’ influence and access to Arctic resources and infrastructure.

• Integration with Intelligence and Homeland Security

  • Requires joint oversight by the intelligence community and the Department of Homeland Security.
    
  • Ensures that security assessments inform policy decisions and enforcement actions.

These provisions collectively aim to secure the Arctic as a domain of U.S. sovereignty, protect critical undersea infrastructure, and preserve the integrity of scientific research in the region.

America’s 250‑Year Celebration Turns into a $2 Billion Fix‑Up Plan for National Parks and Public Lands

Overview

The Great American Outdoors Act 250 was enacted to honor the United States’ 250th anniversary by creating a dedicated “America’s Legacy Restoration Fund.” The fund is financed through 100 % of all revenue from the Great American Outdoors Act’s new park and recreation fees, 100 % of all donations, and 50 % of energy‑development revenues earned on federal lands. The bill caps annual deposits at $1.9 billion and directs the rest to the fund, which is intended to pay for priority deferred maintenance and modernization projects across the National Park Service, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Forest Service, Bureau of Land Management, and Bureau of Indian Education.

The legislation specifies how the money is split among the agencies—70 % to the National Parks, 15 % to the Forest Service, and 5 % each to the Fish and Wildlife Service, BLM, and Bureau of Indian Education. A large portion of each agency’s share (70–80 %) must go to non‑transportation projects that improve visitor experience, safety, and accessibility. Transportation projects are allowed only after those priorities are met, and all projects must be tied to a formal maintenance plan and subject to a streamlined environmental review process.

Beyond funding, the act requires robust transparency and accountability. Secretaries must publish a searchable, geospatial dashboard of all funded projects, submit annual reports to Congress, and conduct a GAO study to assess whether the backlog of deferred maintenance is shrinking. The bill also introduces higher entrance fees for foreign visitors and encourages public‑private partnerships and philanthropic donations to supplement federal funds.

Key Elements

• America’s Legacy Restoration Fund – a re‑named, dedicated fund for national parks and public lands.
• Revenue sources – 100 % of park/recreation fees, 100 % of donations, and 50 % of energy‑development revenues on federal lands.
• Allocation formula – 70 % to the National Parks, 15 % to the Forest Service, 5 % each to Fish & Wildlife, BLM, and Bureau of Indian Education.
• Deferred maintenance focus – priority projects must address safety, accessibility, and visitor experience; transportation projects are secondary.
• Non‑transportation emphasis – 70–80 % of each agency’s share must fund non‑transportation projects.
• Public‑private partnership framework – agencies may partner with nonprofits, tribal entities, and private developers under cooperative agreements, with strict reporting requirements.
• Transparency dashboard – searchable, geospatial database of project status, costs, timelines, and environmental reviews.
• Annual reporting & GAO study – agencies submit reports on maintenance backlogs; GAO evaluates effectiveness.
• Foreign visitor fees – $100 entrance fee for non‑immigrant visitors and $250 for the national parks pass, with proceeds going to the fund.
• Streamlined environmental review – categorical exclusions and emergency acquisition flexibilities to speed up maintenance projects.

Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2026

A $X‑billion package that funds defense, environmental restoration, and federal operations for FY 2026

Overview

The Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2026 (H.R. 7148) bundles federal funding for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026 into a single package. The bill allocates billions of dollars to the Department of Defense (DoD) for personnel salaries, operations, maintenance, and research & development, while also providing funds for the Departments of Labor, Health & Human Services, Education, Transportation, Housing & Urban Development, Treasury, and State, among others. The act sets the budget framework for defense readiness, public health, infrastructure, and a wide range of federal priorities.

For the DoD, the act specifies detailed funding for active‑duty and reserve personnel across all services, including the Army, Navy, Marine Corps, Air Force, Space Force, and National Guard. It also authorizes substantial operation‑and‑maintenance funds, procurement of advanced aircraft and missile systems, and environmental restoration projects such as hazardous‑waste cleanup and debris removal. Foreign‑partner contributions—such as in‑kind aid from Iraq and other governments—may be accepted and credited to dedicated accounts, subject to congressional notification and reporting. The bill strengthens Buy‑American provisions, requiring U.S.‑made equipment whenever it is cost‑competitive and quality‑competitive, and imposes restrictions on the procurement of non‑U.S. steel, bearings, and supercomputers.

Beyond defense, the act earmarks millions for environmental restoration across the Army, Navy, and Air Force, allowing funds to be transferred to other appropriations for hazardous‑waste cleanup or debris removal. It also provides for procurement and installation of equipment for shipbuilding, aircraft, missiles, and space‑related projects, with limits on foreign procurement and requirements for domestic production of critical items. Reporting and oversight provisions are included throughout, requiring quarterly reports to Congress on foreign contributions, environmental restoration activities, and procurement decisions, and imposing limits on reprogramming and transfer of funds.

Key Elements

• Defense Personnel & Operations – Billions for salaries, allowances, and training for active‑duty and reserve members of all U.S. armed services.
  
• Operation & Maintenance – $58 billion for the Army, $74 billion for the Navy & Marine Corps, $62 billion for the Air Force, $5.7 billion for the Space Force, and $56 billion for defense‑wide activities.
  
• Procurement & R&D – $3.6 billion for Army aircraft, $7.3 billion for Army missiles, $17.2 billion for Navy aircraft, and billions for shipbuilding, missile systems, and Space Force spacecraft.
  
• Foreign Contributions – Acceptance of in‑kind aid from foreign governments, credited to a dedicated account, with quarterly congressional reporting and restrictions on use (e.g., no man‑portable air defense systems).
  
• Buy‑American Provisions – Equipment and products must be U.S.‑made when cost‑competitive; non‑U.S. steel, bearings, and supercomputers are barred unless a waiver is obtained.
  
• Environmental Restoration – $190 million for Army, $369 million for Navy, $396 million for Air Force environmental cleanup; funds can be transferred to other appropriations for hazardous‑waste or debris removal.
  
• Reporting & Oversight – Mandatory quarterly reports on foreign contributions, environmental restoration, and procurement; limits on reprogramming and transfer of funds; strict documentation of multiyear contracts and procurement decisions.
  
• Other Agency Funding – Significant allocations for Health & Human Services, Education, Transportation, Housing & Urban Development, Treasury, and State, covering personnel, operations, infrastructure, and public‑health initiatives.

EU Sets Zero Tariffs and Quotas for US Goods to Stabilise Transatlantic Trade

Overview

The European Union has adopted Regulation (EU) 2026/1455 to adjust customs duties on a wide range of goods imported from the United States and to open tariff quotas for selected products. The measure follows a political agreement reached on 27 July 2025, in which the United States committed to reduce tariffs on EU goods to a 15 % ceiling and to apply the Most‑Favoured‑Nation (MFN) tariff on key natural‑resource and industrial items. The regulation aims to restore predictability and stability to the EU‑US trade relationship after a series of U.S. tariff increases in 2025, while preserving the EU’s commitment to a rules‑based World Trade Organization (WTO) system.

The regulation applies from 1 July 2026 until 31 December 2029 and includes provisions that allow the Commission to suspend or modify the tariff preferences if the United States fails to honour its commitments or if the measures threaten EU industry. It also establishes safeguard mechanisms to protect Union producers from sudden surges in imports, and mandates regular monitoring and reporting on trade flows, revenue impacts, and the effects on small and medium‑sized enterprises.

Key Elements

• Zero‑Tariff Preference – Customs duties on a list of agricultural, seafood, dairy, and other goods are set to 0 % for U.S. origin, eliminating the ad‑valorem component of the Common Customs Tariff.
  
• Tariff Quotas – For a separate set of products, the regulation opens quotas with preferential in‑quota rates (often 0 % or very low) for a specified volume, after which the standard tariff applies.
  
• Suspension Powers – The Commission may suspend the tariff preferences in whole or part if the U.S. does not implement the 15 % tariff ceiling, undermines the Joint Statement, or if circumstances change.
  
• Safeguard Mechanism – If imports of a U.S. product rise to levels that threaten serious injury to EU industry, the Commission can investigate and, if warranted, suspend the tariff preference.
  
• Monitoring and Assessment – The Commission must report quarterly on trade volumes, values, revenue, and SME impacts, and deliver a comprehensive assessment by 30 June 2029, potentially proposing an extension.
  
• Compliance with WTO – The regulation preserves the EU’s ability to apply anti‑coercion and enforcement measures under existing WTO‑aligned legislation.
  
• Scope of Goods – The preference covers a broad range of items, including fresh produce (e.g., potatoes, onions, citrus), seafood (e.g., salmon, pollock), dairy (e.g., milk, cheese), nuts, soy products, and various food preparations, as detailed in Annexes I–III.
  
• Effective Dates – The regulation enters into force the day after publication (1 July 2026) and remains in force until 31 December 2029, unless the Commission adopts an implementing act to suspend or modify it.

Shielding U.S. Resource Giants from EU Sustainability Rules

Overview

The PROTECT USA Act of 2025 seeks to exempt U.S. companies that are deemed “integral to the national interests” from complying with foreign sustainability due‑diligence laws, most notably the European Union’s Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive. By defining these entities as those involved in extractive, manufacturing, defense, or critical‑mineral activities, the bill aims to protect key sectors such as mining, energy, and advanced manufacturing from foreign regulatory burdens that could hinder U.S. competitiveness and supply‑chain stability.

The Act establishes a blanket prohibition on compliance with any foreign sustainability regulation, while allowing limited exceptions for ordinary U.S. business activities and U.S. statutes. Companies that face hardship under the prohibition may petition the President for a temporary exemption, with the decision guided by economic, employment, and national‑security considerations. The legislation also bars U.S. courts from recognizing foreign judgments related to these regulations and provides a civil remedy for entities harmed by non‑compliance.

For the geoscience and natural‑resource community, the bill represents a significant shift in how U.S. mining, oil and gas, and critical‑mineral operations interact with international environmental standards. It could reduce regulatory costs for U.S. firms but may also intensify trade tensions and raise questions about the U.S. role in global sustainability efforts.

Key Elements

• Definition of “Integral to National Interests”

  • Includes U.S. partnerships, corporations, LLCs, and foreign subsidiaries that:
    
  • Do business with the federal government.
    
  • Derive ≥25 % of revenue from extraction, mining, or manufacturing.
    
  • Produce defense‑related or critical‑mineral products.
    
  • Are otherwise identified by the President.

• Prohibition on Compliance

  • No such entity may comply with any foreign sustainability due‑diligence regulation, including the EU Directive, except for ordinary U.S. business or statutory compliance.

• Hardship Relief Process

  • Entities may petition the President for an exemption.
    
  • President must decide within 30 days, considering economic impact, employment, and national‑security effects.

• Protection Against Adverse Actions

  • No U.S. person may take adverse action against an entity for complying or not complying with foreign regulations.
    
  • Foreign court judgments on these matters are not recognized in U.S. courts unless Congress provides otherwise.

• Enforcement and Remedies

  • The President can take actions to protect affected entities.
    
  • Entities may sue for civil damages, including punitive, compensatory, and attorney‑fee relief.
    
  • Violators face up to $1 million civil penalties and potential ineligibility for federal contracts for up to three years.

• Implications for Geoscience and Natural Resources

  • Reduces regulatory burden on mining, oil & gas, and critical‑mineral producers.
    
  • May alter U.S. participation in global supply chains and sustainability reporting.
    
  • Could influence U.S. trade relations, especially with the EU, and affect domestic environmental oversight.

Uniting States to Restore the Connecticut River: A New Watershed Partnership Act

Overview
The Connecticut River Watershed Partnership Act establishes a coordinated, non‑regulatory program to restore and protect the five‑state watershed that spans Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, and Vermont. The act directs the U.S. Secretary of the Interior, through the Fish and Wildlife Service, to develop a comprehensive strategy that brings together federal, state, tribal, local, and nonprofit partners. Its goals include improving water quality, enhancing fish and wildlife habitat, expanding public access, and integrating nature‑based solutions to climate resilience.

The legislation also creates a voluntary grant program that provides competitive matching funds—up to 75 % federal share, 90 % for projects in environmental‑justice communities—to eligible entities such as state and local governments, nonprofits, and universities. Grants must align with the program’s purposes, which emphasize ecological restoration, farmland conservation, carbon sequestration, and community engagement. Technical assistance and monitoring will support project implementation and track progress.

By authorizing appropriations for 2026‑2030 and requiring annual congressional reports, the act institutionalizes long‑term investment in watershed health. It seeks to harmonize diverse stakeholder interests, promote traditional ecological knowledge, and ensure that restoration benefits both natural systems and the people who depend on them.

Key Elements

• Program Establishment – A non‑regulatory Connecticut River Watershed Partnership program led by the Secretary of the Interior, with a watershed‑wide strategy developed through broad stakeholder consultation.
• Grant Program – Competitive matching grants (up to 75 % federal share, 90 % for environmental‑justice projects) for restoration and protection activities, administered potentially by the National Fish and Wildlife Foundation.
• Stakeholder Engagement – Mandatory consultation with federal agencies (EPA, NOAA, NPS, etc.), state governors, tribal governments, watershed partnership groups, and environmental‑justice communities.
• Restoration Focus – Objectives include fish and wildlife habitat enhancement, water quality improvement, nature‑based climate resilience, farmland conservation, carbon sequestration, and public recreation access.
• Equity and Inclusion – Explicit emphasis on environmental justice communities, with higher federal cost‑sharing and potential full federal funding for projects that cannot afford non‑federal contributions.
• Technical Assistance & Monitoring – Provision of expertise to implement projects and ongoing monitoring to assess ecological and social outcomes.
• Funding and Reporting – Authorizes appropriations for 2026‑2030, requires that at least 75 % of funds support the grant program, and mandates annual reports to Congress detailing funded projects and progress.

EPA Grants Nevada Facility a Mercury Disposal Variance, Allowing Safe Land Disposal of Treated Elemental Mercury

Overview
The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has finalized a site‑specific treatability variance (SSTV) for U.S. Ecology Nevada, Inc. (USE), permitting the company to land‑dispose elemental mercury that is recovered from high‑mercury waste streams. The variance replaces the existing Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) Land Disposal Restrictions (LDR) standard that required recovered mercury to be placed back into commerce. Instead, USE will convert the mercury into a stable mercuric sulfide (HgS) powder, blend it with linear low‑density polyethylene (LLDPE), and extrude it into monolithic containers for disposal in a dedicated RCRA Subtitle C monofill at its Beatty, Nevada facility.

The rule reflects the collapse of the elemental mercury market and the technical impracticality of recycling mercury at the volumes generated by U.S. gold‑mining waste. By allowing treated mercury to be safely land‑disposed, the EPA aims to reduce the risk of long‑term storage of hazardous mercury while maintaining stringent environmental safeguards. The variance is subject to a series of conditions, including permit approvals, periodic leachate testing, and strict containment requirements, to ensure that mercury mobility remains below regulatory limits.

Key Elements
- Scope of the variance: Applies only to elemental mercury recovered from D009, U151, and Bevill‑exempt high‑mercury wastes at Bethlehem Apparatus (PA) and USE’s Beatty, NV facility.
- Treatment process:
- Conversion of elemental mercury to mercuric sulfide powder via a patented reaction.
- Blending of HgS powder with melted LLDPE under vacuum.
- Extrusion into monolithic, DOT‑rated, non‑reactive containers.
- Disposal location: Designated RCRA Subtitle C monofill at USE’s Beatty, Nevada treatment, storage, and disposal (TSD) facility, constructed in an arid environment to minimize leachate generation.
- Regulatory conditions:
- Must obtain all federal, state, and local permits before construction or disposal.
- Must meet the concentration‑based LDR standard of 0.025 mg/L (TCLP) and conduct periodic confirmation testing.
- Must confirm absence of excess mercury in the HgS powder before blending.
- Must maintain independent containment, leachate, and stormwater systems for the HgS waste area.
- Leachate from other units may not be used for dust suppression at the monofill.
- Monitoring and oversight: Quarterly testing for the first two years, then annual testing; Nevada Department of Environmental Protection may impose additional controls.
- Future amendments: Any change in the treatment vendor or process requires a new variance petition and EPA approval to ensure equivalence to the approved Bethlehem Apparatus process.
- Implications for the industry: Provides a viable, regulated pathway for disposing of high‑mercury waste, reducing the burden of indefinite elemental mercury storage and aligning disposal practices with current market realities.

Cachil DeHe Band Gains Full Leasing Power Under HEARTH Act, Boosting Tribal Sovereignty and Economic Growth

The U.S. Department of the Interior’s Bureau of Indian Affairs has officially approved the Cachil DeHe Band of Wintun Indians’ leasing ordinance under the Helping Expedite and Advance Responsible Tribal Homeownership Act of 2012 (HEARTH Act). This approval means the tribe can now negotiate and enter into surface leases on its trust lands without needing additional Secretary of the Interior approval for each lease. The decision, announced on June 22, 2026, removes a key bureaucratic hurdle and empowers the tribe to manage land use more flexibly and responsively.

The ordinance requires the tribe to establish its own leasing regulations, including an environmental review process that aligns with federal standards. Once approved, the tribe can lease land for a variety of purposes—residential, commercial, or resource‑related—while maintaining control over environmental safeguards. Importantly, the policy confirms that federal law preempts state and local taxes on lease‑related improvements, leaseholds, and activities, allowing the tribe to impose its own taxes if it chooses. This framework supports the tribe’s economic development goals while preserving its sovereign authority over land and resources.

In the broader context of federal Indian policy, the HEARTH Act was designed to accelerate tribal homeownership and economic self‑sufficiency by simplifying the leasing process. By granting the Cachil DeHe Band this authority, the Interior Department reinforces its commitment to tribal self‑determination, economic growth, and responsible stewardship of natural resources—principles that resonate with geoscientists, energy professionals, and natural resource managers alike.

Key Elements

• Full Leasing Authority – The tribe can now enter into surface leases on trust lands without further federal approval for each transaction.
  
• Tribal Leasing Regulations – The tribe must develop and submit regulations that include an environmental review process consistent with 25 CFR 162.
  
• Federal Preemption of State/Local Taxes – Lease‑related improvements, leaseholds, and activities are exempt from state and local taxation; the tribe may impose its own taxes if desired.
  
• Environmental Oversight – The ordinance mandates an environmental review that meets HEARTH Act requirements, ensuring sustainable land use.
  
• Federal Oversight and Enforcement – The Secretary retains the right to review, approve, and, if necessary, terminate leases or revoke regulatory approval.
  
• Economic Development Focus – The policy supports the tribe’s goals of homeownership, commercial development, and resource management while preserving tribal sovereignty.
  
• Alignment with Indian Long‑Term Leasing Act – The HEARTH Act amends the 1955 Act to streamline leasing while maintaining federal oversight.
  
• Implications for Natural Resource Management – The tribe can tailor lease terms to suit cultural, environmental, and economic needs, influencing land use in agriculture, forestry, and potential energy projects.

Silicon Metal Trade Review: U.S. Keeps Countervailing Duties on Kazakh Products

Overview

The U.S. Department of Commerce has concluded an expedited sunset review of the countervailing duty (CVD) order on silicon metal imported from Kazakhstan. The review, initiated in March 2026, examined whether the existing duties should be revoked or maintained. After receiving limited responses—primarily from domestic manufacturers Ferroglobe USA and Mississippi Silicon, and a substantive reply from the Kazakh government—the Commerce Department determined that revoking the duties would likely allow continued or renewed subsidies to Kazakh producers, undermining U.S. market fairness.

The final decision maintains the CVD order, citing a net countervailable subsidy rate of 160 % for all suppliers, including major Kazakh entities such as Tau‑Ken Temir LLP and JSC NMC Tau‑Ken Samruk. This high subsidy level indicates that Kazakh silicon metal is heavily supported by government measures, which could distort trade and harm U.S. manufacturers.

The notice also reminds parties subject to administrative protective orders to return or destroy proprietary information, emphasizing compliance with trade‑law confidentiality requirements.

Key Elements

• Countervailing Duty Order: U.S. duties imposed on silicon metal from Kazakhstan to counteract alleged subsidies.
• Sunset Review: Expedited 120‑day review conducted due to insufficient responses from interested parties.
• Domestic Interested Parties: Ferroglobe USA, Inc. and Mississippi Silicon LLC participated and provided substantive responses.
• Kazakh Government Response: Submitted a substantive reply; rebuttal received from domestic parties.
• Net Subsidy Rate: 160 % countervailable subsidy identified for all suppliers, including Tau‑Ken Temir LLP and JSC NMC Tau‑Ken Samruk.
• Revocation Outcome: Revocation deemed likely to lead to continued or renewed subsidies; therefore, the CVD order remains in effect.
• Administrative Protective Orders: Parties must return or destroy confidential information disclosed under APOs, with non‑compliance subject to sanctions.
• Implications for Trade: Maintained duties protect U.S. silicon metal producers from unfair competition and preserve market integrity.

EPA Seeks Public Input on Nationwide Drinking Water Infrastructure Survey

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has submitted a new information‑collection request (ICR) for the 8th Drinking Water Infrastructure Needs Survey and Assessment (DWINSA). The request, identified as EPA ICR 7798.01 with OMB Control Number 2040‑NEW, is being reviewed under the Paperwork Reduction Act. EPA is inviting public comments for an additional 30 days, with the comment deadline set for July 27, 2026.

The survey aims to estimate the 20‑year capital improvement needs of community water systems (CWSs) across all 50 states, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, and U.S. territories. It will use a census approach for large systems (over 100,000 residents), a statistically based sample for medium systems (3,301–100,000 residents), and a re‑sample of small systems (≤3,300 residents) that participated in the previous survey. The data will inform how the Drinking Water State Revolving Fund (DWSRF) is allocated and help the EPA assess long‑term costs of Safe Drinking Water Act regulations.

Key Elements - Scope: Covers 2,975 community water systems and their primacy agencies, plus supplemental questions for Tribal utilities (AI and ANV).
- Methodology: Census for large systems; statistical sampling for medium systems; re‑sampling for small systems.
- Data Collected: 20‑year capital improvement needs, project documentation, and supplemental questions on barriers to DWSRF funding and Tribal system capabilities.
- Exclusions: No direct data collection on lead service lines or non‑profit non‑CWSs.
- Burden: Estimated 16,114 respondent hours per year, costing $1,060,526 annually, with a 11,303‑hour reduction from the previous survey.
- Funding Impact: Results will guide the allocation of DWSRF funds among states and improve national estimates of infrastructure costs.
- Stakeholder Engagement: EPA will consult with small system representatives, trade associations, and technical assistance providers to refine cost estimates.
- Comment Period: Public comments accepted until July 27, 2026; submissions should reference Docket ID EPA‑HQ‑OW‑2024‑0561.

New York Tightens Water Safety: EPA Gives Green Light to Revised Supervision Rules

Overview

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has tentatively approved New York’s updated Public Water System Supervision Program, which incorporates the Long Term 2 Enhanced Surface Water Treatment Rule. This revision strengthens oversight of drinking‑water treatment facilities, ensuring that state‑level regulations meet or exceed federal minimum requirements for protecting public health and the environment.

The approval signals that New York’s new rules are at least as stringent as the federal baseline, providing greater assurance that surface water sources—critical for both human consumption and ecological health—are treated with advanced technologies and rigorous monitoring. The update reflects a broader national effort to modernize water treatment standards in response to evolving scientific knowledge and emerging contaminants.

Stakeholders, including water utilities, environmental groups, and the public, now have a window to review the changes and voice concerns. Comments and requests for public hearings must be submitted by July 27, 2026, allowing the EPA to consider any substantive issues before finalizing the program.

Key Elements

• Adoption of Long Term 2 Rule – New York has integrated the federal Long Term 2 Enhanced Surface Water Treatment Rule into its state regulations, focusing on advanced treatment for surface water supplies.
  
• Compliance and Stringency – EPA determined the revised program meets all federal minimums and is no less stringent than the corresponding federal rule.
  
• Tentative Approval – The EPA’s decision is provisional, pending public input and any required hearings.
  
• Public Comment Period – Comments and hearing requests must be received by July 27, 2026, ensuring transparency and stakeholder engagement.
  
• Hearing Requirements – Substantial hearing requests must include contact details, a brief statement of interest, and a signature, and will be scheduled if received on time.
  
• Access to Documents – All related documents are available for inspection at EPA Region 2 and the New York State Department of Health during business hours.
  
• Contact Information – Comments can be directed to Katie Lynch, Water Division, EPA Region 2, or submitted in writing to the specified addresses.
  

These provisions collectively aim to enhance the safety and reliability of New York’s drinking water supply while maintaining rigorous oversight aligned with federal standards.

EPA Publishes Its Comments on Federal Environmental Impact Statements

Overview

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has issued a notice announcing the public availability of its comment letters on Environmental Impact Statements (EISs) filed by other federal agencies. In accordance with the Clean Air Act and the Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) guidance, the agency is required to disclose its assessments and recommendations on these documents. This notice specifically highlights the EPA’s comments on the Sweetwater Lake Recreation Management and Development Project, a proposed initiative that will shape land use and resource management in the region.

The notice serves several key purposes. First, it informs stakeholders—such as local communities, industry groups, and environmental organizations—of the EPA’s position on the project’s environmental implications. Second, it provides a transparent record of the agency’s review process, ensuring that the public can see how federal environmental standards are applied. Finally, it establishes the timeline for the comment period, giving interested parties a clear deadline to submit their own feedback.

By making these comment letters publicly accessible, the EPA reinforces its commitment to open government and collaborative decision‑making in the fields of geoscience, natural resource management, and environmental protection.

Key Elements

• Public Disclosure Requirement: EPA must publish its comments on EISs under Section 309(a) of the Clean Air Act and CEQ guidance (42 U.S.C. 4332).
  
• Weekly Receipt of EISs: The agency receives new EIS submissions every week (e.g., June 12–22, 2026).
  
• Specific Project Highlighted: Sweetwater Lake Recreation Management and Development Project – EPA’s comment letter is now available.
  
• Comment Period Deadline: Stakeholders can submit feedback on the project until September 23, 2026.
  
• Contact Information: Leanne Veldhuis (EPA) – 970‑471‑1796 for inquiries about the comment letter.
  
• Agency Leadership: Notice issued by Nancy Abrams, Deputy Director, Federal Activities Division.
  
• Transparency Goal: Enables public scrutiny of EPA’s environmental assessments and supports informed decision‑making in land use and resource development.

Rio Grande LNG Expands Export Reach: New 312 Bcf/yr Train Seeks Long‑Term Approval to Ship LNG Beyond Free‑Trade Partners

Overview

Rio Grande LNG Train 6, LLC (RGLNG Train 6) has filed a request with the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) for a long‑term, multi‑contract authorization to export up to 312 billion cubic feet of liquefied natural gas (LNG) per year from a proposed sixth liquefaction train adjacent to the existing Rio Grande LNG Terminal in Brownsville, Texas. The project would add a new marine jetty and supporting infrastructure on brown‑field land, leveraging the terminal’s existing facilities to minimize new environmental impacts.

The application, submitted under the Natural Gas Act (NGA), seeks permission to export LNG to any country that is not a U.S. free‑trade agreement (FTA) partner, provided U.S. law does not prohibit trade. DOE will evaluate the request in light of NGA provisions, DOE regulations, and the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). A final decision will not be issued until the agency completes its environmental review.

Stakeholders have 60 days to submit protests, comments, or motions to intervene, with a deadline of 4:30 p.m. Eastern on August 25, 2026. The authorization, if granted, would remain in effect through the later of December 31, 2050, or twenty years after commercial operation begins.

Key Elements

• Export volume: ~312 billion cubic feet of natural gas per year (Bcf/yr).
  
• Location: Brownsville Ship Channel, Cameron County, Texas, adjacent to the existing Rio Grande LNG Terminal.
  
• Infrastructure: Sixth liquefaction train, new marine jetty, and integrated support facilities on brown‑field land.
  
• Lease arrangement: Rio Grande LNG LandCo, LLC (affiliate) holds the long‑term lease.
  
• Export scope: Authorization to ship LNG to non‑FTA countries, subject to U.S. law and policy.
  
• Term: Effective until the later of December 31, 2050, or 20 years after commercial start.
  
• Regulatory framework: Natural Gas Act (NGA) sections 3(a) and 3©; DOE’s Office of Global Energy Security.
  
• Environmental review: DOE must satisfy NEPA requirements before issuing a final order.
  
• Public comment period: 60 days from notice publication; deadline August 25, 2026.
  
• Contact information: DOE Office of Global Energy Security, email fergas@hq.doe.gov for electronic filings.

California Coastal Management Program Under Review: NOAA Calls for Public Input on Spaceports, Oil, and More

Overview

The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) is conducting a performance evaluation of California’s federally approved Coastal Management Program, as mandated by the Coastal Zone Management Act (CZMA). The evaluation seeks to assess how effectively the state has implemented the program, met coastal protection goals, and complied with grant and cooperative‑agreement requirements.

To enrich the assessment, NOAA is holding one in‑person meeting and two virtual public meetings in August 2026. These sessions invite stakeholders—including industry, environmental groups, and local communities—to share observations and new information on key coastal issues such as spaceport infrastructure, offshore oil production, pipeline maintenance, desalination projects, and undersea cable installations.

All comments received by August 22, 2026, will be incorporated into the final evaluation report, which NOAA will publish once the review is complete. The process underscores NOAA’s commitment to transparency and public participation in coastal stewardship.

Key Elements

• Agency & Legal Basis

  • NOAA’s Office for Coastal Management, under the Department of Commerce.
    
  • Evaluation required by Section 312 of the Coastal Zone Management Act (CZMA).
    

• Meeting Schedule

  • In‑person: August 10, 2026, 2 p.m.–6 p.m. PT, Pacific Ballroom, Hilton Santa Monica Hotel & Suites, Santa Monica, CA.
    
  • Virtual: August 11 and 12, 2026, 2 p.m.–5 p.m. PT via Adobe Connect.
    

• Participation & Registration

  • Oral comments: 3‑minute speaking slots; registration by email (Aug 8 for in‑person, Aug 10 for virtual).
    
  • Virtual attendance capped at 1,000 participants per session; register for only one session.
    
  • Written comments accepted by email or mail; deadline August 22, 2026.
    

• Topics of Interest

  • Spaceport infrastructure.
    
  • Offshore oil production.
    
  • Pipeline maintenance.
    
  • Desalination projects.
    
  • Undersea cable deployments.
    

• Public Record & Accessibility

  • All oral and written comments, including speaker names, will be publicly available.
    
  • Meeting recordings and transcripts will be provided upon request.
    

• Contact & Further Information

  • Josh Lott, Acting Chief, Policy, Planning, and Communications Division, NOAA Office for Coastal Management.
    
  • Email: [contact email]; Phone: (843) 628‑8895.
    

• Next Steps

  • NOAA will compile and analyze all input, then issue a final evaluation report and any recommended actions.

U.S. Delays Decision on Chinese Graphite Electrodes Import Investigation

Overview

The U.S. Department of Commerce has postponed the preliminary determination in its less‑than‑fair‑value (LTFV) investigation of large‑diameter graphite electrodes imported from the People’s Republic of China. Graphite electrodes are critical components in electric arc furnaces used for steel production, making them a key material in the global steel and energy sectors. The investigation, launched on March 16 2026, seeks to determine whether these imports are priced below fair market value, which could trigger duties to protect U.S. manufacturers.

The preliminary determination was originally due by August 3 2026. On June 5 2026, two U.S. companies—Resonac Graphite America Inc. and Tokai Carbon GE LLC—requested a 50‑day extension to allow the Department to gather and analyze questionnaire responses and, if needed, issue supplemental questions. The Department granted the request, moving the deadline to September 22 2026. The final determination deadline remains 75 days after the new preliminary date, unless further extensions are granted.

This postponement reflects the complexity of the case and the need for thorough data collection. While the delay does not change the investigation’s objectives, it provides additional time for stakeholders to prepare and for the Department to ensure a fair assessment of market conditions affecting U.S. graphite electrode producers.

Key Elements

• Investigation launch: March 16 2026, targeting large‑diameter graphite electrodes from China.
  
• Legal basis: Tariff Act §§ 733(b)(1)(A) and 733©(1); 19 CFR 351.205(e).
  
• Petitioners: Resonac Graphite America Inc. and Tokai Carbon GE LLC.
  
• Postponement request: Submitted June 5 2026, citing need for additional time to collect and analyze questionnaire data.
  
• New deadline: Preliminary determination now due September 22 2026 (190 days after initiation).
  
• Final determination: 75 days after the new preliminary date, unless further postponed.
  
• Implications: Extended timeline may affect U.S. steel producers, importers, and Chinese exporters, influencing trade dynamics and potential duty imposition.
  
• Agency involved: International Trade Administration, Enforcement and Compliance, U.S. Department of Commerce.

Tax Breaks for Disaster‑Ready Homes: The 2025 Disaster Mitigation Act

Overview

The Disaster Mitigation and Tax Parity Act of 2025 amends the Internal Revenue Code to exclude from taxable income any payments received under state‑based catastrophe loss mitigation programs. The bill, introduced by Representative LaMalfa and now sponsored by Mr. Murphy, seeks to give homeowners and property owners a financial incentive to make structural improvements that reduce damage from windstorms, earthquakes, and wildfires. By treating these mitigation payments as non‑income, the Act promotes investment in resilient construction and encourages states to expand their disaster‑relief programs.

The legislation applies to programs established by states, local governments, joint powers authorities, or state‑created entities that oversee essential or basic property insurance markets. Qualified payments are defined as funds used solely to improve a property’s ability to withstand natural hazards. The Act also preserves the property’s basis, meaning owners do not lose tax depreciation benefits when they use the funds for mitigation.

Effective for taxable years beginning after December 31 2020, the Act allows retroactive claims, giving taxpayers the opportunity to amend past returns and claim the exclusion. The bill aligns tax policy with geoscience‑based risk assessments, supporting broader efforts to reduce disaster losses and strengthen community resilience.

Key Elements

• Income Exclusion – Payments from state‑based catastrophe mitigation programs are excluded from gross income under a new subsection of Section 139 of the Internal Revenue Code.
  
• Qualified Payments – Defined as funds used to improve a property so it can better withstand windstorms, earthquakes, or wildfires.
  
• Program Eligibility – Applies to programs created by states, local governments, joint powers authorities, or state‑created entities that regulate essential or basic property insurance markets.
  
• No Basis Increase – The exclusion does not increase the property’s tax basis, preserving depreciation and other tax benefits.
  
• Retroactive Claims – Taxpayers can claim the exclusion on amended returns for years prior to the Act’s effective date.
  
• Geoscience Alignment – Encourages investment in hazard‑resilient construction informed by seismic, meteorological, and wildfire risk data.
  
• Insurance Market Impact – By reducing loss exposure, the Act may lower insurance premiums and support the stability of state‑managed insurance pools.
  
• Policy Synergy – Complements existing federal disaster relief programs and state building‑code initiatives aimed at reducing future catastrophe costs.

Geothermal Cost‑Recovery Act: Turning Heat into Hard Cash for the Interior

Overview

The Geothermal Cost‑Recovery Authority Act of 2025 amends the 1970 Geothermal Steam Act to give the U.S. Department of the Interior the power to recover administrative and inspection costs from parties that lease, permit, or operate geothermal resources on federal lands. The new authority is in effect from the day the bill is enacted until September 30, 2032, covering everything from lease applications to well abandonment and site reclamation.

The Act is designed to strengthen the financial foundation of the Interior’s geothermal program. By allowing the Secretary to collect fees for processing applications, issuing permits, and conducting inspections, the Interior can offset the costs of managing geothermal development without raising taxes or diverting funds from other programs. The law also includes safeguards: the Secretary may reduce or waive fees if they would impose an economic hardship or if a lower amount better promotes resource use.

Within five years of enactment, the Interior must report to Congress and the public on how the new cost‑recovery mechanism has affected its geothermal operations, and it must recommend whether the provision should be renewed or revised. This transparency aims to balance fiscal responsibility with the interests of the geothermal industry and other stakeholders.

Key Elements

• Cost‑Recovery Scope

  • Covers all reasonable administrative costs for lease processing, operations plans, drilling permits, and related approvals.
    
  • Includes inspection and monitoring costs for exploration, drilling, plugging, abandonment, construction, operation, termination, and reclamation of geothermal sites.

• Timeframe

  • Effective from enactment until September 30, 2032.

• Decision Criteria

  • The Secretary may require reimbursement only if a cooperative cost‑share agreement does not exist.
    
  • Adjustments allowed for economic hardship or to promote greater geothermal use.

• Use of Recovered Funds

  • Credited to the Department of the Interior’s appropriation, account, or fund as discretionary offsetting collections.
    
  • Funds are earmarked for the same activities that generated the costs (lease processing, permitting, inspections).

• Reporting Requirement

  • Within five years, the Interior must submit a report to the House Natural Resources Committee and the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee, and publish it online.
    
  • The report must assess the impact on the Bureau of Land Management’s geothermal program, recommend reauthorization or updates, and include stakeholder input.

• Legislative Status

  • Placed on the Union Calendar (No. 569) and committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union.

Pulaski Pipeline Plan Gets Environmental Review – Public Comment Deadline Approaches

Overview

The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) has released an Environmental Assessment (EA) for Columbia Gulf Transmission, LLC’s proposed Pulaski Project, a 41.3‑mile, 30‑inch natural‑gas pipeline in Kentucky. The line is intended to deliver 260,000 dekatherms per day of gas to the John S. Cooper Power Station, supporting East Kentucky Power Cooperative’s energy needs. The EA evaluates the project’s potential effects on air, water, wildlife, and local communities, and explores reasonable alternatives and mitigation measures.

The assessment concludes that the Pulaski Project would not constitute a major federal action under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), meaning it is unlikely to significantly affect the quality of the human environment. Nevertheless, FERC is required to consider the EA’s findings when deciding whether to issue a Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity under the Natural Gas Act.

Stakeholders—including local residents, environmental groups, and state agencies—are invited to submit comments by 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on July 22, 2026. Comments can be filed electronically via FERC’s eComment or eFiling systems, or by mail. The Commission will review all input before making a final decision on the project’s authorization.

Key Elements

• Project Scope: 41.3 miles of new 30‑inch pipeline, pig launcher/receiver, bidirectional pig trap, meter and regulator stations, and four mainline valves.
  
• Purpose: Transport 260,000 dekatherms/day of natural gas to the John S. Cooper Power Station in Kentucky.
  
• Regulatory Framework: FERC is the lead federal agency under the Natural Gas Act of 1938 and the NEPA lead agency for the EA.
  
• Environmental Findings: EA determines the project is not a major federal action; potential impacts are identified and mitigation measures proposed.
  
• Public Participation: Comment period ends July 22, 2026; submissions must reference docket CP26‑11‑000.
  
• Comment Channels: eComment (text‑only), eFiling (file attachments), or paper mail to FERC’s Secretary.
  
• Decision Basis: FERC will weigh economic necessity and environmental effects before granting a Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity.
  
• Access to Documents: EA available electronically on FERC’s website and eLibrary; no printed copies.

Biron Hydroelectric Project Seeks Land Transfer to Expand County Park

Overview

Consolidated Water Power Company has filed a non‑capacity amendment to its license for the Biron Hydroelectric Project on the Wisconsin River. The amendment proposes to convey 64.45 acres of project land to Wood County so the county can operate and maintain CERA Park, a public day‑use and camping area already within the project boundary. The company also requests changes to the recreation plan to reflect this transfer and to ensure long‑term park operation.

The project sits entirely on private land in Portage and Wood counties, Wisconsin, and does not involve any federal property. The amendment does not alter the plant’s power output; it focuses on land ownership and recreation management while preserving flowage easements that maintain water levels for the hydroelectric facility.

The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) has opened a public comment period, inviting federal, state, local, and tribal agencies with environmental expertise to cooperate on environmental documentation. Any interested parties may file comments, protests, or motions to intervene by July 22, 2026, using FERC’s e‑filing system or by mail.

Key Elements

• Project: Biron Hydroelectric Project, Wisconsin River, Portage & Wood counties.
  
• License Amendment: Non‑capacity change (Project No. 2192‑055) filed February 17, 2026.
  
• Land Transfer: 64.45 acres of project land to be conveyed in fee title to Wood County for CERA Park.
  
• Recreation Plan Update: Amendments to the existing recreation plan to reflect the land transfer and ensure long‑term park operation.
  
• Flowage Easements: Retained over the transferred land to maintain water levels for hydroelectric operations.
  
• Public Participation: Comment, protest, and intervention deadline July 22, 2026 (5 PM Eastern).
  
• Filing Instructions: Electronic filing via FERC eComment/eFiling; paper filings accepted at specified addresses.
  
• Agency Cooperation: Federal, state, local, and tribal agencies may assist in environmental documentation but cannot intervene.
  
• No Federal Lands: The project does not occupy any federal property, simplifying land‑ownership issues.
  
• Environmental Oversight: The amendment will be reviewed under the Federal Power Act and FERC’s environmental rules.

USDA Seeks Public Input on Disaster Relief Data Collection for Farmers

Overview

The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) has submitted a request to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review and clearance of an information‑collection requirement under the Paperwork Reduction Act. The notice invites comments by July 27, 2026, on the necessity, accuracy, and burden of the proposed data collection, as well as ways to improve its quality and reduce respondent effort through electronic or automated means.

This collection supports the Farm Service Agency’s (FSA) Emergency Relief Program (ERP 2022), which was funded with $3.74 billion from the 2023 Disaster Relief Supplemental Appropriations Act. ERP 2022 provides financial assistance to crop producers who suffered revenue, quality, or production losses from a wide range of natural disasters—including droughts, wildfires, hurricanes, tornadoes, floods, derechos, excessive heat, winter storms, and smoke exposure—during 2022. The program also covers losses of trees, bushes, vines, and even harvested wine grapes.

The USDA’s goal is to streamline the eligibility‑determination process, reduce paperwork for producers, and ensure that payments are accurately targeted. The agency has revised respondent estimates and burden hours to reflect the actual number of ERP 2022 participants, removed obsolete forms, and clarified the data sources (FSA and Rural Marketing Administration records) that will be used to verify compliance. Comments will help shape the final collection, ensuring it remains practical, efficient, and responsive to the needs of the agricultural community.

Key Elements

• OMB Review & Comment Period – USDA seeks public feedback on the necessity, burden, and design of the information collection; comments due July 27, 2026.
  
• Paperwork Reduction Act Compliance – The collection must obtain a valid OMB control number before any data can be requested.
  
• ERP 2022 Funding Context – $3.74 billion allocated for losses from 2022 natural disasters affecting crops, livestock, and related commodities.
  
• Eligibility Determination – Producers may retain up to 90 % of revenue losses if the loss is attributable to crops without insurance or NAP coverage; eligibility is verified via FSA‑524C and supporting documentation.
  
• Revised Burden Estimates – Updated respondent counts (≈218,640 farms) and burden hours to reflect actual ERP 2022 participation; obsolete forms removed.
  
• Data Sources & Verification – Uses FSA and Rural Marketing Administration data; producers may need to submit additional documentation if compliance cannot be confirmed.
  
• Technology & Automation – Encourages use of electronic, automated, or other technological collection techniques to minimize respondent burden.
  
• Geoscience & Natural‑Resource Impact – The program addresses losses from a spectrum of geoscientific events (drought, wildfire, hurricanes, etc.), underscoring the intersection of climate variability and agricultural resilience.
  
• Notification & Compliance Process – Producers receive mail notifications of compliance status; no further action required if compliant, otherwise additional documentation is requested.
  

These provisions collectively aim to ensure that disaster‑relief payments are accurately targeted, efficiently administered, and that the data collection process imposes the least possible burden on affected farmers.

EU Tightens Foreign‑Investment Rules to Protect Energy, Minerals and Critical Infrastructure

Overview

The European Union has adopted Regulation (EU) 2026/1386 to replace the 2019 framework for screening foreign direct investments. Its core aim is to safeguard the Union’s security, public order and economic resilience by ensuring that any foreign investment that could influence the management or control of Union‑based entities is thoroughly assessed before it is completed.

The new rules apply to all Member States, requiring them to establish a national screening mechanism that covers not only direct foreign investments but also those carried out through a foreign investor’s subsidiary in the Union. The regulation introduces a harmonised set of criteria and procedures, including a 45‑day initial review, a mandatory prior‑authorisation requirement for sensitive sectors, and a robust cooperation mechanism that allows Member States and the Commission to exchange information, provide comments and issue opinions on potentially risky transactions.

Key sectors identified as “critical” include dual‑use and defence items, semiconductor and quantum technologies, artificial intelligence, critical raw‑material extraction and processing, transport, energy and digital infrastructure, financial market infrastructure, and voter‑registration systems. The regulation also establishes secure data‑exchange systems, an online EU portal for filings, and mandatory annual reporting to ensure transparency and accountability.

Key Elements

• Universal Screening Requirement

  • All Member States must screen foreign investments that create lasting links to Union targets, including those made through a foreign investor’s subsidiary in the Union.
    
  • The 2019 regulation is repealed; the new framework takes effect 18 months after entry into force.

• Common Minimum Scope

  • Dual‑use items, defence goods, semiconductor/quantum/AI technologies, critical raw‑material activities (exploration, extraction, processing, recycling, stockpiling), transport, energy, and digital infrastructure deemed critical by risk assessment.
    
  • Financial market infrastructure (CCPs, central securities depositories, regulated markets, payment systems) and voter‑registration databases are also covered.

• Procedural Harmonisation

  • Initial review within 45 calendar days of filing; in‑depth investigation if needed.
    
  • Prior authorisation required for sensitive sectors; mitigation measures may be imposed instead of outright prohibition.
    
  • Screening decisions must be justified, proportionate, and subject to judicial review.

• Cooperation Mechanism

  • Mandatory notification of certain foreign investments to other Member States and the Commission.
    
  • Structured timelines for comments (≤20 days) and Commission opinions (≤30 days).
    
  • Multi‑country transactions require coordinated filings, notifications, and aligned decision timelines.

• Information and Confidentiality

  • Secure, encrypted communication system and an online EU portal for electronic filings.
    
  • Confidentiality safeguards for sensitive information, with clear rules on data protection and classification.
    
  • Host Member States must provide completeness status and can request additional information from investors or other Member States.

• Transparency and Reporting

  • Annual public reports by Member States on screening activity, outcomes, and legislative developments.
    
  • Commission publishes an annual report on implementation, trends, and cost of compliance.
    
  • A secure database will hold information on notified investments and screening outcomes.

• Evaluation and Adaptation

  • The Commission evaluates the regulation’s effectiveness 4½ years after entry into force and every five years thereafter.
    
  • Delegated acts allow the Commission to update lists of critical projects, technology areas, and critical medicines as circumstances evolve.

• Geoscience and Mineral‑Resource Focus

  • Explicit inclusion of critical raw‑material activities (Section I, Annex I) ensures that mining, exploration, and processing of strategic minerals are subject to screening.
    
  • The regulation supports resilience of supply chains for minerals essential to energy, transport, and digital infrastructure.

• Environmental and Land‑Use Implications

  • By covering critical infrastructure and transport networks, the regulation indirectly protects land‑use patterns and environmental assets that underpin energy and transport systems.
    
  • The focus on critical technologies and raw materials aligns with EU goals for sustainable and secure resource use.

These provisions collectively aim to create a predictable, harmonised, and transparent framework for foreign investment screening that protects the EU’s strategic interests while maintaining an open investment environment.

Flood‑Risk Data Collection: Army Corps Seeks Public Input on Property Owner Forms

Overview

The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) is proposing a new public information collection to support its Nonstructural Flood Risk Management Program. The program focuses on measures such as home elevation and floodproofing that reduce damage from flooding without building new levees or walls. To determine which properties qualify and to estimate costs, the Corps will gather detailed ownership and property data from residential and commercial owners through a secure online portal and paper forms.

The Corps is inviting comments on the necessity, accuracy, and burden of this data collection. Stakeholders can suggest ways to improve the clarity and usefulness of the information, and to reduce the time and effort required from respondents, including the use of automated technologies. All comments will be considered by August 24 2026, and the public can submit them via the Department of Defense’s regulatory office.

This initiative is authorized under the Water Resources Development Act of 1974, Executive Order 11988, and USACE’s own regulations. Without the collected data, the Corps cannot verify property eligibility, assess structural suitability, or develop accurate cost estimates for flood‑risk reduction projects.

Key Elements

• Purpose: Collect property and ownership data to evaluate eligibility for nonstructural flood‑risk measures (e.g., elevation, floodproofing).
  
• Legal Basis: Section 73 of the Water Resources Development Act, Executive Order 11988, and Engineer Regulation 1165‑2‑26.
  
• Data Collection Instruments:
  
  • Property Owner Interest Form (≈3 min)
    
  • Application Part I (≈30 min)
    
  • Application Part II (≈15 min)
    
  • Right of Entry Form (≈5 min)
    
• Delivery Methods: Secure online portal (ArcGIS Survey123) or paper/PDF submissions.
  
• Estimated Burden: Total of 16,240 minutes (≈270 hours) across all forms, with an average of 16,240 minutes per respondent.
  
• Comment Period: Open until August 24 2026; submissions must reference docket number USA‑2026‑HQ‑0397.
  
• Potential Improvements: Suggestions for reducing respondent burden, enhancing data quality, and incorporating automated collection techniques.
  
• Outcome: Enables the Corps to validate property characteristics, conduct on‑site inspections, and finalize agreements with eligible owners, thereby advancing flood‑risk reduction goals.

Colorado Pipeline Expansion: Public Scoping for New Natural Gas Link

Overview
The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) is opening a scoping period to gather public input on the Critical Energy Reliability Link Project, a natural‑gas pipeline expansion proposed by Rockies Express Pipeline LLC, Cheyenne Connector, LLC, and East Cheyenne Gas Storage, LLC. The project will run through Weld, Adams, Arapahoe, Elbert, and El Paso counties, adding roughly 160 miles of 24‑inch pipeline, a compressor station, and associated facilities to deliver up to 100,000 dekatherms per day of firm gas service to Colorado Springs Utilities.

On May 15 2026 the applicants submitted amendments that extend the pipeline by 1.1 miles, add a 2.7‑mile spur, and modify several workspaces and access roads, increasing the total construction footprint by about 20 acres. The scoping period closes on July 17 2026, giving stakeholders a chance to shape the environmental analysis that will be used to decide whether the project is in the public convenience and necessity.

FERC’s environmental review will cover geology, soils, water resources, wetlands, wildlife, endangered species, cultural resources, socio‑economics, land use, visual impacts, air quality, noise, and reliability. The agency invites comments on potential impacts, reasonable alternatives, and mitigation measures. Landowners along the route may be approached for easements, and if agreements cannot be reached, eminent domain could be invoked under the Natural Gas Act.

Key Elements

• Project Scope – ~160 miles of 24‑inch pipeline, a 6,200‑hp compressor station, and ancillary facilities; amended to include a 2.7‑mile spur and 1.1‑mile extension.
  
• Land Use – Approximately 2,268 acres disturbed during construction; 1,068 acres retained for permanent operation; 69.8 % of the route follows existing rights‑of‑way.
  
• Scoping Deadline – July 17 2026 (5:00 p.m. ET).
  
• Public Participation – Comments accepted electronically via eComment or eFiling, or by paper mail to FERC.
  
• Eminent Domain – If easements are not negotiated, the pipeline company may seek condemnation; compensation determined by state courts.
  
• NEPA Process – FERC will prepare an Environmental Document addressing impacts on geology, water, wildlife, cultural resources, and more, and will consider reasonable alternatives.
  
• Cooperating Agencies – State, local, and tribal agencies may request cooperating‑agency status to contribute expertise.
  
• Section 106 Consultation – Ongoing dialogue with the Colorado State Historic Preservation Office to assess effects on historic properties.
  
• Environmental Mailing List – Updated to include new landowners and stakeholders affected by the amended route.
  
• Access to Information – All documents, appendices, and the Environmental Document will be available through FERC’s eLibrary and the natural gas environmental documents web page.

Puget Sound Energy Pipeline Ownership Transfer: Public Participation and Intervention Deadline

Overview

Puget Sound Energy, Inc. (Puget), Sumas Pipeline Company (Sumas), and Sumas Dry Kilns, Inc. (Dry Kilns) have filed a joint application with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) to transfer Sumas’s 7 % ownership interest in a border‑crossing natural‑gas pipeline in Whatcom County, Washington, to Dry Kilns. After the transfer, Puget will hold 90 % of the facility and Dry Kilns 10 %. The parties affirm that no new construction or modification of the existing pipeline will occur.

The application triggers FERC’s environmental review process. Within 90 days of the notice, FERC staff will either complete an environmental assessment (EA) or issue a schedule for a full environmental impact statement (FEIS). The outcome will inform federal and state agencies of the timing for completing all necessary authorizations.

Public participation is a key component of the proceeding. Interested parties may file comments, protests, or motions to intervene. The deadline for filing a motion to intervene is 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on July 8, 2026. All filings must reference docket number CP26‑539‑000 and can be submitted electronically via FERC’s eComment or eFiling systems, or by paper mail.

Key Elements

• Ownership Transfer: Sumas’s 7 % stake in the Whatcom County pipeline is being transferred to Dry Kilns; Puget will own 90 %, Dry Kilns 10 %.
  
• No Construction Changes: The transfer does not involve new construction or modification of the existing pipeline infrastructure.
  
• Environmental Review: FERC will conduct an EA or FEIS within 90 days; the review will be publicly available on eLibrary.
  
• Public Participation Channels:
  
  • Comments (support or objections)
    
  • Protests (under 18 CFR 385.211)
    
  • Motions to intervene (Rule 214)
    
• Intervention Deadline: 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time, July 8, 2026.
  
• Submission Methods: eComment, eFiling, or paper mail to FERC’s Office of Public Participation.
  
• Contact Information:
  
  • FERC Office of Public Participation: (202) 502‑6595
    
  • Legal counsel for applicants: Pamela J. Anderson (Perkins Coie) and Jack H. Grant (Law Offices of Jack H. Grant).
    
• Service List: Intervenors will be added to FERC’s service list and receive all subsequent filings.
  
• Regulatory Authority: Notice issued under 18 CFR 2.1, 18 CFR 157.9, and 18 CFR 385.102(d).

Pneumatic Power: Erie Boulevard Hydropower Plans Safer, Smarter Dam Upgrade

Overview
Erie Boulevard Hydropower L.P. has filed a notice with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) to replace the remaining wooden flashboards on its Beebee Island dam on the Black River in Jefferson County, New York, with a modern pneumatic flashboard system. The new system will use steel plates supported by inflatable bladders that can be raised or lowered to manage spillway flow, thereby reducing the annual failures that have plagued the wooden boards during high‑water events.

The upgrade is intended to enhance dam safety, improve operational control, and stabilize reservoir levels, which in turn should create more consistent environmental conditions downstream. To install the system, the company plans a brief six‑week drawdown of about one foot below the dam crest, after which the reservoir will be restored to its normal level. No new ground disturbance is expected beyond the existing infrastructure.

FERC will prepare an Environmental Assessment (EA) under the National Environmental Policy Act, with a draft EA slated for release by November 2, 2026. A 30‑day public comment period will follow, and all comments will be considered in the final decision. Interventions have already been filed by the U.S. Department of the Interior, New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, and New York Rivers United, indicating active stakeholder engagement.

Key Elements

• Project Scope: Replacement of 3‑foot‑high wooden flashboards on ~²⁄₃ of the dam crest with a pneumatic system.
• Location: Beebee Island Project, Black River, Watertown, Jefferson County, NY (non‑federal land).
• Operational Benefits: Improved spillway control, reduced reservoir elevation swings, enhanced dam safety.
• Environmental Measures: Installation of a sump pump and venting system to provide required veiling flows (0.5 in. along the dam top) during May 1–Oct 31.
• Construction Impact: ~1‑foot drawdown for ~6 weeks; no new ground disturbance beyond existing structures.
• Regulatory Process: FERC to issue an Environmental Assessment by Nov 2, 2026; 30‑day comment period; final decision to incorporate public and agency feedback.
• Stakeholder Interventions: U.S. Interior, NY State Environmental Conservation, and New York Rivers United have filed motions to intervene, reflecting environmental and public interest concerns.
• Contact Information: Office of Public Participation (202 502‑6595); Mark Mattozzi (202 502‑8087) for inquiries.

Sugar River Hydro II: Surrendering a Small‑Scale Hydropower Project – Environmental Assessment Released

Overview

The U.S. Department of Energy and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) have published an Environmental Assessment (EA) for Sugar River Hydro II, LLC’s request to surrender its license for the Sugar River II Hydroelectric Project in Sullivan County, New Hampshire. The EA evaluates the environmental effects of dismantling the plant, including disconnecting generators, removing transformers, hydraulic fluids, and monitoring equipment, and securing the powerhouse. The Commission recommends the “reservoir drawdown” alternative—gradually lowering the reservoir to its natural level—as the preferred option, concluding that this action would not constitute a major federal action affecting the human environment.

The assessment also compares the drawdown alternative to a no‑action scenario, providing stakeholders with a clear understanding of potential ecological and social impacts. The project does not involve federal lands, and the EA is available online through FERC’s eLibrary. Public comments are solicited until July 17, 2026, with electronic filing encouraged.

For geoscientists, energy planners, and natural resource professionals, the document highlights how small‑scale hydroelectric projects can be responsibly decommissioned while minimizing environmental disruption and maintaining transparency through public participation.

Key Elements

• Project Details: Sugar River II Hydroelectric Project, Sullivan County, New Hampshire; license number 10934.
• Proposed Action: Surrender of the license; removal of all electrical, hydraulic, and monitoring equipment; securing the powerhouse.
• Preferred Alternative: Reservoir drawdown—gradual lowering of the reservoir to its natural level.
• Environmental Conclusion: Implementation of the drawdown alternative is not a major federal action under NEPA.
• Public Participation: Comments due by July 17, 2026; electronic filing via FERC eFiling or eComment systems; paper filings accepted.
• Access to EA: Available on FERC’s eLibrary; docket number P‑10934‑035.
• Contact Information: FERC Online Support, Office of Public Participation, and Secretary Debbie‑Anne A. Reese for inquiries and submissions.

Virginia’s New 300‑MW Pumped‑Storage Project Seeks Preliminary Permit

Overview
Bluff Spur Pumped Storage, LLC has filed a preliminary permit application with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) to study the feasibility of a large‑scale pumped‑storage energy project in Wise County, Virginia. The proposed system would use two 70‑acre reservoirs—an upper reservoir at 3,620 ft and a lower reservoir at 2,280 ft above NAVD88—connected by a 5,000‑foot tunnel that splits at a 100‑foot‑diameter powerhouse. The plant would house two turbine‑generator units totaling 300 MW, capable of producing roughly 840 GWh of electricity annually.

The preliminary permit, if granted, would give Bluff Spur priority to file a full license application but would not authorize any land‑disturbing activities or access to private lands or waters without explicit permission. Initial water for filling the reservoirs would come from nearby surface waterways or groundwater wells.

FERC has opened a public comment period that closes on August 17, 2026. Stakeholders—including those wishing to intervene, file competing applications, or submit notices of intent—can submit electronic filings through FERC’s eFiling system or send paper copies to the Commission’s offices. The Commission encourages electronic submissions and provides support contacts for assistance.

Key Elements

• Location: Wise County, Virginia
  
• Project Size: 300 MW capacity, 840 GWh annual generation
  
• Reservoirs: Two 70‑acre reservoirs (upper at 3,620 ft, lower at 2,280 ft) each holding ~2,400 acre‑feet
  
• Tunnel: 5,000‑foot concrete/steel‑lined tunnel with a 15‑foot diameter, bifurcating at the powerhouse
  
• Powerhouse: 100‑foot‑diameter open‑pit structure with two turbine‑generator units
  
• Transmission: 3.4‑mile, 161‑kV line to connect to a substation
  
• Water Source: Adjacent surface waterways and/or groundwater wells for initial fill and make‑up
  
• Permit Purpose: Grant priority to file a full license application; no land‑disturbing authority granted
  
• Public Participation: Comments, motions to intervene, and competing applications due by 5:00 p.m. ET on August 17, 2026
  
• Filing Channels: FERC eFiling system, eComment system, or paper submissions to the Commission’s Washington or Rockville offices
  
• Regulatory Reference: Section 4(f) of the Federal Power Act; 18 CFR 4.36 for competing applications.

Pipeline Project Gets New Environmental Review Deadline: What It Means for Energy Reliability

Overview
The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) has issued a revised schedule for the environmental assessment (EA) of the Critical Energy Reliability Link Project, a natural‑gas pipeline and storage expansion operated by Rockies Express Pipeline LLC (REX). The project, originally slated for an EA release on July 2, 2026, has been altered to include new facilities and landowner changes, prompting FERC staff to extend the review period. The updated EA issuance date is now set for October 2, 2026, with a 90‑day federal authorization decision deadline of December 31, 2026.

The notice underscores that the EA’s release will depend on the quality of information REX submits in response to forthcoming environmental information requests. Once issued, the EA will be open for a 30‑day public comment period, allowing stakeholders—including local communities, environmental groups, and industry participants—to review the proposed changes and provide feedback. The revised timeline also signals that other federal and state agencies must align their permitting and authorization decisions with the new schedule, ensuring coordinated oversight under the Natural Gas Act.

For those interested in tracking the project’s progress, FERC offers a free eSubscription service that delivers real‑time updates on filings, document summaries, and direct links to the docket. Public inquiries and participation opportunities are available through the Office of Public Participation, ensuring transparency and public engagement throughout the review process.

Key Elements

• Project Scope: Expansion of the Rockies Express Pipeline and East Cheyenne Gas Storage facilities, including new and modified infrastructure affecting additional landowners.
  
• Revised EA Issuance Date: October 2, 2026 (previously July 2, 2026).
  
• Public Comment Period: 30 days following EA release.
  
• Federal Authorization Decision Deadline: 90 days after EA issuance, December 31, 2026.
  
• Dependency on REX Submissions: EA release contingent on the quality of information provided by REX in response to environmental information requests.
  
• Coordination with Other Agencies: The schedule applies to federal and state agencies responsible for permits and approvals under the Natural Gas Act.
  
• Tracking and Participation: eSubscription service for real‑time docket updates; Office of Public Participation for comments, interventions, and rehearing requests.
  
• Unique Identification: Environmental review documents identified by EAXX‑019‑20‑000‑1765365565 under NEPA.

Streamlining Lost‑Oil Royalties: BLM’s New Rule Cuts Red Tape for Energy Operators

Overview

The Bureau of Land Management (BLM) has proposed a rule to revise its royalty regulations for oil and natural gas that is lost on federal and Indian leases. The changes are driven by the One Big Beautiful Bill Act (July 4 2025) and Executive Order 14154, “Unleashing American Energy.” The goal is to reduce unnecessary compliance burdens for operators while simplifying the BLM’s royalty determination process.

The proposal will adjust how royalties are calculated and reported for lost hydrocarbons, aiming to make the process more efficient for both the industry and the agency. By clarifying the rules and eliminating redundant paperwork, the BLM expects to speed up royalty assessments and reduce administrative costs.

Stakeholders—including oil and gas operators, tribal governments, and environmental groups—are invited to comment on the rule by August 24 2026. The Office of Management and Budget will review information‑collection aspects of the proposal by July 24 2026.

Key Elements

• Reduced Compliance Burden: Simplifies reporting requirements for lost oil and gas on federal and Indian leases.
  
• Streamlined Royalty Determinations: Clarifies calculation methods to expedite BLM’s assessment process.
  
• Legal Basis: Anchored in the One Big Beautiful Bill Act and Executive Order 14154, “Unleashing American Energy.”
  
• Comment Period: Public comments accepted until August 24 2026; OMB information‑collection comments due by July 24 2026.
  
• Contact Information: Comments can be submitted to the BLM via mail, online portal, or by contacting Acting Division Chief John Ajak.
  
• Impact on Tribes: Adjustments apply to Indian leases, potentially affecting royalty revenue streams for tribal governments.
  
• Transparency: The rule includes a plain‑language summary and follows 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(4) requirements for public notice.

BLM Rewrites Oil & Gas Leasing Rules to Align with New Energy and Land Stewardship Policies

Overview
The Bureau of Land Management (BLM) has issued a proposed rule to overhaul its oil and gas leasing regulations. The revision is designed to incorporate the requirements of the One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBB), several executive orders focused on energy deregulation and government efficiency, and the Royalty Resiliency Act. By updating these rules, the BLM aims to streamline leasing procedures while ensuring that public lands are managed responsibly under the Mineral Leasing Act.

The proposal restores minimum bond amounts to the levels that existed before the 2024 rule, reducing financial barriers for operators. It also introduces new provisions for royalty allocation schedules, allowing clearer distribution of royalties across multiple leases within a single agreement. These changes are intended to enhance transparency and fairness for both the government and industry participants.

Stakeholders—including oil and gas companies, environmental groups, and local communities—will have until August 24, 2026, to submit comments. The rule also includes revised information‑collection requirements that must be approved by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB). The BLM invites public input to shape the final rule and ensure that the leasing process balances economic development with stewardship of public lands.

Key Elements

• Alignment with OBBB and Executive Orders – Incorporates mandates from the One Big Beautiful Bill Act and several presidential orders on energy deregulation and government efficiency.
  
• Royalty Resiliency Act Provisions – Introduces allocation schedules for clearer royalty distribution across multiple leases.
  
• Bond Amounts – Reverts minimum bond requirements to pre‑2024 levels, easing financial burdens on operators.
  
• Leasing Process Improvements – Enhances procedural efficiency while maintaining stewardship obligations under the Mineral Leasing Act.
  
• Public Comment Period – Comments due by August 24, 2026; OMB comments on information‑collection requirements due by July 24, 2026.
  
• Stakeholder Engagement – Provides multiple channels for submitting comments, including mail, online docket search, and direct contact with BLM officials.
  
• Transparency and Accountability – Revised information‑collection rules require OMB approval, ensuring that data gathering remains justified and proportionate.

EPA Grants Clean Harbors Temporary Storage Flexibility for Hazardous Waste in Utah

Overview

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has approved a no‑migration variance (NMV) for Clean Harbors’ Grassy Mountain facility in Tooele County, Utah. The variance allows the company to temporarily store treated hazardous wastes in up to 250 “put piles” within its Subtitle C landfill cell while awaiting formal verification that the wastes meet the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) Land Disposal Restrictions (LDR) treatment standards.

The approval is conditional: each put pile must be confined by a 20‑mil polyethylene liner and a spray‑applied Posi‑Shell® cover, and the piles may remain staged for no longer than six months. Once LDR compliance is confirmed, the waste is transferred to the landfill’s working face and subject to the facility’s standard hazardous‑waste disposal rules.

EPA’s decision follows a public comment period and a detailed petition from Clean Harbors. The agency emphasized that the variance is intended only for temporary staging, not permanent disposal, and requires rigorous monitoring and engineering controls to prevent any migration of hazardous constituents.

Key Elements

• Scope of the variance: up to 250 put piles at a time, covering four waste categories (general metals, cyanide/sulfide with metals, high‑chromium wastes, and ammonia).
  
• Duration: each put pile may be staged for a maximum of 180 days; extensions require state approval.
  
• Engineered controls:
  
  • 20‑mil polyethylene geomembrane liner (minimum 12 in. visible on all sides).
    
  • Posi‑Shell® spray‑applied mortar cover (minimum thickness, with temporary polyethylene sheeting if weather prevents curing).
    
  • Run‑on/run‑off berms and ditches to divert stormwater.
    
• Compliance monitoring: daily inspections, immediate remediation of deficiencies, root‑cause analysis if LDR pass rates exceed 5 %.
  
• Reporting requirements: weekly logs of deficiencies, annual RCRA reports, and notification of any significant changes to the Region 8 Administrator.
  
• Future amendments: Clean Harbors may request expansion to new landfill cells if conditions remain unchanged, but must obtain EPA approval and maintain the same controls.
  
• Public comment: the variance was finalized after a 30‑day comment period in December 2025, with three comments addressed in the docket.
  
• Effective date: the final approval became effective July 23, 2026.

Silicon Metal from Malaysia Cleared of Dumping Claims – No Duties Imposed

Overview

Silicon metal, a high‑purity form of silicon used in semiconductor manufacturing, solar panels, and advanced alloys, is a critical raw material for the global technology and renewable‑energy sectors. The U.S. Department of Commerce recently concluded an administrative review of the antidumping duty order on silicon metal imported from Malaysia for the period August 1 2023 – July 31 2024. The review examined whether Malaysian exporters sold the product in the United States at less than its normal value, a condition that would trigger additional duties.

The final results, published on June 23 2026, found that the weighted‑average dumping margin for the Malaysian company PMB Silicon Sdn. Bhd. was 0 %. Consequently, no antidumping duties will be assessed on entries covered by this review, and Customs will liquidate those entries without applying any duty. The decision was made without any comments from interested parties, and no further analysis or decision memorandum accompanies the notice.

For geoscientists, energy engineers, and natural‑resource professionals, this outcome means that the supply chain for silicon metal remains stable and cost‑effective, supporting continued investment in semiconductor fabrication, photovoltaic manufacturing, and high‑performance alloys. The ruling also underscores the importance of monitoring trade policies that can affect the availability and pricing of critical materials used in technology and energy applications.

Key Elements

• Zero Dumping Margin: PMB Silicon’s weighted‑average dumping margin for the review period is 0 %, eliminating any antidumping duties.
• No Duty Assessment: Customs will liquidate relevant entries without applying antidumping duties; entries with unknown destination will be liquidated at the all‑others rate if no specific rate applies.
• Cash Deposit Requirements: Cash deposit rates remain in effect for all shipments entering the U.S. after publication, with rates set per the final results or the all‑others rate of 12.27 % for non‑covered firms.
• Importers’ Responsibilities: Importers must file certificates for reimbursement of duties before liquidation; failure to do so could trigger double duty assessments.
• Administrative Protective Order (APO) Compliance: Parties subject to an APO must return or destroy proprietary information as required, with non‑compliance considered a sanctionable violation.
• Trade Stability: The ruling supports continued, duty‑free access to Malaysian silicon metal, benefiting U.S. industries reliant on this material for electronics, renewable energy, and advanced materials.

Virginia’s Outer Continental Shelf: A Call for Mineral Leasing Input

Overview

The Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (BOEM) has opened a Request for Information and Interest (RFI) to explore the possibility of leasing hard minerals—such as heavy mineral sands and phosphorites—off the coast of Virginia. The RFI follows an unsolicited proposal from Odyssey Marine Exploration and is part of a broader federal effort to accelerate domestic production of critical minerals identified as essential to national security and economic resilience.

The RFI invites comments and indications of interest from a wide range of stakeholders, including federal and state agencies, tribal governments, industry, environmental groups, and the public. Respondents can submit detailed geological, ecological, and socioeconomic data, as well as specific block nominations, to help BOEM assess the feasibility, environmental impacts, and commercial viability of potential leases.

If BOEM decides to proceed, the process will follow the standard leasing framework: identification of mining areas, publication of a Proposed Leasing Notice, a Final Leasing Notice, competitive cash‑bid auctions, and eventual lease issuance. Environmental reviews under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and consultations with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, and federally recognized tribes will shape the final decision.

Key Elements

• RFI Purpose: Gather information and gauge interest before any lease sale; not a commitment to lease.
  
• Geographic Scope: Approximately 1.77 million acres (2,764 sq mi) between 3–63.5 mi offshore the Delmarva Peninsula, depth 30–410 ft.
  
• Minerals of Interest: Heavy mineral sands, phosphorites, and other hard minerals (excluding oil, gas, sulfur).
  
• Stakeholder Engagement: Solicits input from federal agencies, state and local governments, tribal entities, industry, and the public.
  
• Environmental Considerations: Requires data on marine habitats, fisheries, cultural resources, and potential impacts to inform NEPA analysis.
  
• Economic & National Security Context: Aligns with executive orders on critical minerals and the Energy Act of 2020, emphasizing domestic supply chains.
  
• Leasing Process: If pursued, will involve a competitive cash‑bid auction, with potential for sealed or oral bids, and a lease term of 10–20 years depending on mineral type.
  
• Confidentiality & FOIA: Proprietary information may be protected; public comments will be posted on regulations.gov unless marked confidential.
  
• Submission Deadline: July 23, 2026 for comments, information, and indications of interest.
  
• Contact & Submission: Electronic or hard‑copy submissions to BOEM’s Marine Minerals Division, with separate instructions for indications of interest.

EPA Seeks Public Input on Cost‑Recovery Deals for Lead‑Contaminated Superfund Site in Iowa

Overview
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has announced two proposed Administrative Settlement Agreements (ASAs) under CERCLA to recover past response costs incurred during a time‑critical removal action at the Recycletronics‑Akron Farm Facility Superfund Site in Akron, Iowa. The removal action, conducted between March and July 2022, removed roughly 944 tons of lead‑containing cathode ray tube glass—a hazardous substance— from the site.

The proposed ASAs involve WM Recycle America, L.L.C. and Dynamic Lifecycle Innovations, Inc., the companies that arranged for the hazardous waste disposal. Each party would reimburse the EPA for its share of the removal costs and, in return, the EPA would agree not to pursue further legal or administrative action against them under CERCLA sections 106 and 107(a).

EPA is inviting public comments on the agreements until July 23, 2026. Comments will be reviewed and may lead to modifications or withdrawal of the settlements if new information suggests they are inappropriate or inadequate. The process underscores the EPA’s commitment to transparency and stakeholder engagement in Superfund cost recovery.

Key Elements

• Site & Contamination – Recycletronics‑Akron Farm Facility, Akron, Iowa; removal of ~944 tons of lead‑containing CRT glass.
  
• Removal Action – Fund‑lead, time‑critical removal conducted March–July 2022.
  
• Proposed Parties – WM Recycle America, L.L.C. and Dynamic Lifecycle Innovations, Inc.
  
• Cost Recovery – Each party to pay EPA for its proportionate share of removal costs.
  
• Legal Covenant – EPA will not sue or take administrative action against the parties under CERCLA §§ 106, 107(a).
  
• Public Comment Period – Open until July 23, 2026; comments identified by Docket ID EPA‑R07‑SFUND‑2026‑2806.
  
• Submission Channels – Mail, fax, or electronic submission to Catherine Chiccine, EPA Region 7.
  
• Transparency – Proposed agreements available for inspection at EPA Region 7 office; comments posted publicly.
  
• Implications for Stakeholders – Provides a mechanism for responsible parties to share cleanup costs while limiting future liability; informs the broader community about lead remediation efforts and regulatory processes.