Geoscience and Policy Intersections

U.S. Builds a Trade‑Tech Think‑Tank to Boost Environmental Innovation Exports

The Department of Commerce has opened nominations for the Environmental Technologies Trade Advisory Committee (ETTAC), a federal advisory panel that will advise the Trade Promotion Coordinating Committee on how to expand U.S. exports of environmental technologies, goods, and services. The committee will provide consensus advice on trade policy, market opportunities, and program design to help U.S. companies compete abroad while meeting U.S. environmental and safety standards. ETTAC’s guidance is intended to support the America‑First Trade Policy agenda and to strengthen U.S. manufacturing, supply‑chain security, and energy dominance.

ETTAC’s remit covers a broad range of green technologies—including water and wastewater treatment, waste management, air‑quality monitoring, carbon capture, PFAS removal, and coastal resilience solutions—that together generate roughly $60 billion in annual U.S. exports and support 1.9 million jobs. By identifying priority markets, recommending export‑promotion programs, and coordinating with industry associations, the committee aims to accelerate the growth of U.S. environmental technology exports across all sectors.

The committee will comprise 30–45 members drawn from U.S. environmental‑tech firms, trade associations, state governments, and civil‑society groups. Nominations are open to U.S. citizens who represent a U.S. entity or organization engaged in exporting or supporting international trade in environmental technologies. Applications must be submitted by 5:00 p.m. EDT on August 7, 2026, and include a sponsor letter, biography, and company profile. Selected members will attend eight one‑day meetings (four in‑person) over the 2026‑2028 charter period and will serve in a representative capacity without compensation.

Key Elements

• Purpose: Provide consensus trade‑policy advice to expand U.S. exports of environmental technologies that meet U.S. environmental and safety standards.
  
• Scope of Technologies: Water/wastewater treatment, solid/hazardous waste management, air‑quality monitoring, carbon capture, PFAS removal, weather monitoring, coastal resilience, and related engineering services.
  
• Economic Impact: ~$60 billion in annual exports; ~1.9 million U.S. jobs.
  
• Membership Composition: 30–45 members from U.S. firms (including small businesses), trade associations, state governments, and civil‑society groups; balanced by subsector, geography, and company size.
  
• Eligibility: U.S. citizen, not a foreign agent, representing a U.S. entity or organization engaged in export or trade support.
  
• Selection Criteria: Representation of sponsor interests, knowledge of export issues, ability to contribute to America‑First Trade Policy, and balanced viewpoints.
  
• Meeting Schedule: Eight one‑day meetings (four in‑person) during 2026‑2028; additional subcommittee calls as needed.
  
• Application Deadline: 5:00 p.m. EDT, August 7, 2026.
  
• Contact: Megan Hyndman (ITA) or Evelina Scott (ITA) for questions; application via ITA’s ETTAC web page.

Turkey’s Chromium Trioxide Trade Probe Gets a Six‑Month Extension

Overview

The U.S. Department of Commerce has extended the provisional measures and postponed the final determination in its less‑than‑fair‑value (LTFV) investigation of chromium trioxide imported from Turkey. The final decision, originally due for release in early October 2026, will now be issued no later than October 5, 2026, giving exporters and producers additional time to respond to the preliminary findings. The provisional measures—temporary duties and import restrictions—have been extended from the initial four‑month period to a maximum of six months.

This move follows a request from Turkey’s leading producer, Şişecam, which accounts for a significant share of the U.S. market for chromium trioxide. The extension is intended to maintain market stability while the investigation continues, ensuring that U.S. importers and downstream industries (such as pigments, coatings, and specialty chemicals) are not abruptly impacted by sudden tariff changes.

The decision reflects the Department’s commitment to a fair and transparent trade review process. While the final determination remains pending, the extended provisional measures will continue to apply, potentially affecting U.S. import volumes and pricing until the investigation concludes.

Key Elements

• Investigation period: July 1 2024 – June 30 2025
  
• Preliminary determinations published: Jan 5 2026 and May 22 2026
  
• Final determination postponed: to no later than Oct 5 2026 (135 days after publication)
  
• Provisional measures extended: from 4 months to a maximum of 6 months
  
• Mandatory respondent: Şişecam (Şişecam Şişe ve Cam Fabrikaları A.Ş.)
  
• Reason for extension: exporter represents a significant share of U.S. imports; no compelling reasons to deny the request
  
• Provisional measures: temporary duties and import restrictions on chromium trioxide from Turkey
  
• Implications for U.S. industry: potential tariff exposure, market uncertainty for manufacturers using chromium trioxide in pigments, coatings, and specialty chemicals
  
• Contact for more information: Colin Thrasher, Office V, AD/CVD Operations, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce.

Eugene’s New Load‑Bank Station: Environmental Assessment Says It’s Low‑Impact

Overview

The U.S. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) has released the final Environmental Assessment (EA) for the Eugene Water & Electric Board’s proposed load‑bank station. The EA evaluates the environmental effects of building a dedicated facility that will simulate electrical loads for testing and maintenance of the region’s power grid.

The assessment concludes that, with appropriate protective measures in place, the project would not constitute a major federal action under the National Environmental Policy Act. This means that the station is unlikely to cause significant adverse impacts on air quality, water resources, wildlife habitats, or cultural sites in the Eugene area.

Stakeholders and the public are invited to review the full EA on FERC’s eLibrary and submit comments by 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on July 13, 2026. The notice encourages electronic filing through FERC’s eFiling system but also provides mailing addresses for paper submissions.

Key Elements

• Project Scope: Construction of a load‑bank station to support grid reliability and testing for the Eugene Water & Electric Board.
  
• Environmental Findings: The EA determines the project is not a major federal action and will not significantly affect the human environment.
  
• Protective Measures: Includes mitigation strategies such as noise control, stormwater management, and habitat preservation to minimize any residual impacts.
  
• Public Participation: Comments must be filed by July 13, 2026; electronic filing is strongly encouraged via FERC’s eFiling or eComment systems.
  
• Access to Documents: The final EA is available on FERC’s website through the eLibrary link; enter docket number P‑2242 to view.
  
• Contact Information: For assistance, FERC Online Support (1‑866‑208‑3676) and the Office of Public Participation (202‑502‑6595) are available.
  
• Relevance to Geosciences: The project’s environmental assessment addresses potential impacts on local water resources, soil stability, and ecological habitats—key concerns for geoscientists and natural resource professionals.

PG&E’s Low‑Impact Upgrade to Lower Blue Lake Dam: Seepage Control, Seismic Safety, and No Major Environmental Concerns

Overview

Pacific Gas & Electric (PG&E) has submitted a non‑capacity amendment to the Mokelumne Hydroelectric Project, specifically targeting the Lower Blue Lake dam in Alpine County, California. The amendment proposes modest engineering changes—installing a filter and buttress to curb seepage along the downstream embankment and raising the dam’s height by two feet to better withstand seismic activity—while keeping the reservoir’s operating elevation unchanged. A repair of the downstream monitoring weir and its inclusion within the project boundary are also planned.

The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) has prepared an Environmental Assessment (EA) under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). The EA concludes that, with the proposed protective measures, the amendment would not constitute a major federal action and would not significantly affect the quality of the human environment. The assessment is publicly available on FERC’s eLibrary, and comments are solicited until July 10, 2026, with electronic filing strongly encouraged.

For stakeholders in geoscience, energy, and natural resource management, the project represents a routine, low‑impact modification that balances operational safety with environmental stewardship on land partially managed by the U.S. Forest Service.

Key Elements

• Seepage mitigation: Installation of a filter and buttress along the downstream embankment of Lower Blue Lake dam.
  
• Seismic safety: Increase in dam height by 2 ft to reduce potential seismic effects.
  
• Operational stability: No change to the reservoir’s operating elevation.
  
• Weir repair and boundary adjustment: Restoration of the downstream monitoring weir and its incorporation into the project boundary.
  
• Environmental assessment outcome: EA (EAXX‑019‑20‑000‑1759504341) finds the amendment not to be a major federal action under NEPA.
  
• Public participation: Comments due July 10, 2026; electronic filing via FERC eFiling or eComment is encouraged.
  
• Project context: Lower Blue Lake is a storage component of the Mokelumne Project on Middle Creek, a tributary of Blue Creek, located on U.S. Forest Service land in Alpine County, California.
  
• Access to documents: EA available on FERC’s eLibrary; docket number P‑137‑227.
  
• Regulatory framework: Review conducted under 18 CFR part 380 and the National Environmental Policy Act.

Revised Timeline for Lyons Falls Hydroelectric Project Relicensing

Overview

The U.S. Department of Energy and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) have issued a revised procedural schedule for the relicense application of the Lyons Falls Hydroelectric Project, filed by Northbrook Lyons Falls, LLC. The update follows earlier requests for additional information and extensions granted to the applicant, aiming to streamline the review process while ensuring all required studies are completed on time.

The new schedule sets clear deadlines for key deliverables: study reports on bypassed reach flow and visual resources are due in July 2026; supplemental information must be submitted by September 2026; FERC will issue an acceptance notice and scoping notice in October 2026; and the project will be deemed ready for environmental analysis by January 2027. These milestones are designed to keep the licensing process on track and to provide stakeholders with predictable timelines for environmental and regulatory review.

The notice also indicates that further adjustments to the schedule may occur as needed, and it provides contact details for inquiries. The procedural updates are governed under 18 CFR 2.1 and reflect FERC’s commitment to transparent, timely oversight of hydroelectric projects.

Key Elements

• July 2026 – Northbrook must file the Bypassed Reach Flow Evaluation Study and Visual Resources Study.
  
• September 2026 – Submission of additional information requested by FERC.
  
• October 2026 – FERC issues an Acceptance Notice and a Scoping Notice to the applicant.
  
• January 2027 – Project is declared ready for Environmental Analysis.
  
• Flexibility – The schedule may be revised further to accommodate new developments.
  
• Contact – Questions can be directed to Joshua Dub (email/phone) under FERC authority 18 CFR 2.1.

Alaska’s Solomon Lake Hydropower Project: New License, Study Requests, and Tight Filing Deadline

Overview
The U.S. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) has accepted a new major license application from Copper Valley Electric Association (CVEA) for the Solomon Gulch Hydroelectric Project in Valdez, Alaska. The application seeks to continue operating a 12 MW conventional hydroelectric facility that uses Solomon Lake’s stored water to supply electricity to the local grid. In addition to the license, the notice invites federal, state, tribal, and local agencies to request additional scientific studies and to cooperate in preparing the environmental document, with a 60‑day window ending Monday, July 27, 2026.

The project’s environmental profile includes a 660‑acre reservoir, a 400‑foot rockfill dam, and two Francis turbines. CVEA must maintain minimum fish flows of 2 cfs at the tailrace and lower falls to protect salmon and other aquatic species. The notice also outlines a boundary adjustment that would reduce the project’s acreage on federal and state lands while adding a small private parcel to accommodate a transmission right‑of‑way.

FERC has set a preliminary schedule that culminates in a “Notice of Ready for Environmental Analysis” in February 2027. CVEA must file final amendments within 30 days of that notice. The filing deadline for final amendments is therefore early March 2027, giving stakeholders a clear timeline for review and comment.

Key Elements

• Project Scope: 12 MW hydroelectric facility on Solomon Lake, Alaskan Copper River Basin.
  
• Location & Land Use: 440 acres currently, with a proposed boundary change to ~760 acres (671 acres state, 85 acres BLM, 3 acres private).
  
• Infrastructure: 400‑ft rockfill dam, 450‑ft spillway, two 48‑in intake pipes, two 48‑in penstocks, 70 ft × 60 ft powerhouse, 110‑mile transmission line.
  
• Environmental Requirements: Continuous minimum flows of 2 cfs at tailrace and lower falls; reservoir maintained between 615 ft and 685 ft elevation.
  
• Study Request Deadline: July 27, 2026 (60 days from filing).
  
• Procedural Schedule:
  
  • Deficiency letter & additional info: July 2026
    
  • Notice of Application Accepted: November 2026
    
  • Scoping Notice & comments: November–December 2026
    
  • Notice of Ready for Environmental Analysis: February 2027
    
• Final Amendment Deadline: 30 days after February 2027 notice (early March 2027).
  
• Stakeholder Participation: Agencies may file study requests or cooperate in environmental documentation but cannot intervene.
  
• Filing & Comment Channels: Electronic filing via FERC eFiling/eComment; paper filings accepted at FERC headquarters.

Mining Expansion on Montana’s National Forest Sparks Environmental Review

Overview

The U.S. Department of Agriculture’s Forest Service, in partnership with the Montana Department of Environmental Quality, has announced its intent to prepare an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for Stillwater Mining Company’s proposed Amendment 14 to the Stillwater Mine plan of operations. The amendment would extend underground platinum‑group‑metal mining for an additional 36–42 years and expand surface disturbance on National Forest System lands, including a new 30‑acre waste‑rock storage area and relocation of water‑management infrastructure.

The notice opens a 30‑day public comment period, ending July 15, 2026, during which stakeholders can submit written or electronic feedback on alternatives, impacts, and supporting studies. The Forest Service and Montana DEQ aim to publish a draft EIS in June 2027 and a final EIS for pre‑decisional administrative review by April 2028. The project’s Planning, Administrative Reviews, and Litigation System identification number is 68998.

Key concerns identified in the preliminary analysis include potential degradation of Nye Creek’s riparian and scenic values, impacts on surface and groundwater quality, and the availability of suitable topsoil for reclamation. The amendment also carries significant economic implications, as the Stillwater Mine is the principal domestic source of palladium and platinum in the United States and supports roughly 1,100 jobs.

Key Elements

• Project Scope: Expansion of waste‑rock storage (≈30 acres), new ventilation and water‑management infrastructure, and relocation of existing surface facilities on National Forest System lands.
• Timeline: 30‑day comment period (until July 15, 2026); draft EIS (June 2027); final EIS (April 2028).
• Regulatory Framework: Joint lead agencies (Forest Service & Montana DEQ); compliance with 36 CFR 228, NEPA, and pre‑decisional administrative review (36 CFR 218).
• Environmental Concerns:
  • Riparian and scenic integrity of Nye Creek (engineered channel relocation).
  • Surface and groundwater quality and quantity.
  • Availability of topsoil for final reclamation.
• Permitting: Coordination with Montana DEQ, Army Corps of Engineers, EPA, and U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service (Section 7 ESA).
• Economic Impact: Potential extension of mine life by 36–42 years; continued employment for ~1,100 workers; sustained domestic supply of critical platinum‑group metals.
• Public Participation: Written comments accepted via mail or electronically; comments after July 15, 2026 may not be considered. Objections under 36 CFR 218 require prior written comments during designated opportunities.

Susquehanna Basin Grants Water‑Use Green Light to 34 Energy Projects

Overview

The Susquehanna River Basin Commission (SRBC) has issued a Federal Register notice approving consumptive water use for 34 projects in the Pennsylvania basin for the month of May 2026. The approvals include one new project—SVC Manufacturing’s Gatorade‑Mountaintop plant—and 33 renewals of existing oil‑and‑gas drilling pads operated by companies such as Coterra Energy, Expand Operating LLC, and XTO Energy. Each approval specifies a maximum withdrawal rate ranging from 3 mgd to 8 mgd (million gallons per day), reflecting the water demands of drilling, processing, and associated industrial activities.

The notice is grounded in the federal water‑use framework established by Public Law 91‑575 and codified in 18 CFR 806.22(e) and (f). Under this rule, the SRBC may approve or renew consumptive use permits when the water withdrawals are deemed necessary for the project’s operation and are consistent with the basin’s water‑resource management plan. The document serves as a public record of the Commission’s decisions and provides contact information for further inquiries.

For stakeholders in geoscience, energy, and natural resource management, the notice highlights the ongoing balance between industrial development and water‑resource stewardship in the Susquehanna River Basin. It underscores the regulatory process that ensures water withdrawals are monitored, documented, and aligned with broader environmental and resource‑management goals.

Key Elements

• Scope of Approvals: 34 projects (1 new, 33 renewals) approved for consumptive water use during May 1‑31 2026.
  
• Project Types: Primarily oil‑and‑gas drilling pads; one industrial manufacturing facility (SVC Manufacturing).
  
• Water Use Limits: Consumptive withdrawals range from 3.0 mgd to 8.0 mgd, with most projects capped at 7.5 mgd.
  
• Regulatory Basis: Approvals issued under 18 CFR 806.22(e) (new projects) and (f) (renewals).
  
• Geographic Distribution: Projects located across Susquehanna, Lycoming, Bradford, Tioga, Sullivan, and surrounding counties in Pennsylvania.
  
• Contact & Transparency: SRBC’s General Counsel, Jason E. Oyler, listed as the point of contact; notice published in the Federal Register (Doc 2026‑11968).
  
• Implications for Water Management: The approvals reflect the Commission’s role in balancing industrial water demand with basin‑wide water‑resource sustainability.
  
• Relevance to Professionals: Provides a clear example of how consumptive water use is regulated for energy and industrial projects, informing geoscientists, engineers, and environmental planners.

Susquehanna River Basin Commission Greenlights 13 Water Projects and Expands Emergency Water Use

Overview
On June 4 2026, the Susquehanna River Basin Commission convened in Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, to review and approve a slate of water‑resource initiatives that will shape water use across the basin for the coming years. The meeting also finalized the fiscal‑year 2027 budget, secured new grant agreements with federal and state environmental agencies, and updated the 2025‑2027 Water Resources Program to reflect current needs and regulatory priorities.

The Commission’s decisions included the extension of an emergency certificate that allows a New York village to continue operating a temporary well, and the approval of 13 projects ranging from groundwater withdrawals for municipal and industrial use to large‑scale surface‑water withdrawals for a clean‑energy power plant. Two additional projects were tabled for further review. These actions demonstrate the Commission’s role in balancing water supply demands with environmental stewardship and regulatory compliance.

For stakeholders—including municipalities, industry, and conservation groups—these approvals provide clearer timelines and regulatory certainty, while the updated program and budget underscore the Commission’s commitment to sustainable water management across the Susquehanna River Basin.

Key Elements

• Fiscal and Program Updates

  • Adopted FY 2027 budget reconciliation.
  • Approved a grant agreement with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
  • Approved a grant amendment with the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection.
  • Updated the 2025‑2027 Water Resources Program.

• Emergency Certificate Extension

  • Extended temporary operation for a well in Sidney, NY, under a December 31 2025 emergency certificate.

• Approved Water‑Use Projects (13 total)

  • Groundwater withdrawals: up to 0.756 mgd for Chobani, 0.720 mgd for Cedar Rock, 0.500 mgd for Cargill, etc.
  • Surface‑water withdrawals: up to 73.200 mgd for Constellation Energy’s clean‑energy center; 5.000 mgd for BKV Operating; 3.000 mgd for PPG Operations; 0.300 mgd for New Enterprise Stone & Lime.
  • Consumptive use: up to 21.000 mgd for Constellation Energy; 0.498 mgd for Berlin Borough; 0.449 mgd for Nature’s Way Purewater.
  • Out‑of‑basin diversions: up to 0.498 mgd for Berlin Borough.

• Tabled Projects (2)

  • Groundwater withdrawal for Middlesex Township Municipal Authority (0.914 mgd).
  • Surface‑water withdrawal for New Enterprise Stone & Lime’s Tyrone Quarry (0.216 mgd).

• Stakeholder Impact

  • Provides municipalities and industries with approved water‑use permits.
  • Ensures compliance with federal and state water‑quality regulations.
  • Supports regional economic development while maintaining basin‑wide water sustainability.

U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Seeks Public Input on Wilderness Stewardship Policy Updates

Overview

The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) has issued a Notice of Request for Information (NRI) to gather public and stakeholder feedback on potential revisions to Part 610 of its Service Manual, the internal policy that guides the review, planning, stewardship, and administration of wilderness areas within the National Wildlife Refuge System. The Service is exploring whether updates, clarifications, or other changes could improve how wilderness areas are managed, ensuring that natural and cultural resources, public uses, and fire management are better aligned with contemporary conservation goals.

Part 610 is a non‑binding internal policy that outlines five key chapters: an overview of wilderness stewardship, specific guidance on administration and resource stewardship, planning procedures, review and evaluation protocols, and special provisions for Alaska wilderness. By inviting comments, the FWS hopes to refine these chapters so that they reflect current scientific understanding, stakeholder needs, and evolving environmental challenges.

Stakeholders—including local, state, tribal, U.S. territory, and federal agencies, as well as the general public—are encouraged to submit written comments by August 14, 2026. Comments can be submitted through the Federal eRulemaking Portal or by mail to the FWS Policy and Regulations Branch. The Service will publish all received comments and may withhold personal identifying information at the request of the commenter, though it cannot guarantee complete anonymity.

Key Elements

• Purpose of the Request: Solicit input on whether Part 610 should be updated, clarified, or otherwise revised to improve wilderness stewardship within the National Wildlife Refuge System.
• Scope of Part 610: Covers wilderness review, planning, stewardship of natural and cultural resources, public use management, fire policy, and Alaska‑specific provisions.
• Non‑binding Nature: The manual is internal policy, not legally enforceable, but guides FWS operations and decision‑making.
• Comment Deadline: Written comments must be received by August 14, 2026.
• Submission Channels: Federal eRulemaking Portal (search docket FWS‑HQ‑NWRS‑2026‑2575) or mail to the FWS Policy and Regulations Branch, Falls Church, VA.
• Who Can Comment: Public, local, state, tribal, U.S. territory, and federal agencies; individuals and organizations are welcome.
• Privacy Considerations: Commenters may request that personal identifying information be withheld from public review, though this cannot be guaranteed.
• Contact Information: Nick Kaczor, National Wilderness Coordinator, Branch of Wildlife Resources, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
  
• Related Guidance: Separate comment opportunity for climbing activity guidance (docket FWS‑HQ‑NWRS‑2026‑1618) is available for those interested.

BLM Seeks Public Input on Wilderness Study Area Management Rules

Overview

The Bureau of Land Management (BLM) has issued a notice inviting the public to comment on potential updates to BLM Manual 6330, the policy that governs Wilderness Study Areas (WSAs). WSAs are parcels of public land identified as having wilderness‑quality values that may be preserved if Congress designates them as wilderness. The manual sets the “non‑impairment” standard, ensuring that activities on these lands do not diminish their suitability for future wilderness status.

The notice highlights that the manual applies to three categories of WSAs: those identified through the federal land review process, legislative WSAs created by Congress, and WSAs reported in Wilderness Study Reports under FLPMA Section 202. Because WSAs can be the subject of scientific research, mineral exploration, and recreational use, any changes to the manual could influence how these activities are regulated and how land managers balance conservation with resource development.

BLM is encouraging stakeholders—including scientists, land managers, industry representatives, and the general public—to submit comments by August 14, 2026. The agency will consider suggestions for clarifications, revisions, or new provisions that could improve the management of WSAs while preserving their wilderness potential.

Key Elements

• Purpose of Manual 6330 – Provides policy and procedural guidance for managing WSAs to maintain their wilderness‑quality values.
  
• Non‑impairment Standard – Requires BLM managers to ensure that land use activities do not degrade the suitability of a WSA for future wilderness designation.
  
• Scope of Application – Covers WSAs identified by FLPMA Section 603, legislative WSAs, and Section 202 WSAs reported in Wilderness Study Reports.
  
• Public Comment Process – Comments due by August 14, 2026; can be submitted electronically (search code BLM‑2026‑0069) or by mail to the BLM Director.
  
• Potential Impact on Geoscience and Resource Use – Updates could affect permitting for scientific research, mineral exploration, and other land‑use activities within WSAs.
  
• Contact Information – Sean MacDougall, BLM Division of National Conservation Lands, email/phone provided for inquiries.
  
• Transparency Notice – Comments, including personal identifying information, may be made public; users can request confidentiality but it is not guaranteed.

BLM Seeks Public Input on Updating Wilderness‑Like Land Planning Rules

Overview

The Bureau of Land Management (BLM) has issued a notice inviting the public to comment on potential updates to BLM Manual 6320, which guides how the agency evaluates and incorporates lands that exhibit wilderness characteristics into its land‑use planning process. The manual is grounded in the Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976 (FLPMA) and other statutes, ensuring that public lands with wilderness‑like conditions receive appropriate consideration during planning, amendments, or revisions.

The request reflects the BLM’s commitment to balancing conservation and resource development. By refining the manual’s language and procedures, the agency aims to clarify how such lands are identified, assessed, and managed, potentially affecting future projects ranging from energy extraction to recreation and habitat protection.

Stakeholders—including geoscientists, natural resource professionals, and local communities—are encouraged to submit comments by August 14, 2026. The BLM will review all input to determine whether clarifications or revisions are warranted, thereby shaping the stewardship of thousands of acres that share characteristics with designated wilderness areas.

Key Elements

• Purpose: Update BLM Manual 6320 to improve guidance on lands with wilderness characteristics.
• Legal Basis: Guided by FLPMA § 202 and related federal statutes.
• Scope: Applies to land‑use plans, amendments, and project‑level decisions affecting wilderness‑like lands.
• Public Comment Window: Comments accepted until August 14, 2026.
• Submission Methods: Online via the BLM website (search code BLM‑2026‑0068), mail, or hand delivery to the Interior Department.
• Contact: Sean MacDougall, BLM Division of National Conservation Lands (email/phone provided).
• Transparency: Comments may be made public; personal data may be disclosed unless specifically requested to be withheld.
• Potential Impact: Revised guidance could influence future resource development, conservation planning, and land‑management decisions across the United States.

BLM Seeks Public Input on Wilderness Management Manual Updates

Overview

The Bureau of Land Management (BLM) has issued a notice inviting public comment on potential revisions to BLM Manual 6340, Management of Designated Wilderness Areas. The manual governs how BLM lands that have been designated by Congress as part of the National Wilderness Preservation System are managed, with the goal of preserving their wilderness character while allowing for recreational, scenic, scientific, educational, conservation, and historical uses in line with the Wilderness Act.

The update process reflects the BLM’s commitment to adapt its policies to contemporary conservation challenges, emerging scientific knowledge, and evolving public expectations. Stakeholders—including geoscientists, natural resource professionals, and outdoor recreation advocates—are encouraged to propose clarifications or new provisions that could improve stewardship, facilitate research, and balance access with protection.

Comments are due by August 14, 2026. The BLM will consider suggestions that address the manual’s guidance on permitted uses under Section 4©, requirements under Section 4(d), and related recreational policies such as climbing guidance under the Expanding Public Lands Outdoor Recreation Experiences Act.

Key Elements

• Public Comment Deadline: August 14, 2026 (no later than this date).
  
• Scope of Manual 6340: Provides policy and procedural guidance for managing BLM-designated wilderness areas.
  
• Wilderness Act Compliance: Emphasizes preservation of wilderness character while allowing recreational, scenic, scientific, educational, conservation, and historical uses.
  
• Section 4© & 4(d) Guidance: Addresses permitted uses and requirements to maintain wilderness integrity.
  
• Recreational Climbing Guidance: Separate docket (BLM‑2026‑0034) for climbing policy under the Expanding Public Lands Outdoor Recreation Experiences Act.
  
• Stakeholder Engagement: Targeted at geoscientists, natural resource professionals, and the general public to provide input on updates, clarifications, or revisions.
  
• Submission Channels: Electronic comments via the BLM docket system (BLM‑2026‑0067), mail, or hand delivery to the BLM Director’s office in Washington, DC.
  
• Contact Information: Sean MacDougall, Division of National Conservation Lands (email/phone provided).
  
• Transparency Notice: Comments, including personal identifying information, may be made publicly available unless the commenter requests confidentiality.

Georgia Food Plant Settlement: $356 k to Restore Flat Creek, Ending Future Lawsuits

Overview
On June 2, 2026 the U.S. Department of Justice filed a proposed consent decree under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA) to resolve claims that a food‑processing facility in Dawsonville, Georgia released hazardous substances that harmed natural resources. The decree requires the defendant to pay a total of $356,773 to federal and state agencies, fund restoration projects in Flat Creek, and agree not to be sued for related natural‑resource damages thereafter.

The settlement allocates $96,274.96 to the U.S. Department of the Interior and $10,497.59 to the Georgia Department of Natural Resources for cost reimbursements, $137,831 to the Natural Resource Damages Assessment and Restoration Fund for Flat Creek restoration projects, and $112,169 to the same fund for future restoration activities. The defendant will also implement a fish‑passage improvement project in Flat Creek to restore upstream fish migration.

The notice invites public comment on both the consent decree and a draft Restoration Plan that outlines five possible restoration alternatives, including no action, fish‑passage improvements, adaptive management, off‑site habitat restoration, and mitigation banking. Comments must be submitted within 30 days of publication to the DOJ or the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, as appropriate.

Key Elements

• Total Settlement Payment: $356,773, split among federal and state agencies and restoration funds.
  
• Agency Reimbursements:
  
  • $96,274.96 to the U.S. Department of the Interior.
    
  • $10,497.59 to the Georgia Department of Natural Resources.
    
• Restoration Funding:
  
  • $137,831 to the Natural Resource Damages Assessment and Restoration Fund for Flat Creek projects.
    
  • $112,169 to the same fund for future restoration and assessment activities.
    
• Restoration Project: Defendant must build a fish‑passage improvement in Flat Creek to enable upstream fish migration and repopulation.
  
• Covenant Not to Sue: The United States and State of Georgia waive future natural‑resource damage claims related to the release once the decree is lodged.
  
• Restoration Plan Alternatives:
  
  1. No Action/Natural Recovery.
     
  2. Defendant‑led Fish Passage Improvement Project.
     
  3. Adaptive Management of the Fish Passage Project.
     
  4. Off‑site Aquatic Habitat Restoration.
     
  5. Mitigation Banking Credit.
     
• Public Comment Period: 30 days from the notice date (June 15, 2026).
  
• Comment Submission:
  
  • DOJ: pubcomment‑ees.enrd@usdoj.gov or P.O. Box 7611, Washington, DC 20044‑7611.
    
  • Draft Restoration Plan: david_rouse@fws.gov or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Southeast Region, Atlanta, GA.
    
• Access to Documents: Proposed consent decree and draft restoration plan available for download on the DOJ website.

City of Columbia’s Sewer Expansion Faces Revised Deadlines: DOJ Opens New Comment Window

Overview

On March 30 2026, the U.S. Department of Justice filed a proposed material modification to a Consent Decree in the Clean Water Act case v. Civil Action No. 3:13‑cv‑2429‑MGL. The modification addresses the City of Columbia’s plan to complete four additional sewer‑capacity projects designed to reduce combined‑sewer overflows and protect local waterways.

The original notice mistakenly set a uniform deadline of January 1 2029 for all projects. The DOJ has corrected this, clarifying that two projects must be finished by January 1 2029 while the remaining two are due by July 1 2029. This adjustment reflects the differing scopes and timelines of the infrastructure upgrades.

To ensure transparency and stakeholder input, the DOJ has reopened the public comment period for 15 days following this notice. Comments can be submitted electronically or by mail to the Assistant Attorney General, Environment and Natural Resources Division, and must reference the case number. The full proposed modification and the existing Consent Decree are available for download on the DOJ website.

Key Elements

• Consent Decree Modification – Adjusts the City of Columbia’s obligations under the Clean Water Act to complete four sewer‑capacity projects.
  
• Revised Project Deadlines – Two projects: Jan 1 2029; two projects: Jul 1 2029.
  
• Public Comment Window – 15‑day period to submit feedback, ensuring community and stakeholder engagement.
  
• Submission Channels – Email: pubcomment-ees.enrd@usdoj.gov; Mail: Assistant Attorney General, U.S. DOJ‑ENRD, P.O. Box 7611, Washington, DC 20044‑7611.
  
• Document Access – Proposed modification and existing Consent Decree downloadable from the DOJ website.
  
• Implications for Water Quality – Completion of these projects will reduce combined‑sewer overflows, improving downstream water quality and protecting aquatic ecosystems.
  
• Relevance to Geoscience & Natural Resources – The infrastructure upgrades involve civil engineering, hydrology, and environmental monitoring, directly impacting local watershed management and compliance with federal water regulations.

NRC Opens Scoping for New Michigan SMR Power Plant: Public Input Needed

Overview
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) has announced its intent to prepare an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for a phased construction permit (CP) and limited work authorization (LWA) request submitted by Palisades SMR, LLC. The project involves building two SMR‑300 small modular reactors (Pioneer Units 1 and 2) at the Palisades Energy Center in Covert, Michigan. The reactors are expected to generate roughly 680 MW of baseload electricity, addressing regional demand and supporting Michigan’s energy goals.

The NRC is initiating a 30‑day public scoping period, ending July 15, 2026, to gather comments on the scope of the EIS. The notice invites stakeholders—including the applicant, federal, state, local, and tribal agencies, and the general public—to identify alternatives, environmental concerns, and key issues that should be examined. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers will serve as a cooperating agency, while the NRC remains the lead agency.

The forthcoming EIS will assess impacts on air quality, water resources, geology, ecosystems, land use, socioeconomics, radiological safety, and more. It will also evaluate a range of reasonable alternatives, including a no‑action option, and will coordinate with other federal review processes such as the Endangered Species Act and the National Historic Preservation Act.

Key Elements

• Project Scope: Dual‑unit SMR‑300 reactors (Pioneer Units 1 & 2) at Palisades Energy Center, Covert, Michigan.
  
• Phased Construction Permit: Two‑step licensing—first a Limited Work Authorization (LWA) for preliminary construction activities, followed by a full Construction Permit (CP).
  
• Environmental Review: Single comprehensive EIS covering construction, operation, and decommissioning phases.
  
• Scoping Period: 30 days (until July 15, 2026) for public and stakeholder comments on EIS scope and alternatives.
  
• Cooperating Agencies: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers; potential involvement of other federal, state, tribal, or local agencies.
  
• Alternatives Considered: No‑action alternative, phased construction, and other technically and economically feasible options.
  
• Public Participation: Comments can be submitted electronically via the Federal rulemaking website or by mail; NRC will publish draft EIS for further review.
  
• Regulatory Context: Compliance with NEPA, the Atomic Energy Act, 10 CFR 50, 51, and coordination with the Endangered Species Act, NHPA, and other applicable laws.
  
• Impact Areas: Air quality, water (surface and groundwater), geology, terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems, land use, socioeconomics, radiological and non‑radiological health, waste management, uranium fuel cycle, decommissioning, cultural resources, and fuel transportation.
  
• Timeline for Further Action: Part 2 of the phased CP application will be filed within 18 months of Part 1 submission; the draft EIS will follow the scoping phase.

U.S. Puts Super‑Critical Geothermal on the Map: New Act Fuels Next‑Gen Energy Research

Overview

The Next‑Generation Geothermal Research and Development Act amends the 2007 Energy Independence and Security Act to accelerate the development of advanced geothermal technologies—especially closed‑loop and super‑critical systems. By redefining key terms and expanding research mandates, the bill seeks to unlock the vast, largely untapped geothermal potential across the United States and its territories.

The legislation establishes a coordinated research agenda that includes data sharing, advanced modeling, and field testing. It creates a national repository of subsurface data, mandates regular updates, and requires memoranda of understanding between federal agencies to pool information from mining, critical‑minerals, and energy projects. Grants and center‑of‑excellence programs are set up to spur innovation in drilling, reservoir stimulation, sensor development, and power‑generation equipment tailored to super‑critical conditions.

Ultimately, the act aims to bring geothermal energy to commercial viability, reduce water use, and diversify the U.S. renewable portfolio. It also introduces mandatory reporting to Congress on resource potential, water consumption, and commercialization barriers, ensuring transparency and accountability as the industry moves from research to deployment.

Key Elements

• Expanded Definitions – Introduces “closed‑loop,” “next‑generation,” and “super‑critical” geothermal systems, clarifying the scope of research and development.
  
• Data Infrastructure – Creates a publicly accessible repository for drilling, seismic, lithology, and heat‑mapping data, with periodic updates and standardization.
  
• Interagency Collaboration – Requires memoranda of understanding between the Department of Energy, Interior, and other federal agencies to share geothermal data, including from mining and critical‑minerals operations.
  
• Regional Exploration – Authorizes the Interior to drill super‑critical exploration boreholes in representative geological provinces and conduct site‑selection studies, including U.S. territories.
  
• Next‑Generation R&D Program – Funds research on well completion, permeability management, materials, sensors, and hard‑rock drilling, with a focus on super‑critical conditions.
  
• Center of Excellence – Grants to national laboratories or multi‑institutional collaborations to coordinate research, workforce development, and best‑practice dissemination.
  
• Commercial‑Readiness Grants – Provides up to $150 M per year (FY 2027‑2031) for innovative technologies that accelerate commercial deployment, prioritizing projects with proven field expertise and potential for diverse geological settings.
  
• Reporting Requirements – Mandates annual and biennial reports to Congress on resource potential, project results, commercialization barriers, and water‑use metrics.
  
• Resource Assessment Updates – Requires the U.S. Geological Survey to conduct quadrennial updates on geothermal potential, including super‑critical resources in U.S. territories.
  

These provisions collectively aim to transform geothermal from a niche research area into a mainstream, commercially viable, and environmentally sustainable energy source.

Federal Funding Boosts U.S. Natural Resource Management for 2027

Overview

The Department of the Interior, Environment, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2027 (H.R. 9171) allocates more than $12 billion in discretionary funds for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2027. The bill covers a broad range of agencies—including the Bureau of Land Management (BLM), U.S. Geological Survey (USGS), National Park Service (NPS), Forest Service, and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)—and provides the financial foundation for land, water, wildlife, and environmental protection programs across the country.

Key allocations support the BLM’s management of public lands and mineral resources, the USGS’s geoscience research and mapping, and the Forest Service’s wildfire suppression and hazardous fuels programs. The EPA receives substantial funding for the Superfund, hazardous waste cleanup, and water quality initiatives, while the Interior’s Indian Affairs and Indian Health Service receive billions for tribal programs and health services. The bill also earmarks funds for the National Park Service’s Everglades restoration, historic preservation, and new park infrastructure projects.

Notably, the act includes a mix of new programs—such as the Good Samaritan Mine Remediation Act and expanded wild horse and burro management—and policy restrictions that prohibit the use of funds for certain endangered‑species rules, lead‑ammunition regulations, and other environmental rulemakings. The legislation also establishes transfer authorities, reprogramming limits, and reporting requirements to ensure accountability and coordination among federal agencies.

Key Elements

• BLM: $1.21 billion for land management, mineral potential assessment, and wild horse/burro programs; $42 million for mining law administration; $104 million for Oregon/California grant lands.
• USGS: $1.37 billion for surveys, research, and satellite operations; $95 million for satellite data; $53 million for deferred maintenance.
• Forest Service: $1.88 billion for national forest system management, hazardous fuels, and wildfire suppression; $2.57 billion additional wildfire suppression reserve.
• NPS: $2.87 billion for park operations, Everglades restoration, and new construction; $92 million for recreation and cultural programs.
• EPA: $290 million for Superfund, $53 million for leaking underground storage tank cleanup, $16 million for oil spill programs; $43 million for the Office of Inspector General.
• Indian Affairs & Health Service: $2.27 billion for Indian programs and $403 million for Indian Health Service operations, including electronic health records.
• Water Infrastructure: $3.70 billion for state and tribal water grants, Clean Water State Revolving Funds, and drinking water infrastructure.
• Wildlife & Conservation: $1.36 billion for Fish and Wildlife Service, including endangered species management, critical habitat, and habitat restoration.
• Restrictions: Prohibits use of funds for certain endangered‑species rules, lead‑ammunition regulations, and specific environmental rulemakings; limits use for certain mining and land‑use activities.
• Transfer & Reprogramming: Authorizes limited inter‑agency transfers (e.g., to the Federal Highway Administration) and sets reprogramming thresholds requiring congressional approval.
• Reporting & Accountability: Requires quarterly status reports on balances, expenditures, and compliance with reprogramming and transfer provisions.

US Appropriations Bill Allocates Billions to Agriculture, Rural Development, Food Safety, and Related Agencies for FY 2027

Overview

The 2027 Agriculture, Rural Development, Food and Drug Administration, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act (H.R. 8646) provides the federal government with billions of dollars to support the nation’s food system, rural economies, and public health. The bill earmarks funds for the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) and its many agencies—including the Agricultural Research Service, National Institute of Food and Agriculture, Rural Development, and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA)—as well as for related entities such as the Commodity Futures Trading Commission and the Farm Credit Administration. The appropriations cover a wide range of programs, from crop research and extension services to rural housing, water‑and‑waste‑management, and food‑safety inspections.

The legislation also contains a number of policy provisions that shape how the money will be used. It sets limits on administrative costs, requires notification of certain transfers, and imposes restrictions on the use of funds for regulatory rule‑making or lobbying. Key environmental and geoscience‑related measures include funding for hazardous‑materials cleanup, watershed protection, and climate‑resilient agriculture, as well as cybersecurity and infrastructure upgrades for USDA’s information systems. The bill further directs the FDA to maintain and expand its inspection and enforcement activities, while limiting the agency’s ability to issue new food‑safety regulations until certain data are available.

Overall, the act represents a comprehensive investment in the country’s agricultural backbone, rural communities, and public health infrastructure, while embedding oversight mechanisms to ensure that appropriated funds are used responsibly and transparently.

Key Elements

• USDA Core Funding – Roughly $1.8 billion for the Agricultural Research Service, $1.0 billion for the National Institute of Food and Agriculture, and $1.1 billion for the Food and Nutrition Service’s child‑nutrition programs.
  
• Rural Development – $270 million for the Rural Development program, including housing insurance, community facilities, and rural utilities, with a focus on persistent‑poverty counties.
  
• Food Safety & FDA – $1.2 billion for the Food Safety and Inspection Service, plus $7.1 billion for the FDA’s overall budget, covering inspections, enforcement, and user‑fee revenue.
  
• Water & Environmental Protection – $35 million for watershed and flood‑prevention operations, $800 million for the Natural Resources Conservation Service’s conservation programs, and $500 million for hazardous‑materials management.
  
• Cybersecurity & IT – $134 million for the Office of the Chief Information Officer, with at least $60 million earmarked for cybersecurity.
  
• Loan & Credit Programs – $4.6 billion for the Agricultural Credit Insurance Fund (farm ownership and operating loans), $2.0 billion for the Rural Housing Service’s loan guarantees, and $2.9 billion for the Rural Electrification and Telecommunications Loans program.
  
• Administrative and Oversight Provisions – Limits on administrative costs (e.g., $62 million from fees for FDA activities), requirements for 30‑day notification before reprogramming funds, and restrictions on using appropriated money for lobbying or new regulatory rules.
  
• Special Provisions – Funding for the dairy indemnity program, the Native American Institutions Endowment Fund ($11.9 million), and the Food for Peace program ($900 million).
  
• Environmental and Climate Focus – Grants for climate‑resilient agriculture, watershed rehabilitation, and the Urban Agriculture and Innovative Production Program.
  
• Reporting and Accountability – Mandatory quarterly obligation plans, performance reports for Farm Service Agency projects, and notification requirements for transfers to the Working Capital Fund.
  

These elements collectively aim to strengthen the agricultural sector, support rural communities, enhance food safety, and protect natural resources while ensuring fiscal responsibility and transparency.

DHS 2027 Appropriations: A Big Boost for Earth‑Science‑Based Disaster Resilience

Overview

The Department of Homeland Security Appropriations Act for fiscal year 2027 (FY 2027) allocates roughly $30 billion to DHS, with a significant portion earmarked for agencies that rely on geoscience and environmental data. The bulk of the funding supports the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), the Coast Guard, and the Transportation Security Administration (TSA), all of which use earth‑science tools to protect infrastructure, respond to natural hazards, and secure coastal and inland waterways.

Key priorities include: - Disaster relief and preparedness: $28 billion is directed to FEMA’s disaster relief fund, flood‑hazard mapping, and emergency response programs. The act also funds the National Flood Insurance Program and grants for state and local emergency management. - Coastal and marine protection: The Coast Guard receives $12 billion for vessel procurement, marine vessel upgrades, and coastal surveillance, while the act authorizes $1.5 billion for oil‑spill liability and environmental compliance. - Climate‑resilient infrastructure: Funding for the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) includes $1.9 billion for risk‑management operations, and the act requires the Department to develop climate‑adaptation plans for critical infrastructure.

The legislation also imposes strict reporting and oversight requirements, ensuring that funds are used transparently and that environmental impacts are monitored. It restricts the use of money for certain activities—such as building new fencing or deploying surveillance towers that are not autonomous—highlighting a focus on responsible, science‑based decision making.

Key Elements

• $28 billion for FEMA: Disaster relief, flood‑hazard mapping, emergency assistance, and state‑local grant programs.
  
• $12 billion for the Coast Guard: Vessel procurement, marine vessel upgrades, coastal surveillance, and oil‑spill response.
  
• $1.5 billion for environmental compliance: Oil‑spill liability, environmental restoration, and coastal erosion mitigation.
  
• $1.9 billion for CISA: Risk‑management operations, national infrastructure simulation, and cybersecurity for critical infrastructure.
  
• $1.5 billion for TSA: Aviation security equipment, risk‑based screening, and emergency response.
  
• $3 billion for the U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP): Operations, vehicle procurement, and maritime interdiction.
  
• $1 billion for U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE): Operations, vehicle procurement, and detention facilities.
  
• $1 billion for the Secret Service: Protective services and training.
  
• Reporting requirements: Monthly budget and staffing reports, quarterly oversight reports, and mandatory public dashboards for disaster relief and environmental data.
  
• Restrictions: Funds cannot be used for new fencing, non‑autonomous surveillance towers, or to alter immigration enforcement in ways that conflict with existing laws.
  
• Climate‑adaptation mandates: DHS must develop and submit climate‑resilience plans for critical infrastructure and coastal assets.
  
• Environmental data sharing: DHS must share flood‑hazard and climate data with state and local agencies to improve disaster preparedness.
  

This appropriation underscores the federal commitment to using geoscience, environmental monitoring, and climate science to safeguard the nation’s infrastructure, communities, and natural resources.

EU Grants Official Status to Slovakia’s “Cigeľka” Mineral Water: A Geology‑Powered PDO

Overview

On 16 June 2026 the European Union published an application for the registration of a protected designation of origin (PDO) for the Slovak mineral water known as Cigeľská prírodná minerálna voda (Cigeľka). The application is made under Article 15(4) of Regulation (EU) 2024/1143, which governs geographical indications for agricultural products. Member‑state authorities, third‑country entities, or interested parties may file an opposition within three months of publication, ensuring a transparent and inclusive approval process.

The product is a naturally aerated, high‑mineral‑content water sourced from springs in the Carpathian Flysch Belt of northeastern Slovakia. Its distinctive chemistry—rich in sodium, calcium, magnesium, bicarbonates, chlorine, iodine, and bromine—results from the interaction of groundwater with claystone, sandstone, and marlstone layers, as well as volcanic‑derived carbon dioxide. The defined geographical area, bounded by specific mountain ridges and watershed lines, provides the unique hydrogeological conditions that give Cigeľka its characteristic effervescence and salty flavour.

The PDO registration will formally protect the name and the product’s link to its terroir, reinforcing local branding, safeguarding against misuse, and potentially boosting tourism and export opportunities. It also aligns the product with existing national and bilateral protection agreements, ensuring a comprehensive legal framework for the preservation of this geologically significant resource.

Key Elements

• Legal Basis: Application filed under Article 15(4) of Regulation (EU) 2024/1143; opposition period of 3 months per Article 17.
  
• PDO Designation: Cigeľská prírodná minerálna voda / Minerálna voda Cigeľka / Cigeľka registered as a Protected Designation of Origin (PDO).
  
• Geographical Scope: Defined area in the Bardejov district, Prešov region, bounded by specific mountain ridges and watershed lines within the Carpathian Flysch Belt.
  
• Geological Context: Springs emerge from claystone, sandstone, and marlstone layers; volcanic activity supplies natural CO₂, creating a naturally aerated, mineral‑rich water.
  
• Mineral Profile: High levels of sodium (5 000–10 000 mg L⁻¹), calcium (20–400 mg L⁻¹), magnesium (50–300 mg L⁻¹), bicarbonates (15 000–22 000 mg L⁻¹), chlorine (2 500–4 500 mg L⁻¹), plus iodine and bromine; total mineralisation 20 900–29 900 mg L⁻¹.
  
• Production Rules: Water is pumped directly to the bottling site without treatment; bottling occurs in hygienically controlled facilities, maintaining a closed‑loop system.
  
• Packaging & Labeling: Bottles must meet strict hygiene standards; labeling must reflect the PDO status and geographical origin.
  
• Conservation Measures: A conservation zone protects the mineral‑water springs from damaging activities, ensuring long‑term sustainability.
  
• Existing Protections: National protection under Act No 159/1973 and bilateral agreements with Switzerland, Austria, and Portugal; the PDO adds EU‑level legal reinforcement.
  
• Economic Implications: Formal recognition can enhance market differentiation, support local industry, and promote tourism linked to the unique geological heritage.

2027 DHS Budget: $X Billion to Strengthen Coast Guard, FEMA, and Environmental Resilience

Overview

The Department of Homeland Security Appropriations Act, 2027 (H.R. 9310) allocates roughly $X billion for the federal agency’s fiscal year ending September 30, 2027. The bill provides broad funding for core DHS functions—operations, intelligence, management, and oversight—while embedding a strong emphasis on environmental protection, disaster response, and natural‑resource stewardship. Key environmental provisions include expanded Coast Guard resources for maritime safety, enhanced FEMA disaster‑relief and flood‑hazard mapping, and dedicated funds for oil‑spill liability and coastal restoration projects.

The act also imposes rigorous reporting and oversight requirements. The Secretary must submit monthly budget and staffing reports, quarterly Inspector General audits, and detailed plans for any new pilots or demonstrations. These measures are designed to ensure that appropriated funds are used efficiently, transparently, and in line with congressional intent, particularly for programs that intersect with geoscience and natural‑resource management.

Overall, the bill balances operational readiness with a commitment to safeguarding the nation’s natural environment, reinforcing the DHS’s role as a steward of the country’s coastlines, waterways, and disaster‑prone landscapes.

Key Elements (Geoscience & Natural Resource Focus)

• Coast Guard Operations & Environmental Compliance

  • $12.17 billion for operations, support, and reserve activities, including $530 million for defense‑related activities and $25 million for environmental compliance and restoration.
    
  • $1.06 billion for procurement, construction, and improvements, with $20 million earmarked for oil‑spill liability projects.
    

• FEMA Disaster Relief & Flood Management

  • $1.76 billion for operations and support, with $506.5 million for the State Homeland Security Grant Program (including $88 million for Operation Stonegarden).
    
  • $3.80 billion for federal assistance grants, covering flood‑hazard mapping, risk analysis, and disaster‑relief funds.
    
  • $28.39 billion allocated to the Disaster Relief Fund for major disasters, with a focus on flood‑related emergencies.
    

• Flood Hazard Mapping & Insurance

  • $199.84 million for the National Flood Insurance Fund, with $185 million for flood‑plain management and mapping.
    
  • $702 million for flood‑hazard mapping and risk analysis, available until September 30, 2028.
    

• Oil‑Spill Liability & Coastal Restoration

  • $25 million in Coast Guard procurement for oil‑spill liability projects.
    
  • $20 million in Coast Guard procurement for environmental compliance and restoration.
    

• Environmental Monitoring & Cybersecurity

  • $1.96 billion for the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA), including $396 million for procurement, construction, and improvements.
    
  • $14 million for CISA research and development, supporting advanced environmental threat detection.
    

• Reporting & Oversight

  • Monthly budget and staffing reports required by the CFO.
    
  • Quarterly Inspector General reports on appropriations and program performance.
    
  • Detailed plans for pilots and demonstrations, with mandatory cost and performance metrics.
    

• Restrictions on Use of Funds

  • Prohibits use of funds for certain immigration enforcement activities, political or disinformation initiatives, and procurement from entities linked to the People’s Republic of China.
    
  • Limits use of funds for building non‑autonomous surveillance towers and for certain border‑crossing fee programs.
    

These provisions collectively ensure that the DHS’s 2027 budget supports both national security and the stewardship of the United States’ geoscientific and natural‑resource assets.

“EU Takes Romania to Court Over Unclosed Landfills: A Legal Battle for Cleaner Soil”

Overview

The European Commission has initiated legal proceedings against Romania (Case C‑389/26) to enforce compliance with the EU Landfill Directive (1999/31/EC). The Commission argues that Romania has failed to close nine municipal landfills that were exempt from certain environmental safeguards until 2017, thereby breaching Article 14(b) of the Directive and related accession conditions. The case, filed in 2026, seeks a judgment that Romania is in breach of EU law and orders the state to pay the Commission’s costs.

The dispute centers on the obligation of member states to close non‑compliant landfills “as soon as possible” after the exemption period ends. Romania, which joined the EU in 2007, was granted a 10‑year grace period for 101 existing landfills. The Commission’s formal notice (2020) and reasoned opinion (2024) concluded that Romania has not yet taken the required closure actions for the nine identified sites. The case underscores the EU’s commitment to enforcing environmental standards and protecting soil, water, and air quality across the Union.

If the Court rules in favor of the Commission, Romania would be required to close the remaining landfills, implement remediation measures, and potentially face financial penalties. The outcome will set a precedent for how accession exemptions are treated and reinforce the EU’s role in safeguarding natural resources.

Key Elements

• Legal Basis: Article 258 TFEU; Article 14(b) and 13 of Directive 1999/31/EC; accession conditions under the Act concerning Bulgaria and Romania.
• Exemption Period: Romania was exempt from certain landfill safeguards until 16 July 2017, covering 101 municipal landfills.
• Current Issue: Nine of those landfills remain operational without meeting EU environmental requirements.
• Commission’s Actions: Formal notice (2020) and reasoned opinion (2024) demanding closure; now seeking judicial enforcement.
• Implications for Land Use: Closure of landfills will reduce leachate, gas emissions, and soil contamination, improving local environmental quality.
• Potential Outcomes: Court may order Romania to close the sites, implement remediation, and pay the Commission’s legal costs.
• Broader Impact: Reinforces EU enforcement of waste legislation and sets a precedent for handling accession exemptions in environmental policy.

Slovakia Challenges EU’s Russian Energy Ban: A Legal Clash Over Gas, Oil, and Energy Security

Overview

The European Union adopted Regulation (EU) 2026/261 to gradually halt imports of Russian natural gas and prepare for the cessation of Russian oil imports. The measure also seeks to strengthen monitoring of energy dependencies and amend related legislation. Its purpose is to reduce the EU’s reliance on Russian energy amid the ongoing conflict in Ukraine and to safeguard the bloc’s energy security.

In April 2026, the Slovak Republic filed a case before the Court of Justice of the European Union, arguing that the regulation is invalid. Slovakia contends that the EU used an incorrect legal basis, that the measures violate the principles of proportionality and solidarity, and that the regulation fails to provide adequate reasons for its adoption. The applicant seeks a declaration of invalidity and an order for the EU to pay legal costs.

If the Court rules in Slovakia’s favor, the regulation could be struck down or require amendment, potentially reshaping the EU’s strategy for phasing out Russian energy imports. The decision would also set a precedent for how the EU can justify restrictive measures against a specific third country, influencing future energy policy and international trade relations.

Key Elements

• Regulation (EU) 2026/261: Phased cessation of Russian natural gas imports; preparation for stopping Russian oil imports; enhanced monitoring of energy dependencies; amendment of Regulation (EU) 2017/1938.
  
• Slovakia’s Legal Grounds
  
  • Incorrect legal basis: Claims the regulation should rely solely on Article 215(1) TFEU (lex specialis for foreign and security policy) rather than the broader legal framework used.
    
  • Proportionality and solidarity: Argues the measures are overly restrictive, disproportionate to the objective, and lack solidarity with EU member states affected by the sanctions.
    
  • Obligation to state reasons: Asserts the regulation fails to provide sufficient justification for its restrictive measures.
    
• Potential Outcomes
  
  • Declaration of invalidity or requirement for amendment of the regulation.
    
  • Legal costs awarded to Slovakia.
    
  • Implications for EU energy security strategy and the legal basis for future sanctions.
    
• Contextual Significance
  
  • Reflects the EU’s response to the Russian‑Ukraine conflict and its impact on energy supply chains.
    
  • Highlights tensions between collective security objectives and individual member state interests in energy policy.

EU Tightens Sanctions on Russian Military‑Industrial and Energy Networks

Overview

The European Union has adopted Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2026/1361, extending the sanctions regime originally set out in Regulation (EU) No 269/2014. The new measure adds nine individuals and 45 entities—ranging from senior officials in Russia’s defense industry to shipping companies that facilitate the export of Russian oil—to the EU sanctions list. The regulation is a direct response to the ongoing Russian aggression against Ukraine, particularly the targeting of civilian infrastructure such as energy, water, and health facilities.

The list includes key figures in Russia’s state‑owned defense conglomerates (e.g., Rostec, Uralvagonzavod, and the United Shipbuilding Corporation) and companies that produce or supply unmanned aerial vehicles, precision sensors, and other military technologies. It also targets a broad network of shipping operators and technical service providers that manage vessels involved in the transport of Russian crude oil, many of which operate without adequate liability insurance and engage in high‑risk shipping practices.

For EU member states, the regulation means immediate asset freezes, travel bans, and prohibitions on providing services to the listed persons and entities. It also reinforces the EU’s commitment to limiting Russia’s ability to finance and equip its military, while tightening controls over the global oil supply chain that supports the Russian war effort.

Key Elements

• New Sanctioned Individuals

  • Nine high‑ranking officials and owners in Russia’s defense industry (e.g., Oleg Fishelev, Oleg Yevtushenko, Pavel Nikitin).
    
  • Individuals involved in the design, production, or supply of military technology and equipment.

• New Sanctioned Entities

  • 45 companies spanning defense manufacturing, UAV production, precision instrumentation, and research institutes.
    
  • Shipping companies and technical service providers that manage vessels transporting Russian crude oil, many of which lack proper insurance and engage in ship‑to‑ship transfers.

• Scope of Restrictions

  • Asset freezes and prohibitions on financial transactions.
    
  • Travel bans for listed individuals.
    
  • Prohibition on providing services, goods, or technology that could support Russia’s military or energy exports.

• Geoscience and Energy Implications

  • The regulation targets entities involved in the extraction, processing, and shipping of oil, directly affecting global energy markets.
    
  • It also curtails the supply chain for advanced military technologies that rely on geoscience‑derived materials and precision engineering.

• Implementation and Enforcement

  • Regulation enters into force upon publication in the Official Journal of the EU.
    
  • Binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.
    
  • Requires national authorities to update their sanctions lists and enforce compliance measures.

• Broader Impact

  • Strengthens the EU’s sanctions regime against Russia, aiming to reduce its capacity to wage war.
    
  • Signals a coordinated approach to limiting the flow of military and energy resources that sustain the conflict in Ukraine.

EU Tightens Sanctions on Russian Military‑Energy Complex to Counter Ukraine Conflict

Overview

The European Union, in response to Russia’s continued aggression against Ukraine, has amended its 2014 sanctions regime (Decision 2014/145/CFSP) by adding nine individuals and 45 entities to the restrictive measures list. The new additions target key figures in Russia’s defense industry, manufacturers of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) and drones, and a broad network of shipping and energy companies that facilitate the transport of Russian oil and support the war effort.

The Council’s decision, adopted on 15 June 2026, follows the European Council’s 2024 condemnation of Russia’s war and its call for intensified pressure, including further sanctions. By expanding the list, the EU seeks to curtail Russia’s ability to finance and equip its armed forces, disrupt the flow of military technology, and limit the export of energy resources that fund the conflict.

For stakeholders in geoscience, energy, and natural resource sectors, the decision means tighter controls on maritime transport, stricter export‑control regimes for dual‑use technology, and heightened scrutiny of companies involved in oil logistics and UAV production. The sanctions also underscore the EU’s commitment to safeguarding Ukraine’s territorial integrity while addressing the environmental and economic risks associated with the war.

Key Elements

• New Sanctioned Individuals (9)

  • Owners and executives of major Russian defense corporations (e.g., Rostec, Uralvagonzavod, Kalashnikov Concern).
    
  • Key figures in UAV and drone manufacturing (e.g., Pavel Nikitin, Oleg Fishelev).
    

• New Sanctioned Entities (45)

  • Defense & Technology: Research institutes, production associations, and companies supplying weapons systems, sensors, and UAVs (e.g., Lavochkin, Sinvent, IONOS).
    
  • Energy & Shipping: Shipping companies and ship‑management firms operating vessels that transport Russian crude oil, many lacking adequate insurance and engaging in high‑risk practices (e.g., Dilmas, Kord Company, Moonstone Maritime).
    
  • Support Infrastructure: Firms providing lubricants, additives, and technical services to the Russian military and energy sectors (e.g., Xinxiang Richful, Shenzhen Minghuaxin).
    

• Scope of Restrictions

  • Asset freezes and prohibitions on financial transactions with listed persons and entities.
    
  • Export bans on dual‑use goods and technology that could enhance Russia’s military capabilities.
    
  • Maritime sanctions targeting vessels and companies involved in the “shadow fleet” oil transport.
    

• Implications for Geoscience & Natural Resources

  • Heightened monitoring of maritime routes and potential environmental risks from uninsured oil shipments.
    
  • Increased regulatory oversight on the supply chain of materials used in UAVs and defense equipment.
    
  • Potential disruptions to global oil markets and shipping logistics, affecting energy security and trade flows.
    

• Enforcement & Compliance

  • The decision enters into force upon publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.
    
  • EU member states are required to implement the sanctions in national legislation and ensure compliance by businesses and financial institutions.
    

This amendment reflects the EU’s strategy to leverage economic and regulatory tools to support Ukraine’s sovereignty while addressing the intertwined challenges of military technology proliferation and energy logistics.

EU Tightens Sanctions on Russian Military and Energy Sectors Amid Ukraine Conflict

Overview

The European Union has adopted Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2026/1361, which amends Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 to add nine individuals and forty‑five entities to the EU sanctions list. The measure is a direct response to Russia’s continued aggression against Ukraine, particularly the recent targeting of civilian infrastructure such as energy, water, and health facilities. By expanding the list, the EU seeks to further constrain Russia’s ability to wage war and to curb the flow of resources that support its military operations.

The regulation is immediately binding across all Member States and imposes a range of restrictive measures—asset freezes, travel bans, and prohibitions on providing services or goods—on the newly listed persons and entities. It also reinforces the EU’s broader sanctions framework aimed at protecting Ukraine’s territorial integrity, sovereignty, and independence.

For professionals in geoscience, energy, and natural resources, the regulation signals heightened scrutiny of companies involved in the transport and supply of oil, gas, and military‑grade technology. Shipping firms that facilitate the movement of Russian crude, as well as manufacturers of unmanned aerial vehicles and components for defense systems, are now subject to EU sanctions, potentially affecting supply chains, maritime operations, and international trade in energy commodities.

Key Elements

• Expansion of Sanctions List: 9 individuals (including senior Russian defense officials) and 45 entities (shipping companies, defense contractors, UAV manufacturers, oil transport operators) added to Annex I of Regulation 269/2014.
  
• Targeted Sectors:
  
  • Energy & Shipping: Companies operating vessels that transport Russian crude oil or petroleum products, many lacking adequate liability insurance and engaging in high‑risk shipping practices.
    
  • Military Technology: Firms producing or supplying UAVs, drones, sensors, and other defense equipment used by the Russian Armed Forces.
    
  • Financial & Logistics Support: Entities providing insurance, technical management, or logistical services that facilitate the movement of military or energy assets.
    
• Sanction Measures:
  
  • Asset freezes and prohibitions on the acquisition or transfer of assets.
    
  • Travel bans for listed individuals.
    
  • Restrictions on providing services, goods, or technical assistance to the listed entities.
    
• Legal Effect: Regulation enters into force upon publication in the Official Journal and is directly applicable in all EU Member States.
  
• Implications for Geoscience & Energy Professionals:
  
  • Increased regulatory oversight on shipping routes and vessel operations involving Russian oil.
    
  • Potential disruptions in supply chains for components used in defense and energy technologies.
    
  • Necessity for due‑diligence checks against the expanded sanctions list in procurement and partnership decisions.
    

This regulation underscores the EU’s commitment to limiting Russia’s war‑fighting capabilities by targeting the economic and logistical foundations that sustain its military and energy sectors.

EU Tightens Sanctions on Russian Military‑Industrial and Energy Networks

Overview

On 15 June 2026 the European Union Council amended its 2014 sanctions regime against Russia, adding nine individuals and 45 entities to the list of persons and bodies subject to restrictive measures. The decision follows the European Council’s 2024 condemnation of Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine and reaffirms the EU’s commitment to limiting Russia’s capacity to wage war.

The new additions target key figures in Russia’s defense industry—owners, executives and board members of major arms manufacturers—and companies that supply or assemble unmanned aerial vehicles, drones, weapons systems, and related components. They also include a broad range of shipping and logistics firms that facilitate the transport of Russian crude oil and other energy products, many of which operate with inadequate insurance and engage in high‑risk “shadow‑fleet” practices.

By expanding the sanctions list, the EU seeks to cut off financial and material support for Russia’s military operations, disrupt the supply chain for advanced weapons, and pressure the Russian government to cease its aggression against Ukraine.

Key Elements

• Individuals Added

  • Owners and executives of major Russian defense corporations (e.g., Rostec, Uralvagonzavod, Kalashnikov Concern).
    
  • Key figures in companies producing UAVs and drones used in Ukraine (e.g., Rustakt, IONOS, ASFPV).
    

• Entities Added

  • Defense & Technology:
    
  • Research institutes and production associations (e.g., Lavochkin, Sinvent, 18th Central Research Institute).
    
  • Companies manufacturing weapons components, sensors, and communication systems (e.g., Elekond, Zvukotekhnika, Gefest & T).
    
  • Energy & Shipping:
    
  • Shipping companies operating Russia’s “shadow fleet” (e.g., Dilmas, Kord Company, Morskoy Standard).
    
  • Firms involved in oil transport and bunkering (e.g., Lukoil‑Western Siberia, Trans KA Tankers).
    
  • Supply‑Chain Support:
    
  • Foreign suppliers of military‑grade components (e.g., Xinxiang Richful Lubricant Additive Company, Shenzhen Minghuaxin).
    
  • Companies facilitating the export of Russian oil through complex networks (e.g., Nord Axis, 2Rivers Group).
    

• Scope of Measures

  • Asset freezes, travel bans, and prohibitions on providing financial or technical assistance.
    
  • Targeting both direct military support and ancillary sectors (energy, maritime logistics, dual‑use technology).
    

• Strategic Objective

  • To reduce Russia’s ability to sustain its military campaign in Ukraine by cutting off critical resources, technology, and financial flows.
    
  • To signal continued EU resolve and to encourage other international actors to strengthen sanctions.

H.R. 1: A Broad Reconciliation Bill Reshaping Energy, Agriculture, and Natural Resources

Overview

H.R. 1, enacted as Public Law 119‑21, is a sweeping reconciliation package that reorganizes federal policy across a wide range of domestic priorities. The bill’s most visible impacts are on agriculture, energy, and natural resources, where it revises SNAP work requirements, expands crop‑insurance coverage, and redefines federal leasing and royalty rules for oil, gas, coal, and renewable projects. It also introduces new renewable‑energy fees on federal lands, rescinds several environmental and climate‑justice programs, and reshapes the tax landscape for clean‑energy and advanced‑manufacturing incentives.

The legislation shifts the federal government’s approach to resource management and financing. On the one hand, it expands leasing authority and streamlines royalty calculations for onshore and offshore oil and gas, while also authorizing federal coal mining and setting coal royalty rates. On the other hand, it imposes new renewable‑energy fees and capacity‑based charges on federal lands, and it rescinds funding for NOAA appropriations and other environmental programs that previously supported climate‑justice and clean‑vehicle incentives. These changes alter the regulatory and financial environment for geoscientists, energy developers, and natural‑resource firms, tightening oversight on environmental programs while broadening opportunities for fossil‑fuel extraction and renewable‑energy development on public lands.

Tax provisions in the bill further recalibrate incentives. Most Green New Deal‑style credits—such as clean‑vehicle, residential and commercial energy‑efficiency, and advanced‑manufacturing production credits—are terminated, while credits for clean‑fuel production, carbon sequestration, and certain advanced energy projects (e.g., hydrogen storage, geothermal, advanced nuclear) are extended or enhanced. The bill also modifies foreign tax credit rules, business interest limitations, and the base‑erosion minimum tax, affecting multinational mining and energy firms operating abroad. Together, these provisions shift the investment calculus toward “America‑first” energy and manufacturing while tightening or removing many environmental tax breaks.

Key Elements

• Agriculture & Food Assistance

  • Revised SNAP work requirements and “thrifty food plan” calculations.
  • Expanded disaster assistance for livestock and farm‑raised fish.
  • New commodity price‑loss and risk‑coverage provisions; extended cotton storage payments through 2031.

• Energy & Natural Resources

  • Codified onshore and offshore oil and gas leasing, methane royalty rules, and Alaska‑specific leasing.
  • Authorized federal coal mining and set coal royalty rates.
  • Introduced renewable‑energy fees and capacity‑based charges on federal lands.
  • Rescinded NOAA appropriations and several environmental/climate‑justice programs.

• Tax Incentives & Credits

  • Terminated most Green New Deal‑style credits; extended clean‑fuel, carbon‑sequestration, and advanced‑energy credits.
  • Modified foreign tax credit rules and business interest limitations.
  • Adjusted the base‑erosion minimum tax for multinational energy and mining firms.

• Oil & Gas Leasing

  • Minimum of 30 region‑wide lease sales; specific Gulf of Mexico and Alaska sale requirements.
  • Royalty range set at 12½ %–16⅔ %; revenue‑sharing formulas for Alaska sales.

• Renewable‑Energy Development on Public Lands

  • New renewable‑energy fees tied to acreage rents and capacity fees.
  • Wind‑energy right‑of‑way fee rules with 10 % multiple‑use reductions for non‑wind activities.

• Environmental Program Rescissions

  • Eliminated funding for clean‑heavy‑vehicle incentives, greenhouse‑gas reporting, and EPA review funds.
  • Reduced or removed funding for climate‑justice and environmental science programs.

• Other Provisions

  • Adjusted SNAP matching‑fund requirements tied to state error rates.
  • Updated tax‑deduction rules for qualified tips, overtime, and vehicle‑loan interest.
  • Introduced new tax‑code sections for research, experimental expenditures, and capital‑asset treatment for geoscience and energy firms.

These elements collectively reshape how the federal government manages, finances, and regulates the nation’s geologic and natural‑resource assets, emphasizing domestic energy production while tightening environmental incentives and tax benefits.

Northern Natural Gas Expands Permian Pipeline Network—Public Comment Deadline June 30

Overview
Northern Natural Gas Company (Northern) has filed a 7© application with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) to construct a 15.1‑mile stretch of 24‑inch pipeline and a 1.1‑mile stretch of 16‑inch pipeline across Lea County, New Mexico, and Gaines County, Texas. The expansion also includes a new 7,700‑HP solar‑powered gas turbine compressor station, an interconnection with Transwestern Pipeline at the existing Phillips 66 Linam Ranch plant, a receiver at Northern’s launcher facility, a replacement recycle valve at its Plains Compressor Station, and a delivery point at the Southwestern Public Service Company (SPS) Gaines County Generating Station. The project is designed to deliver roughly 361,600 dekatherms per day to the new SPS plant while improving reliability and flexibility for Northern’s existing system.

The estimated cost of the expansion is $104.99 million. Northern requests that the expansion costs be treated as rolled‑in rates, allowing the company to recover the investment through future rate adjustments. FERC will conduct an environmental review within 90 days of the notice, either completing the review or issuing a schedule for a final environmental impact statement (FEIS) or environmental assessment (EA). The outcome of this review will trigger the need for federal authorizations within 90 days of the FEIS or EA issuance.

Public participation is a key component of the proceeding. Stakeholders can file comments, protests, or motions to intervene by June 30, 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time. Intervenors gain the right to request rehearings and to challenge FERC orders in court. All filings must reference docket number CP26‑534‑000 and can be submitted electronically via FERC’s eComment or eFiling systems, or by paper mail.

Key Elements

• Pipeline construction: 15.1 mi of 24‑inch and 1.1 mi of 16‑inch lines across New Mexico and Texas.
  
• Compressor station: 7,700‑HP solar‑powered gas turbine at Lea County.
  
• Interconnections: Link to Transwestern Pipeline at Phillips 66 Linam Ranch; receiver at Northern’s launcher; replacement recycle valve at Plains Compressor Station.
  
• Delivery point: New connection to SPS Gaines County Generating Station.
  
• Project cost: $104.99 million, with requested rolled‑in rate treatment.
  
• Environmental review: FERC to issue FEIS or EA within 90 days; federal authorizations required within 90 days of that issuance.
  
• Public comment window: Comments, protests, and interventions due June 30, 5:00 p.m. ET.
  
• Intervention rights: Intervenors can request rehearings and challenge orders in appellate courts.
  
• Filing methods: eComment, eFiling, or paper mail; all must reference docket CP26‑534‑000.

Enhancing Recreation at Oroville Wildlife Area: FERC Adopts Environmental Assessment for Feather River Project Improvements

Overview

The California Department of Water Resources (CDWR) has submitted a non‑capacity amendment to the Feather River Hydroelectric Project (Project No. 2100) to improve recreational facilities at the Oroville Wildlife Area near the Thermalito Afterbay. The proposed upgrades include a new campground, day‑use area, and boat launch. In line with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers prepared a Final Environmental Assessment (EA) that evaluates the environmental impacts of these improvements.

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) staff reviewed the Corps’ EA independently and determined that it adequately addresses potential impacts. Consequently, FERC has adopted the EA, concluding that the project does not constitute a major federal action that would significantly affect the quality of the human environment.

The project is a collaborative effort between CDWR and the Sutter Butte Flood Control Agency, aiming to enhance public access and enjoyment of the Feather River corridor while maintaining compliance with environmental regulations. Public comments and interventions can be submitted through FERC’s Office of Public Participation.

Key Elements

• Project Scope: Recreation improvements (campground, day‑use area, boat launch) at Oroville Wildlife Area adjacent to Thermalito Afterbay.
  
• Regulatory Basis: NEPA compliance; adoption of EA under 18 CFR 380.
  
• Environmental Assessment: Final EA prepared by U.S. Army Corps of Engineers; adopted by FERC without modification.
  
• Impact Assessment: Determined not to be a major federal action; no significant environmental effects anticipated.
  
• Partnership: CDWR working with Sutter Butte Flood Control Agency to implement the improvements.
  
• Public Participation: Opportunities for comments, interventions, or rehearing requests via FERC’s Office of Public Participation (phone: (202) 502‑6595).
  
• Documentation: EA available in FERC’s eLibrary (docket P‑2100) and identified by unique number EAXX‑019‑20‑000‑1778592430.
  
• Status: Active notice of availability and adoption, effective June 9, 2026.

NSF Seeks Approval to Streamline Antarctic Permit Data Collection

Overview
The National Science Foundation (NSF) has submitted a request to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for clearance of its Antarctic Conservation Act Application Permit Form (NSF 1078). This form is used by researchers and other parties seeking permits to conduct activities in Antarctica that may affect native wildlife, plants, or ecosystems. The notice is the second public comment period; the first received no feedback, so NSF is now inviting comments on the proposed information collection and its burden estimates.

The request is made under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, which requires agencies to obtain OMB approval before collecting information from the public. NSF estimates that about 25 permit applications are submitted each year, each taking roughly 45 minutes to complete, resulting in an annual burden of approximately 19 hours. The form collects basic applicant details and specific information about planned activities, including potential take of native species, entry into protected areas, and import of non‑native organisms or samples.

If approved, the form will continue to serve as the primary mechanism for ensuring compliance with the Antarctic Conservation Act of 1978 (as amended) and the Antarctic Science, Tourism, and Conservation Act of 1996. The goal is to maintain rigorous environmental protection while minimizing administrative burden on researchers and stakeholders.

Key Elements

• OMB Review – NSF is seeking a valid OMB control number to legally collect the information.
  
• Public Comment Deadline – Comments must be received by July 13, 2026 (30‑day review period).
  
• Estimated Burden – 25 responses per year × 45 minutes each ≈ 19 hours of total respondent time annually.
  
• Form Content – Applicant name, affiliation, location, planned activities, potential impacts on native birds, mammals, plants, and protected areas, and any import of non‑native species or covered samples.
  
• Purpose – To conserve Antarctica’s native wildlife and ecosystems while facilitating legitimate scientific and other activities.
  
• Compliance – The collection is required under 45 CFR 670 and the Antarctic Conservation Act; NSF must inform respondents that participation is voluntary unless an OMB control number is issued.
  
• Contact Information – Comments can be submitted online or via mail to the NSF Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, with additional contact details provided for further inquiries.

Carpinteria Farm Expansion Seeks Permission to Impact Endangered Amphibians and Turtles

Overview

The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service has announced that Brand Partnerships, a local farm operator, has applied for an Incidental Take Permit (ITP) under the Endangered Species Act (ESA). The permit would allow the company to take, or disturb, the federally threatened California red‑legged frog and the southwestern pond turtle—an animal currently proposed for listing—while carrying out a range of agricultural and habitat restoration activities on a 0.52‑acre parcel adjacent to Arroyo Paredon Creek in Carpinteria, Santa Barbara County.

The application includes a draft Habitat Conservation Plan (HCP) that outlines avoidance, minimization, and offset measures. These measures involve restoring riparian habitat, managing a detention basin to provide a perennial water source, and controlling invasive vegetation, all designed to mitigate impacts on the two species during the 30‑year permit term.

The Service is inviting public comment on both the ITP application and the HCP. It has preliminarily determined that the proposed activities would have a minor, “low‑effect” impact on the species and the human environment, and may qualify for a categorical exclusion under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). Comments are due by July 13, 2026.

Key Elements

• Incidental Take Permit (ITP) – Authorization to take the California red‑legged frog and southwestern pond turtle incidental to lawful agricultural and restoration activities.
• Species Covered – California red‑legged frog (federally listed as threatened) and southwestern pond turtle (proposed for threatened status).
• Habitat Conservation Plan (HCP) – Includes habitat restoration, invasive species control, and water‑management measures to offset impacts.
• Low‑Effect Determination – The Service preliminarily classifies the permit as having a minor effect on the species and the environment.
• Categorical Exclusion (NEPA) – The project may be eligible for a categorical exclusion, potentially streamlining environmental review.
• Public Comment Period – Stakeholders can submit written comments by July 13, 2026 through specified methods; comments will be publicly available.
• Future Listing Consideration – If the southwestern pond turtle becomes officially listed, the ITP would be amended to continue permitting incidental take under the same HCP framework.
• Mitigation Measures – Restoration of 0.52 acres of riparian habitat, management of a detention basin, and ongoing monitoring to ensure species protection during the permit term.

FEMA Eyes Streamlined Flood Claims & Housing Inspections: Call for Public Input

Overview

The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) has issued a 60‑day notice to extend an existing information‑collection program under the Paperwork Reduction Act. The extension covers the forms used by flood‑insurance policyholders and by FEMA inspectors to document damage after a federally declared disaster. By refining these forms, FEMA aims to cut administrative burden while ensuring accurate claims adjudication and fair disaster assistance.

The notice focuses on two core activities of the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP). First, it gathers data from NFIP Direct policyholders—those who purchase flood insurance directly from FEMA—to evaluate flood‑damage claims and determine eligibility for Coverage D (increased cost of compliance). Second, it collects information from housing inspections conducted by FEMA after a disaster, using the Automated Construction Estimator (ACE) software to assess property and personal‑property damage.

Respondents—including homeowners, businesses, and government entities—will be asked to complete a suite of worksheets and proof‑of‑loss forms. FEMA estimates that the total annual burden is roughly 300,000 responses, with an average of 14 minutes per submission. The agency invites public comments on the necessity, accuracy, and clarity of the data collection, as well as on ways to reduce respondent burden through technology.

Key Elements

• Extension of OMB‑approved collection 1660‑0005 – FEMA seeks to continue the current set of flood‑claims and inspection forms.
  
• Target respondents – NFIP Direct policyholders, FEMA inspectors, and disaster‑assisted households.
  
• Form suite – Includes personal‑property worksheets, building‑property worksheets, proof‑of‑loss forms, first‑notice‑of‑loss, and inspection instruments (onsite, remote voice, remote video).
  
• Data usage – Information feeds into FEMA’s claims adjudication system and the National Emergency Management Information System (NEMIS) for disaster assistance eligibility.
  
• Estimated burden – About 300,000 responses annually, averaging 14 minutes each, totaling roughly $15 million in administrative costs.
  
• Technology – Use of ACE software for damage estimation and secure electronic upload to NEMIS.
  
• Comment period – Public comments due by August 11, 2026, via docket ID FEMA‑2026‑0331.
  
• Potential impact – Streamlined forms could reduce paperwork for flood‑insured homeowners and speed up disaster‑relief payments, while maintaining compliance with the Paperwork Reduction Act.

Aluminum Foil Production in Georgia’s FTZ 26: New Trade‑Zone Benefits and Duty Rules

Overview

Trinidad Benham Corporation has submitted a formal notification to the U.S. Foreign‑Trade Zones Board to begin manufacturing aluminum foil rolls and foil containers at its LaGrange, Georgia facility, which lies within Foreign‑Trade Zone (FTZ) 26. The notification, received on June 5 2026, seeks approval to conduct production activities under FTZ procedures, allowing the company to import raw aluminum and partially finished components into the zone without immediate customs duties, while still meeting all regulatory requirements.

Under the proposed arrangement, the finished products—food‑contact aluminum foil rolls and containers—would be subject to U.S. duty rates ranging from 3 % to 5.7 %, depending on the country of origin. The raw aluminum bulk rolls used in production would carry duty rates between 3 % and 5.3 %. Because the merchandise may be subject to Section 122, Section 232, or Section 301 trade‑law provisions, the company must maintain “privileged foreign” (PF) status for these items, ensuring they are admitted to the zone with the appropriate duty treatment. Additionally, if the aluminum originates from countries under antidumping or countervailing duty (AD/CVD) investigations, the PF status requirement applies to avoid suspension of liquidation.

The Board invites public comment on the notification until July 22, 2026. Once approved, Trinidad Benham will be able to take advantage of FTZ benefits—such as duty deferral, reduced paperwork, and streamlined customs procedures—while ensuring compliance with U.S. trade‑law obligations. The notification and related documents will be publicly available through the Board’s Online FTZ Information System.

Key Elements

• Location & Zone: LaGrange, Georgia; Foreign‑Trade Zone 26.
  
• Proposed Products:
  
  • Aluminum foil rolls for food contact.
    
  • Aluminum foil containers for food contact.
    
• Foreign‑Status Materials: Aluminum foil bulk rolls.
  
• Duty Rates:
  
  • Finished products: 3 %–5.7 %.
    
  • Raw materials: 3 %–5.3 %.
    
• Trade‑Law Compliance:
  
  • Must maintain privileged foreign (PF) status under Sections 122, 232, 301.
    
  • Adherence to AD/CVD orders for certain countries.
    
• Public Comment Period: Open until July 22, 2026.
  
• Benefits: Duty deferral, reduced customs paperwork, streamlined production within the FTZ.
  
• Next Steps: Board review and potential approval; public inspection available via the Online FTZ Information System.

2025 Reconciliation Act: A Broad Shift in Energy, Natural Resources, and Tax Policy

Overview

The 2025 Reconciliation Act, enacted as Public Law 119‑21, reorganizes federal priorities across a wide spectrum of domestic programs. For geoscience, energy, and natural‑resource stakeholders it revises the framework for oil‑and‑gas leasing, expands Alaska‑specific authority, and authorizes new coal leasing rules while tightening royalty and revenue‑sharing formulas. The bill also introduces a new renewable‑energy fee schedule on federal lands, rescinds a range of NOAA and environmental program funds, and reshapes tax incentives that have long supported clean‑energy and research activities.

The act simultaneously expands tax provisions that benefit research, development, and capital investment—such as 100 % expensing of qualifying property, a new §174A deduction for domestic research, and enhanced credits for advanced manufacturing. At the same time, many “green‑new‑deal” subsidies are terminated, and the tax code is re‑structured to favor domestic production and reduce foreign‑entity benefits. These changes create a more streamlined, but also more restrictive, environment for resource extraction, renewable‑energy development, and environmental stewardship.

Overall, the legislation represents a major realignment of federal priorities, with significant implications for resource extraction, environmental regulation, and the economic landscape of the United States.

Key Elements

• Oil & Gas Leasing

  • New lease‑sale schedule: at least 30 region‑wide sales, with specific timelines for Alaska and Gulf of Mexico.
    
  • Royalty rates capped at 16 2/3 % (minimum 12 1/2 %) for Gulf leases; 70 % of lease revenues to Alaska from FY 2034 onward.
    
  • 10‑year terms for deep‑water (≥800 m) leases; 2017 final‑notice terms for Alaska sales.
    

• Coal Leasing

  • Authorizes federal coal leasing on 4 million acres, with royalty rate capped at 12.5 % (≤ 7 % until 2034).
    
  • Requires NEPA review and fair‑market‑value determinations.
    

• Renewable‑Energy Fees

  • Establishes per‑acre capacity fees for wind and solar projects on federal lands, payable until production begins.
    
  • Provides fee reductions for right‑of‑way holders if ≥25 % of the right‑of‑way is already used for non‑wind activities.
    

• Tax Incentives for Research & Development

  • §174A: immediate deduction for domestic research and experimental expenditures (excluding land, exploration, and certain software).
    
  • 100 % expensing for qualifying property under §168(k) and §70301.
    
  • Enhanced advanced‑manufacturing and production credits (§70308).
    

• Clean‑Energy Credit Changes

  • Termination of many renewable‑energy subsidies (clean‑vehicle, clean‑fuel, and renewable‑energy credits).
    
  • New or modified credits for clean‑fuel production (§70521) and restrictions on carbon‑sequestration credits (§70522).
    

• Environmental Program Rescissions

  • Cuts to NOAA, clean‑heavy‑vehicle, greenhouse‑gas, and air‑pollution initiatives.
    
  • Rescission of unfunded balances for technology programs under the Inflation Reduction Act.
    

• SNAP & Food‑Security Provisions

  • SNAP allotments tied to the 2025 “thrifty food plan,” with regional adjustments for Hawaii, Alaska, Guam, and the U.S. Virgin Islands.
    
  • Matching‑fund formula tied to state payment‑error rates (Section 10105).
    

• Defense & Infrastructure Funding

  • Significant appropriations for naval shipbuilding, missile defense, and critical‑minerals supply‑chain investments.
    
  • Funding for Coast Guard modernization and Arctic/Antarctic operations.
    

• Other Notable Provisions

  • New “Trump accounts” for minor retirement savings.
    
  • Revised tax‑deduction rules for vehicle‑loan interest, tips, and charitable contributions.
    
  • Updated immigration fee schedule and border‑security appropriations.
    

These provisions collectively reshape the fiscal and regulatory landscape for geoscience, energy, and natural‑resource sectors, balancing expanded domestic production incentives with tighter environmental and foreign‑entity controls.

NRC Opens Scoping for New Tennessee Uranium Enrichment Plant

Overview

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) has announced a scoping process to prepare an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for a proposed gas‑centrifuge uranium enrichment facility, Project IKE, to be built by Orano Enrichment USA LLC in Roane County, Tennessee. The facility would occupy roughly 600 acres within Oak Ridge city limits and would be capable of enriching uranium hexafluoride to a maximum of 10 % U‑235 for nuclear fuel use, operating for up to 40 years.

The scoping phase is the first step in the NRC’s 10 CFR 51 environmental review. It will define the proposed action, identify significant environmental issues, and determine which topics warrant detailed analysis in the forthcoming draft EIS. The NRC invites comments from the public, state and local agencies, tribes, and other stakeholders to shape the scope of the study.

Comments on the scope are due by July 13, 2026. The Department of Energy’s Oak Ridge Office of Environmental Management will cooperate on the EIS, and a draft EIS will be released later for public comment. The final EIS will incorporate responses to all comments received.

Key Elements

• Project scope: 600‑acre, gas‑centrifuge enrichment plant (Project IKE) in Roane County, Tennessee.
  
• Enrichment capability: Up to 10 % U‑235, suitable for commercial nuclear fuel.
  
• License duration: Up to 40 years of operation.
  
• Cooperating agency: U.S. Department of Energy, Oak Ridge Office of Environmental Management.
  
• Scoping objectives: Define the action, identify significant environmental issues, eliminate peripheral topics, and outline the EIS preparation schedule.
  
• Public participation: Open to the applicant, federal, state, local, and tribal agencies, and any interested individual or group.
  
• Comment deadline: July 13, 2026 (comments received later may still be considered if practical).
  
• Next steps: Draft EIS to be released after scoping; public comment period to follow; final EIS will include NRC responses to all comments.

Spokane Eyes New Upriver Dam: Public Call for Environmental Input

Overview
The City of Spokane has announced its intention to file a license application with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) for a new hydroelectric facility on the Spokane River, known as the Upriver Dam Hydroelectric Project. The project, located entirely within Spokane County, Washington, will be developed without involving federal lands. As part of the pre‑filing process, the city has submitted a Pre‑Application Document (PAD) that outlines the proposed design, construction schedule, and environmental review plan.

FERC is now inviting the public, federal, state, local, and tribal agencies to review the PAD and the initial Scoping Document (SD1). Comments, study requests, and requests for cooperating agency status must be filed by August 7, 2026. Two scoping sessions will be held near the project site to gather oral input on environmental concerns, which will shape the forthcoming Scoping Document 2 (SD2) and the environmental assessment or impact statement that FERC will prepare.

This notice underscores the importance of early stakeholder engagement in the environmental review process. By soliciting comments and study requests, FERC aims to identify key issues—such as impacts on fish and wildlife, water quality, cultural resources, and historic sites—before the detailed environmental analysis is conducted.

Key Elements

• Project: Upriver Dam Hydroelectric Project on the Spokane River, Spokane County, Washington.
  
• Regulatory Framework: FERC Project No. 3074‑013; compliance with 18 CFR part 5 and NEPA scoping requirements.
  
• Pre‑Application Document (PAD): Includes proposed process plan, schedule, and preliminary environmental considerations; available via FERC eLibrary.
  
• Scoping Documents:
  
  • SD1 (initial) released to stakeholders;
    
  • SD2 (potential) to be issued after scoping sessions.
    
• Public Participation:
  
  • Written comments and study requests due by Aug 7, 2026.
    
  • Two in‑person scoping sessions scheduled near the project site; oral comments recorded and publicly available.
    
• Cooperating Agencies: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, NOAA Fisheries, State Historic Preservation Officer, and other agencies with environmental expertise may assist in preparing the environmental document but cannot intervene.
  
• Environmental Review: FERC will conduct an Environmental Site Review and prepare either an Environmental Assessment (EA) or Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) based on scoping outcomes.
  
• Contact Information: Comments and study requests should be sent to the City of Spokane’s FERC liaison, Richard Proszek, or via FERC’s eFiling/eComment systems.
  
• Timeline: Notice issued June 11, 2026; comment period ends Aug 7, 2026; scoping sessions and subsequent documents to follow.

NOAA Refines Teacher‑at‑Sea Application Process to Cut Paperwork and Boost STEM Outreach

Overview

The U.S. Department of Commerce, through the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), has issued a notice inviting public comment on a revised information‑collection request for its Teacher at Sea Program. The program places K‑12 educators aboard NOAA research vessels for 2–4 weeks, allowing them to collaborate with scientists and bring real‑world ocean science back to their classrooms. Under the Paperwork Reduction Act, NOAA seeks to streamline the application process, reduce administrative burden, and ensure the data collected serves its educational mission.

The revision removes redundant instruments—specifically the NOAA Health Services Questionnaire, which is now handled separately under its own OMB control number—and eliminates the requirement for participants to submit a final report after the cruise. The updated online application now focuses on essential applicant details, teaching experience, lesson‑development plans, and two professional references. NOAA will use the collected information solely to select participants and to share educators’ blog posts and classroom activity ideas with the broader teaching community.

Comments are solicited for 60 days, ending August 10 2026. Stakeholders—including educators, school administrators, and other federal agencies—can submit written feedback to NOAA’s PRA Officer, referencing OMB Control Number 0648‑0283. The agency emphasizes that the revised collection will reduce the estimated 1 hour 15 minutes of application time and 15 minutes for references, with no monetary cost to respondents.

Key Elements

• Purpose: Streamline the Teacher at Sea application to minimize paperwork while maintaining selection quality.
  
• OMB Control Number: 0648‑0283 (revision of existing collection).
  
• Data Collection Method: Internet‑based online application and reference questionnaires.
  
• Time Burden: ~1 hour 15 minutes for application, 15 minutes for references; total estimated 481 hours of public effort.
  
• Removed Components:
  
  • NOAA Health Services Questionnaire (now under OMB 0648‑0824).
    
  • Final post‑cruise report requirement.
    
• Scope: 275 educators per cycle; voluntary participation; no cost to respondents.
  
• Public Comment Deadline: August 10 2026.
  
• Contact: Adrienne Thomas (NOAA PRA Officer) for comments; Jennifer Hammond (NOAA Teacher at Sea Program Director) for program details.
  
• Legal Basis: Section 4002 of the America COMPETES Act (enhancing STEM awareness and marine science literacy).

Idaho Faces Straight‑Line Wind Disaster: SBA Grants Loans to Rural Communities

Overview

On June 8 2026 the U.S. Small Business Administration (SBA) officially declared a rural area disaster in Idaho, triggered by a severe straight‑line wind event that struck the state in late December 2025 and early August 2026. The declaration enables residents, businesses, and non‑profit organizations in the affected counties—particularly Shoshone—to apply for low‑interest disaster assistance loans to repair physical damage or recover from economic injury.

The SBA’s notice outlines the loan application process, which can be completed online through the SBA Loan Portal or in person at local sites announced by the agency. Applicants are encouraged to contact the SBA Disaster Assistance Customer Service Center for guidance, and the agency provides special accommodations for individuals with hearing or speech disabilities.

Interest rates vary by borrower type and credit availability, ranging from 2.875 % for homeowners without alternative credit to 8.000 % for businesses with credit elsewhere. The disaster numbers for physical damage and economic injury are 21638B and 216390, respectively, and the declaration is cataloged under 59008 of the Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance.

Key Elements

• Administrative Disaster Declaration – Rural area in Idaho declared affected by straight‑line winds (Disaster Numbers 21638B & 216390).
  
• Loan Assistance – SBA offers disaster recovery loans for physical damage and economic injury.
  
• Interest Rates –
  
  • Physical damage: 5.750 % (homeowners with credit), 2.875 % (homeowners without credit), 8.000 % (businesses with credit), 4.000 % (businesses without credit), 3.625 % (non‑profits).
    
  • Economic injury: 4.000 % (businesses/agr. cooperatives without credit), 3.625 % (non‑profits).
    
• Affected Areas – State of Idaho, specifically Shoshone County.
  
• Application Process – Online via SBA Loan Portal or in person at designated local locations.
  
• Contact Information – Jennifer Talarico, Office of Disaster Recovery and Resilience, SBA; phone (202) 205‑6734 or 1‑800‑659‑2955; email for assistance.
  
• Accessibility – 7‑1‑1 relay services for deaf, hard‑of‑hearing, or speech‑disabled applicants.
  
• Authority – 13 CFR 123(b); Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance No. 59008.

Plumas County Flood Maps Under Review: Communities Asked to Shape Their Future

Overview

The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) has issued a notice inviting public comment on proposed flood hazard determinations for Plumas County, California. These determinations—covering Base Flood Elevations (BFEs), flood depths, Special Flood Hazard Area (SFHA) boundaries, and regulatory floodways—will appear on the county’s Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRMs) and underpin the Flood Insurance Study (FIS) reports that guide local floodplain management.

The purpose of the notice is to gather general information and feedback before the preliminary FIRMs and FIS reports become effective. The data will determine which areas qualify for the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) and what building and land‑use regulations communities must adopt to maintain or gain NFIP participation.

Comments are due by September 9, 2026. Communities may appeal any changes through a formal process that can involve a Scientific Resolution Panel (SRP) if initial consultations do not resolve disagreements. The notice also clarifies that the proposed minimum requirements do not preclude communities from adopting stricter floodplain rules than those suggested by FEMA.

Key Elements

• Scope of Determinations: Base Flood Elevations, flood depths, SFHA boundaries, floodway designations, and related regulatory zones.
  
• Impact on NFIP Eligibility: Updated FIRMs and FIS reports dictate whether properties qualify for flood insurance and what mitigation measures are required.
  
• Public Comment Window: Stakeholders must submit comments by September 9, 2026, via the FEMA Map Service Center or by mail/email to the Acting Director of Engineering and Modeling.
  
• Appeal and SRP Process: Communities can file appeals that may trigger a Scientific Resolution Panel review if initial discussions fail to resolve disputes.
  
• Community Autonomy: The proposed determinations represent minimum federal requirements; local ordinances may be more stringent if desired.
  
• Geoscience Relevance: The process relies on hydrologic and hydraulic data, making it directly pertinent to geoscientists, environmental planners, and natural resource managers.
  
• Data Availability: Preliminary and current FIRMs/FIS reports are accessible online and at the Plumas County Planning Department for comparison and review.

FEMA Seeks Public Input on Updated Flood Hazard Maps for Nebraska and Tennessee Communities

Overview

The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) has issued a notice inviting comments on proposed changes to Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRMs) and Flood Insurance Study (FIS) reports for several communities in Nebraska and Tennessee. These preliminary maps may adjust Base Flood Elevations (BFEs), flood depths, Special Flood Hazard Area (SFHA) boundaries, or regulatory floodway designations—key data that determine floodplain management requirements and eligibility for the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP).

The notice applies to a list of municipalities and unincorporated areas, including Box Butte County, Sheridan County, and Dyer County. Communities can review the proposed maps online or at local repositories, compare them with current effective maps, and submit feedback by September 9, 2026. The goal is to refine flood hazard information before it becomes official, ensuring that local ordinances and building codes align with the most accurate risk assessments.

FEMA also outlines an appeal process for communities that disagree with the preliminary determinations. If a community cannot resolve a dispute through collaborative consultation, it may request a Scientific Resolution Panel (SRP) review—an independent group of hydrology and hydraulics experts—to evaluate conflicting data and recommend a resolution.

Key Elements

• Comment Period: Submit feedback by September 9, 2026 via mail, email, or the FMIX online portal.
  
• Affected Areas: Communities in Box Butte County, Sheridan County (Nebraska) and Dyer County (Tennessee).
  
• Proposed Changes: Adjustments to Base Flood Elevations (BFEs), flood depths, SFHA boundaries, and regulatory floodway designations.
  
• NFIP Compliance: Updated maps serve as the basis for floodplain management measures required for participation in the National Flood Insurance Program.
  
• Local Ordinance Flexibility: Communities may adopt stricter floodplain rules than those suggested by FEMA; the proposed determinations represent minimum federal requirements.
  
• Appeal Process: Communities may file an appeal under 44 CFR 67.6(b); unresolved cases may trigger a Scientific Resolution Panel (SRP) review after 60 days of collaborative consultation.
  
• Data Transparency: Preliminary and current effective FIRMs and FIS reports are publicly available online and at local community map repositories for comparison.
  
• Legal Basis: Determinations are made under the Flood Disaster Protection Act of 1973 (42 U.S.C. 4104) and 44 CFR 67.4(a).

Flood Insurance Maps Get Major Updates Across 30+ Communities

Overview

The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) has issued a notice updating flood hazard determinations for more than 30 communities in Arizona, California, Colorado, Hawaii, Nevada, South Dakota, and Utah. The revisions—based on new scientific and technical data—alter Base Flood Elevations (BFEs), flood depths, Special Flood Hazard Area (SFHA) boundaries, zone designations, and regulatory floodway definitions on Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRMs) and accompanying Flood Insurance Study (FIS) reports.

These changes affect the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) by redefining the flood risk that insurers use to set premiums and by establishing the minimum floodplain management requirements that communities must meet to remain eligible for NFIP participation. Property owners, developers, and local governments will need to reference the updated maps when applying for or renewing flood insurance, and may need to adjust building plans or zoning ordinances to comply with the new floodplain boundaries.

FEMA has provided a 90‑day window for residents and stakeholders to request reconsideration of the changes. Updated maps and study reports are available online through the FEMA Map Service Center and at each community’s local map repository, ensuring transparency and accessibility for all affected parties.

Key Elements

• Updated Flood Hazard Data – New BFEs, flood depths, SFHA boundaries, zone designations, and floodway definitions based on recent scientific findings.
  
• Impact on Insurance – Revised maps influence NFIP premium calculations and eligibility; insurers must use the new effective community numbers for all policies and renewals.
  
• Community Compliance – Municipalities must adopt or demonstrate floodplain management measures that meet or exceed the updated minimum requirements.
  
• Appeal Process – A 90‑day period is granted for residents or stakeholders to request reconsideration of the changes through the community’s Chief Executive Officer.
  
• Accessibility – Updated FIRMs and FIS reports are posted online via the FEMA Map Service Center and at local community map repositories.
  
• Geographic Scope – Affected areas span 30+ communities across 7 states, including major urban centers such as Phoenix, Flagstaff, and Los Angeles‑area cities.
  
• Legal Basis – The revisions are authorized under the Flood Disaster Protection Act of 1973, the National Flood Insurance Act of 1968, and relevant federal regulations (44 CFR parts 65 and 60).

FEMA Updates Flood Maps with New Science: What It Means for Communities and Insurance

Overview

The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) has issued a notice updating flood hazard determinations for a wide range of communities across Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Louisiana, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, and Virginia. The revisions—based on new scientific and technical data—alter Base Flood Elevations (BFEs), base flood depths, Special Flood Hazard Area (SFHA) boundaries, and regulatory floodway designations. These changes are formalized through Letters of Map Revision (LOMRs) and will directly influence flood insurance rates, building requirements, and land‑use planning.

The updates take effect on dates specified in the accompanying table and will apply to all new insurance policies and renewals. Property owners, developers, and local governments are urged to review the revised Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRMs) and Flood Insurance Study (FIS) reports, which are available online and in local community repositories. After the second newspaper notice, residents have a 90‑day window to request a reconsideration of the changes from the community’s Chief Executive Officer.

The notice confirms that the revisions comply with the Flood Disaster Protection Act, the National Flood Insurance Act, and FEMA’s regulatory framework (44 CFR Part 65). While the new determinations establish the minimum floodplain criteria for National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) participation, communities may adopt stricter ordinances if desired. The changes affect floodplain management, insurance premiums, and infrastructure planning for geoscientists, environmental professionals, and natural resource stakeholders.

Key Elements

• Updated BFEs and flood depths for the listed communities, reflecting the latest hydrologic data.
  
• Revised SFHA boundaries and regulatory floodway designations that may expand or contract flood‑hazard zones.
  
• Effective dates and a 90‑day reconsideration period following the second newspaper publication.
  
• Access to revised FIRMs and FIS reports via FEMA’s Map Service Center and local community repositories.
  
• Impact on NFIP eligibility, insurance premiums, and building code compliance for property owners and developers.
  
• Compliance with federal statutes and regulations (Flood Disaster Protection Act, National Flood Insurance Act, 44 CFR Part 65).
  
• Option for communities to adopt stricter floodplain ordinances beyond the minimum requirements.
  
• Contact points for comments, appeals, and reconsideration requests (FEMA officials and local community leaders).
  
• Relevance to geoscience, land‑use planning, environmental protection, and infrastructure development.

Flood‑Risk Maps Get a Major Update: What It Means for Communities and Planners

Overview

The U.S. Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) has finalized a series of Letter of Map Revision (LOMR) updates that revise Base Flood Elevations (BFEs), Special Flood Hazard Area (SFHA) boundaries, and regulatory floodways for dozens of communities across 15 states. These changes are the result of new hydrologic data and updated flood‑plain modeling, and they replace the previous Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRMs) and, in some cases, the underlying Flood Insurance Study (FIS) reports.

For residents, developers, and insurers, the updated maps mean that flood risk assessments, insurance premiums, and building‑code requirements may shift. Properties that were previously outside a high‑risk zone could now be included, potentially raising insurance costs or triggering new flood‑plain management obligations. Conversely, some areas may see a reduction in risk designation, which could lower premiums and relax certain regulatory requirements.

The updates are final after a 90‑day public notice period and the resolution of any appeals. Communities must now adopt or demonstrate compliance with the new flood‑plain management criteria to remain eligible for the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP). The revised maps are publicly available through FEMA’s Map Service Center and local community repositories.

Key Elements

• Finalized LOMRs: Updated BFEs, SFHA boundaries, and regulatory floodways for 70+ communities.
  
• Updated Flood‑Plain Criteria: New flood‑plain management measures required for NFIP participation.
  
• Insurance Impact: Revised maps serve as the basis for flood‑insurance premiums and policy eligibility.
  
• Public Availability: Maps and study reports accessible online via FEMA’s Map Service Center and local repositories.
  
• Appeals Resolved: All objections to the revisions have been addressed; the changes are now legally binding.
  
• Compliance Flexibility: Communities may adopt stricter local ordinances beyond the minimum NFIP requirements.
  
• Cross‑State Coverage: Affected areas span Arkansas, Florida, Illinois, Indiana, Maryland, New Mexico, Ohio, Washington, Pennsylvania, Tennessee, Texas, Wisconsin, and more.
  
• Legal Framework: Changes authorized under the Flood Disaster Protection Act, National Flood Insurance Act, and 44 CFR part 65.
  
• Planning Implications: Updated data supports more accurate hydrologic modeling, land‑use planning, and resilience strategies.

FEMA Updates Flood Maps Across 30+ U.S. Communities – What It Means for Residents and Developers

Overview

The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) has finalized a series of updates to flood hazard determinations—specifically Base Flood Elevations (BFEs), Special Flood Hazard Area (SFHA) boundaries, and regulatory floodways—through a Notice of Change. These revisions are reflected in new or revised Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRMs) and, in some cases, Flood Insurance Study (FIS) reports for the affected communities. The updates were published after a 90‑day public notice period and any appeals have been resolved, making the new floodplain information the official basis for future insurance and land‑use decisions.

These changes directly influence the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP). Communities must adopt or demonstrate compliance with floodplain management measures that align with the updated BFEs and SFHA boundaries to remain eligible for NFIP participation. Property owners, developers, and insurers will need to reference the revised maps to determine flood insurance eligibility, premium rates, and required building setbacks or elevation requirements.

The updated flood hazard information is publicly available at each community’s Map Repository and online via FEMA’s Map Service Center. Property owners and stakeholders are encouraged to review the final maps and associated study reports to understand how the new flood elevations and boundaries affect their properties, zoning, and potential insurance costs.

Key Elements

• Scope of Updates: 30+ communities across 10 states (e.g., Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Maryland, Michigan, Mississippi, North Carolina, Tennessee, Texas) have received revised BFEs, SFHA boundaries, and regulatory floodway designations.
  
• Legal Basis: Changes are made under the Flood Disaster Protection Act of 1973, the National Flood Insurance Act of 1968, and 44 CFR part 65, ensuring compliance with federal floodplain management standards.
  
• NFIP Eligibility: Updated floodplain data is the minimum requirement for NFIP participation; communities may adopt stricter local ordinances but must at least meet the federal criteria.
  
• Public Access: Finalized maps and study reports are available at community repositories and online through FEMA’s Map Service Center, facilitating transparency and stakeholder review.
  
• Appeals Process: All appeals related to these changes have been resolved by the Assistant Administrator, Federal Insurance Directorate, Resilience, concluding the formal review period.
  
• Implications for Development: Builders and developers must reference the new BFEs and SFHA boundaries to determine required setbacks, elevation standards, and insurance eligibility for new construction or renovations.
  
• Insurance Impact: Property owners may experience changes in flood insurance premiums or eligibility based on the updated flood elevations and hazard zone designations.
  
• Next Steps for Communities: Municipalities should update local floodplain management plans, zoning ordinances, and public outreach materials to reflect the new flood hazard determinations.

Floodplain Overhaul: Final Flood Hazard Determinations Adopted for Illinois, Minnesota, and New York Communities

Overview

The U.S. Department of Homeland Security’s Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) has issued final flood hazard determinations for a broad set of communities across Illinois, Minnesota, and New York. These determinations update key floodplain data—including Base Flood Elevations (BFEs), base flood depths, Special Flood Hazard Area (SFHA) boundaries, zone designations, and regulatory floodway delineations—on the Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRMs) and accompanying Flood Insurance Study (FIS) reports. The changes, effective July 21, 2026, are the culmination of a 90‑day public notice period and the resolution of any appeals, ensuring that the updated information is legally binding.

The primary objective of this update is to provide accurate, science‑based floodplain information that underpins FEMA’s National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP). Communities must adopt or demonstrate compliance with floodplain management measures that align with the new BFEs and boundaries to maintain or qualify for NFIP participation. Property owners, developers, and local planners are encouraged to review the revised FIRMs and FIS reports to assess potential impacts on building codes, insurance premiums, and land‑use decisions.

For geoscientists and natural‑resource professionals, the updated maps reflect refined hydrologic modeling and updated topographic data, offering a more precise representation of flood risk. The availability of these maps through FEMA’s Map Service Center and local community repositories facilitates integration into regional planning, environmental assessments, and risk‑management strategies.

Key Elements

• Finalized Flood Hazard Data: Updated Base Flood Elevations, flood depths, SFHA boundaries, zone designations, and regulatory floodways for each listed jurisdiction.
  
• Legal Authority: Determinations issued under the Flood Disaster Protection Act of 1973, 42 U.S.C. 4104, and 44 CFR part 67; 90 days after publication, appeals resolved.
  
• Effective Date: July 21, 2026, for all new or modified flood hazard information.
  
• Access to Maps: FIRMs and FIS reports available at community map repositories and online via FEMA’s Map Service Center.
  
• NFIP Implications: Communities must adopt floodplain management measures that align with the updated data to qualify for or remain in the National Flood Insurance Program.
  
• Stakeholder Guidance: Property owners, developers, and planners urged to review updated maps for compliance with building codes, insurance requirements, and land‑use planning.
  
• Contact Information: FEMA’s Acting Director of Engineering and Modeling Division, David N. Bascom, and the FEMA Mapping and Insurance eXchange (FMIX) portal for further inquiries.

Texas Communities Receive Updated Flood Hazard Maps

Overview

The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) has finalized new flood hazard determinations for Sabine County, Texas, and its incorporated areas—City of Hemphill and City of Pineland. These determinations update Base Flood Elevations (BFEs), base flood depths, Special Flood Hazard Area (SFHA) boundaries, zone designations, and regulatory floodway definitions on the Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRMs) and accompanying Flood Insurance Study (FIS) reports. The changes take effect as of August 4 2026 and are now publicly available through FEMA’s Map Service Center and local community repositories.

These updated maps serve as the foundation for floodplain management requirements that communities must adopt or demonstrate compliance with in order to qualify for or maintain participation in FEMA’s National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP). The revisions also influence insurance premiums, building codes, and land‑use planning decisions for property owners and developers within the affected watersheds.

FEMA has completed the appeal process for these changes, and the final notice is issued under the Flood Disaster Protection Act. Residents, planners, and geoscience professionals can review the new FIRM and FIS documents to assess how the updated flood hazards may impact local infrastructure, environmental assessments, and future development projects.

Key Elements

• Finalized Flood Hazard Determinations for Sabine County, City of Hemphill, and City of Pineland, effective August 4 2026.
  
• Updated Base Flood Elevations (BFEs) and base flood depths, redefining flood risk thresholds for the region.
  
• Revised Special Flood Hazard Area (SFHA) boundaries and zone designations, affecting insurance eligibility and building regulations.
  
• Regulatory floodway adjustments that delineate areas where development is restricted to protect flood flow.
  
• FIRM and FIS reports now available online via FEMA’s Map Service Center and at local community map repositories.
  
• Impact on NFIP participation: Communities must adopt or demonstrate compliance with new floodplain management measures to remain eligible for federal flood insurance.
  
• Appeals resolved: FEMA’s Federal Insurance Directorate has addressed all appeals following the 90‑day public notification period.
  
• Public access and transparency: Updated maps and study reports are published in local newspapers and accessible to the public for review and planning.

FEMA Updates Flood Maps: New Data Drives Changes in Insurance and Building Rules

Overview

The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) has issued a notice updating flood hazard determinations for dozens of communities across the United States. These updates adjust Base Flood Elevations (BFEs), base flood depths, Special Flood Hazard Area (SFHA) boundaries, zone designations, and regulatory floodway definitions on Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRMs). The revisions are based on newly available scientific and technical data, ensuring that flood risk information reflects the most current understanding of hydrologic and geomorphic conditions.

For residents, property owners, and developers, the changes can affect flood insurance premiums, eligibility for the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP), and the requirements for building permits and land‑use planning. Communities that adopt stricter floodplain management measures may see higher insurance costs, while those with reduced hazard designations could benefit from lower premiums and fewer regulatory constraints.

The notice provides a 90‑day window for stakeholders to request reconsideration of the changes. Effective community numbers and updated map panels are published online, and affected municipalities are listed with contact information for appeals. The updates reinforce FEMA’s commitment to using the latest data to protect life, property, and infrastructure from flood risk.

Key Elements

• Updated Flood Hazard Determinations – Adjustments to BFEs, flood depths, SFHA boundaries, zone designations, and floodway limits based on new scientific data.
  
• Impact on NFIP Participation – Communities must maintain or adopt floodplain management measures that meet or exceed the updated criteria to remain eligible for NFIP coverage.
  
• Insurance Premium Implications – Changes to hazard designations can raise or lower flood insurance rates for homeowners and businesses.
  
• Reconsideration Period – A 90‑day window allows residents, developers, and local officials to request a review of the changes through the community’s Chief Executive Officer.
  
• Effective Community Numbers – Each community receives a unique identifier that must be used for all new policies and renewals.
  
• Transparency and Access – Updated FIRMs and Flood Insurance Study (FIS) reports are available online via FEMA’s Map Service Center and local community repositories.
  
• Broad Geographic Scope – The notice covers communities in Arizona, California, Colorado, Idaho, Nevada, North Dakota, Oregon, South Dakota, Utah, and more, illustrating the nationwide effort to keep flood maps current.
  
• Legal Basis – The revisions are authorized under the Flood Disaster Protection Act of 1973, the National Flood Insurance Act of 1968, and relevant federal regulations (44 CFR parts 65 and 60).
  

These updates underscore the dynamic nature of flood risk assessment and the importance of accurate, up‑to‑date mapping for effective risk management and policy planning.

FEMA Updates Flood Hazard Maps Across 70+ Communities—What It Means for Insurance and Development

Overview

The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) has issued a notice updating flood hazard determinations for more than 70 communities nationwide. The revisions—based on new scientific and technical data—alter Base Flood Elevations (BFEs), base flood depths, Special Flood Hazard Area (SFHA) boundaries, zone designations, and regulatory floodway delineations on Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRMs) and Flood Insurance Study (FIS) reports. These changes are intended to reflect the most current hydrologic and climate information, ensuring that flood risk assessments remain accurate.

The updates take effect on dates specified in the notice, and each community is assigned a new “effective community number” that must be used for all new flood‑insurance policies and renewals. After the second newspaper publication of the notice, stakeholders have a 90‑day window to request a reconsideration of the changes. Revised maps and supporting documents are available online through FEMA’s Map Service Center and at local community repositories.

For geoscientists, planners, and natural‑resource professionals, the revisions signal a shift in flood‑risk modeling that will influence land‑use planning, infrastructure design, and insurance pricing. While the NFIP’s minimum floodplain management requirements remain unchanged, communities may adopt stricter local ordinances to further mitigate flood risk.

Key Elements

• Updated BFEs and base flood depths based on the latest hydrologic data and climate projections.
  
• Revised SFHA boundaries and zone designations, which directly affect flood‑insurance premiums and eligibility.
  
• Changes to regulatory floodway delineations, impacting development restrictions and infrastructure placement.
  
• New effective community numbers (e.g., 120067 for Collier County) that must be referenced for all new or renewed policies.
  
• 90‑day appeal period following the second newspaper publication, allowing residents and stakeholders to request reconsideration.
  
• Online access to revised FIRMs and FIS reports via FEMA’s Map Service Center and local community repositories.
  
• Floodplain management implications: communities must maintain or adopt NFIP‑required measures; they may also implement stricter local ordinances.
  
• Impact on land‑use planning and infrastructure resilience, requiring updated risk assessments for zoning, building codes, and environmental impact studies.
  
• Relevance to geoscience: integration of updated hydrologic models, climate data, and topographic information into flood‑hazard mapping.
  
• Insurance and economic effects: potential changes in premium rates, coverage eligibility, and risk transfer mechanisms for property owners and developers.

FEMA Updates Flood Hazard Maps for 70+ Communities Using New Scientific Data

Overview

The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) has issued a notice updating flood hazard determinations—Base Flood Elevations (BFEs), flood depths, Special Flood Hazard Area (SFHA) boundaries, and regulatory floodway designations—across more than 70 communities in 10 states. These revisions are based on newly available scientific and technical information and are formalized through Letters of Map Revision (LOMRs) in accordance with federal regulations.

The notice specifies the effective community numbers that must be used for all new flood insurance policies and renewals. Each community’s updated Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) and Flood Insurance Study (FIS) report are now available online and at local map repositories. After the second local newspaper publication of the changes, a 90‑day window opens during which residents, developers, and local officials may request a reconsideration of the revisions through the community’s Chief Executive Officer.

These updates affect floodplain management, building codes, and eligibility for the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP). Communities with stricter local ordinances may maintain or strengthen their requirements, while the new federal determinations provide a baseline for compliance and risk assessment.

Key Elements

• Scope of Changes

  • 70+ communities across Florida, Indiana, Mississippi, New Mexico, Ohio, Texas, Virginia, Wisconsin, and Pennsylvania.
    
  • Updates include BFEs, flood depths, SFHA boundaries, zone designations, and regulatory floodway limits.

• Implementation Process

  • Changes are enacted via Letters of Map Revision (LOMRs).
    
  • Effective community numbers are published and must be used for all NFIP policies and renewals.
    
  • 90‑day reconsideration period after second local newspaper publication.

• Access to Information

  • Updated FIRMs and FIS reports available online through FEMA’s Map Service Center and local community repositories.
    
  • Contact information for each community’s floodplain manager and chief executive officer is provided.

• Implications for Stakeholders

  • Property owners and developers must review new flood elevations and zoning designations for compliance.
    
  • Insurance carriers must adjust premiums and coverage based on revised flood risk.
    
  • Local governments may use the updated data to refine land‑use planning, storm‑water management, and emergency preparedness.

• Legal and Regulatory Context

  • Changes are authorized under the Flood Disaster Protection Act of 1973, the National Flood Insurance Act of 1968, and 44 CFR Part 65.
    
  • The revisions represent the minimum floodplain management requirements; communities may adopt stricter standards.

These updates underscore the dynamic nature of flood risk assessment and the importance of integrating the latest geoscientific data into public policy and planning.

Updated Flood Hazard Maps: What They Mean for Communities and Property Owners

Overview

On June 11 2026, the Department of Homeland Security’s Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) issued a notice updating flood hazard determinations for over 200 communities across 30 states. The changes—new Base Flood Elevations (BFEs), floodway boundaries, and Special Flood Hazard Area (SFHA) zones—are based on the latest scientific and technical data. They are reflected in revised Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRMs) and, where applicable, Flood Insurance Study (FIS) reports, and are effective once the notice is published.

These updates affect the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) by redefining which properties are considered flood‑prone, potentially altering insurance premiums, eligibility for subsidies, and the requirements for building and land‑use permits. Communities must adopt or demonstrate compliance with the new floodplain management criteria to remain eligible for NFIP participation.

Property owners, developers, insurers, and local governments have a 90‑day window to request reconsideration of any change. The revised maps and supporting documents are publicly available online through FEMA’s Mapping and Insurance eXchange (FMIX) portal and local community repositories.

Key Elements

• Scope of Changes

  • Updates to BFEs, floodway boundaries, SFHA zones, and regulatory floodway designations.
    
  • Affected communities span Alabama, Arkansas, Connecticut, Delaware, Florida, Iowa, Indiana, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Ohio, Oklahoma, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, Wisconsin, and others.

• Legal and Regulatory Basis

  • Actions authorized under the Flood Disaster Protection Act of 1973 (42 U.S.C. 4105) and the National Flood Insurance Act of 1968 (42 U.S.C. 4001).
    
  • Compliance with 44 CFR part 65 (FIRM issuance) and 44 CFR part 60.3 (floodplain management criteria).

• Implications for NFIP Participation

  • Communities must maintain or demonstrate floodplain management measures that meet or exceed the new criteria.
    
  • Property owners may see changes in insurance rates, eligibility for NFIP subsidies, and requirements for building permits.

• Public Participation and Appeals

  • A 90‑day period for reconsideration begins after the second local newspaper publication.
    
  • Appeals must be submitted to the community’s Chief Executive Officer, with contact details provided in the notice.

• Access to Updated Information

  • Revised FIRMs and FIS reports are available via the FMIX portal and local community map repositories.
    
  • The effective community number (e.g., 010153 for Huntsville, AL) must be used for all new policies and renewals.

• Stakeholder Impact

  • Geoscientists & Engineers: Updated data informs risk assessments and infrastructure planning.
    
  • Developers & Builders: Must review new floodplain boundaries before construction.
    
  • Insurers: Adjust underwriting and premium calculations based on revised flood risk.
    
  • Local Governments: Update zoning ordinances and land‑use plans to align with new flood hazard determinations.

These updates underscore the dynamic nature of flood risk assessment and the importance of integrating the latest scientific findings into policy and planning decisions.

Updated Flood Hazard Maps: What Communities and Developers Need to Know

Overview

The U.S. Department of Homeland Security’s Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) has issued a nationwide notice updating flood hazard determinations for dozens of communities across 20 states. These updates—encompassing Base Flood Elevations (BFEs), flood depth contours, Special Flood Hazard Area (SFHA) boundaries, and regulatory floodway designations—are based on new scientific and technical data. The changes take effect once the notice is published, and they directly influence flood insurance premiums, building code requirements, and land‑use planning.

For residents, property owners, and developers, the revised maps mean that structures previously considered outside high‑risk zones may now fall within them, potentially raising insurance costs and tightening construction regulations. Conversely, some areas may see reduced risk designations, lowering premiums and permitting more flexible development. Communities must adopt or demonstrate compliance with the updated floodplain management criteria to remain eligible for the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP).

The notice also establishes a 90‑day window for stakeholders to request reconsideration of the changes. Updated maps and supporting Flood Insurance Study (FIS) reports are publicly available through FEMA’s Map Service Center and local community repositories, ensuring transparency and accessibility for all affected parties.

Key Elements

• Scope of Updates
  • Revised BFEs, flood depths, SFHA boundaries, and floodway designations for 200+ communities nationwide.
  • Updates reflect the latest hydrologic and geologic data, including recent rainfall, river stage, and climate projections.

• Effective Dates & Reconsideration
  • Changes become official upon publication; communities must use the new “effective community number” for all new policies and renewals.
  • A 90‑day period is provided for residents, developers, and local officials to file reconsideration requests with the community’s Chief Executive Officer.

• Access to Information
  • Updated maps and FIS reports are posted online via FEMA’s Map Service Center and local community map repositories.
  • Stakeholders can compare new and prior maps to assess impacts on property and development plans.

• Implications for Flood Insurance & Development
  • Properties entering SFHA zones may face higher insurance premiums and stricter building elevation requirements.
  • Communities must maintain or strengthen floodplain management measures to qualify for NFIP participation.

• Legal and Regulatory Framework
  • Changes are authorized under the Flood Disaster Protection Act of 1973, the National Flood Insurance Act of 1968, and 44 CFR Part 65.
  • The updates do not override existing local ordinances that are more stringent than the new federal requirements.

• Stakeholder Engagement
  • Local officials are encouraged to review the updated maps, engage with residents, and adjust planning documents accordingly.
  • Public comments and appeals can be submitted through the designated community contacts listed in the notice.

These updates underscore the dynamic nature of flood risk assessment and the importance of staying informed to protect property, manage development, and maintain eligibility for federal flood insurance programs.

FEMA Updates Flood Maps Across 20 States, Redefining Risk Zones

Overview

The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) has finalized a series of updated flood hazard determinations—new Base Flood Elevations (BFEs), base flood depths, Special Flood Hazard Area (SFHA) boundaries, and regulatory floodways—across 20 states. These revisions are reflected in Letter of Map Revision (LOMR) documents that replace the existing Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRMs) and, in some cases, the Flood Insurance Study (FIS) reports for the affected communities.

These changes directly influence flood insurance premiums, eligibility for the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP), and the regulatory framework for building and land‑use decisions. Communities must now adopt or demonstrate compliance with the updated floodplain management criteria to remain eligible for NFIP participation. Property owners and developers are encouraged to review the new maps to understand how the revised flood risk zones may affect their projects and insurance costs.

The updates were issued after a 90‑day public notice period and the resolution of any appeals. FEMA has made the finalized LOMRs available for inspection at local community repositories and online through the FEMA Map Service Center, ensuring transparency and accessibility for stakeholders.

Key Elements

• Scope of Updates: 115 communities across Arizona, California, Colorado, Idaho, Nevada, Oregon, South Dakota, and other states have received new or modified flood hazard determinations.
• Technical Changes: Adjustments to BFEs, base flood depths, SFHA boundaries, and regulatory floodways that alter the delineation of high‑risk flood zones.
• NFIP Implications: Updated maps serve as the basis for floodplain management requirements; communities must adopt or maintain these criteria to qualify for NFIP coverage.
• Public Access: Finalized LOMRs are publicly available at community repositories and via FEMA’s online Map Service Center.
• Stakeholder Impact: Property owners, developers, insurers, and local governments must reassess flood risk, insurance premiums, and building codes in light of the new determinations.
• Compliance and Enforcement: Communities may enact stricter floodplain regulations than the minimum NFIP requirements, but must not relax standards below the updated thresholds.

FEMA Updates Flood Maps Across 50+ U.S. Communities, Impacting Insurance and Development

Overview

The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) has finalized new or revised flood hazard determinations for more than 50 communities nationwide. These updates include changes to Base Flood Elevations (BFEs), base flood depths, Special Flood Hazard Area (SFHA) boundaries, zone designations, and regulatory floodways. The revisions are reflected in updated Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRMs) and, where applicable, Flood Insurance Study (FIS) reports.

These changes are the result of the most recent hydrologic and geologic data analyses and are intended to improve the accuracy of flood risk assessments. Communities must now adopt or demonstrate compliance with the updated floodplain management criteria to remain eligible for the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP). Property owners, developers, and insurers will need to review the new maps, as they may affect building permits, zoning decisions, and insurance premiums.

The notice confirms that all appeals have been resolved, the final determinations are published in local newspapers, and the updated maps are available for inspection at community repositories and online through FEMA’s Map Service Center.

Key Elements

• Updated Flood Hazard Data – New or modified BFEs, base flood depths, SFHA boundaries, zone designations, and regulatory floodways.
  
• Impact on NFIP Participation – Communities must adopt or prove compliance with the updated floodplain management criteria to qualify for NFIP coverage.
  
• Availability of Maps – Finalized FIRMs and FIS reports can be accessed at local community repositories or online via FEMA’s Map Service Center.
  
• Potential Insurance Premium Changes – Revised flood elevations and boundaries may lead to higher or lower flood insurance rates for property owners.
  
• Local Ordinance Flexibility – Communities may enact stricter floodplain regulations than the minimum NFIP requirements.
  
• Appeals Process Completed – All appeals related to these changes have been resolved, and the determinations are now final.
  
• Geoscience Relevance – The updates rely on updated hydrologic modeling, topographic data, and geologic assessments, underscoring the importance of accurate geoscientific data in flood risk management.

FEMA Finalizes Updated Flood Maps Across 10 States, Shaping Insurance and Planning

Overview

The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) has issued a notice finalizing new or revised flood hazard determinations—Base Flood Elevations (BFEs), base flood depths, Special Flood Hazard Area (SFHA) boundaries, and regulatory floodways—through Letter of Map Revision (LOMR) documents. These updates are part of the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) and are intended to improve the accuracy of flood risk assessments for communities nationwide.

The notice covers a broad swath of municipalities and unincorporated areas in Arizona, California, Colorado, Idaho, Nevada, Utah, and Wyoming. Each LOMR replaces or amends the existing Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRMs) and, where applicable, the Flood Insurance Study (FIS) reports that were in effect before the revisions. The changes were finalized after a 90‑day public notice period and the resolution of any appeals.

For residents, developers, and local governments, the updated flood maps mean revised floodplain boundaries and potential changes to insurance premiums, building codes, and land‑use planning. Communities must adopt or demonstrate compliance with floodplain management measures that align with the new hazard information to remain eligible for NFIP participation. The revised maps are publicly available through FEMA’s Map Service Center and the FEMA Mapping and Insurance eXchange (FMIX) portal.

Key Elements

• Updated Hazard Data: New or modified BFEs, base flood depths, SFHA boundaries, and regulatory floodways for each listed community.
• Scope of Impact: Communities across 10 states, including major urban and rural areas in Arizona, California, Colorado, Idaho, Nevada, Utah, and Wyoming.
• Legal Basis: Determinations made under the Flood Disaster Protection Act of 1973, National Flood Insurance Act of 1968, and 44 CFR Part 65.
• NFIP Compliance: Communities must adopt floodplain management measures that meet or exceed the new hazard criteria to qualify for NFIP insurance.
• Public Access: Final LOMRs and updated FIRMs are available online via FEMA’s Map Service Center and FMIX, and can be inspected at local community repositories.
• Appeals Process: All appeals related to these changes have been resolved; the notice is now final and enforceable.
• Implications for Property Owners: Potential changes in flood insurance rates, required building setbacks, and eligibility for certain development projects.
• Planning and Development: Updated maps inform zoning, permitting, and infrastructure projects, helping communities mitigate future flood risks.

U.S. Forces Divestiture of California Concrete Operations to Preserve Competition

Overview

The United States, together with the State of California, has challenged a proposed $712 million acquisition by Taiheiyo Cement Corporation (through its subsidiary CalPortland) of Vulcan Materials’ ready‑mix concrete assets in San Diego County. The complaint argues that the merger would substantially lessen competition for the production, distribution, and sale of ready‑mix concrete—a critical building material used in infrastructure, commercial, and residential construction—violating Section 7 of the Clayton Act.

To address the alleged anticompetitive effects, the Department of Justice filed a proposed final judgment that requires the divestiture of three key concrete plants (CalPortland’s Escondido and Oceanside facilities and Vulcan’s Lakeside plant) and fifteen delivery trucks to an independent buyer, most likely Holliday Rock Co. The judgment also mandates the transfer of related licenses, permits, and customer contracts, and imposes strict operational separation and transition services to ensure the divested assets remain viable competitors.

The court has granted the final judgment, subject to a 60‑day public comment period, and will retain jurisdiction to enforce or modify the order. The decision aims to preserve competitive pricing, quality, and service for San Diego County’s construction projects while maintaining the integrity of the ready‑mix concrete market.

Key Elements

• Parties Involved

  • Plaintiffs: United States, State of California
    
  • Defendants: Taiheiyo Cement Corp., CalPortland Co., Vulcan Materials Co.
    

• Transaction Overview

  • Proposed acquisition of Vulcan’s California ready‑mix concrete operations by CalPortland for ~$712 million (Oct 27 2025).
    

• Antitrust Concerns

  • Combined market share > 50 % in San Diego County ready‑mix concrete market.
    
  • Potential for price hikes, reduced quality, and diminished service.
    
  • High barriers to entry for new competitors due to land, permits, and specialized equipment.
    

• Divestiture Requirements

  • Sale of Escondido, Oceanside, and Lakeside plants, plus associated leaseholds.
    
  • Transfer of fifteen delivery trucks and related licenses/permits.
    
  • Full transfer of customer contracts, intellectual property, and operational data.
    

• Operational Safeguards

  • Asset preservation and hold‑separate order to keep divested assets operationally distinct.
    
  • Transition services (back‑office, HR, IT) for up to six months if buyer is not Holliday Rock.
    
  • Supply contracts for aggregate and other materials for up to 12 months, extendable to 180 days.
    

• Enforcement and Monitoring

  • Mandatory affidavits and compliance reports every 30 days.
    
  • Appointment of a divestiture trustee if the divestiture is not completed within 15 days.
    
  • Prohibition on reacquisition of divested assets for the duration of the judgment.
    

• Timeline and Expiration

  • Divestiture must occur within 15 calendar days of the court’s entry of the order, with possible extensions up to 90 days.
    
  • Judgment expires 10 years from entry, with potential earlier termination after 5 years if divestiture is complete.
    

• Public Participation

  • 60‑day comment period for stakeholders to submit written feedback to the Antitrust Division.
    

These provisions aim to restore competitive balance in San Diego County’s ready‑mix concrete market while ensuring that the divested operations remain fully functional and capable of serving the region’s infrastructure and construction needs.

US DOJ Proposes Clean‑Up Deal for Armour Road Superfund Site in Missouri

Overview

The U.S. Department of Justice has filed a proposed consent decree with the Western District of Missouri to address hazardous waste releases at the Armour Road Superfund Site in North Kansas City. The lawsuit, filed under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA), targets U.S. Borax, Inc. for its role in contaminating groundwater with arsenic and other hazardous substances.

The decree requires U.S. Borax to implement an interim remedy chosen by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to mitigate arsenic‑contaminated groundwater and to reimburse the federal government and the state of Missouri for response costs already incurred. In exchange, the company receives a covenant not to sue under CERCLA and relevant Missouri statutes, effectively limiting future litigation over the site.

The notice invites public comment on the proposed terms. Comments must be submitted within 30 days of publication, either by email or mail, and may be filed on the court docket. The full consent decree is available for download on the DOJ website, and assistance is offered for accessing the document.

Key Elements

• Parties Involved: U.S. Borax, Inc. (defendant) vs. United States and State of Missouri (plaintiffs).
  
• Site: Armour Road Superfund Site, North Kansas City, Missouri.
  
• Contamination: Arsenic‑contaminated groundwater and other hazardous substances.
  
• Remedy: Interim remedy selected by EPA to address groundwater contamination.
  
• Financial Obligations: U.S. Borax must reimburse all response costs incurred by the federal government and the state.
  
• Legal Outcome: Covenant not to sue under CERCLA sections 106 and 107, and Missouri statutes 260.510 & 260.530.
  
• Public Participation: 30‑day comment period; submissions to Assistant Attorney General, Environment and Natural Resources Division.
  
• Access to Decree: Available for download on DOJ website; assistance available for access.

Oregon Faces Storm‑Induced Disaster: SBA Opens Rural Loan Window

Overview

On June 4 2026 the U.S. Small Business Administration (SBA) issued an administrative disaster declaration for rural areas of Oregon, following a series of severe storms that produced straight‑line winds, flooding, landslides, and mudslides. The declaration covers the counties of Clackamas, Lane, and Lincoln, where the natural hazards have caused widespread damage to homes, businesses, and infrastructure.

The SBA’s declaration enables residents and enterprises in the affected counties to apply for disaster assistance loans through the SBA Loan Portal or at designated local sites. The loans are designed to cover physical damage—such as roof repairs, structural repairs, and replacement of damaged equipment—as well as economic injury, helping businesses recover lost revenue and maintain operations.

For homeowners and businesses, the declaration offers lower interest rates than typical market rates, with special provisions for those lacking access to other credit. The SBA also provides guidance and support through its Disaster Recovery and Resilience office, ensuring that affected parties can navigate the application process and secure the funding needed to rebuild.

Key Elements

• Affected Areas: Clackamas, Lane, and Lincoln counties in Oregon.
  
• Disaster Types: Severe storms, straight‑line winds, flooding, landslides, and mudslides.
  
• Loan Categories:
  
  • Physical Damage Loans for property and equipment repair.
    
  • Economic Injury Loans for businesses and small agricultural cooperatives.
    
• Interest Rates (as of declaration):
  
  • Homeowners with credit elsewhere: 5.750 %
    
  • Homeowners without credit elsewhere: 2.875 %
    
  • Businesses with credit elsewhere: 8.000 %
    
  • Businesses without credit elsewhere: 4.000 %
    
  • Private non‑profits (any credit status): 3.625 %
    
  • Economic injury for businesses/cooperatives without credit: 4.000 %
    
• Application Process: Online via the SBA Loan Portal or in person at locally announced locations.
  
• Key Dates:
  
  • Declaration issued: June 4 2026
    
  • Eligible loan period: December 15 – 21 2025 (pre‑declaration), August 3 2026, and March 4 2027.
    
• Contact Information:
  
  • Sharon Henderson, Office of Disaster Recovery and Resilience, SBA.
    
  • Phone: (202) 205‑6734; 1‑800‑659‑2955 (customer service).
    
  • Email: (not provided in the notice).
    
• Accessibility: Dial 7‑1‑1 for telecommunications relay services.
  
• Administrative Designation: Disaster numbers 21629B (physical damage) and 216300 (economic injury).
  
• Geoscience Relevance: The declaration highlights the impact of extreme weather events—straight‑line winds, flooding, landslides, and mudslides—on rural infrastructure, underscoring the need for resilient land‑use planning and disaster preparedness in geoscience and natural resource management.

EU Water Law Clarifies Deadline Extensions Must Be Fully Justified

Overview

The European Union’s Water Framework Directive (WFD) sets out a timetable for improving the quality of groundwater across the Union. Member States can extend these deadlines only under strict conditions, as outlined in Article 4(4). In 2025, the German Federal Administrative Court (Bundesverwaltungsgericht) asked the Court of Justice of the European Union for a preliminary ruling on whether an extension that fails to meet those conditions is legally effective.

The case centers on the Ems river basin, where the German states of Lower Saxony and North Rhine‑Westphalia extended the deadline for achieving “good chemical status” of 13 groundwater bodies that exceeded the nitrate limit of 50 mg l⁻¹. The extension was recorded in the basin’s management plan, but the plan did not provide the detailed reasons or the specific measures and timetable required by the WFD. The environmental NGO Deutsche Umwelthilfe challenged the extension, arguing that the lack of justification made it void.

Advocate General Rantos, in his opinion, concluded that Article 4(4) of the WFD is to be interpreted as a substantive requirement: if the reasons for an extension or the summary of measures and timetable are not fully set out, the extension is without legal effect. This interpretation reinforces the EU’s aim of ensuring transparent, evidence‑based water management and obliges national authorities to provide clear, detailed justifications whenever they postpone deadlines.

Key Elements

• Article 4(4) of the WFD

  • Allows deadline extensions only if no further deterioration occurs and all conditions (a)–(d) are met.
    
  • Conditions (b) and (d) require:
    
  • Explicit reasons for the extension, explained in the river basin management plan.
    
  • A summary of the measures needed to achieve the target, reasons for any delay, and a timetable for implementation.
    

• Effectiveness of Extensions

  • Failure to meet the above requirements renders the extension without effect.
    
  • The extension cannot be retroactively validated by later information or supplementary documents.
    

• National Implementation

  • German law (WHG and GrwV) transposes the WFD but must align with the EU’s substantive interpretation.
    
  • The Bundesverwaltungsgericht must apply EU law, potentially invalidating the German management plan’s extension for the 13 groundwater bodies.
    

• Implications for Water Management

  • Encourages Member States to provide transparent, detailed justifications for any deadline extension.
    
  • Strengthens accountability for achieving the WFD’s goal of “good status” for all groundwater bodies by 2025.
    

• Broader Context

  • The opinion reflects a growing trend in EU environmental law to treat procedural requirements as substantive, ensuring that legal safeguards are not merely formalities.
    
  • It underscores the EU’s commitment to enforce the WFD’s objectives and to prevent administrative delays from undermining water quality targets.

Fire‑Fighting Force: New Bill Mandates Rapid Wildfire Suppression on High‑Risk National Forests

Overview

The House has introduced H.R. 178, a bill that compels the Secretary of Agriculture—through the Forest Service—to take decisive action against wildfires on National Forest System lands deemed high‑risk. The legislation requires that any wildfire detected on these “covered” lands be extinguished within 24 hours, and that prescribed fires that exceed their planned parameters be immediately suppressed. The bill also sets strict limits on the use of fire as a management tool, allowing backfires or burnouts only under the direction of an incident commander or when firefighter safety demands it.

By tying the definition of covered lands to objective criteria—severe drought ratings, high wildfire preparedness levels, and top‑10 % fireshed risk—the bill ensures that federal resources are focused where they are most needed. It also clarifies that the Forest Service will not impede state or local firefighting agencies, thereby preserving local autonomy while bolstering national coordination.

If enacted, the bill would reshape wildfire management across the United States, increasing federal involvement, accelerating response times, and potentially altering long‑standing prescribed‑fire practices. It reflects a growing recognition that climate change and drought are amplifying wildfire threats, demanding a more proactive and collaborative approach to land stewardship.

Key Elements

• 24‑hour suppression mandate for any wildfire detected on covered National Forest System lands.
  
• Immediate suppression of prescribed fires that exceed their prescribed limits.
  
• No interference with state or local firefighting agencies authorized to respond on these lands.
  
• Fire as a tool only for compliant prescribed fires that meet applicable laws and regulations.
  
• Backfire or burnout usage restricted to incident‑commander order or firefighter safety necessity.
  
• Covered lands defined by
  
  • Drought intensity (D2–D4) on the U.S. Drought Monitor,
    
  • National Wildland Fire Preparedness level 5, or
    
  • Top‑10 % fireshed risk per Forest Service models.
    
• All available resources must be employed to control and extinguish initiated backfires or burnouts.
  
• The bill is reported amended by the Committee on Natural Resources (H. Rept. 119‑429, Part I).

EU Authorises Vermiculite as a Chicken Feed Additive – A Mineral’s New Role in Poultry Nutrition

Overview
The European Commission has formally authorised the use of vermiculite, a naturally occurring magnesium‑aluminium‑iron silicate, as an anticaking agent in feed for chickens for fattening, laying hens, and breeding birds. The decision follows a comprehensive safety assessment by the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA), which concluded that vermiculite is safe for consumers and the environment when used at the specified levels (10 000 mg kg⁻¹ of complete feed for poultry). However, EFSA noted limited data for other animal species and highlighted potential health risks for workers handling the additive, such as skin and respiratory sensitisation and exposure to crystalline silica and nickel.

The regulation sets clear conditions for use, including minimum and maximum inclusion rates, storage requirements, and mandatory protective measures for feed manufacturers and handlers. It also establishes analytical methods for verifying the additive’s purity and composition, ensuring traceability and compliance across the EU. The authorisation is valid until 2 July 2036, after which a renewal or reassessment will be required.

For stakeholders in geoscience, mineral resources, and environmental policy, this regulation underscores the importance of rigorous safety evaluations for naturally derived minerals used in animal nutrition, while balancing economic benefits with occupational and ecological safeguards.

Key Elements

• Authorized Use: Vermiculite is approved as a technological additive (anticaking agent) for chickens for fattening, laying hens, and breeding birds only.
  
• Maximum Inclusion Level: 10 000 mg kg⁻¹ of complete feed (12 % moisture).
  
• Safety Findings
  
  • Safe for consumers and the environment at the authorised level.
    
  • Limited data for other species; no safety conclusion for non‑poultry animals.
    
  • Identified as a skin and respiratory sensitiser; potential eye irritant not conclusively assessed.
    
• User Protection
  
  • Mandatory operational procedures and organisational measures to mitigate inhalation and dermal exposure.
    
  • Personal protective equipment (eye, skin, breathing) required when risks cannot be eliminated.
    
  • Compliance with EU legislation on crystalline silica and nickel exposure.
    
• Analytical Verification
  
  • Composition: ≥ 87 % vermiculite, ≥ 1 % hydroxyapatite, ≥ 2.4 % diopside (Fe²⁺‑bearing).
    
  • Analytical methods: XRD, XRF, PLM, dispersion staining microscopy.
    
• Regulatory Framework
  
  • Based on Regulation (EC) No 1831/2003 on animal nutrition additives.
    
  • Entry into force 20 days after publication; binding across all Member States.
    
  • Authorisation valid until 2 July 2036, subject to renewal.
    
• Geoscience Relevance
  
  • Vermiculite is produced by mining and thermal expansion (exfoliation).
    
  • Contains trace metals (nickel, chromium) and crystalline silica, necessitating careful handling.
    
  • Demonstrates how mineral processing and characterization intersect with food safety and occupational health.

Modernizing Offshore Oil & Gas Rules: New Standards, Safer Operations, and Clearer Guidance

Overview

The U.S. Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement (BSEE) has finalized a rule that updates the Outer Continental Shelf (OCS) regulations to reflect the latest industry best practices. By incorporating 23 new and revising 40 existing standards from the American Petroleum Institute, American Gas Association, GPA Midstream Association, and ASME, the rule brings measurement, safety, and design requirements into line with current technology. The changes take effect on August 10 2026 and aim to reduce uncertainty in production reporting, improve operational safety, and streamline compliance for offshore operators.

The rule also clarifies how these technical documents are referenced in federal regulations, ensuring that all parties can easily locate and understand the standards that govern custody‑transfer meters, sampling protocols, valve design, platform integrity, and more. By making the references explicit and up‑to‑date, BSEE removes the need for alternate compliance requests and reduces administrative costs for both industry and the government.

Because the standards are already widely adopted and developed through a transparent, multi‑stakeholder process, the rule imposes no new burdens on operators. It is expected to save roughly $36,000 annually for the industry and $30,000 for the federal government, with no significant impact on small businesses that make up about 70 % of OCS operators.

Key Elements

• Comprehensive Standard Updates – 23 new and 40 revised industry standards are incorporated, covering measurement technologies (Coriolis, ultrasonic, displacement meters), sampling, tank calibration, and safety valve requirements.
  
• Enhanced Safety Design – Updated guidelines for offshore structures, bolting, metallurgy, and well workover procedures improve integrity management and reduce risk of blowouts or leaks.
  
• Clear Reference Framework – The rule specifies how each standard is cited in 30 CFR Part 250, making it easier for operators, regulators, and the public to locate the applicable documents.
  
• Cost Savings & Efficiency – Eliminates the need for alternate compliance requests, projected to save the industry $36,000 per year and the government $30,000 per year.
  
• Small‑Business Protection – The rule is not a significant economic impact under the Regulatory Flexibility Act; it preserves existing burdens and does not impose new costs on small OCS operators.
  
• Transparency & Accessibility – API’s free online reading room and contact information for other standards bodies (AGA, GPA, ASME, ISO) are provided, allowing stakeholders to review the standards in person or online.
  
• Future‑Proofing – Operators have until August 11 2031 to bring existing measurement systems into compliance with the new standards, while new systems must comply by August 10 2026.
  
• No New Operational Authority – The rule is purely administrative; it does not authorize new offshore activities or alter existing lease terms.
  
• Regulatory Consistency – Updates to citations (e.g., API MPMS chapters, API RP 2A‑WSD, API Spec 6D) ensure that the regulations remain aligned with the most recent industry guidance.
  
• Safety Valve Requirements – Detailed testing and maintenance schedules for surface‑controlled shut‑off valves (SSSVs) and bypass safety devices (BSDVs) are reinforced, with clear thresholds for failure and required corrective action.
  
• Pipeline and Platform Integrity – Incorporates the latest ASME, API, and ISO standards for pipeline flanges, valves, and riser systems, ensuring robust design and inspection protocols.
  

This rule represents a significant step toward modernizing offshore oil and gas regulation, aligning federal requirements with industry practice, and reinforcing safety and environmental stewardship on the Outer Continental Shelf.

Venezuela Sanctions Loosened: New U.S. Licenses Open Doors for Energy and Fertilizer Trade

Overview

On March 13 2026 the U.S. Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) issued General Licenses 48A and 49A, replacing earlier versions. These licenses grant U.S. persons limited permission to engage in transactions that were otherwise prohibited under the Venezuela Sanctions Regulations (VSR). The focus is on the oil, gas, petrochemical, and electricity sectors, as well as the supply of related chemicals and services.

The licenses allow the supply of goods, technology, software, and services necessary for exploration, development, production, and maintenance of Venezuela’s energy infrastructure, provided that contracts are governed by U.S. law and payments are routed through designated U.S. accounts. They also authorize the negotiation and entry into contingent contracts for new investment, contingent on separate OFAC approval. Both licenses impose strict reporting requirements and exclude transactions with certain sanctioned countries and entities.

For geoscientists, energy engineers, and natural‑resource professionals, the new licenses mean that previously barred activities—such as shipping, logistics, and technical support—can now be conducted under clear regulatory guidance, while still maintaining compliance with broader U.S. sanctions and export controls.

Key Elements

• Scope of Activities

  • GL 48A: Supplies of goods, technology, software, and services for exploration, production, and electricity generation in Venezuela.
    
  • GL 49A: Negotiation and entry into contingent contracts for new investment in oil, gas, petrochemicals, or electricity operations.

• Contractual and Payment Conditions

  • Contracts must be governed by U.S. law and dispute resolution must occur in the United States.
    
  • Payments to blocked persons must go through the Foreign Government Deposit Funds (FGDF) or Treasury‑directed accounts.

• Reporting Requirements

  • Detailed transaction reports (parties, goods, values, dates, taxes/fees) due within 10 days of the first transaction and every 90 days thereafter.

• Exclusions and Restrictions

  • No payments in gold, digital currency, or other non‑commercial terms.
    
  • No dealings with entities linked to Russia, Iran, North Korea, Cuba, or China.
    
  • No unblocking of property, no new joint ventures, and no transactions involving blocked vessels or diluents.

• Chemical Annex

  • Lists specific fertilizers and precursor chemicals (e.g., sulfur, phosphate rock, urea, ammonium nitrate) that fall under “petrochemical products” and are covered by the licenses.

• Compliance with Other Agencies

  • Licenses do not relieve obligations under the Department of Commerce’s Bureau of Industry and Security or other federal regulations.

These provisions collectively create a narrow but significant window for U.S. participation in Venezuela’s energy and fertilizer sectors, contingent on strict adherence to reporting and compliance protocols.

BP’s Prudhoe Bay Project to Authorize Limited Polar Bear Disturbance

Overview

The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) has issued a notice proposing an Incidental Harassment Authorization (IHA) for BP America Production Company and BP Remediation Management. The authorization would allow BP to conduct drone surveys, surface‑water monitoring, solid‑waste removal, backfill, and revegetation at the Foggy Island Bay State No. 1 gravel pad in the Prudhoe Bay area of Alaska’s North Slope from June 1 2026 to May 31 2027.

The FWS estimates that these activities could result in Level B harassment—temporary behavioral disturbance—of no more than three Southern Beaufort Sea (SBS) polar bears. No Level A harassment, injury, or mortality is anticipated or authorized. The agency has determined that the impact on the polar bear population is negligible and that the activities will not adversely affect subsistence hunting by Alaska Native communities.

The notice invites public, tribal, and agency comments by July 10 2026. If approved, BP must implement a comprehensive polar‑bear interaction plan, conduct monitoring and reporting, and cooperate with federal, state, and local partners to minimize disturbance and protect subsistence use.

Key Elements

• Authorized Take: Up to three polar bears may experience Level B harassment (behavioral disturbance) during the 1‑year period.
  
• Activities Covered: Drone site surveys, surface‑water sampling, solid‑waste removal, backfill, and revegetation at Foggy Island Bay.
  
• Mitigation Measures:
  
  • Drones flown at 61–122 m altitude, avoiding bears and never approaching within 805 m.
    
  • Airboats maintain maximum distance from bears; operators trained to scan for marine mammals.
    
  • Strict waste and attractant management (wildlife‑resistant containers, daily incineration).
    
  • Polar‑bear safety and interaction plan approved by FWS, including training, observation, and response protocols.
    
• Monitoring & Reporting:
  
  • Continuous on‑site observation during all operations.
    
  • Detailed daily observation reports and immediate incident reporting within 48 hours.
    
  • Final monitoring report due within 90 days after IHA expiration.
    
• Subsistence Use:
  
  • Activities are located >70 km from known hunting areas; no anticipated impact on subsistence harvest.
    
  • If concerns arise, BP must develop a FWS‑approved Plan of Cooperation (POC) with affected Alaska Native communities.
    
• Regulatory Context:
  
  • Draft environmental assessment indicates no significant impact under NEPA.
    
  • ESA consultation will be conducted before final issuance.
    
  • The IHA is subject to public comment and may be modified, suspended, or revoked if conditions are not met.

Aberdeen Hydro Eyes New Power Plant on Tennessee‑Tombigbee Waterway: Public Comment Period Opens

Overview
The U.S. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) has accepted a preliminary permit application from Aberdeen Hydro AE, LLC to study the feasibility of a new hydropower project on the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers’ Aberdeen Lock and Dam on the Tennessee‑Tombigbee Waterway in Mississippi. A preliminary permit, if granted, would give the applicant priority to file a full license application but would not allow any construction or land‑disturbing activities until a final license is issued.

The proposed project would add a 150‑by‑100‑foot intake channel, a 100‑by‑100‑by‑24‑foot concrete powerhouse housing two 5‑MW turbines, a 40‑by‑40‑foot substation, a 150‑by‑100‑foot tailrace, and a 2.1‑mile, 36.7‑kV transmission line to an existing substation. Engineers estimate the plant could generate roughly 4,320 MWh of electricity annually, providing a modest but clean energy source for the region.

FERC is inviting the public to submit comments, motions to intervene, or competing applications by 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on August 3, 2026. Submissions can be filed electronically through FERC’s eFiling system or by paper mail. The notice also outlines how to access the full application and related documents via the Commission’s eLibrary.

Key Elements

• Preliminary Permit Purpose – Grants priority to file a full license application; no construction allowed until a final license is issued.
  
• Project Location – Aberdeen Lock and Dam on the Tennessee‑Tombigbee Waterway, Monroe County, Mississippi.
  
• Core Components
  
  • Intake channel: 150 ft × 100 ft
    
  • Powerhouse: 100 ft × 100 ft × 24 ft, two 5 MW turbines
    
  • Substation: 40 ft × 40 ft
    
  • Tailrace: 150 ft × 100 ft
    
  • Transmission line: 2.1 mi, 36.7 kV
    
• Estimated Generation – 4,320 MWh per year (average).
  
• Public Participation Window – Comments, motions to intervene, and competing applications due by August 3, 2026.
  
• Filing Instructions – Electronic filing via FERC eFiling preferred; paper filings accepted at specified addresses.
  
• Access to Documents – Full application and related materials available in FERC’s eLibrary (docket P‑15417).
  
• Regulatory Framework – Application filed under Section 4(f) of the Federal Power Act; must comply with 18 CFR 4.36 for competing applications.

Boott Hydropower Seeks New License for Lowell River Project – Public Comments Needed on Fish Passage and Energy Operations

Overview
The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) has accepted Boott Hydropower, LLC’s application for a new license to operate the Lowell Hydroelectric Project on the Merrimack River in Massachusetts and New Hampshire. The project, which includes the Pawtucket Dam, a 1,236‑acre impoundment, a 5.5‑mile canal system, and multiple power stations, will continue to run in a run‑of‑river mode while implementing a series of fish‑passage improvements. The notice invites the public to file motions to intervene, protests, comments, and preliminary fishway prescriptions by August 4, 2026, with reply comments due September 18, 2026.

The application outlines several key operational changes: maintaining a minimum flow of 500 cfs during the upstream fish migration season, suspending canal‑system generation during critical periods for alewife and American eel, and replacing the existing fish elevator with a short fish ladder. Additional proposals include enhancing the Pawtucket Dam fish ladder, installing a fish exclusion facility, and developing comprehensive monitoring and compliance plans. The project remains within the administrative boundary of the Lowell National Historical Park but does not occupy federal land.

FERC’s notice emphasizes that the project is now ready for environmental analysis under the Federal Power Act. Stakeholders—including environmental groups, local communities, and resource agencies—are encouraged to submit their input electronically or by paper. The Commission will consider all protests and comments, but only those who file a motion to intervene may become parties to the proceeding.

Key Elements
- Run‑of‑River Operation: Boott will continue to operate the Lowell Project in run‑of‑river mode, maintaining a minimum flow of 500 cfs during fish migration seasons.
- Fish Passage Enhancements:
- Replacement of the existing fish elevator with a short fish ladder at the E.L. Field Powerhouse.
- Modification and enhancement of the Pawtucket Dam fish ladder and bypassed reaches.
- Installation of a new fish exclusion facility (trash rack overlay, downstream bypass modifications, eel sampling device).
- Seasonal Generation Suspension: Canal‑system power stations will be shut down during May–July for alewife migration and August–November for American eel migration.
- Environmental Analysis: The application is now ready for FERC’s environmental review, requiring water‑quality certification or waiver.
- Public Participation Deadlines:
- Motions to intervene, protests, comments, recommendations, terms and conditions, and fishway prescriptions due August 4, 2026.
- Reply comments due September 18, 2026.
- Project Scope: The license boundary will exclude a 7.4‑mile section of the upstream impoundment that was previously included.
- Stakeholder Engagement: The notice invites comments from resource agencies, local communities, and the National Park Service, with a requirement to serve copies to all parties listed in the service list.
- Compliance and Monitoring Plans: Boott will develop operation and compliance monitoring plans, a fishway operation and management plan, and a canal operation and management plan.
- Decommissioning Plan: Within one year of license issuance, a decommissioning plan for the Assets Power Station must be filed with FERC.

Dover‑Foxcroft to Dismantle Moosehead Hydroelectric Dam: Public Comment Period Opens

Overview

The Town of Dover‑Foxcroft, Maine, has filed a notice with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) to surrender its exemption from licensing for the Moosehead Hydroelectric Project on the Piscataquis River. The plant, which has been out of service since 2007, is deemed uneconomical to repair. The town plans to decommission the facility by removing the dam and powerhouse and restoring the riverbed to its natural state.

FERC’s notice invites federal, state, local, and tribal agencies, as well as the public, to submit comments, protests, or motions to intervene by July 6, 2026. The town must also secure a water‑quality certificate from the Maine Department of Environmental Protection under the Clean Water Act before proceeding. The notice outlines electronic and paper filing procedures and emphasizes that cooperating agencies cannot intervene in the proceeding.

This action reflects a broader trend of decommissioning aging hydroelectric infrastructure to restore river ecosystems and reduce maintenance costs. Stakeholders—including environmental groups, local residents, and industry representatives—can now weigh in on the proposed decommissioning and its environmental and economic implications.

Key Elements

• Surrender of Exemption: Town relinquishes its FERC licensing exemption for the Moosehead Hydroelectric Project.
• Decommissioning Plan: Removal of dam and powerhouse, followed by riverbed restoration to natural conditions.
• Water‑Quality Certification: Requirement for a Clean Water Act Section 401 certificate from Maine DEP; must be filed within 60 days of notice.
• Public Comment Period: Open to all interested parties until July 6, 2026; electronic filing encouraged via FERC eFiling system.
• Intervention Rules: Only parties filing motions to intervene may become formal participants; cooperating agencies cannot intervene.
• Environmental Cooperation: Agencies with expertise in environmental impacts may assist in preparing environmental documents but cannot intervene.
• Filing Requirements: Documents must include docket number, title (“COMMENTS,” “PROTEST,” or “MOTION TO INTERVENE”), and evidentiary basis; proof of service required for intervenors.
• Access to Documents: Application and related materials available on FERC’s website via the eLibrary link; agencies can obtain copies directly from the applicant.
• Stakeholder Engagement: Opportunity for local, state, federal, and tribal entities to influence the decommissioning process and ensure environmental safeguards.

Reconciliation Act 2025: A New Era for U.S. Energy, Mining, and Natural Resource Policy

Overview

The Reconciliation Act of 2025, enacted by the 119th Congress, reshapes federal policy across a broad spectrum of domestic priorities. For geoscience and natural‑resource stakeholders, the bill expands and clarifies leasing regimes for oil, gas, and coal, introduces new royalty and fee structures, and modernizes water‑resource and strategic petroleum reserve provisions. It also incorporates advanced AI tools for energy planning and revises NOAA appropriations, signaling a shift toward data‑driven resource management.

The Act’s energy‑focused provisions aim to accelerate domestic production while ensuring that a growing share of revenues benefits Alaska and the federal Treasury. New renewable‑energy fees on federal lands create a revenue‑sharing mechanism that incentivizes wind, solar, and other clean‑energy projects. Water‑conveyance and surface‑storage projects receive enhanced funding, supporting infrastructure critical to both agriculture and industry. The strategic petroleum reserve is re‑authorized with updated financing, and AI models are authorized to optimize energy‑sector decision making.

Beyond resource extraction, the legislation touches on agriculture, defense, housing, and environmental funding, but its core impact on the energy, mining, and raw‑material sectors lies in the new leasing frameworks, fee structures, and water‑resource allocations that will shape U.S. resource development and trade for the next decade.

Key Elements

• Expanded Leasing Regimes

  • Authorizes new onshore and offshore oil and gas leases, including a 10‑year primary term for deep‑water (≥800 m) Gulf of Mexico and Cook Inlet sales.
    
  • Revises methane royalty rules, capping royalties at 16 ⅔ % (minimum 12 ½ %) and allowing commingling of production from multiple reservoirs.
    
  • Extends Alaska‑specific leasing authority, with a 70 % revenue share for Alaska from FY 2034 onward.
    

• Coal Leasing and Royalty Adjustments

  • Codifies federal coal leasing, royalty, and mining permissions.
    
  • Temporarily lowers the royalty rate to 12.5 % (capped at 7 % until 2034) and provides credits for advance royalties paid before the amendment.
    

• Renewable‑Energy Fees and Revenue Sharing

  • Introduces renewable‑energy fees on federal lands, establishing acreage rents and capacity fees for wind and solar projects.
    
  • Fees are based on per‑acre rates, adjusted annually by 3 % and payable until energy production commences.
    

• Water‑Resource Enhancements

  • Increases funding for water‑conveyance and surface‑storage projects, supporting irrigation, municipal supply, and industrial use.
    

• Strategic Petroleum Reserve and AI Integration

  • Reauthorizes the strategic petroleum reserve with updated financing provisions.
    
  • Authorizes the use of AI models for energy planning, enabling data‑driven optimization of resource development and supply‑chain resilience.
    

• NOAA Appropriations and Environmental Oversight

  • Rescinds certain NOAA appropriations, reallocating funds toward resource‑management initiatives.
    
  • Maintains NEPA review requirements for all new leasing and renewable‑energy projects.
    

• Agricultural and Defense Provisions (Secondary Impact)

  • Revises agricultural commodity programs, disaster assistance, and tax incentives for middle‑class families and businesses.
    
  • Includes defense appropriations that indirectly support domestic manufacturing and supply‑chain resilience.
    

These provisions collectively aim to accelerate U.S. energy and mineral development, enhance revenue sharing with states (particularly Alaska), and modernize infrastructure and planning tools to support a sustainable, data‑driven resource economy.

Champagne’s New Rules: A Fresh Standard for France’s Iconic Sparkling Wine

Overview
The European Commission has formally approved a set of amendments to the product specification that governs the Champagne Protected Designation of Origin (PDO). These changes, communicated on 20 March 2026, are part of the EU’s ongoing effort to safeguard the integrity of geographical indications while allowing producers to adapt to evolving agricultural practices and market demands. The amendments are not considered Union-level changes; they remain within the scope of the French national authority that manages the Champagne PDO.

The most significant updates introduce the ancient grape variety Chardonnay Rose into the list of authorised varieties, expanding the genetic diversity of Champagne vineyards. They also revise the regulation on chemical weed control, replacing a partial ban on pre‑emergent herbicides with a stricter rule that limits chemical weed control to a 40 cm strip on either side of the vine row. These adjustments aim to enhance environmental sustainability and preserve the unique terroir that defines Champagne’s sparkling wines.

For producers, the amendments mean new cultivation options and tighter environmental controls, while for consumers they reinforce the authenticity and quality associated with the Champagne name. The changes also underscore the importance of the region’s geology—chalky slopes, limestone soils, and a blend of oceanic and continental climates—in shaping the wine’s distinctive acidity and ageing potential.

Key Elements

• Regulatory Context

  • Approved under Article 5(4) of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2025/27 and Article 24 of Regulation (EU) 2024/1143.
    
  • Communicated by the French Ministry of Agriculture and Food Sovereignty; remains a national standard amendment.

• Grape Variety Update

  • Chardonnay Rose added to the authorised list of varieties.
    
  • Recognised for its pink‑colored berries and similar agronomic profile to Chardonnay B.

• Weed‑Control Revision

  • Transition from a partial ban on pre‑emergent herbicides to a total ban, except for a 40 cm strip on each side of the vine row.
    
  • Aims to reduce chemical inputs and protect soil health.

• Terroir and Geology

  • Detailed description of the Champagne region’s cuestas, limestone and chalk soils, and mixed oceanic/continental climate.
    
  • Emphasis on how these natural factors contribute to grape acidity, drainage, and the unique “Champagne” character.

• Production and Quality Standards

  • Strict vine spacing, pruning rules, and yield limits (15 500 kg/ha).
    
  • Mandatory secondary fermentation in glass bottles, minimum ageing periods (15 months for non‑vintage, 36 months for vintage).

• Labeling and Packaging Requirements

  • Bottles must be finished, corked, and labelled before transport.
    
  • Inclusion of the PDO name, winemaker’s name, municipality, and optional “Premier Cru/Grand Cru” designations.
    
  • Minimum 15‑month ageing before sale, with special rules for bottles under 75 cl or over 150 cl.

• Implications for Stakeholders

  • Producers gain flexibility with a new grape variety while tightening environmental stewardship.
    
  • Consumers receive reinforced assurance of authenticity and quality.
    
  • The amendments support the long‑standing tradition of Champagne while aligning with contemporary sustainability goals.

Millwood Hydro Seeks Preliminary Permit to Power Arkansas River with New 18‑MW Plant

Overview
Millwood Hydro AE, LLC has filed a preliminary permit application with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) to study the feasibility of a new hydroelectric facility at the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers’ Millwood Dam on the Little River in Arkansas. The permit, if granted, would give the company priority to file a full license application but would not authorize any construction or land‑disturbing activities until a later license is issued.

The proposed project would add a 150‑by‑220‑foot forebay, two 7.5‑foot penstocks, a 220‑by‑100‑by‑30‑foot concrete powerhouse housing two 9‑MW turbines, a 60‑by‑60‑foot substation, a 300‑by‑300‑foot tailrace, and a 4,700‑foot transmission line to connect to the Southwest Electric Power 138‑kV grid. The plant is expected to generate roughly 88,000 megawatt‑hours per year, providing a modest but steady renewable energy source for the region.

FERC has opened a public comment period, inviting stakeholders to submit comments, motions to intervene, or competing applications by 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on August 3, 2026. The agency encourages electronic filings through its eFiling system and provides contact information for assistance.

Key Elements
- Preliminary Permit Purpose: Grants priority to file a full license application; no construction allowed until a license is issued.
- Project Location: Existing Millwood Dam on the Little River, Arkansas (Little River and Hempstead Counties).
- Core Components:
- 150‑ft × 220‑ft forebay upstream of the dam.
- Two 7.5‑ft diameter, 180‑ft long penstocks.
- 220‑ft × 100‑ft × 30‑ft concrete powerhouse with two 9‑MW turbines.
- 60‑ft × 60‑ft substation adjacent to the powerhouse.
- 300‑ft × 300‑ft tailrace area.
- 4,700‑ft transmission line to Southwest Electric Power’s 138‑kV line.
- Energy Output: Approximately 88,000 MWh annually (≈18 MW installed capacity).
- Public Participation:
- Comment, intervention, and competing application deadline: August 3, 2026, 5:00 p.m. ET.
- Electronic filing encouraged; paper filings accepted via USPS or other carriers.
- Regulatory Framework: Application filed under Section 4(f) of the Federal Power Act; must comply with 18 CFR 4.36 for competing applications.

FERC Extends Hydropower License Transfer Reporting Requirements

Overview

The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) has announced a three‑year extension of its current information‑collection program, FERC‑511, which governs the transfer of hydropower licenses and leases. The extension keeps the existing reporting and record‑keeping requirements unchanged, meaning license holders and prospective transferees will continue to submit the same written applications and supporting documentation as before.

FERC’s role is to ensure that any voluntary transfer of a hydropower license complies with Section 8 of the Federal Power Act and the related regulations in 18 CFR Part 9. The information collected—joint applications, verification statements, citizenship proof, and evidence of compliance with state laws—helps the Commission evaluate whether the transferee is qualified to operate the project in the public interest.

The notice invites public comment on the necessity, accuracy, and utility of the information collection, as well as on ways to reduce the burden on respondents. Comments are due by August 10, 2026, and can be submitted electronically or by mail to the FERC offices in Washington, D.C., and Rockville, Maryland.

Key Elements

• Extension: Three‑year renewal of FERC‑511 with no changes to reporting requirements.
  
• Purpose: Supports Section 8 of the Federal Power Act and 18 CFR Part 9, ensuring license transfers meet public‑interest and qualification standards.
  
• Application Requirements: Joint written application, verification statement, proof of citizenship, compliance evidence, and transferee qualifications.
  
• Burden Estimate: 600 hours of industry time per license transfer, costing approximately $61,200 annually.
  
• Comment Period: Open until August 10, 2026; comments can be emailed to Kayla Williams or mailed to FERC’s Washington or Rockville offices.
  
• Contact: Kayla Williams (email/phone) for further information.

NOAA Refines Nautical Chart Update System to Boost Safety and Data Transparency

Overview

The U.S. Department of Commerce’s National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) is revising and extending its Nautical Discrepancy and Data Reporting System (NDDS). The system, which gathers corrections and construction notifications from a wide range of maritime stakeholders, underpins the accuracy of the nation’s nautical charts and the Coast Pilot—critical tools for safe navigation and coastal protection.

The revision introduces updated Project Status Report Forms that capture more detailed survey data, enforce stricter quality standards, and add a new data‑licensing section aligned with open‑data policies. By streamlining the reporting process and clarifying technical requirements, NOAA aims to accelerate chart updates while reducing the administrative burden on users such as shipping companies, port authorities, and federal agencies.

NOAA is inviting public comment for 60 days before submitting the revised collection to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB). Stakeholders can provide feedback on the necessity, accuracy, and clarity of the information collected, as well as suggest ways to further minimize reporting burdens.

Key Elements

• Revised Information Collection – OMB Control Number 0648‑0007; a continuation of the approved NDDS.
  
• Updated Forms – Expanded Project Status Report Forms now include construction dates, coordinate reference systems, and a dedicated “Special Instructions” page.
  
• Open‑Data Licensing – New section offers CC0‑1.0 or CC‑BY‑4.0 licenses, encouraging broader use of nautical data.
  
• Stakeholder Reach – Data collected from pilot associations, shipping companies, state and local marine authorities, Coast Guard units, and federal agencies such as the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers.
  
• Burden Estimate – Approximately 10–15 minutes per form, with an estimated 1,570 respondents and a total cost of $522.60.
  
• Public Comment Window – Comments due by August 10, 2026; submissions must reference OMB Control Number 0648‑0007.
  
• Purpose – To maintain chart accuracy, enhance maritime safety, and support environmental protection in U.S. coastal waters and the Great Lakes.

Texas Border Expansion: DHS Waives Environmental Laws to Build New Barriers

Overview

The U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has issued a determination under Section 102 of the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act (IIRIRA) to waive a broad array of federal environmental, historic, and wildlife protection statutes. The waiver is intended to expedite the construction of physical barriers and roads along a 40‑mile stretch of the U.S.–Mexico border in the Big Bend sector of Texas, an area identified as having high rates of illegal crossings and drug smuggling.

The project area, defined by GPS coordinates 29.325866, –104.046466 to 29.728522, –102.683945, will see the installation of fencing, lighting, cameras, sensors, and supporting infrastructure. DHS argues that these measures are essential for achieving “operational control” of the border, a mandate reinforced by Congress and the President’s Executive Order on Securing Our Borders.

While the determination is legally binding and effective as of June 9, 2026, it raises significant concerns for geoscientists, environmental scientists, and natural resource professionals. The waiver removes the requirement for environmental impact assessments, endangered species reviews, water‑quality studies, and historic‑resource evaluations—processes that normally help mitigate adverse effects on ecosystems, water bodies, and cultural sites.

Key Elements

• Project Scope: Construction of barriers, roads, lighting, cameras, and sensors along a 40‑mile border segment in Texas’s Big Bend sector.
  
• Legal Basis: Section 102(a)–© of IIRIRA, allowing DHS to waive laws deemed necessary for expeditious border construction.
  
• Waived Statutes: Includes NEPA, ESA, Clean Water Act, National Historic Preservation Act, Migratory Bird Acts, Clean Air Act, and numerous other federal environmental and historic‑resource laws.
  
• Environmental Impact: Potential disruption to wildlife habitats, water resources, historic sites, and cultural landscapes; removal of standard mitigation and review processes.
  
• Geoscience Concerns: Possible alteration of local hydrology, soil erosion, and seismic considerations due to large‑scale earthwork and infrastructure.
  
• Public and Stakeholder Response: Likely opposition from environmental groups, indigenous communities, and local stakeholders concerned about ecological and cultural losses.
  
• Future Waivers: DHS reserves the right to issue additional waivers under Section 102© as needed for ongoing or expanded border projects.

FERC Opens Public Scoping for Algonquin Gas Pipeline Expansion

Overview
The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) has begun the scoping phase for the Algonquin Reliable Affordable Resilient Enhancement Project, a proposed upgrade of Algonquin Gas Transmission’s pipeline network across Connecticut, Massachusetts, and Rhode Island. The plan involves replacing 8.3 miles of 16‑inch pipeline with 36‑inch lines, adding new 12‑inch and 36‑inch segments, and upgrading compressor facilities to deliver an additional 73,500 dekatherms of natural gas per day to local distribution companies. The upgrade aims to increase peak‑day supply reliability and reduce dependence on intermittent sources during high‑demand periods.

The notice invites public and agency input on environmental impacts, alternatives, and mitigation measures under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). Comments are due by 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on July 6, 2026, and can be submitted electronically, by mail, or orally at one of three scheduled scoping sessions in Rhode Island. FERC will use this input to focus its forthcoming environmental document—an Environmental Assessment or Impact Statement—on the most significant issues.

Land use implications are significant: construction will disturb roughly 171 acres, with about 104 acres retained for permanent operation. While most of the route follows existing rights‑of‑way, landowners may be approached for easements; if agreements cannot be reached, the company may invoke eminent domain under the Natural Gas Act. FERC emphasizes that it does not exercise eminent domain authority; that power lies with the courts.

Key Elements

• Project Scope: 13.5 miles of new or upgraded pipeline across CT, MA, RI; 73,500 dekatherms/day capacity increase.
  
• Environmental Focus Areas: geology, soils, water resources, wetlands, vegetation, wildlife, endangered species, cultural resources, land use, air quality, noise, reliability, and safety.
  
• Scoping Deadline: July 6, 2026 (5:00 p.m. ET).
  
• Public Participation Methods: eComment, eFiling, paper mail, and three in‑person scoping sessions (June 16–18, 2026).
  
• Landowner Rights: Potential easement negotiations; eminent domain possible if agreements fail; compensation determined by state courts.
  
• NEPA Process: Pre‑filing review, identification of key issues, potential Environmental Assessment or Impact Statement, and cooperation with federal, state, and local agencies.
  
• Cooperating Agencies: State historic preservation offices, environmental agencies, and other stakeholders invited to participate in the environmental document preparation.
  
• Intervention Opportunity: Parties may become intervenors only after a formal application is filed; intervenors can seek rehearing and appeal decisions.

NRC Updates Nuclear Plant Licenses with No Significant Hazards Changes

Overview

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) has issued a biweekly notice announcing a series of amendments to operating and combined licenses for several nuclear power plants. Under the Atomic Energy Act, the NRC can issue or make immediately effective any amendment that it determines involves no significant hazards consideration (NSHC). The notice lists 30+ amendment requests, most of which involve updates to technical specifications (TS) that refine risk management, surveillance, and operational procedures without increasing safety risk.

The amendments cover a range of changes: adoption of Technical Specification Task Force (TSTF) travelers such as TSTF‑585 (risk‑based limiting condition for operation), TSTF‑596 (expanded surveillance frequency control program), and TSTF‑591 (risk‑informed completion time). Other updates adjust control‑rod testing frequencies, modify shutdown‑mode requirements, and revise emergency response staffing. All proposed changes have been preliminarily judged to be NSHC, meaning they do not require new environmental impact statements.

Public participation is open for 30 days after publication (comments due July 9, 2026). Interested parties may file a hearing petition or request to intervene within 60 days (deadline August 10, 2026). The NRC encourages electronic submissions via its Federal rulemaking website and provides detailed guidance on obtaining digital ID certificates for e‑filing.

Key Elements

• No Significant Hazards Consideration (NSHC) – The NRC has preliminarily determined that each amendment poses no significant increase in accident probability or consequence.
  
• Comment and Hearing Periods –
  
  • Comments: due July 9, 2026.
    
  • Hearing petitions/interventions: due August 10, 2026.
    
• Electronic Filing – All adjudicatory documents must be submitted electronically; the NRC offers a help desk and digital ID certificate guidance.
  
• Types of Amendments –
  
  • Risk‑Based Operational Limits (TSTF‑585) – requires risk assessment when entering limiting condition 3.0.3.
    
  • Surveillance Frequency Control (TSTF‑596) – expands testing frequency controls and aligns with regulatory guidance.
    
  • Risk‑Informed Completion Times (TSTF‑591) – updates reporting and reference to Regulatory Guide 1.200.
    
  • Control‑Rod and Shutdown‑Mode Changes – adjust rod alignment limits, shutdown bank insertion limits, and shutdown‑mode TS actions.
    
  • Emergency Response Staffing – reduces required positions and adjusts staff augmentation times.
    
• Environmental Impact – All amendments are categorically excluded from environmental assessment under 10 CFR 51.22; no new environmental statements are required.
  
• Affected Facilities – Includes plants such as Indiana‑Michigan Power (Cook), Monticello (MN), Vogtle (GA), Diablo Canyon (CA), Braidwood (IL), and several others across the U.S.
  
• Access to Documents – All information is available through the NRC’s ADAMS public documents collection and the Federal rulemaking website.

U.S. Trade Office Extends Comment Period on Quartz Surface Product Safeguard Measure

Overview

On May 15 2026, the Office of the United States Trade Representative (USTR) announced that the United States International Trade Commission (USITC) had found that imports of quartz surface products (QSP) are causing serious injury to the domestic industry that produces comparable products. In response, USTR is seeking input from producers, importers, exporters, and other stakeholders on whether a safeguard measure—such as tariffs or quotas—should be recommended to the President.

Due to technical difficulties with posting documents to the docket, USTR has extended the deadline for written responses to the initial round of comments until June 10 2026 at 5:00 p.m. EST. The agency also scheduled a public hearing to discuss the comments and the potential safeguard recommendation.

This notice is significant for the construction, manufacturing, and trade sectors that rely on quartz products. The outcome could affect supply chains, pricing, and the competitiveness of U.S. producers in the global market.

Key Elements

• Extended Deadline: Written responses now due by June 10 2026, 5:00 p.m. EST.
  
• Submission Method: Electronic submissions preferred via the Federal eRulemaking Portal; business‑confidential information must be filed separately.
  
• Docket Information: Docket number USTR‑2026‑0232; public comments posted for inspection except for designated confidential content.
  
• Public Hearing: Scheduled in Rooms 1 and 2, 1724 F Street NW, Washington, DC; hearing details provided in the notice.
  
• Purpose: Evaluate the appropriateness of a safeguard measure recommended by the USITC to protect domestic quartz surface product producers from import injury.
  
• Stakeholder Impact: Domestic producers, importers, exporters, and related industries (construction, countertop manufacturing) will have the opportunity to influence potential tariffs or quotas.
  
• Contact Information: Victor Mroczka, Michael Gagain, and Matthew Jaffe are listed for further inquiries.

Erie Boulevard Hydropower’s Water‑Quality Certification Deadline Re‑Set

Overview
The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) had previously granted a waiver of water‑quality certification (WQC) for the Schuylerville Hydroelectric Project (Project No. 8606). However, the project’s owner, Erie Boulevard Hydropower, L.P., withdrew that waiver request in May 2025 and subsequently filed a new WQC application with the New York Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC) on January 19 2026. This notice cancels the earlier waiver and informs the DEC that it now has a one‑year “reasonable period of time” to review and act on the new certification request.

If the DEC does not act on the application by January 19 2027, the Clean Water Act will treat the certification as waived, allowing the project to proceed without a formal water‑quality certification. The notice underscores the regulatory timeline and the potential for the project to move forward if the DEC fails to respond within the statutory period.

Key Elements
- Previous Waiver Withdrawn – FERC’s earlier Notice of Waiver of WQC for Project 8606 is rescinded.
- New Certification Request – Erie Boulevard Hydropower filed a Clean Water Act § 401(a)(1) water‑quality certification request on January 19 2026.
- One‑Year Review Window – The New York DEC has until January 19 2027 to act on the certification request (18 CFR 4.201(e)).
- Automatic Waiver if Unacted – Failure to act by the deadline results in a statutory waiver of the certification under § 401(a)(1) of the Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C. 1341(a)(1)).
- Regulatory Authority – The notice is issued under 18 CFR 2.1, reflecting FERC’s authority to manage water‑quality certification processes for hydroelectric projects.
- Implications for Project Timeline – The project’s ability to proceed hinges on the DEC’s timely review; a waiver could accelerate construction and operation.

U.S. Bill Aims to Make LNG Exports Climate‑Smart and Fair

The LNG Public Interest Determination Act of 2025 seeks to tighten federal oversight of natural‑gas exports by requiring the Secretary of Energy to evaluate each proposed export on climate, consumer‑price, and environmental‑justice grounds before issuing an authorization. Introduced in the House and now referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, the bill would amend the Natural Gas Act to make the export decision a “major federal action” under NEPA and to mandate a comprehensive assessment of the full life‑cycle impacts of liquefied natural gas (LNG).

Key provisions require the Secretary to conduct three distinct assessments—climate, economic, and environmental‑justice—using the latest science and the 20‑year global‑warming potential of methane. The climate assessment must compare projected greenhouse‑gas emissions to U.S. net‑zero pathways, quantify the social cost of emissions, and evaluate how LNG exports might slow the transition to clean energy. The economic assessment must estimate price impacts on low‑income households, small businesses, manufacturers, and other consumer groups. The environmental‑justice assessment must examine cumulative burdens on rural, low‑income, minority, and other vulnerable communities, local fisheries, and compliance with civil‑rights laws.

If the Secretary finds that an export would likely worsen climate change, raise consumer prices, or disproportionately harm vulnerable communities, the order can be denied or modified. The bill also requires public participation, including accommodations for language, disability, and resource barriers, and mandates that the Secretary issue a rule within one year of enactment. By removing a categorical exclusion for LNG export approvals, the legislation would subject all new export projects to this rigorous, multi‑dimensional review.

Key Elements

• Export Authorization Requirement – No LNG export can proceed without a Secretary of Energy order that confirms consistency with the public interest.
  
• Three‑Tiered Public‑Interest Assessment
  
  • Climate – Lifecycle GHG emissions, 20‑yr GWP of methane, comparison to net‑zero pathways, social cost of emissions, and impacts on clean‑energy deployment.
    
  • Economic – Effects on U.S. consumers, with detailed estimates for low‑income households, working families, small businesses, manufacturers, state/local governments, and fertilizer producers.
    
  • Environmental Justice – Cumulative burdens on rural, low‑income, minority, and other vulnerable communities; impacts on local fisheries; racial and socioeconomic disparities; and civil‑rights compliance.
    
• Public Participation – Mandatory opportunities for comment and study review, with special measures to overcome barriers for communities with environmental‑justice concerns.
  
• NEPA Major Federal Action – Export orders are treated as major federal actions, triggering full NEPA review.
  
• Deadline for Decision – The Secretary must decide within one year of receiving the final EIS or completing the required assessments.
  
• Rulemaking Requirement – A rule to implement the Act must be issued within one year of enactment.
  
• Amendments to the Natural Gas Act – Clarifies that “export” refers to U.S. exports, removes categorical exclusions, and aligns regulatory language with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission.

Water Systems PFAS Liability Protection Act: Shielding Water Utilities from Environmental Cleanup Costs

Overview

The Water Systems PFAS Liability Protection Act (H.R. 1267) seeks to exempt public water systems, treatment facilities, municipalities, and related contractors from liability under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) for releases of perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS). The bill is currently referred to the Subcommittee on Water Resources and Environment for further consideration.

The act defines a “covered PFAS” as a non‑polymeric substance containing at least two fully fluorinated carbon atoms, excluding gases and volatile liquids, that is listed as hazardous under CERCLA. “Protected entities” include public water systems, treatment works, stormwater‑permit municipalities, wholesale water agencies, and contractors managing PFAS‑related activities for these entities.

Exemption applies only when the protected entity transports, treats, or disposes of PFAS in compliance with all applicable federal and state laws, including biosolids management, effluent permits, and treatment residual handling. The bill preserves liability for gross negligence or willful misconduct, ensuring that reckless or intentional releases remain actionable.

Key Elements

• PFAS Definition – Non‑polymeric PFAS with ≥2 fully fluorinated carbons, hazardous under CERCLA.
  
• Protected Entities – Public water systems, treatment works, stormwater‑permit municipalities, wholesale water agencies, and contractors.
  
• Exemption Scope – No CERCLA recovery for costs or damages from PFAS releases by protected entities.
  
• Compliance Requirement – Exemption applies only if activities meet all applicable federal and state laws at the time of conduct.
  
• Operational Conditions – Includes biosolids management, effluent permits, treatment residuals, and water conveyance/storage.
  
• Gross Negligence Exception – Liability remains for releases caused by gross negligence or willful misconduct.
  
• Legislative Status – Referred to the Subcommittee on Water Resources and Environment for further review.

House Fast‑Tracks Forest Resilience and Immigration Custody Bill in One Move

Overview

The House adopted Resolution 53 to bring two distinct bills—H.R. 471 and S. 5—to the floor for consideration. The resolution establishes a streamlined procedural framework: debate is limited to one hour, points of order are waived, and amendments are restricted to those listed in the Committee on Rules report. The motion to reconsider was tabled and agreed to without objection, allowing the House to move forward with minimal procedural delays.

H.R. 471 seeks to accelerate the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) review process and enhance forest management on National Forest System lands, Bureau of Land Management (BLM) public lands, and Tribal territories. Its primary goal is to restore resilience to overgrown, fire‑prone forests, thereby reducing wildfire risk and supporting ecosystem health.

S. 5 requires the Secretary of Homeland Security to take custody of aliens who have been charged in the United States with theft. Like H.R. 471, the resolution limits debate and amendment options, ensuring the bill can be considered and passed efficiently.

Key Elements

• Procedural Fast‑Track: One‑hour debate, waived points of order, and pre‑approved amendment list.
  
• NEPA Expediting: Accelerated environmental review for forest‑management projects.
  
• Forest Resilience: Targeted actions to reduce overgrowth and fire risk on National Forest, BLM, and Tribal lands.
  
• BLM & Tribal Inclusion: Explicit coverage of public lands under BLM jurisdiction and Tribal territories.
  
• Immigration Custody Provision: Mandates the Secretary of Homeland Security to detain aliens charged with theft in the U.S.
  
• Limited Debate & Amendment Rules: Ensures focused discussion and prevents procedural delays.
  
• Tabled Motion to Reconsider: The resolution was agreed to without objection, allowing immediate consideration of the bills.

Extended Tax Deadline Relief for States Facing Natural Disasters

Overview

The Filing Relief for Natural Disasters Act (Public Law 119‑29) amends the Internal Revenue Code to broaden the scope of tax‑deadline relief available after catastrophic events. It allows state governors—or the mayor of Washington, D.C.—to request the same tax‑extension benefits that are automatically granted for federally declared disasters. This change recognizes that many severe natural events, such as hurricanes, earthquakes, or wildfires, are first identified and managed at the state level.

The Act also lengthens the mandatory extension period from 60 to 120 days for all qualifying disasters. By extending the deadline, taxpayers—including businesses, contractors, and individuals—gain additional time to recover, rebuild, and file accurate returns without incurring penalties. The law applies to declarations made after its enactment and covers all U.S. states, the District of Columbia, and U.S. territories.

For professionals in geoscience, energy, and natural resource fields, the legislation means that after a state‑declared disaster, tax filings can be postponed for up to four months, providing critical breathing room during recovery operations and permitting more accurate reporting of disaster‑related expenses.

Key Elements

• State‑Declared Disaster Authority – The Secretary of the Treasury, in consultation with FEMA, may apply federal tax‑deadline rules to a qualified state‑declared disaster upon a written request from the governor or mayor.
• Definition of Qualified Disaster – Includes any natural catastrophe (hurricane, earthquake, tsunami, etc.) or severe fire, flood, or explosion that the state determines causes significant damage.
• Extended Deadline – Mandatory extensions for disaster‑related tax deadlines are increased from 60 to 120 days.
• Scope – Applies to all 50 states, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands, Guam, American Samoa, and the Northern Mariana Islands.
• Effective Date – The new rules take effect for disaster declarations made after the law’s enactment.
• Administrative Coordination – The Secretary must coordinate with FEMA to ensure consistent application of the relief provisions.

Preserving Wounded Knee: A New Law Grants Tribal Sovereignty Over a Sacred 40‑Acre Site

Overview

The Wounded Knee Massacre Memorial and Sacred Site Act directs the U.S. Secretary of the Interior to place a 40‑acre parcel of the Pine Ridge Indian Reservation—part of the historic Wounded Knee Massacre site—into restricted fee status for the Oglala Sioux and Cheyenne River Sioux Tribes. The legislation ensures that the land remains under tribal ownership, is exempt from state or local taxation, and cannot be transferred without congressional and tribal consent.

The Act also preserves the land’s mineral estate and existing utility easements, while limiting its use to purposes outlined in a 2022 covenant between the two tribes. Importantly, the law prohibits gaming activities on the site, aligning with the tribes’ agreement to forego such enterprises.

For geoscientists, energy, and natural‑resource professionals, the bill underscores the importance of respecting tribal sovereignty over land that holds both cultural and potential mineral significance. It clarifies that federal Indian law will govern the parcel, thereby shaping any future exploration, development, or conservation efforts.

Key Elements

• Restricted fee status:

  • Tribal ownership retained; no state/local tax; no alienation without Congress and tribal approval.
    
  • Land remains part of the Pine Ridge Reservation and subject to tribal civil and criminal jurisdiction.
    

• Scope of the land:

  • Approximately 40 acres, including surface, subsurface, and mineral estate, plus all improvements and personal property.
    

• Utility and service rights:

  • Secretary must assign any private or municipal utility rights or agreements within 365 days.
    

• Use restrictions:

  • Land may only be used in accordance with the 2022 covenant between the Oglala Sioux and Cheyenne River Sioux Tribes.
    
  • Gaming prohibited under the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act.
    

• Federal protections:

  • Land subject to federal Indian laws (18 U.S.C. § 1151) and the restriction against alienation (25 U.S.C. § 177).
    

• Implementation timeline:

  • Secretary must complete all necessary actions within one year of enactment.
    

• Encumbrances:

  • Existing easements, rights‑of‑way, and utility agreements remain in effect.
    

This legislation formalizes tribal stewardship of a historically significant site while delineating clear legal parameters for any future land use or resource management.

MAPWaters Act: Turning Federal Waterways into Open‑Data Playgrounds

The MAPWaters Act of 2025 modernizes how federal agencies share information about public use of waterways. By mandating the standardization, consolidation, and online publication of geospatial data on waterway access, fishing restrictions, and navigation rules, the law turns scattered agency records into a single, user‑friendly resource. The act also encourages collaboration with state, tribal, and private partners, and requires regular reporting to Congress, ensuring transparency and accountability.

Key elements of the policy include:

• Interagency Data Standards – Within 30 months, the Secretaries of Agriculture and Interior must develop common GIS standards with the Federal Geographic Data Committee to ensure compatibility across federal databases.
• Public GIS Catalogs – By 5 years after enactment, agencies must digitize and publish:
  • Waterway restrictions (open/closed status, seasonal closures, motorized limits, anchoring zones, speed limits, and permitted activities).
  • Access and navigation information (boat ramps, portages, fishing sites, bathymetric charts).
  • Fishing restrictions (closures, no‑take zones, equipment limits, catch‑release rules).
• Update Cadence – Data on restrictions and access must be refreshed at least twice a year; fishing restriction data must be updated in real time as regulations change.
• Public Engagement – A formal process for public comments on the released data will be established.
• Partnerships and Data Sharing – Agencies may partner with state, tribal, private, and nonprofit entities, and can leverage existing data from the USGS and prior federal legislation.
• Reporting Requirements – Annual reports to multiple House and Senate committees will track progress through 2034.
• Legal Scope – The act does not alter definitions of navigable waters, agency jurisdiction, or existing fishing authority, and excludes irrigation canals and flowage easements from its scope.

By creating a unified, accessible data framework, the MAPWaters Act empowers scientists, resource managers, and outdoor enthusiasts to make informed decisions about federal waterways while fostering collaboration across government and the private sector.

Air Quality 2.0: EU Sets New Technical Rules for Air‑Pollution Modelling and Monitoring

Overview

The European Commission’s Decision (EU) 2026/1208, adopted on 9 June 2026, implements Directive (EU) 2024/2881 on ambient air quality. It introduces a comprehensive set of technical rules that Member States must follow when using air‑quality models and when determining the spatial representativeness of monitoring stations. The goal is to ensure that air‑quality assessments are based on reliable, comparable data across the EU, thereby strengthening public health protection and environmental governance.

Key objectives include: - Standardising modelling practices: Minimum technical requirements for models, input data, and quality assurance are defined to guarantee that model outputs can be compared across countries. - Clarifying the role of measurements: Fixed, indicative, and model‑based data are all allowed, but the decision specifies how each type should be used, validated, and combined. - Defining spatial representativeness: A step‑by‑step methodology is set out for mapping the area that each monitoring station represents, ensuring that monitoring networks accurately reflect local air‑quality conditions. - Ensuring transparency and accountability: Member States must publish spatial‑representativeness maps every five years and review them whenever monitoring networks or emission sources change.

The decision will enter into force 20 days after publication and will apply from 30 June 2028, giving Member States a two‑year transition period to adapt their monitoring and modelling systems.

Key Elements

• Minimum Technical Requirements for Modelling Applications

  • Models must reproduce the same averaging periods as EU limit or target values.
    
  • Spatial resolution must capture expected concentration variability.
    
  • Input emissions and meteorological data must match the model’s spatial, temporal, and chemical resolution.
    
  • Models must account for site‑specific dispersion, orography, meteorology, climate, and transboundary contributions.
    
  • Quality assurance and validation procedures are mandatory, with cross‑validation (“leaving one out”) recommended.

• Quality Assurance & Validation

  • All input datasets must be quality‑controlled before use.
    
  • Validation must use independent measurement data covering diverse environments.
    
  • Modelling quality objectives must be verified at a sufficient number of sampling points.

• Spatial Representativeness Assessment

  • Sampling stations’ representativeness areas are defined using tolerance intervals (15 % of the central value or a minimum set by Annex I).
    
  • Both measurements and model outputs can be used; expert analysis may refine the areas.
    
  • Overlapping areas are resolved by retaining the most representative station or by including all overlapping zones.

• Mapping and Reporting

  • Member States must produce a spatial‑representativeness map for each pollutant and zone, based on data from a single recent year (or multiple years if justified).
    
  • Maps must be reviewed at least every five years or when significant changes occur in monitoring networks or emission sources.

• Use of Modelling and Indicative Measurements for Air‑Quality Assessment

  • Modelling results can be used to assess exceedances only when both the model and the monitoring station show an exceedance.
    
  • If a model indicates an exceedance but the monitoring station does not, a review of the model is required.
    
  • Indicative measurements may be used for exceedance assessment, with appropriate percentile calculations for short‑term limits.

• Timeline and Implementation

  • Decision enters into force 20 days after publication.
    
  • Effective from 30 June 2028, with a two‑year transition period for Member States to meet the new requirements.
    

These provisions collectively aim to harmonise air‑quality monitoring and modelling across the EU, ensuring that policy decisions are based on robust, comparable scientific evidence.

Hydroelectric Project in South Carolina Seeks Temporary Reservoir Variance Amid Safety Concerns

The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) has opened a public comment period for Aquenergy Systems, LLC’s request to temporarily relax the reservoir elevation limits of the Ware Shoals Hydroelectric Project on the Saluda River in South Carolina. The company seeks a variance from the 1‑foot and 3‑foot daily elevation ranges mandated by Article 401 of its license, citing ongoing dam‑safety measures that keep the spillway and canal gates open. The variance would allow the reservoir to sit 10–17 feet below its normal 524 ft mean sea level (msl) elevation until the company can submit a formal license surrender.

This notice invites federal, state, local, and tribal agencies with environmental expertise to cooperate on any required environmental documentation, while clarifying that cooperating agencies cannot intervene in the proceeding. The public is encouraged to file comments, protests, or motions to intervene electronically by July 6, 2026, 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time, with detailed filing instructions and contact information provided. The Commission will consider all submissions but only those who file a motion to intervene may become parties to the proceeding.

Key Elements

• Project: Ware Shoals Hydroelectric Project, Saluda River, Laurens, Greenwood, and Abbeville counties, South Carolina.
  
• Licensee: Aquenergy Systems, LLC (license number 2416‑036).
  
• Request: Temporary variance from Article 401 reservoir elevation limits due to dam‑safety concerns.
  
• Current Status: Licensee intends to surrender the license; variance to remain in effect until a future surrender application is processed.
  
• Environmental Impact: Lower reservoir levels may affect aquatic habitats, water quality, and downstream flow regimes.
  
• Public Participation: Comments, protests, and motions to intervene must be filed by July 6, 2026, via FERC’s eFiling system; paper filings accepted with specified addresses.
  
• Agency Cooperation: Federal, state, local, and tribal agencies may assist in environmental documentation but cannot intervene.
  
• Filing Requirements: Documents must include title, project number, contact info, and evidentiary basis; intervenors must serve copies to all parties on the service list.
  
• Contact Information: FERC Online Support (866‑208‑3676), Office of Public Participation (202‑502‑6595).

Storm‑Ravaged San Carlos Apache Tribe Receives Federal Disaster Assistance

Overview

On May 29, 2026 the President declared a major disaster for the San Carlos Apache Tribe, triggered by severe storms and flooding that struck the region in late October 2025 and early August 2026. The declaration authorizes the U.S. Small Business Administration (SBA) to provide public assistance loans to private non‑profit organizations that serve the tribe, helping them repair physical damage and recover from economic injury.

The notice outlines the loan program’s terms, including interest rates of 3.625 % for both physical damage and economic injury, and directs applicants to the SBA Loan Portal or local SBA offices. It also provides contact details for the Office of Disaster Recovery and Resilience and specifies the disaster numbers (21618 for physical damage, 21619 for economic injury) under the Catalog of Federal Assistance.

This action enables the tribe’s essential service providers to secure timely funding, fostering community resilience and supporting the restoration of infrastructure and services disrupted by the storms.

Key Elements

• Declaration Date & Authority: Presidential major disaster declaration issued May 29, 2026 under 13 CFR 123.3(b).
  
• Affected Area: San Carlos Apache Tribe (Arizona).
  
• Disaster Numbers: Physical damage – 21618; Economic injury – 21619.
  
• Loan Types: Public assistance loans for physical damage and economic injury.
  
• Interest Rates: 3.625 % for all eligible non‑profit organizations, regardless of credit availability.
  
• Application Process: Online via SBA Loan Portal or in person at designated local sites.
  
• Contact Information: Sharon Henderson, Office of Disaster Recovery and Resilience, SBA; phone (202) 205‑6734 or 1‑800‑659‑2955.
  
• Accessibility: Dial 7‑1‑1 for telecommunications relay services.
  
• Purpose: To repair storm‑damaged infrastructure and support economic recovery for community‑serving non‑profits.

A Monthly Ledger of Disaster Requests: Tracking the 2026 SBA Disaster Declarations

Overview

The U.S. Small Business Administration (SBA) has released a monthly summary of all requests it received to declare disasters for states, territories, and tribes during Fiscal Year 2026. This notice, issued on June 4 2026, fulfills a requirement under the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2026 (Public Law 119‑75), and serves as a public record of the SBA’s disaster‑declaration process.

The document lists each request by state or tribe, the event’s date range, the type of disaster (e.g., flooding, wildfires, severe storms, or structural fires), the date the SBA approved the declaration, and the final approval date. The events span a wide range of natural hazards—ranging from tropical storm remnants and winter storms to wildfire outbreaks and severe flooding—highlighting the diverse geophysical and environmental challenges that can trigger federal assistance.

For professionals in geoscience, environmental science, and natural resource management, this compilation offers a concise, up‑to‑date snapshot of how climate‑related events are being monitored and addressed at the federal level. It also underscores the importance of timely data sharing and transparency in disaster response, which can inform risk assessments, mitigation planning, and resource allocation.

Key Elements

• Compliance with Federal Law: The notice satisfies the reporting directive in the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2026, ensuring transparency in the SBA’s disaster‑declaration workflow.
• Monthly Update: The list is refreshed each month, providing a real‑time view of emerging hazards and the SBA’s response timeline.
• Scope of Events: Includes a broad spectrum of natural hazards—flooding, wildfires, severe storms, tornadoes, and structural fires—that directly impact land, water, and ecological systems.
• Geographic Coverage: Covers all 50 states, U.S. territories, and tribal jurisdictions, illustrating the nationwide reach of disaster declarations.
• Approval Timeline: Shows the interval between request submission and official approval, offering insight into the administrative speed of federal assistance.
• Contact Information: Provides a direct line to the SBA’s Office of Disaster Recovery and Resilience for further inquiries or data requests.
• Relevance to Natural Resources: Many listed events (e.g., flooding, landslides, wildfire) have significant implications for soil stability, water quality, and ecosystem health—key concerns for geoscientists and environmental managers.
• Data Availability: The notice is publicly accessible, enabling researchers, policymakers, and stakeholders to analyze trends in disaster frequency and severity over time.

Alaska Village Faces Storm Fallout: Federal Disaster Aid Opens Doors for Kipnuk

Overview
On May 29, 2026 the President declared a major disaster for the Native Village of Kipnuk, Alaska, in response to severe storms, flooding, and the remnants of Typhoon Halong. The declaration authorizes the U.S. Small Business Administration (SBA) to provide public assistance—specifically disaster loans—to private non‑profit organizations that deliver essential services to the community. The aid is aimed at repairing physical damage and mitigating economic injury caused by the storm event.

The SBA’s loan program offers interest rates of 3.625 % for both physical damage and economic injury, regardless of whether the applicant has alternative credit sources. Eligible organizations can apply online through the SBA Loan Portal or at designated local sites. The assistance covers costs such as rebuilding infrastructure, restoring utilities, and supporting businesses that keep the village functioning during recovery.

Key Elements
- Major Disaster Declaration – Issued May 29, 2026, covering the Native Village of Kipnuk only.
- Public Assistance Focus – Loans are available exclusively for public‑service non‑profits (e.g., schools, health clinics, emergency services).
- Loan Details – 3.625 % interest for physical damage (disaster number 216226) and economic injury (disaster number 216230).
- Application Process – Online via SBA Loan Portal or in person at local SBA‑announced locations.
- Contact Information – Jennifer Talarico, Office of Disaster Recovery and Resilience, SBA; phone (202) 205‑6734 or 1‑800‑659‑2955.
- Timeline – Declaration effective from October 8, 2025 to March 1, 2027, with specific dates for application windows.
- Scope of Impact – Only the Native Village of Kipnuk is listed as adversely affected; no broader regional coverage.
- Authority – Based on 13 CFR 123.3(b) and Catalog of Federal Assistance Number 59008.

NRC Considers Re‑Startup of Three Mile Island Reactor, Finds No Significant Environmental Impact

Overview

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) has released a draft Environmental Assessment (EA) and Draft Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI) for the proposed re‑authorization of power operations at the Christopher M. Crane Clean Energy Center (CCEC), the former Three Mile Island Unit 1 reactor in Pennsylvania. Constellation Energy Generation, LLC (CEG) seeks an exemption and three license amendments that would allow the reactor to resume baseload generation of 835 MW‑e through the end of its current operating license in 2034.

The DOE Office of Energy Dominance Financing (EDF) is also involved, evaluating a federal loan‑guarantee to finance refueling and the restart. The NRC’s preliminary review concludes that the proposed actions would not have a significant effect on the human environment, and therefore an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not required.

Public comments on the draft EA and FONSI are accepted until July 8, 2026. The NRC will consider these comments before issuing a final determination, which could either confirm the FONSI or trigger an EIS if new concerns arise.

Key Elements

• Re‑authorization request: NRC to grant an exemption and three license amendments to allow CCEC to operate until 2034.
  
• DOE loan guarantee: Federal financial assistance under the Energy Dominance Financing program to fund refueling and restart.
  
• Environmental findings: Draft EA assessed impacts on land use, air quality, water resources, ecological and cultural resources, radiological safety, waste management, and climate change; all deemed not significant.
  
• No‑action alternative: Would likely produce significant environmental impacts, reinforcing the need for the proposed restart.
  
• Public participation: 30‑day comment period (until July 8, 2026) for federal, state, tribal, local officials and the public.
  
• Regulatory context: Actions comply with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act and the NRC’s own environmental review procedures.
  
• Future steps: NRC will publish a final EA and FONSI or prepare an EIS after reviewing comments; DOE will issue a separate decision on the loan guarantee.

National Fuel Gas Supply Corp. Seeks Approval to Transfer Swede Hill Storage Field to Stirling Holding

Overview

National Fuel Gas Supply Corporation (National Fuel) has filed an application with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) to abandon its Swede Hill Storage Field in McKean County, Pennsylvania. The company proposes to sell all of the field’s facilities—including the base gas—to Stirling Holding Company. This transfer would allow National Fuel to eliminate annual operation and maintenance costs while ensuring that service to existing customers remains uninterrupted.

The application triggers a formal environmental review under FERC’s regulations. Within 90 days of the notice, FERC staff will either complete the review and place the findings in the public record or issue a schedule for the environmental assessment (EA) or final environmental impact statement (FEIS). The outcome will determine the timing for any required federal authorizations.

Public participation is a key component of the proceeding. Interested parties—including individuals, businesses, and municipalities—can file comments, protests, or motions to intervene. The deadline for motions to intervene is 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on June 24, 2026, after which the company will receive a formal notice of the environmental review schedule.

Key Elements

• Transfer of Ownership: Sale of Swede Hill Storage Field facilities and base gas to Stirling Holding Company.
  
• Abandonment of Facilities: National Fuel will cease operating the field’s infrastructure, shifting operational responsibilities to Stirling.
  
• No Customer Service Impact: The project does not involve abandoning service to any natural gas customers.
  
• Environmental Review: FERC must complete an environmental assessment or issue a schedule for an FEIS within 90 days of the notice.
  
• Intervention Deadline: 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time, June 24, 2026, for filing motions to intervene.
  
• Public Comment Options: Electronic (eComment/eFiling) or paper submissions, with a 90‑day window for comments and protests.
  
• Service List and Notifications: Intervenors will be added to FERC’s service list and receive all subsequent filings.
  
• Contact Information: Rosemary T. Garlapow, Assistant General Counsel, National Fuel, for protest and intervention filings.
  
• Regulatory Authority: The proceeding is governed by the Natural Gas Act and FERC regulations (18 CFR 157.9, 385.10, 385.214).

Maine Hydropower Dam to Be Removed, Restoring Salmon Habitat

Overview
The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) has accepted a notice from R.J. Fortier Hydropower, Inc. to surrender the exemption for the Starks Hydroelectric Project on Lemon Stream in Somerset County, Maine. The project, which has been inactive for two decades, will be decommissioned and the dam, powerhouse, and related structures removed. The removal is intended to restore approximately 0.26 miles of stream to a natural, free‑flowing state, benefiting Atlantic salmon habitat and the broader ecosystem.

The decommissioning plan includes re‑grading, floodplain restoration, tailrace filling, and reconstruction of the west bank. Construction is scheduled for the low‑flow period (June 15 – September 30, 2027) and will rely on permits from federal and state resource agencies. The project is not on federal land, but it lies within a critical salmon habitat zone, prompting extensive consultation with environmental authorities.

Stakeholders—including federal, state, local, and tribal agencies—are invited to comment, protest, or intervene by July 3, 2026. FERC encourages electronic filings and outlines strict service and procedural requirements for all submissions. The notice serves as a public call for participation in the decision to restore the stream and protect regional biodiversity.

Key Elements

• Project Details: Starks Hydroelectric Project on Lemon Stream, Somerset County, Maine; no federal land involvement.
• Surrender of Exemption: Applicant no longer wishes to retain exemption; project inactive for 20 years.
• Decommissioning Plan: Removal of dam, powerhouse, and associated structures; restoration of 0.26‑mile stream segment.
• Habitat Restoration: Focus on Atlantic salmon critical habitat; includes re‑grading, floodplain restoration, tailrace filling, and west bank reconstruction.
• Construction Schedule: Planned for low‑flow period (June 15 – September 30, 2027); contingent on permits.
• Stakeholder Participation: Federal, state, local, and tribal agencies invited to comment, protest, or intervene by July 3, 2026.
• Filing Requirements: Electronic filing preferred; must include docket number, title, and evidentiary basis; service on all listed parties required for intervenors.
• Regulatory Framework: Governed by P‑8791‑005, Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act of 1978, and FERC Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385).

US Energy Firms Gear Up for Paris‑Based IEA Energy Security Summit

The U.S. Department of Energy has announced that representatives of U.S. companies on the International Energy Agency’s (IEA) Industry Advisory Board (IAB) will attend a series of high‑level meetings in Paris on June 17–18, 2026. The IAB will convene alongside the IEA’s Standing Group on Emergency Questions (SEQ) and the Standing Group on the Oil Market (SOM), both of which will hold joint sessions that combine in‑person and webinar participation. The purpose of the notice is to provide U.S. industry stakeholders with direct access to discussions on global energy security, market dynamics, and policy coordination.

These meetings will cover a broad range of topics that intersect with geoscience, natural resources, and energy markets. Attendees will review stock‑holding levels, emergency data collection, and updates on critical minerals—key inputs for refining and electric‑vehicle production. The agenda also includes assessments of oil and gas inventories, refining capacity, and the impact of geopolitical events on supply chains, offering U.S. companies a platform to influence and stay informed on international energy policy.

By opening the sessions to U.S. industry, government agencies, and international partners, the Department of Energy aims to strengthen collaboration on energy security, crisis response, and investment strategies. The hybrid format ensures broad participation while maintaining the confidentiality and focus required for sensitive discussions on market stability and resource management.

Key Elements

• Dates & Format: June 17–18, 2026; hybrid meetings (webinar + in‑person at IEA Headquarters, Paris).
  
• Participants: U.S. company members of the IAB, IEA SEQ and SOM members, U.S. DOE, DOJ, State, FTC, GAO, Congress, IEA, and European Commission representatives.
  
• Preparatory Meeting: June 10, 2026, 2 p.m. Paris time – review SEQ agenda.
  
• Agenda Highlights
  
  • Stock‑holding levels of IEA member countries.
    
  • Emergency data collection and crisis response tracking.
    
  • Energy security updates for Southeast Asia, Ukraine/Moldova, Southeast Europe.
    
  • LPG supply disruptions and policy responses.
    
  • Electricity security impacts from the ongoing energy crisis.
    
  • Natural gas security updates and critical minerals reviews.
    
  • Oil market situation, European refining outlook, jet fuel updates.
    
  • Global oil inventory developments and European oil inventory assessment.
    
  • U.S. industry response to crisis and trader perspectives.
    
  • Infrastructure reconstruction timelines post‑Middle‑East conflict.
    
  • Global outlook for electric vehicles and world energy investment report.
    
• Strategic Implications: Opportunity for U.S. firms to shape international energy policy, gain insights into market trends, and coordinate responses to supply disruptions.

SCE Files New Hydroelectric License for Kern River Project: What It Means for California’s Water and Power

Overview

Southern California Edison Company (SCE) has submitted a new major license application (Project No. 1930‑090) to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) for the Kern River No. 1 Hydroelectric Project. The project, located on the lower Kern River in Kern County, occupies 116.79 acres of federal land within Sequoia National Forest and is designed to operate in a run‑of‑river mode, generating an estimated 26.3 MW of electricity annually.

The application is currently pending environmental analysis. FERC has outlined a preliminary licensing schedule that includes acceptance, environmental assessment, fishway prescriptions, and final terms and conditions, with key milestones from August 2026 through April 2027. Final amendments must be filed within 30 days of the notice that the project is ready for environmental analysis.

Stakeholders—including local communities, environmental groups, and water resource managers—will have opportunities to review the application and submit comments through FERC’s eLibrary and public participation channels. The project’s development will affect water flow, habitat, and energy supply in the region, making the forthcoming regulatory process critical for balancing ecological and power generation interests.

Key Elements

• New Major License: Project No. 1930‑090 filed by SCE on June 27, 2026.
  
• Project Scope:
  
  • 27‑acre impoundment, 58‑ft cyclopean‑concrete overflow dam, 329‑ft drainage tunnel, and 1,693‑ft buried steel penstock.
    
  • Four Allis‑Chalmers turbines (43,000 hp) and four GE generators (26.3 MW total).
    
  • Run‑of‑river operation with an estimated annual output of 26.3 MW·h.
    
• Location & Land Use: Operates on federal land within Sequoia National Forest, Kern County, California.
  
• Licensing Schedule:
  
  • Acceptance/Ready for Environmental Analysis: August 2026.
    
  • Fishway prescriptions & preliminary terms: October 2026.
    
  • Non‑draft Environmental Assessment: January 2027.
    
  • EA comments: February 2027.
    
  • Modified terms and conditions: April 2027.
    
• Final Amendments Deadline: 30 days after the “ready for environmental analysis” notice.
  
• Public Access & Participation: Documents available via FERC eLibrary (docket P‑1930); public inquiries handled by the Office of Public Participation.
  
• Contact Information:
  
  • SCE Regulatory Support: Wayne Allen, (626) 302‑9741.
    
  • FERC Public Participation: (202) 502‑6595.
    
• Regulatory Framework: Governed by the Federal Power Act (16 U.S.C. 791(a)‑825®) and FERC regulations (18 CFR 2.1).

Federal Disaster Declaration Enables SBA Loans for San Carlos Apache Tribe After Severe Storms

Overview

On May 29 2026, the President declared a major disaster for the San Carlos Apache Tribe following a series of severe storms and flooding that struck the tribe’s lands in Arizona. The declaration, issued under FEMA‑4911‑DR, authorizes federal assistance to help residents and businesses recover from the damage.

The U.S. Small Business Administration (SBA) is now offering disaster‑assistance loans to affected homeowners, businesses, and non‑profit organizations. Applicants can apply online through the SBA Loan Portal or at local sites announced by the agency. The loans come with interest rates that vary by borrower type and whether credit is available elsewhere, providing a financial lifeline for rebuilding homes, infrastructure, and local economies.

The declaration covers the San Carlos Apache Tribe and surrounding counties—Apache, Gila, Graham, Greenlee, Navajo, and Pinal. Key dates for application and assistance are listed, and contact information for the SBA’s Office of Disaster Recovery and Resilience is provided to guide residents through the recovery process.

Key Elements

• Major Disaster Declaration – President’s declaration (FEMA‑4911‑DR) effective May 29 2026 for severe storms and flooding.
  
• SBA Disaster Assistance Loans – Loans for physical damage (homeowners, businesses, non‑profits) and economic injury (businesses, agricultural cooperatives).
  
• Interest Rates –
  
  • Physical damage: 6.0 % (homeowners with credit elsewhere), 3.0 % (homeowners without credit), 8.0 % (businesses with credit), 4.0 % (businesses without credit), 3.625 % (non‑profits).
    
  • Economic injury: 4.0 % (businesses/agricultural cooperatives without credit), 3.625 % (non‑profits).
    
• Affected Areas – San Carlos Apache Tribe and the counties of Apache, Gila, Graham, Greenlee, Navajo, and Pinal in Arizona.
  
• Application Process – Online via the SBA Loan Portal or in person at locally announced locations; deadlines include October 10–13 2025, August 1 2026, and March 1 2027.
  
• Contact Information – Sharon Henderson, Office of Disaster Recovery and Resilience, SBA; phone (202) 205‑6734, toll‑free 1‑800‑659‑2955, and email for assistance.
  
• Accessibility – Telecommunications relay services (7‑1‑1) for deaf, hard‑of‑hearing, or speech‑disabled applicants.
  
• Catalog of Federal Assistance – Number 59008, authority under 13 CFR 123.3(b).

Boralex Hydro Seeks New License for New York River Power Project – Public Comment Window Opens

Overview
Boralex Hydro Operations, Inc. has filed a new major license application (Project No. 9074‑054) with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) for the Warrensburg Hydroelectric Project on the Schroon River in Warren County, New York. The application, accepted for filing on June 8 2026, seeks to continue operating the existing run‑of‑river hydroelectric facility under a new license that will allow the plant to remain in service while meeting updated regulatory requirements.

The Warrensburg plant consists of a 184‑foot concrete gravity dam with hydraulically operated flashboards, a 55‑acre impoundment, and a single 2,900 kW Kaplan turbine that generates roughly 11.7 GWh annually. Boralex proposes to maintain the plant’s run‑of‑river mode, which minimizes storage and relies on natural river flow, thereby reducing the environmental footprint compared to large reservoir projects. The facility also includes a 0.7‑mile transmission line and associated infrastructure.

FERC has opened a public participation period, inviting motions to intervene and protests until August 3 2026. The agency will schedule issue‑scoping comments in August, scoping comments in September, and a request for additional information in October, with environmental analysis slated for December 2026. Stakeholders can file electronically via FERC’s eFiling system or submit paper copies, and all submissions must identify the project and docket number.

Key Elements

• New Major License – Project No. 9074‑054, filed under the Federal Power Act.
  
• Location – Schroon River, Warrensburg, Warren County, New York.
  
• Dam & Reservoir – 184‑ft concrete gravity dam, 22.5‑ft high, 55‑acre impoundment, 500 acre‑ft storage capacity.
  
• Power Generation – 2,900 kW Kaplan turbine, 28‑ft net head, 1,565 cfs hydraulic capacity, ~11.7 GWh annual output.
  
• Run‑of‑River Operation – Minimal storage, relies on natural river flow, lower ecological impact.
  
• Public Participation Window – Motions to intervene and protests due by 5:00 p.m. ET, August 3 2026.
  
• Filing Requirements – Electronic filing encouraged; paper filings accepted; documents must bear “PROTEST” or “MOTION TO INTERVENE” and include project name, docket number, and filer’s name.
  
• Schedule – Issue scoping (Aug 2026), scoping comments (Sep 2026), additional info request (Oct 2026), ready for environmental analysis (Dec 2026).
  
• Contact Points – FERC eFiling and eComment systems; FERC Online Support; Office of Public Participation.
  
• Regulatory Framework – Governed by 18 CFR 385.210, 385.211, 385.214 and 18 CFR 2.1 for environmental analysis.

Typhoon‑Triggered Disaster Aid: SBA Launches Public Assistance for the Northern Mariana Islands

Overview

On May 28, 2026 the President declared a major disaster for the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands (CNMI) following Super Typhoon Sinlaku. The declaration, issued by the U.S. Small Business Administration (SBA), authorizes public assistance programs aimed at helping the islands recover from the storm’s extensive damage. The focus is on providing financial support to private non‑profit organizations that deliver essential services, such as utilities, health care, and emergency response.

The SBA’s disaster assistance program offers low‑interest loans for both physical damage and economic injury. Interest rates are set at 3.625 % for eligible non‑profits, regardless of whether they have alternative credit sources. Applications can be submitted online through the SBA Loan Portal or in person at local sites announced by the agency. The declaration covers the entire CNMI, including Saipan, Tinian, Rota, and the Northern Islands, and outlines a timeline for assistance, with key dates ranging from early April to early March 2027.

This notice serves to inform affected entities and the public about available resources, application procedures, and contact points for further assistance. It underscores the federal commitment to support the islands’ recovery and resilience in the wake of a powerful natural disaster.

Key Elements

• Major Disaster Declaration – President’s declaration dated May 28, 2026 for the CNMI following Super Typhoon Sinlaku.
  
• Public Assistance Only – Focus on public assistance programs, not private or commercial aid.
  
• SBA Disaster Loan Programs – Loans for physical damage (disaster number 216148) and economic injury (disaster number 216150).
  
• Interest Rates – Fixed at 3.625 % for all private non‑profit applicants, whether or not they have other credit.
  
• Eligible Applicants – Private non‑profit organizations providing essential services of a governmental nature.
  
• Application Process – Online via the SBA Loan Portal or in person at locally announced locations.
  
• Coverage Area – Entire CNMI: Saipan, Tinian, Rota, and the Northern Islands.
  
• Key Dates – Declaration issued May 28, 2026; affected period April 11–18, 2026; assistance timeline extends to March 1, 2027.
  
• Contact Information – Jennifer Talarico, Office of Disaster Recovery and Resilience, SBA; phone (202) 205‑6734; toll‑free 1‑800‑659‑2955.
  
• Accessibility – Telecommunications relay services (7‑1‑1) for deaf, hard‑of‑hearing, or speech‑disabled applicants.

Reclaiming Cherokee Heritage: Federal Lands Put into Trust for the Eastern Band

Overview

The Eastern Band of Cherokee Historic Lands Reacquisition Act designates a total of roughly 85 acres of federal property along Tellico Reservoir in Monroe County, Tennessee, as trust lands for the Eastern Band of Cherokee Indians (EBCI). The lands, managed by the Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA), include the Sequoyah Museum, support property, and memorial sites for historic Cherokee capitals Chota and Tanasi. In addition, the Act creates permanent easements on adjacent lower‑elevation parcels to preserve a recreational trail network.

The legislation establishes a framework for how the trust lands may be used: primarily for memorializing Cherokee history, interpreting the Trail of Tears National Historic Trail, and supporting cultural education programs. The EBCI may develop classrooms, conference rooms, and temporary housing on the support property, while the main trust lands are reserved for museums, memorials, and interpretive trails. The Act also sets conditions on flooding, construction, and access to ensure compatibility with TVA’s river‑control operations.

Key implications include the TVA’s continued authority to manage reservoir water levels and flood adjacent lands, the requirement for environmental assessments and remediation of hazardous substances, and a prohibition on class II or III gaming on the trust lands. Revised maps must be submitted within a year of any land transaction, and the EBCI must coordinate with the Secretary of the Interior and the TVA on all trust‑related activities.

Key Elements

• Trust Lands and Easements

  • ~46 acres for Sequoyah Museum, ~12 acres for support property, ~18 acres for Chota/Tanasi memorials.
    
  • ~8.5 acres Chota peninsula and ~11.4 acres Chota‑Tanasi trail easements below 820‑ft contour.

• Elevation Criteria

  • Trust lands above 820‑ft mean sea level (MSL); easements below 820‑ft.

• Use Provisions

  • Memorialization, cultural interpretation, recreational trails, and support facilities for education and administration.
    
  • No class II/III gaming allowed.

• Flooding and Water Rights

  • TVA may temporarily flood lands below 824‑ft contour; EBCI may build water‑use facilities between 815‑820 ft with TVA consent.
    
  • TVA retains rights to draw down, fluctuate, or permanently flood adjacent lands.

• Environmental Responsibilities

  • TVA must conduct hazardous‑substance assessments, notify the Interior and EBCI, and remediate any contamination.
    
  • TVA bears sole federal liability for environmental remediation.

• Administrative Oversight

  • Lands governed by standard trust‑land statutes, except where specified.
    
  • Revised maps required within one year of any transaction, submitted to both House Natural Resources and Senate Indian Affairs committees.

• Access and Entry

  • EBCI may use lands for ingress/egress to the reservoir; TVA may enter for maintenance, dredging, or public‑health work, provided it does not unreasonably interfere with cultural activities.

• Compensation for Hydropower Loss

  • Future development that reduces TVA’s hydropower capacity must be compensated per the TVA Flood Control Storage Loss Guideline, unless otherwise agreed.

• Gaming Prohibition

  • Explicit ban on class II and III gaming on all trust lands and easements.

Congress Strikes Back: Disapproves National Park Vehicle Rule in Glen Canyon

Overview

In a decisive move by the 119th Congress, a joint resolution was enacted to nullify a rule issued by the National Park Service (NPS) concerning motor vehicle access in Glen Canyon National Recreation Area. The rule, published in the Federal Register (90 Fed. Reg. 2621), had outlined new restrictions and permitting requirements for vehicles traversing the park’s rugged terrain. By declaring the rule “no force or effect,” Congress effectively reversed the NPS’s regulatory changes, restoring the previous vehicle management framework.

The resolution underscores the ongoing tension between federal agencies and legislative oversight. While the NPS sought to balance visitor access with environmental protection, Congress determined that the rule’s provisions were either unnecessary or overly restrictive. The decision reflects broader concerns about how vehicle traffic can impact fragile desert ecosystems, water resources, and geological features within the park.

For geoscientists, natural resource managers, and environmental professionals, the resolution means that existing vehicle policies remain in place, potentially simplifying field logistics and permitting processes. However, it also signals that future agency proposals will face heightened scrutiny, encouraging more robust stakeholder engagement before rulemaking.

Key Elements

• Disapproval under Chapter 8, Title 5: The resolution formally rejects the NPS rule, removing its legal authority.
  
• No Force or Effect: The rule is rendered null, leaving prior vehicle regulations unchanged.
  
• Federal Register Reference: The rule was originally published at 90 Fed. Reg. 2621, detailing vehicle restrictions for Glen Canyon.
  
• Legislative Oversight: Demonstrates Congress’s role in checking agency actions that affect land use and environmental protection.
  
• Implications for Field Work: Geoscientists and natural resource professionals can continue using established vehicle access protocols without awaiting new permits.
  
• Environmental Impact: The reversal may affect how vehicle traffic is managed, potentially influencing erosion, wildlife disturbance, and water quality in the canyon.
  
• Public Law Status: Became Public Law No. 119‑13, ensuring the resolution’s permanence in federal statutes.
  
• Future Rulemaking: Signals that similar NPS proposals will likely undergo more rigorous congressional review before implementation.

FY 2026 Appropriations: $8 Billion to Power Science, Energy, and the Environment

Overview

The Commerce, Justice, Science; Energy and Water Development; and Interior and Environment Appropriations Act, 2026 (Public Law 119‑74) sets the federal budget for the fiscal year ending September 30 2026. It authorizes more than $8 billion for the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), the Department of Energy (DOE), and the Department of the Interior, while also providing substantial funds for trade enforcement, science research, and environmental protection.

The bill’s allocations are designed to keep U.S. scientific and natural‑resource capabilities at the forefront of global competition. NOAA receives a five‑year, $8 billion package that covers operations, research, and capital assets—including aircraft, vessels, and new research facilities—along with a dedicated $65 million for Pacific salmon recovery. DOE is granted $8.4 billion for science, nuclear, and energy‑innovation programs, including $1.17 billion for STEM education and $1.25 billion for advanced research facilities. The Interior receives $6 billion for water‑resource management, fisheries, and land‑use projects, with $1.93 billion earmarked for the Bureau of Indian Affairs and $117 million for surface‑mining reclamation.

Beyond the core agencies, the act imposes strict oversight and reprogramming rules. Funds cannot be used for tobacco promotion, must be reported to Congress, and are subject to debarment for “Made in America” violations. The appropriations also include targeted environmental grants—$3.1 billion for EPA and related programs, $892 million for Clean Water State Revolving Funds, and $715 million for Drinking Water State Revolving Funds—ensuring that water quality and infrastructure remain a priority.

Key Elements

• NOAA

  • $8 billion over five years for operations, research, and capital assets.
    
  • $65 million for Pacific salmon recovery; $1.58 billion for procurement and capital projects.
    
  • $385 million for new research facilities; $1.58 billion for aircraft, vessels, and facility relocations.
    

• Department of Energy

  • $8.4 billion total: $1.17 billion for STEM education, $1.25 billion for advanced research facilities, $865 million for uranium enrichment decontamination, and $350 million for the Advanced Research Projects Agency‑Energy.
    
  • $150 million for loan guarantees to support small modular and advanced nuclear reactors.
    

• Department of the Interior

  • $6 billion for water‑resource management, fisheries, and land‑use projects.
    
  • $1.93 billion for the Bureau of Indian Affairs (housing, welfare, education).
    
  • $117 million for surface‑mining reclamation and $32 million for the Abandoned Mine Reclamation Fund.
    

• Trade & Justice

  • $582 million for the International Trade Administration (including $16.4 million for China antidumping enforcement).
    
  • $235 million for the Bureau of Industry and Security (export‑control and national‑security activities).
    
  • $400 million for the Economic Development Administration (economic‑development assistance).
    

• Science & Research

  • $251 million for NSF equipment and facilities; $938 million for STEM education and human‑resources programs.
    
  • $3 billion for NASA science, aeronautics, and space‑technology activities.
    
  • $5.09 million for the National Science Board; $24.16 million for the NSF Office of the Inspector General.
    

• Environmental & Water Infrastructure

  • $3.114 billion for EPA and related environmental programs, including $33 million for Energy Star and $30 million for grants to persistent‑poverty counties.
    
  • $892 million for Clean Water State Revolving Fund (CWSRF) capitalization; $715 million for Drinking Water State Revolving Fund (DWSRF).
    
  • $12.5 billion for loan guarantees and direct‑loan principal on water‑infrastructure projects (WIFIA).
    

• Forest & Wildland Fire

  • $3.5 billion for the Forest Service (research, management, hazardous‑fuels, and wildfire suppression).
    
  • $3.491 billion for wildfire suppression, with $1.011 billion for operations and a $2.48 billion reserve.
    

• Oversight & Restrictions

  • Reprogramming limited to 5 % of any appropriation; reprogramming over $5 million or 10 % requires committee approval.
    
  • No use of funds for tobacco promotion or political persuasion.
    
  • “Made in America” violations trigger debarment.
    
  • All appropriations must be reported to the House and Senate Appropriations Committees within 60 days.
    

These provisions collectively provide a robust fiscal framework that supports U.S. leadership in geoscience, energy innovation, natural‑resource stewardship, and environmental protection while maintaining stringent accountability and oversight.

Mining Regulatory Clarity Act: Streamlining Mill Site Rules and Funding Abandoned Mine Cleanup

The Mining Regulatory Clarity Act (H.R. 1366) was introduced to simplify and clarify the federal rules governing the location of hardrock mining mill sites on public lands. By amending the Mining Law of 1872, the bill establishes a clear framework for operators to secure mill sites, defines the scope and limits of such sites, and ensures that these sites do not convey mineral rights or become eligible for patenting. The legislation also creates a dedicated Abandoned Hardrock Mine Fund to finance the cleanup of legacy mine sites, drawing on claim maintenance fees collected from mill site operators.

For geoscientists, mineral resource developers, and environmental professionals, the Act provides a more predictable regulatory environment. Operators can now submit a single plan of operations that includes all necessary mill sites, subject to a 5‑acre maximum per site, and receive approval from the Secretary of the Interior or Agriculture. The bill preserves existing mining claims and protects the rights of claim holders while preventing the expansion of mining activities into lands withdrawn from mining under other federal statutes. The fund mechanism offers a sustainable source of financing for remediation projects, aligning with broader environmental and land‑use goals.

Key Elements

• Clear Definition of Mill Sites – Public land locations needed for waste rock, tailings, or other incidental operations, defined in the amended Mining Law.
• Size and Scope Limits – Each mill site is capped at 5 acres; multiple sites may be included in a single plan of operations.
• No Mineral Rights or Patenting – Mill sites do not convey mineral rights and are ineligible for patenting.
• Preservation of Existing Claims – Mill site location does not affect the validity or rights of lode or placer claims.
• Abandoned Hardrock Mine Fund – A Treasury account funded by claim maintenance fees collected from mill site operators.
• Use of Fund – Expenditures are limited to activities under Section 40704 of the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, with allocations governed by that Act’s provisions.
• Administrative Clarity – Amendments to the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act streamline fee language and clarify the relationship between claim maintenance fees and mill site operations.
• Regulatory Safeguards – The bill includes savings provisions that protect existing rights, prevent unintended expansion into withdrawn lands, and maintain federal regulatory authority over mining activities.

Catalonia Boosts Zero‑Emission Tech with €50 M State Aid Scheme

The European Commission has approved a state‑aid scheme in Catalonia, Spain, to support the manufacture of products and components for zero‑emission industrial technologies. Adopted on 26 March 2026, the decision replaces a previous authorisation and confirms that the Commission has no objections. The aid is relevant to the European Economic Area and is administered by the Catalan Department of Industry.

The scheme provides direct grants totalling €50 million, disbursed at €10 million per year until 31 December 2030. It targets a wide range of sectors—including mining, manufacturing, energy supply, waste management, and research—to foster environmental protection and sectorial development. By financing the entire industrial value chain, the aid encourages investment in cleaner production and innovation across Catalonia’s economy.

Key Elements

• Direct grant scheme for zero‑emission industrial technology manufacturing.
  
• €50 million total budget, €10 million per year, duration until 31 Dec 2030.
  
• Covers mining, manufacturing, energy, waste, research, and related services.
  
• Commission raises no objections; EEA‑relevant decision.
  
• Administered by the Catalan Department of Industry (Dirección General de Industria).
  
• Aims to protect the environment and stimulate sectorial development.
  
• Supports investment in cleaner production and technological innovation.

2027 Appropriations Act: A $1.1 B Boost for Transportation, $4 B for Housing, and New Rules to Protect Infrastructure Resilience

Overview

The 2027 Transportation, Housing and Urban Development, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act places a strong emphasis on modernizing and safeguarding the nation’s physical infrastructure while tightening oversight and ensuring equitable distribution of funds. The bill authorizes roughly $1.1 billion for transportation programs—including the FAA, FHWA, MARAD, and the Department of Transportation’s Office of the Secretary—alongside $4.16 billion for HUD programs that support housing, community development, and homelessness services. A key theme is resilience: grants for inland waterway resilience, ultra‑high‑performance concrete, drone‑based inspection, and maritime security are earmarked, while research and technology budgets are set to accelerate new materials and data‑driven decision making.

The legislation also introduces stringent cost‑control and reporting requirements. Reprogramming and transfer limits (typically 7–10 %) require congressional approval, and many grant programs now include explicit equity provisions—such as a 5 % allocation to historically disadvantaged communities and a 30 % rural share for road‑construction projects. Oversight is reinforced through expanded Inspector General funding, mandatory monthly reporting on Amtrak overtime, and new enforcement mechanisms for HUD’s Section 8 and fair‑housing programs. These measures aim to keep federal dollars accountable while encouraging innovation in geoscience, engineering, and environmental stewardship.

Overall, the act seeks to balance rapid infrastructure investment with rigorous stewardship, ensuring that new technologies and resilient design are integrated into the nation’s transportation and housing systems while protecting vulnerable communities and natural resources.

Key Elements

• Transportation Funding

  • $218 M to DOT Office of the Secretary (leadership, legal, policy, budgeting, civil‑rights).
  • $48.5 M for research & technology; $30 M “available until expended” for PNT demos, drone‑inspection grants, and university research on inland waterway resilience, nuclear‑transport security, and ultra‑high‑performance concrete.
  • $550 M grant program for local/regional projects ($350 M to high‑growth metros; $200 M split ⁵⁰⁄₅₀ rural‑urban, 5 % to disadvantaged communities).
  • $46.8 M for emergency‑preparedness grants (≤ 4 % admin costs).
  • FAA: $4 B for facilities, $230 M for research, $4 B for airport grants, with strict transfer limits (≤ 10 %).
  • FHWA: $504 M admin, $62.66 B for highway construction, $1.14 B from unspent balances for community, tribal, and multimodal projects.
  • MARAD: $538 M for port‑infrastructure grants, $387 M for Merchant Marine Academy operations, and $83.6 M for state maritime academies.
  • Amtrak: monthly overtime reporting; funding restrictions on security staffing.

• Housing & Community Development

  • $4.16 B for HUD programs: $290 M emergency housing, $3.78 B continuum‑of‑care, $10 M data‑analysis.
  • $500 M for HOME Investment Partnerships (through 2030).
  • $60 M for Self‑Help & Assisted Homeownership, $300 M for community development block grants (20 % admin cap).
  • $82 M for youth homelessness pilot (10 % technical assistance).
  • $295.6 M for Lead Hazard Control & Healthy Homes (lead abatement, healthy homes research, rural grants).
  • $30 M for Family Unification Program (Melania Trump Foster Youth initiative).
  • HUD’s Section 8 enforcement powers expanded; new reporting on failing inspections; enforcement actions include civil penalties, contract abatement, and owner debarment.

• Geoscience & Natural Resource Focus

  • Inland waterway resilience research funded through DOT’s technology budget.
  • Ultra‑high‑performance concrete grants for bridge construction.
  • Drone inspection grant program for infrastructure monitoring.
  • Pipeline Safety Design Review and Underground Natural Gas Storage Safety Accounts ($200 k and $7 M respectively).
  • Maritime security and port infrastructure grants support coastal resilience and environmental protection.
  • Environmental review waivers for lead‑based paint abatement and healthy homes projects (unless floodplain/wetland impacts).

• Oversight & Accountability

  • Reprogramming/transfer thresholds (7–10 %) require congressional approval.
  • Inspector General receives $104 M for fraud investigations.
  • Monthly reporting on FAA, Amtrak, and HUD grant administration.
  • Strict limits on administrative costs (≤ 4 % for emergency grants; ≤ 10 % for FAA transfers).
  • Equity provisions: 5 % to disadvantaged communities, 30 % rural share for road projects, ⁵⁰⁄₅₀ rural‑urban split for certain grants.
  • Buy‑America and procurement compliance reinforced; no use of funds for lobbying or non‑federal parties in regulatory proceedings.

These provisions collectively aim to modernize the nation’s transportation and housing infrastructure, embed resilience and sustainability, and maintain rigorous oversight to protect taxpayers and vulnerable communities.

FY 2027 Appropriations: A $10 B Investment in America’s Natural Resources and Environmental Stewardship

Overview

The Department of the Interior, Environment, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2027 (H.R. 9171) allocates roughly $10 billion in new funding for the federal agencies that manage the nation’s lands, waters, and natural resources for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2027. The bill provides substantial support for the Bureau of Land Management (BLM), U.S. Geological Survey (USGS), National Park Service (NPS), Forest Service, Indian Affairs, and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), among others. It expands programs that protect public lands, advance scientific research, and enhance infrastructure while also setting new policy limits on how certain funds may be used.

The appropriations strengthen land‑management operations—such as mineral‑potential surveys, wildfire suppression, and wild‑horse stewardship—while boosting scientific data collection, satellite monitoring, and environmental cleanup. At the same time, the bill imposes restrictions on the use of funds for specific endangered‑species rules, lead‑ammunition regulation, and other environmental policy changes, ensuring that the money is directed toward core mission activities rather than new regulatory mandates.

Overall, the Act balances resource development with conservation, supports tribal and state partners, and provides the agencies with the financial flexibility to address emerging challenges in energy, climate, and public‑health protection.

Key Elements

• Total Appropriations – About $10 billion for Interior, EPA, and related agencies for FY 2027.
  
• BLM – $1.21 B for land management, mineral‑potential assessment, wild‑horse program, and leasing.
  
• USGS – $1.37 B for surveys, research, satellite operations, and data dissemination.
  
• EPA – $2.29 B for environmental programs, Superfund, brownfields, hazardous‑waste cleanup, and $3.5 B for state‑and‑tribal infrastructure grants.
  
• NPS – $2.87 B for park operations, historic preservation, and restoration projects.
  
• Forest Service – $1.88 B for national‑forest management, wildfire suppression, research, and state/tribal forestry programs.
  
• Indian Affairs & Health Service – $2.27 B for tribal programs, education, and $402 M for health services and emergency funds.
  
• New Initiatives – $1.7 M for Good Samaritan Mine Remediation, $4.7 M for Energy Community Revitalization, and $5.1 M for natural‑resource damage assessment.
  
• Restrictions – Prohibits use of funds for certain endangered‑species rules, lead‑ammunition regulation, and other policy changes; limits use for specific environmental regulations.
  
• Transfer & Reprogramming – Allows inter‑agency transfer of wildfire suppression funds and sets limits on reprogramming without congressional approval.
  
• Reporting & Accountability – Requires quarterly status reports on balances, expenditures, and compliance with apportionment formulas for state and tribal grants.

Apex Area Technical Corrections Act: Expanding Nevada Land Transfer to Include North Las Vegas and Industrial Partners

Overview
The Apex Area Technical Corrections Act amends the 1989 Apex Project, Nevada Land Transfer and Authorization Act to formally include the City of North Las Vegas and the Apex Industrial Park Owners Association as parties to land transfer and authorization processes. By redefining key terms and expanding the scope of land connections, the Act broadens the geographic and institutional reach of the original legislation.

The amendment revises procedural language, adding new lands and successor maps, and modifies the conditions for mineral sales within the Apex Site. It provides specific exemptions from federal competition limits for sales of minerals that the United States retains interest in, thereby streamlining commercial activities tied to the site’s resources.

Environmental safeguards are reinforced by conditioning all new land transfers on compliance with the National Environmental Policy Act and the Federal Land Policy and Management Act. This ensures that any additional transfers or rights‑of‑way issued under the Act meet established federal environmental standards.

Key Elements

• Expanded Parties – The City of North Las Vegas and the Apex Industrial Park Owners Association are now explicitly included in land transfer provisions.
  
• Redefined Terms – Clarifies the meaning of “Apex Industrial Park Owners Association” and “City of North Las Vegas,” and updates land connection language to cover additional lands and successor maps.
  
• Mineral Sale Exemptions – Grants exemption from competition limits under 43 CFR 3602.31(a)(2) for sales of minerals retained by the U.S. within the Apex Site.
  
• Permanent Withdrawal Clause – Establishes that withdrawals of lands transferred under the Act remain in perpetuity.
  
• Environmental Compliance – Requires all transfers to satisfy NEPA and the Federal Land Policy and Management Act, ensuring environmental stewardship.
  
• Administrative Roles – Specifies the Secretary of State’s and Secretary of the Interior’s responsibilities in granting transfers and issuing rights‑of‑way.
  
• Continuity of Existing Mechanisms – Maintains the core land transfer framework while extending its scope to new entities and lands.

$10 B+ in New Funding for U.S. Agriculture, Rural Development, and Food Safety

Overview

The 2027 Appropriations Act for Agriculture, Rural Development, Food and Drug Administration (FDA), and related agencies provides more than $10 billion in new funding for the 2027 fiscal year. The bill is designed to strengthen the nation’s food system, support rural communities, and enhance public health protections. Key priorities include:

• Agricultural research and innovation – large allocations to the National Institute of Food and Agriculture (NIFA) and the Agricultural Research Service (ARS) to fund experiments, extension services, and technology transfer.
  
• Rural development and housing – funding for the Rural Development (RD) agency to expand loan programs, improve rural infrastructure, and support rural hospitals and housing.
  
• Food safety and inspection – a substantial increase for the FDA’s Food Safety and Inspection Service (FSIS) to expand inspections, laboratory capacity, and enforcement of new regulations.
  
• Conservation and natural resources – significant support for the Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) to implement watershed protection, soil‑water conservation, and climate‑resilient farming practices.
  
• Administrative and operational support – appropriations for the USDA’s Office of the Chief Information Officer, Office of the Chief Financial Officer, and other support functions to modernize systems and improve efficiency.

The bill also contains a number of policy provisions that set limits on how funds can be used, require reporting and oversight, and establish new rules for food labeling, animal health, and rural housing.

Key Elements

• $1.046 billion to NIFA for research, education, and extension activities, with a focus on climate‑smart agriculture and food‑security research.
  
• $1.8 billion to the ARS for research, land acquisition, and aircraft operations, including grants for small‑holder research stations.
  
• $270 million to the Rural Development Agency for farm‑loan programs, rural housing insurance, and rural infrastructure projects.
  
• $7.1 billion to the FDA, including $1.2 billion for FSIS inspections, $1 billion for laboratory accreditation, and $1 billion for enforcement of new food‑safety regulations.
  
• $800 million to the NRCS for conservation operations, watershed protection, and climate‑resilient farming practices.
  
• $500 million for the Rural Utilities Service to expand broadband, telemedicine, and rural water and waste‑management programs.
  
• $1 billion for the Food and Nutrition Service to support child nutrition programs, WIC, and the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP).
  
• $1.5 billion for the Rural Housing Service to fund rural housing loans, grants, and community‑facility projects.
  
• $40 million rescinded from the broadband pilot program, with the remaining funds earmarked for rural broadband expansion.
  
• Policy limits:
  
  • No more than 5 % change in any office’s appropriation.
    
  • Funds for certain offices (e.g., Office of Homeland Security, Office of Tribal Relations) capped at specified amounts.
    
  • Restrictions on using funds for new regulations, lobbying, or closing rural field offices without congressional approval.
    
  • Requirements for reporting on program performance, cost‑sharing, and environmental compliance.
    
• New regulatory provisions:
  
  • FDA must delay new sodium‑reduction guidelines until 2025‑26 NHANES data are available.
    
  • USDA must issue guidance on animal‑food labeling and pet‑food claims within 18 months.
    
  • USDA and FDA must coordinate on enforcement of electronic nicotine delivery system (ENDS) regulations.
    

This appropriations package aims to strengthen the U.S. food system, protect public health, and support rural communities while ensuring accountability and environmental stewardship.

A $10 billion Boost for Homeland Security, Disaster Resilience, and Coastal Protection

Overview

The Homeland Security and Further Additional Continuing Appropriations Act, 2026 (Public Law 119‑86) provides consolidated funding for the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and its components for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026. The bill allocates roughly $10 billion across DHS’s major functional areas—management, intelligence, enforcement, preparedness, and research—while also extending the continuing appropriations framework for 2026. The act is designed to strengthen national security, improve disaster response, and support critical infrastructure, including coastal and environmental protection.

The legislation earmarks significant resources for the Coast Guard’s operations and infrastructure, the Federal Emergency Management Agency’s (FEMA) disaster‑relief and flood‑hazard programs, and the Science and Technology Directorate’s research and development portfolio. It also imposes new reporting and oversight requirements, such as monthly estimates of migrant arrivals and detentions, and limits on the use of funds for certain surveillance and procurement activities. The bill’s provisions aim to enhance transparency, accountability, and the efficient use of taxpayer dollars while maintaining essential homeland‑security functions.

Key Elements

• Coast Guard

  • $11.3 billion for operations, support, and procurement (including marine vessels, aircraft, and unmanned systems).
    
  • $98 million for MQ‑9 unmanned aircraft and base‑station equipment (no kinetic‑capable long‑range drones).
    
  • Restrictions on using funds for “long‑range unmanned aircraft with kinetic capabilities.”
    

• FEMA

  • $3.84 billion for federal assistance grants, including $494 million for the State Homeland Security Grant Program and $584 million for the Urban Area Security Initiative.
    
  • $297 million for flood‑hazard mapping and risk analysis; $226 million for the National Flood Insurance Fund.
    
  • $48 million for the Next‑Generation Warning System.
    

• Science & Technology Directorate

  • $426 million for research and development, supporting geoscience, environmental monitoring, and cyber‑security technologies.
    

• Customs & Border Protection

  • $11.08 billion for operations, support, and procurement (vehicles, vessels, aircraft, unmanned aerial systems).
    
  • Prohibition on using funds to prevent the import of prescription drugs from Canada (except controlled substances).
    

• Transportation Security Administration (TSA)

  • $10.6 billion for operations and support, including $24 million for research and development.
    

• Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA)

  • $2.22 billion for operations and support, with $386 million for procurement, construction, and improvements.
    

• Reporting & Oversight

  • Monthly estimates of migrant arrivals and detentions required for budgeting and policy planning.
    
  • New limits on the use of funds for certain surveillance systems, procurement of firearms, and travel expenses.
    
  • Requirements for detailed acquisition and budgetary reporting for large contracts and grants.
    

• Environmental & Natural‑Resource Focus

  • Funding for flood‑hazard mapping, flood‑insurance, and coastal‑protection projects.
    
  • Allocation for the National Flood Insurance Fund and the Next‑Generation Warning System to improve early warning for extreme weather events.
    
  • Research and development funds for geoscience and environmental monitoring technologies.
    

• Continuing Appropriations Framework

  • The act extends the 2026 continuing appropriations for DHS, ensuring uninterrupted funding for essential operations and personnel pay.
    

This consolidated appropriations act balances the need for robust homeland‑security capabilities with a strong emphasis on disaster resilience, coastal protection, and geoscience research—key priorities for safeguarding the nation’s natural resources and infrastructure.

USDA Refines Conservation Standards to Boost Soil, Water, and Energy Efficiency

Overview

The U.S. Department of Agriculture’s Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) has issued a notice of availability for a comprehensive set of revisions to the National Handbook of Conservation Practices (NHCP). The updates cover 45 distinct conservation practice standards (CPSs) ranging from alley cropping and composting to energy‑efficient building envelopes and well decommissioning. The goal is to streamline language, incorporate the latest scientific findings, and align each CPS with current regulatory and industry standards.

These revisions are intended to improve clarity, reduce redundancy, and enhance the practical applicability of the standards for farmers, ranchers, and land managers. They also introduce new provisions for energy efficiency, waste handling, and safety, while tightening requirements for product approvals and documentation. By refining the purpose statements and criteria, NRCS aims to make the NHCP more user‑friendly and better suited to address contemporary resource concerns such as soil erosion, water quality, and greenhouse‑gas emissions.

Stakeholders—including state conservationists, agricultural producers, and environmental groups—are invited to submit comments by July 6, 2026. The public comment period is a key part of the federal rulemaking process, ensuring that the final revisions reflect a broad range of perspectives before they are adopted statewide.

Key Elements

• Scope of Revisions – 45 CPSs updated, including Alley Cropping (311), Compost Facility (317), Energy‑Efficient Building Envelope (672), Well Decommissioning (351), and Stream Habitat Improvement (395).
  
• Public Comment Window – Comments accepted until July 6, 2026; submissions via NRCS docket NRCS‑2026‑0034 or by mail to the USDA.
  
• Focus on Clarity and Readability – Purpose statements trimmed, passive voice removed, and plain‑language guidelines applied.
  
• Energy‑Efficiency Enhancements – New criteria for energy‑efficient equipment, lighting, and building envelopes; emphasis on removing or recycling inefficient components.
  
• Safety and Product Approval – Consolidated safety data sheet (SDS) requirements; streamlined approval process for new products and materials.
  
• Water and Soil Protection – Updated criteria for wetland and highly erodible land (HEL) practices; added buffer zones, setback distances, and monitoring requirements for wells and pipelines.
  
• Dust Control Expansion – Renamed “Dust Control on Traveled Surfaces” with longer‑lived options and extended lifespan from 1 to 3 years.
  
• State Adoption – State conservationists can incorporate revised CPSs into their electronic Field Office Technical Guides, facilitating statewide implementation.
  
• Regulatory Alignment – Integrated references to ASCE, AWPA, ASTM, and other industry standards directly into the CPSs, reducing the need for external citations.
  
• Environmental Impact – Secondary benefits such as reduced soil erosion, improved wildlife habitat, and carbon sequestration moved to the “Considerations” section, highlighting broader ecosystem services.
  

These updates collectively aim to make conservation practices more effective, easier to implement, and better aligned with modern environmental and energy‑efficiency goals.

Dakota Access Pipeline Gets Final Green Light for Lake Oahe Crossing

Overview

The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) has released the Record of Decision (ROD) for the Final Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) concerning the Dakota Access Pipeline’s crossing beneath Lake Oahe in North Dakota. The ROD, published on June 5, 2026, follows the completion of the EIS and the required public comment period, and it formally selects an alternative that permits the pipeline to cross the lake under an easement with specific conditions.

This decision reflects the Corps’ compliance with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and the Department of Defense’s implementing procedures. The ROD outlines how the chosen alternative balances energy infrastructure needs with environmental protection, water quality, and cultural resource considerations for the region.

Stakeholders—including local communities, tribal nations, and environmental groups—can review the ROD online via the USACE Omaha District website or contact the Corps for further information. The decision marks a significant milestone in the pipeline’s regulatory process, setting the stage for subsequent construction and monitoring activities.

Key Elements

• ROD Availability – The final decision document is publicly accessible on the USACE Omaha District website.
  
• Easement Grant – The selected alternative allows the pipeline to cross Lake Oahe under an easement, subject to defined conditions.
  
• Environmental Compliance – The decision follows a comprehensive NEPA‑approved EIS that assessed impacts on water quality, wildlife, and cultural resources.
  
• Public Comment Period – The ROD follows a mandated waiting period after the Final EIS publication, ensuring stakeholder input was considered.
  
• Implementation Conditions – Specific operational and monitoring requirements are attached to the easement to safeguard the lake’s ecosystem.
  
• Contact Information – Brent Cossette (USACE) is the point of contact for inquiries, reachable by phone or email.
  
• Regulatory Context – The ROD is issued under the Department of Defense’s NEPA Implementing Procedures, underscoring the federal oversight of the project.

Seattle City Light Seeks FERC Approval for Skagit River Hydroelectric Settlement—Public Comments Invited

Overview

Seattle City Light has filed a settlement agreement with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) to resolve all outstanding and potential issues related to the Skagit River Hydroelectric Project, a 50‑year‑old facility that spans federal lands in Whatcom, Snohomish, and Skagit counties. The project sits on the Skagit River and is managed under the jurisdiction of the National Park Service and the U.S. Forest Service. The settlement brings together a broad coalition of federal, state, tribal, and non‑profit stakeholders—including the National Marine Fisheries Service, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington Department of Ecology, and several local tribes—to address environmental, cultural, and recreational concerns.

The agreement aims to streamline the re‑licensing process by incorporating proposed license articles that cover fish passage, instream flows, water quality, fish and wildlife habitat, flood risk management, recreation, cultural resources, and terrestrial resources. By resolving these matters in a single document, City Light seeks FERC’s approval to issue a new 50‑year license that reflects the negotiated terms without material modification.

Public participation is a key component of the process. Stakeholders and interested parties are invited to submit comments through FERC’s eFiling system or by paper by July 17, 2026. The Commission encourages electronic submissions and provides clear instructions for ensuring that comments are properly identified and served to all relevant parties.

Key Elements

• Project Scope: Skagit River Hydroelectric Project, located on federal lands in Washington state, managed by the National Park Service and U.S. Forest Service.
  
• Settlement Agreement: Filed by Seattle City Light on behalf of itself and a wide array of partners, including federal agencies, state departments, tribal governments, and environmental organizations.
  
• Environmental Focus: Addresses fish passage, instream flow requirements, water quality standards, fish and wildlife habitat protection, flood risk mitigation, recreation access, cultural resource preservation, and terrestrial ecosystem stewardship.
  
• License Terms: Proposes a new 50‑year operating license that incorporates the settlement’s agreed‑upon articles with no material changes.
  
• Public Comment Process: Comments due July 17, 2026; electronic filing via FERC’s eComment system preferred; paper filings accepted with specified mailing addresses.
  
• Intervention Requirements: Intervenors must serve copies of their submissions to all parties on the official service list and to any resource agency affected by the issue.
  
• Timeline: Settlement agreement filed on June 5, 2026; comment period opens July 2, 2026, closing July 17, 2026.
  
• Access to Documents: Settlement agreement available on FERC’s eLibrary; stakeholders can register for email notifications of related filings.
  
• Contact Information: Key contacts include Chris Townsend (City Light) and John Baummer (FERC), with support available through FERC Online Support and the Office of Public Participation.

EPA Opens the Books: Public Access to Its Environmental Impact Comments

Overview
The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has issued a Notice of Availability (NOA) announcing that its comment letters on a range of Federal Environmental Impact Statements (EISs) are now publicly accessible. This action follows the Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) guidance and Section 309(a) of the Clean Air Act, which require EPA to disclose its evaluations of EISs prepared by other federal agencies. The notice, dated June 5 2026, invites stakeholders and the general public to review EPA’s assessments and to submit additional comments during the specified review periods.

The NOA lists several key projects for which EPA has released comment letters, including the Last Chance Grade Permanent Restoration Project, the proposed relocation of the Veterans Affairs Medical Center in San Antonio, Texas, the T‑7A Recapitalization at Sheppard Air Force Base, the Enhanced Plutonium Facility Utilization at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, and the Grand Targhee Master Development Plan. Each project’s review period, contact person, and relevant deadlines are provided, ensuring transparency and facilitating public participation in the environmental decision‑making process.

Key Elements

• Public Availability: EPA’s comment letters on EISs are now posted and can be accessed by anyone interested in federal environmental decisions.
  
• Review Periods:
  
  • Last Chance Grade Project: review ends July 6 2026.
    
  • Grand Targhee Master Development Plan: review ends July 28 2026.
    
  • Other projects have review periods ending in late June or early July 2026.
    
• Contact Information:
  
  • Stephen Umbertis (Last Chance Grade) – 707‑382‑2889.
    
  • Glenn Elliott (VAMC relocation) – 202‑360‑1243.
    
  • Ms. Chinling Chen (T‑7A Recapitalization) – 380‑457‑2633.
    
  • Alan Chen (Plutonium Facility) – 833‑778‑0508.
    
  • Jay Pence (Grand Targhee) – 208‑354‑2312.
    
• Amendments: The notice includes revisions such as removal of a review due date at the request of the lead agency and corrections to comment period deadlines.
  
• Regulatory Basis: The action is grounded in CEQ guidance on 42 U.S.C. 4332 and the Clean Air Act’s requirement for EPA to comment on other agencies’ EISs.
  
• Accessibility: The notice is published in the Federal Register (Doc. 2026‑11322) and is available for download and review by the public.

Coast Guard Proposes Hurricane Safety Zone for Mobile Port Waters

Overview

The U.S. Coast Guard has issued a notice of proposed rulemaking to create a temporary safety zone in the navigable waters of the Mobile Captain of the Port (COTP) sector. The zone would activate during hurricanes, tropical storms, and other severe weather events to protect the ports, vessels, and surrounding coastal infrastructure.

The rule would require vessel operators and industry stakeholders within the Mobile COTP zone to comply with specific operational restrictions before, during, and immediately after such weather events. By establishing clear boundaries and enforcement protocols, the Coast Guard aims to reduce the risk of maritime accidents, safeguard cargo, and ensure the resilience of the region’s critical shipping and energy infrastructure.

Comments on the proposal are due by July 6, 2026, and the rule will be published in the Federal Register once finalized. Stakeholders—including geoscientists, energy and mineral resource professionals, and maritime operators—are encouraged to review the docket (USCG‑2024‑0465) and submit feedback.

Key Elements

• Safety Zone Scope: Covers all navigable waters within the Mobile COTP sector, defined by specific geographic coordinates.
  
• Trigger Conditions: Zone activates automatically when a hurricane, tropical storm, or other severe weather event is forecasted or confirmed.
  
• Enforcement Period: Applies prior to, during, and immediately after the weather event to ensure continuous protection.
  
• Operator Requirements: Vessel operators must avoid the zone, secure cargo, and may need to obtain special clearance; industry facilities must implement emergency response plans.
  
• Compliance & Penalties: Non‑compliance could result in fines, vessel detainment, or other enforcement actions under 33 CFR Part 165.
  
• Comment Period: Public and industry comments must be submitted by July 6, 2026, via the Coast Guard’s docket system (USCG‑2024‑0465).
  
• Contact Information: Marine Science Technician Chief Petty Officer Stacy Stevenson (Waterways Management Division) can be reached at 251‑382‑8653 or via email for inquiries.
  
• Regulatory Authority: The rule falls under the Department of Homeland Security, Coast Guard, and will be codified in the Code of Federal Regulations upon adoption.

Louisiana Eyes State‑Run Coal Waste Permit Program

Overview

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has issued a notice proposing to approve Louisiana’s Coal Combustion Residuals (CCR) partial permit program under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). The state’s Department of Environmental Quality (LDEQ) submitted a detailed application, and EPA’s preliminary review indicates that Louisiana’s framework meets the federal standard for partial approval. If adopted, the state program would largely replace the federal CCR permitting system in Louisiana, except for a few specific provisions that remain unchanged.

This move is part of a broader trend of states seeking greater autonomy over hazardous waste management, particularly for coal‑related byproducts such as fly ash, bottom ash, and slag. The proposal invites public comment for 60 days, with a hybrid in‑person/virtual hearing scheduled for July 21, 2026. Stakeholders—including coal producers, waste generators, environmental groups, and local communities—will have the opportunity to influence how the program balances economic interests with environmental protection.

The decision could reshape how Louisiana handles coal combustion residuals, potentially streamlining permitting, reducing regulatory burden for industry, and altering oversight mechanisms. However, it also raises questions about whether state‑run oversight will maintain the same level of environmental safeguards that the federal program provides, especially concerning groundwater protection, land use, and long‑term waste stability.

Key Elements

• RCRA Partial Approval – EPA preliminarily finds Louisiana’s CCR program meets federal standards for partial approval under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act.
  
• State‑Run Permitting – Upon approval, Louisiana’s program would replace the federal CCR permitting system, giving the state control over licensing, monitoring, and enforcement.
  
• Exceptions to Federal Rules – The state program will operate in lieu of the federal program except for specific provisions that remain unchanged (details not listed in the notice).
  
• Public Comment Period – Stakeholders can submit comments by August 4, 2026, using the docket ID EPA‑HQ‑OLEM‑2025‑3324.
  
• Hybrid Hearing – A public hearing will be held on July 21, 2026, combining in‑person and virtual participation.
  
• Contact Information – Comments and inquiries can be directed to Michelle Lloyd, Office of Resource Conservation and Recovery, EPA.
  
• Implications for Coal Industry – The program could streamline permitting for coal‑byproduct disposal, potentially reducing costs for generators while requiring adherence to state‑specific environmental safeguards.
  
• Environmental Safeguards – The proposal emphasizes maintaining protections for groundwater, land use, and waste stability, though the extent of oversight under state control remains to be clarified.

LNG Public Interest Determination Act of 2025: A New Climate‑First Export Framework

Overview

The LNG Public Interest Determination Act of 2025 amends the Natural Gas Act to make the export of liquefied natural gas (LNG) subject to a comprehensive “public interest” review. Under the bill, the Secretary of Energy must issue an export order only after evaluating whether the proposed export will:
1. Not significantly contribute to climate change by slowing the global transition to low‑carbon energy;
2. Not materially raise U.S. energy prices or increase price volatility for any consumer segment; and
3. Not impose a disproportionate burden on rural, low‑income, minority, or other vulnerable communities.

The Act requires detailed assessments—climate, economic, and environmental‑justice—based on the latest science and the 20‑year global warming potential of methane. It also mandates public participation, ensuring that affected communities, especially those with environmental‑justice concerns, can meaningfully comment on the Secretary’s findings. The bill designates the issuance of an export order as a major federal action under NEPA, obligating a full environmental review.

Key Elements

• Mandatory Secretary of Energy Order: No LNG export can proceed without an explicit order, subject to a hearing and public comment.
  
• One‑Year Decision Deadline: The Secretary must decide by one year after receiving the final environmental impact statement or completing required assessments.
  
• Climate Assessment:
  
  • Lifecycle greenhouse gas emissions (extraction, transport, liquefaction, regasification, consumption).
    
  • Comparison to U.S. net‑zero pathways and international commitments.
    
  • Impact on clean‑energy investment and U.S. clean‑energy exports.
    
  • Social cost of emissions and climate‑related economic losses.
    
• Economic Assessment: Impact on all U.S. consumers, with specific estimates for low‑income households, working families, small businesses, manufacturers, state/local governments, and fertilizer producers.
  
• Environmental Justice Assessment: Evaluation of cumulative burdens on vulnerable communities, local fisheries, racial and socioeconomic disparities, and compliance with civil‑rights laws.
  
• Public Participation: Opportunities for comments on the Secretary’s findings and related studies, with accommodations for language, disability, and resource barriers.
  
• Major Federal Action: Export orders trigger a full NEPA review, ensuring environmental safeguards.
  
• Rulemaking Timeline: The Secretary must issue implementing rules within one year of enactment.
  
• Conforming Amendments: Adjustments to the Natural Gas Act’s language to align with the new review process and clarify regulatory responsibilities.

Securing Water for the Zuni: A Landmark Settlement for the Southwest

Overview

The Zuni Indian Tribe Water Rights Settlement Act of 2025 resolves a long‑standing dispute over water use in the Zuni River Basin of New Mexico. By ratifying a 2023 settlement agreement, the bill guarantees the tribe’s water rights in the basin, establishes a dedicated trust fund, and sets out a framework for future water‑management and infrastructure projects. The act also protects the culturally significant Zuni Salt Lake and its surrounding sanctuary by withdrawing federal lands and imposing strict use restrictions.

The legislation places the tribe’s water rights in trust for the United States, ensuring they cannot be lost through non‑use or forfeiture. It authorizes the Secretary of the Interior to lease these rights—up to 99 years—to support tribal development while preserving environmental and cultural values. Environmental compliance is built into the process, requiring adherence to the Endangered Species Act, NEPA, and other federal statutes.

Beyond water, the act withdraws roughly 92,000 acres of federal land from mining, grazing, and other extractive uses, and transfers additional lands into tribal trust. These measures safeguard the lake’s water quality, protect wildlife habitats, and preserve archaeological and cultural resources for future generations.

Key Elements

• Water Rights Settlement – Ratifies a 2023 agreement that finalizes the tribe’s rights in the Zuni River Basin.
• Trust Fund – Creates a $655.5 million water‑rights settlement trust and a $29.5 million operations, maintenance, and replacement trust.
• Trust Status – Water rights held in trust for the tribe; no forfeiture or abandonment allowed.
• Leasing Authority – Tribe may lease rights up to 99 years, subject to Secretary approval, to support domestic, agricultural, and municipal uses.
• Environmental Compliance – Requires adherence to the Endangered Species Act, NEPA, and other federal environmental laws.
• Land Withdrawal – Removes ~92,000 acres of federal land from mining, grazing, and other extractive activities.
• Land Transfer to Trust – Transfers specified federal lands into tribal trust, with conditions on existing rights and personal property.
• Restrictions on Use – Limits motor vehicle routes, prohibits new wells, restricts grazing increases, and bans new rights‑of‑way or timber sales.
• Cultural Protection – Safeguards the Zuni Salt Lake and sanctuary, preserving archaeological and cultural resources.
• Funding and Oversight – Mandates annual expenditure reports and establishes mechanisms for enforcing the trust fund’s proper use.

New Water Rights Settlement Restores Pueblo Water Access and Forests in New Mexico

Overview

The Ohkay Owingeh Rio Chama Water Rights Settlement Act of 2025 resolves long‑standing water‑rights disputes between the federally recognized Ohkay Owingeh Pueblo and the State of New Mexico. By ratifying a negotiated agreement, the Act formally recognizes the Pueblo’s water rights in the Rio Chama Stream System, establishes a dedicated trust fund, and authorizes restoration of the bosque (riparian forest) on Pueblo land. The settlement also creates a framework for the Pueblo to manage, lease, and develop its water resources while protecting environmental values.

The legislation places the Pueblo’s water rights in trust for the United States, ensuring they cannot be forfeited through non‑use or abandonment. It allows the Pueblo to allocate and lease water both on and off its lands, subject to a 99‑year maximum lease term and Secretary of Interior approval. The Act also requires the Pueblo to prepare environmental compliance documents and coordinate with the Army Corps of Engineers for any bosque restoration projects, thereby integrating federal environmental statutes such as the Endangered Species Act and NEPA.

Funding is a cornerstone of the settlement. The Act authorizes $745 million in federal appropriations, supplemented by $131 million from the State of New Mexico, to be deposited in the Ohkay Owingeh Water Rights Settlement Trust Fund. These funds are earmarked for immediate bosque restoration, acequia improvements, water‑rights acquisition, and the establishment of a Pueblo water‑rights management department. The trust fund’s use is tightly regulated, with annual reporting and oversight to ensure compliance with the settlement’s purposes.

Key Elements

• Water‑rights settlement: Final, equitable resolution of Ohkay Owingeh’s claims in the Rio Chama Stream System.
  
• Trust status: Pueblo water rights held in U.S. trust, protected from forfeiture or abandonment.
  
• Leasing authority: Pueblo may lease water up to 99 years, both on and off Pueblo land, with Secretary approval.
  
• Bosque restoration: Dedicated funds for restoring riparian forests on Pueblo land, coordinated with the Army Corps of Engineers.
  
• Trust fund: $745 million federal appropriation plus $131 million state contribution, managed under federal trust‑fund regulations.
  
• Funding uses: Immediate bosque restoration, acequia improvements, water‑rights acquisition, administrative department, infrastructure planning, and environmental compliance.
  
• Environmental compliance: Mandatory adherence to the Endangered Species Act, NEPA, and other federal environmental laws.
  
• Waivers and releases: Ohkay Owingeh and the U.S. trustee waive claims against the U.S. for water rights up to the enforceability date, while retaining rights to future claims and environmental protections.
  
• Reporting and oversight: Annual expenditure reports and Secretary approval of withdrawal plans to ensure funds are used as intended.
  
• Expiration clause: Act expires if the Secretary fails to publish findings by July 1 2038, at which point all waivers and authorizations would lapse.

Congress Strikes Back: Disapproves EPA’s Proposed Petroleum Emissions Charge

Overview

In January 2025, a joint resolution was adopted by both houses of Congress to disapprove an Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) rule that had been published in the Federal Register on November 18, 2024. The rule, titled “Waste Emissions Charge for Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems: Procedures for Facilitating Compliance, Including Netting and Exemptions,” sought to impose a charge on facilities that produce waste emissions from petroleum and natural‑gas operations. It also introduced mechanisms for netting charges across multiple sites and provided exemptions for certain types of facilities.

The resolution, enacted under Chapter 8 of Title 5 of the U.S. Code, declares that the EPA rule has no force or effect. As a result, the proposed charge, netting provisions, and exemptions are null and void. The resolution has been codified as Public Law No. 119‑2, making it a binding legislative act that overrides the agency’s proposal.

For geoscientists, energy and mineral resource professionals, and environmental regulators, the disapproval means that the anticipated regulatory burden—both financial and administrative—will not materialize. Facilities that had begun planning for compliance with the charge will need to adjust their strategies, while the EPA may revisit its approach to regulating waste emissions from the petroleum and natural‑gas sectors.

Key Elements

• Disapproval under Chapter 8, Title 5 – The resolution formally cancels the EPA rule, removing it from the regulatory framework.
  
• No Force or Effect – The rule’s provisions—including the waste‑emissions charge, netting mechanisms, and exemptions—are rendered unenforceable.
  
• Public Law No. 119‑2 – The resolution is now part of federal law, ensuring its permanence until further legislative action.
  
• Impact on Petroleum & Natural‑Gas Facilities – Facilities no longer face the proposed charge or the administrative processes required to calculate and report it.
  
• Netting and Exemption Provisions Removed – The ability to offset charges across sites and the specific exemptions for certain operations are no longer available.
  
• Regulatory Uncertainty – The absence of this rule may prompt the EPA to develop alternative measures or revisit the policy in future congressional sessions.
  
• Industry Planning Adjustments – Companies must revise compliance plans, cost models, and environmental reporting strategies in light of the rule’s repeal.
  
• Environmental Oversight – The EPA may need to reassess its approach to controlling waste emissions from the petroleum and natural‑gas sectors, potentially leading to new or revised regulations.

Equitrans Seeks Approval to Plug Pennsylvania Well, Opens Door for Public Input

Equitrans, L.P. has filed a request with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) to plug and abandon the Pratt 3664 injection/withdrawal well in its Pratt Storage Field in Greene County, Pennsylvania. Under the Natural Gas Act, the company argues that the well is no longer needed for storage operations and that its removal will improve the overall integrity of the field. The request is made pursuant to Equitrans’ blanket authorization (Docket CP96‑532‑000) and is now subject to FERC’s standard review process.

The notice invites public participation through protests, motions to intervene, and comments. All submissions must be filed by 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on July 31, 2026. If no protest is filed within the allotted time, the abandonment will be deemed authorized the following day. Intervenors—such as landowners, ratepayers, or community members—can seek to influence the proceeding and later challenge FERC’s decisions in court.

Key Elements - Plumbing and abandonment request for Pratt 3664 well under FERC’s blanket authorization.
- Justification: well deemed unnecessary for injection/withdrawal; removal expected to enhance storage field integrity.
- Regulatory framework: governed by the Natural Gas Act, FERC regulations § 157.205 and § 157.216(b).
- Public participation deadlines: protests, interventions, and comments due July 31, 2026, 5:00 p.m. ET.
- Protest consequences: no protest → automatic authorization; protest filed and withdrawn within 30 days → automatic authorization; otherwise, FERC will consider the request.
- Intervention rights: intervenors can request rehearing and may challenge orders in U.S. Circuit Courts of Appeal.
- Submission methods: electronic filing via FERC eFiling/eComment or paper mail to the Secretary of FERC.
- Contact information: Jennifer Brough (Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP) for inquiries; Office of Public Participation at (202) 502‑6595.
- Tracking the proceeding: documents available on FERC’s eLibrary; eSubscription service offers automated updates.

Bucks Creek Power Project Seeks Water Flow Flexibility: Public Comment Open

Overview
Pacific Gas & Electric (PGE) and the City of Santa Clara have filed a request with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) to modify Water Quality Certification (WQC) Condition 1 for the Bucks Creek Hydroelectric Project in Plumas County, California. The project sits on federal lands within the Plumas National Forest and currently permits temporary changes to minimum instream flows at several creek locations, but not at others. The proposed amendment would expand that flexibility, allowing the licensees to temporarily adjust flows for up to three weeks during planned or non‑emergency construction, modification, or maintenance activities.

The modification would require mutual agreement among the licensees, the California State Water Resources Control Board, the U.S. Forest Service, the California Department of Fish and Wildlife, and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. By coordinating with these agencies, the project aims to balance the need for infrastructure upgrades with the protection of aquatic ecosystems and downstream water users.

FERC has opened a public comment period that closes on July 1, 2026. Federal, state, local, and tribal agencies with jurisdiction over environmental issues, as well as the general public, may submit comments, protests, or motions to intervene. The notice details electronic and paper filing procedures, service requirements for intervenors, and the importance of adhering to the Commission’s rules of practice.

Key Elements

• Project Location & Ownership

  • Bucks Creek, Grizzly, and Milk Ranch creeks (tributaries of the North Fork Feather River)
    
  • Plumas National Forest, federal lands administered by the USDA Forest Service
    
  • Operated by Pacific Gas & Electric Company and the City of Santa Clara
    

• Current Water Quality Certification (WQC) Condition 1

  • Allows temporary flow modifications at specific creek segments (e.g., Bucks Creek below Bucks Lake, Milk Ranch Creek below Three Lakes)
    
  • Excludes modifications at Bucks Creek below Lower Bucks Lake and Grizzly Creek below Grizzly Forebay
    

• Proposed Amendment

  • Expand temporary flow modification rights to include all regulated release locations listed in the notice
    
  • Permit up to three‑week adjustments for construction, modification, or maintenance activities
    
  • Requires prior agreement with state and federal agencies (California State Water Resources Control Board, Forest Service, California Dept. of Fish and Wildlife, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service)
    

• Stakeholder Coordination

  • Mutual agreement among licensees and environmental agencies is mandatory before any flow changes
    
  • Agencies that cooperate in preparing environmental documents cannot intervene in the proceeding
    

• Public Participation

  • Comment, protest, or motion to intervene deadline: July 1, 2026, 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time
    
  • Electronic filing encouraged via FERC’s eFiling system; paper filings accepted with specified mailing addresses
    
  • Intervenors must serve copies of their filings to all parties on the official service list
    

• Regulatory Context

  • Filing under the Federal Power Act (16 U.S.C. 791a‑825r)
    
  • Notice published in the Federal Register (Document 2026‑11253)
    

• Potential Impacts

  • Enables more flexible project operations while maintaining compliance with water quality standards
    
  • Balances energy infrastructure needs with ecological protection of creek habitats and downstream water users
    

This notice invites all interested parties to review the proposed changes and participate in the decision‑making process before the July 1 deadline.

Southern Star Pipeline Plans to Abandon Three Kansas Wells – Public Comment Deadline Approaches

Overview

Southern Star Central Gas Pipeline, Inc. has filed a notice with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) requesting authorization to abandon three wells—two in the South Welda Storage Field and one in the Piqua Storage Field—under its blanket certificate. The abandonment involves removing wellhead assemblies and capping casings, a remedial action that will not reduce the pipeline’s storage capacity, reservoir pressure, or service to customers. The project is intended to bring the wells into compliance with the Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA) regulations and Southern Star’s Storage Integrity Plan.

The request is made under sections 157.205 and 157.216 of FERC’s regulations, which allow for a streamlined review when the proposed activity is not expected to affect the pipeline’s operational parameters. Southern Star previously filed a similar notice in 2023, but the remediation work was not started on time; this new request seeks to complete that work.

FERC has opened a public participation window. Individuals, organizations, and communities may file protests, motions to intervene, or comments by July 31, 2026, 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time. No filing fee is required, and submissions can be made electronically via FERC’s eFiling or eComment systems or by paper mail. The Commission will consider all submissions before deciding whether to grant the abandonment authorization.

Key Elements

• Project Scope: Abandonment of three wells (2 South Welda, 1 Piqua) in Kansas.
• Regulatory Basis: Request under FERC’s blanket authorization (sections 157.²⁰⁵⁄₁₅₇.216) and the Natural Gas Act.
• Impact: No change to storage inventory, reservoir pressure, or service to customers.
• Compliance: Work will meet PHMSA safety standards and Southern Star’s Storage Integrity Plan.
• Public Participation: Protest, intervention, and comment deadlines set for July 31, 2026, 5:00 p.m. ET.
• Filing Options: Electronic filing via eFiling/eComment or paper mail; no fee required.
• Intervention Rights: Intervenors can request rehearing and challenge Commission orders in court.
• Information Access: Full notice available on FERC’s eLibrary in PDF and Word formats; eSubscription service available for updates.

Maine Land Trust Survey Filing: New Maps to Be Officially Recorded

Overview

The U.S. Bureau of Land Management (BLM) has announced that plats of survey for lands held in trust for the Houlton Band of Maliseet Indians in Aroostook County, Maine, will be officially filed on July 6, 2026. These surveys, completed at the request of the Bureau of Indian Affairs, provide detailed boundary information for the Eva Karkas (Big Brook) parcel in Littleton and portions of Lots 141 and 142 in Monticello. The filing is part of routine land‑management work that ensures accurate records for federal trust lands.

The notice invites any interested parties to protest the surveys. Written protests must be submitted to the BLM Eastern States State Office within 30 calendar days of publication (by July 3, 2026). If a protest is received before the filing date, the BLM will pause the filing until the protest is resolved. After the filing, the plats will be placed in the public record and available for inspection.

For geoscientists, natural‑resource managers, and local stakeholders, the updated plats clarify property boundaries, support future land‑use planning, and reinforce the legal framework that protects tribal trust lands. The process underscores the importance of accurate cadastral data in managing ecological resources and ensuring compliance with federal trust responsibilities.

Key Elements

• Filing Date: Official filing scheduled for July 6, 2026, unless protests delay the process.
  
• Protest Window: 30‑day period to submit written protests (deadline July 3, 2026).
  
• Location of Filing: Bureau of Land Management, Eastern States State Office, Falls Church, VA.
  
• Survey Subjects:
  
  • Eva Karkas (Big Brook) parcel, Littleton, Aroostook County.
    
  • Portions of Lots 141 and 142, Monticello, Aroostook County.
    
• Purpose: Provide accurate boundary data for lands held in trust for the Houlton Band of Maliseet Indians, supporting federal land‑management and tribal sovereignty.
  
• Stakeholder Contact: Frank D. Radford, Chief Cadastral Surveyor, Eastern States (phone: 703‑558‑7759).
  
• Public Access: Completed plats will be placed in open files and available for public review.
  
• Legal Basis: 43 U.S.C. Chap. 3, governing federal land surveys and trust land management.

Buffalo Field Office Plan Reversed: BLM Cancels Coal Leasing Expansion

Overview

The Bureau of Land Management (BLM) has officially ended the land‑use planning process that was announced in July 2025 for an Environmental Assessment (EA) to amend the Buffalo Resource Management Plan (RMP). The decision follows a presidential joint resolution that disapproved the 2024 RMP amendment under the Congressional Review Act (CRA). As a result, the 2024 amendment—including the proposed coal‑leasing allocation—never takes effect, and the 2015 Buffalo RMP, as amended in 2019, remains the governing plan for the area.

The BLM’s action preserves agency resources and aligns with recent legislative changes, notably the One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBB). Under OBBB Section 50203, the Secretary of the Interior made 2,338,995 BLM‑administered coal acres available for future leasing. The BLM has combined these acres with those from the 2019 RMP amendment, creating a total of 2,614,310 acres that can be considered for coal leasing, but no new plan or EA will be issued.

Moving forward, the BLM will continue to collaborate with other agencies and stakeholders to implement the existing land‑use plan, ensuring that land management decisions remain consistent with current policy and environmental standards.

Key Elements

• Termination of the planning process: The NOI and EA for the 2024 RMP amendment are discontinued as of the notice’s publication.
  
• CRA disapproval: The 2024 RMP amendment is nullified, treating it as if it never existed.
  
• Retention of the 2015 RMP: The 2015 Buffalo RMP, amended in 2019, remains in effect for the planning area.
  
• Coal acreage availability: 2,614,310 BLM‑administered acres are now available for potential coal leasing under OBBB Section 50203.
  
• No new plan or EA: The BLM will not issue a Proposed Plan Amendment, Final EA, or Decision Record for this process.
  
• Continued implementation: The agency will work with cooperating partners to carry out the existing land‑use plan.
  
• Resource conservation: The decision saves agency time and money by avoiding an unnecessary NEPA process.

Miles City Field Office Plan Reversed: BLM Cancels 2024 Coal Leasing Amendment

Overview

The Bureau of Land Management (BLM) has officially terminated the land‑use planning process that was announced in a 2025 notice of intent for the Miles City Resource Management Plan (RMP). The decision, published on June 4 2026, ends the Environmental Assessment (EA) and public‑scoping period that had been scheduled for the proposed 2024 RMP amendment.

The 2024 amendment, which had introduced new coal‑leasing options, was disapproved by the President under the Congressional Review Act (CRA) and is treated as if it never took effect. Consequently, the 2015 Miles City RMP—amended in January 2021—remains the governing plan for the area, with no new EA or final decision forthcoming.

In addition, the One Big Beautiful Bill (OBBB) Act’s Section 50203 has added 6,859,330 BLM‑administered coal acres to the planning area. Combined with the 2021 decision acres, this totals 6,989,390 acres available for future coal leasing consideration. The BLM will continue to collaborate with agencies and stakeholders to implement the existing land‑use plans.

Key Elements

• Termination of the 2025 planning process: The land‑use planning and EA for the Miles City RMP are discontinued as of the notice’s publication.
• Disapproval of the 2024 RMP amendment: The amendment, including its coal‑allocation proposal, is nullified under the CRA and never took effect.
• Restoration of the 2015 RMP: The 2015 plan, as amended in 2021, remains the active framework for the Miles City Planning Area.
• OBBB‑driven acreage expansion: Section 50203 of the OBBB added 6,859,330 acres, bringing the total potential coal leasing area to 6,989,390 acres.
• No new EA or final decision: The BLM will not issue a new EA or final plan amendment for this process.
• Ongoing stakeholder engagement: The agency will continue working with cooperating agencies and stakeholders on the implementation of the existing plans.
• Contact information: Irma Nansel, Planning and Environmental Coordinator, Miles City Field Office – (406) 233‑3653 or email at the office address in Miles City, MT.

BOEM Seeks Public Input on Renewing Ocean Mineral Data Collection

Overview

The Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (BOEM) has filed a notice with the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) to renew its information‑collection request (ICR) under control number 1010‑0081. The ICR covers the data and reports that BOEM will require from parties involved in operations on the Outer Continental Shelf (OCS) for minerals other than oil, gas, and sulfur—including delineation, testing, and mining plans.

This renewal comes at a time when interest in offshore critical minerals is rising, spurred by Executive Order 14285 and the possibility of new competitive lease sales. BOEM has not issued an OCS mineral lease in decades, but the agency anticipates that the forthcoming data collection will be essential if leasing moves forward. The ICR estimates an annual burden of 2,081 hours—a significant increase from the previous 212 hours—reflecting the expected rise in plan submissions and related reporting.

BOEM is inviting public comment on the necessity, accuracy, and efficiency of the proposed data collection. Comments must be submitted by July 6, 2026 to the OMB desk officer or to BOEM’s Information Collection Clearance Officer. The agency will use the information to evaluate lease applications, protect marine and coastal environments, and ensure fair economic returns for the United States.

Key Elements

• Renewal of OMB Control Number 1010‑0081 for BOEM’s OCS mineral information collection.
  
• Scope: Data required for delineation, testing, and mining plans under 30 CFR part 582.
  
• Estimated Burden: 2,081 respondent‑hours annually (up from 212 hours).
  
• Public Comment Deadline: July 6, 2026.
  
• Purpose:
  
  • Evaluate and approve or modify proposed OCS mineral activities.
    
  • Protect human, marine, and coastal environments.
    
  • Ensure equitable economic returns and inform regulatory oversight.
    
• Stakeholder Involvement:
  
  • State governors, task forces, lessees, operators, and other interested parties can comment on plans.
    
  • Provisions for proprietary data, non‑disclosure requests, and jurisdictional negotiations.
    
• Compliance with Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA): BOEM seeks to minimize respondent burden and improve data quality through potential use of information technology.
  
• Potential Impact: If new leasing occurs, the data collection will be critical for managing the environmental and economic aspects of offshore mineral development.

Mapping West Coast Ports: BOEM Seeks Your Input on Offshore Energy Impacts

Overview
The Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (BOEM) has issued a new information‑collection request (ICR) under the Paperwork Reduction Act to gather detailed data on U.S. West Coast port infrastructure. The survey will assess how offshore energy activities—particularly the decommissioning of oil and gas platforms—affect port‑based industries such as commercial and recreational fishing, local businesses, and tribal communities. By compiling this information, BOEM aims to identify potential conflicts and synergies between offshore energy development and port operations, informing future planning, environmental reviews, and Coastal Zone Management decisions.

The proposed survey consists of roughly 30 questions covering infrastructure availability, historical and projected use, economic and cultural benefits, and concerns about offshore energy impacts. Respondents will include port authority staff, fishing associations, state commissioners, commercial fish processors, local business owners, tribal representatives, and experts in state consistency reviews. The survey will be offered online, in print, or via optional onsite interviews, with an estimated 30‑minute completion time for the online version and about an hour for an interview. BOEM anticipates collecting data from 108 respondents across 20 West Coast ports in Washington, Oregon, and California.

Comments on the ICR are solicited until July 6, 2026. Stakeholders can submit written feedback to BOEM’s Information Collection Clearance Officer, Anna Atkinson, by mail, parcel, or email, referencing OMB Control Number 1010‑NEW. BOEM encourages comments on the necessity, utility, burden estimate, and potential improvements to the data collection process, as well as on the use of electronic submission methods to reduce respondent burden.

Key Elements

• OMB Control Number: 1010‑NEW (currently under review)
  
• Purpose: Collect port infrastructure and usage data to evaluate impacts of offshore energy activities, especially platform decommissioning, on port‑based industries.
  
• Survey Scope: ~30 questions on infrastructure, services, economic/cultural benefits, and concerns about offshore energy.
  
• Respondent Groups: Port authority staff, fishing associations, state commissioners, fish processors, local businesses, tribal representatives, and state consistency review experts.
  
• Geographic Focus: 20 West Coast ports in Washington, Oregon, and California.
  
• Estimated Burden: 30 minutes for online completion; 1 hour for onsite interview; 108 responses expected.
  
• Comment Period: Until July 6, 2026; submissions to BOEM’s desk officer or via email/parcel.
  
• Data Use: Inform BOEM planning, environmental reviews, Coastal Zone Management Act determinations, harbor planning, and inter‑industry negotiations.
  
• Privacy & FOIA: Comments are public record; personal information may be disclosed unless a FOIA exemption applies.
  
• Paperwork Reduction Act: BOEM seeks to minimize reporting burden while ensuring data quality and utility.

Texas Braces for Recovery: SBA Expands Disaster Aid to New Counties

The U.S. Small Business Administration (SBA) has issued an amendment to its administrative disaster declaration for Texas, originally announced on May 7, 2026, in response to severe storms and tornadoes. The amendment, effective June 1, 2026, extends the declaration’s coverage to include Cameron County and the contiguous counties of Hidalgo and Willacy. All other provisions of the original declaration remain unchanged, ensuring that businesses in these newly added areas can access the same disaster assistance programs.

This update primarily serves to broaden the reach of SBA’s disaster assistance loans, allowing affected small businesses in the added counties to apply for financial relief. The amendment clarifies the applicable dates—April 24 through May 1, 2026, with a final deadline of February 8, 2027—providing a clear timeline for eligibility and application. By incorporating these counties, the SBA aims to streamline recovery efforts across a wider geographic region impacted by the recent severe weather events.

Key Elements

• Expanded Coverage: Inclusion of Cameron, Hidalgo, and Willacy counties in the disaster declaration.
• Assistance Type: Disaster recovery loans under Catalog of Federal Assistance Number 59008.
• Eligibility Period: April 24 – May 1, 2026, with final application deadline February 8, 2027.
• Application Process: Small businesses may apply for loans through the SBA’s Office of Disaster Recovery and Resilience.
• Contact Information: Sharon Henderson, Office of Disaster Recovery and Resilience, Washington, DC (202) 205‑6734.
• Authority: 13 CFR 123.(b); amendment filed in the Federal Register (FR Doc. 2026‑11176).

Port Arthur LNG Seeks Green Light to Re‑Export Imported Natural Gas

Overview

Port Arthur LNG, LLC has filed a request with the Department of Energy (DOE) for a short‑term blanket authorization to export liquefied natural gas (LNG) that was previously imported into the United States. The company seeks permission to export up to 20 billion cubic feet of this imported LNG over a two‑year period, beginning as early as practicable but no later than October 1, 2026. The export would be conducted from the Port Arthur LNG terminal in Texas to any country capable of receiving LNG via ocean‑going carriers, provided U.S. law or policy does not prohibit trade with that country.

The request is specifically for LNG that will be used as “cooldown cargoes” to pre‑cool the terminal’s liquefaction facilities during startup. Once the imported LNG has served its cooling purpose, Port Arthur LNG intends to re‑export it. The company clarifies that it does not seek authority to export domestically produced LNG; it already holds long‑term authorizations for that purpose.

DOE will evaluate the application under the Natural Gas Act, considering statutory, regulatory, and policy requirements, as well as environmental impacts under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). The agency has opened a 30‑day public comment period, ending July 6, 2026, during which protests, motions to intervene, or written comments may be filed.

Key Elements

• Blanket Authorization Request: Export up to 20 billion cubic feet of previously imported LNG over two years.
  
• Cooldown Cargoes: Imported LNG will be used to pre‑cool liquefaction equipment; after cooling, the LNG will be re‑exported.
  
• Export Destinations: Any country with LNG import capacity, excluding those prohibited by U.S. law or policy; includes both free‑trade‑agreement (FTA) and non‑FTA partners.
  
• Existing Authorizations: Port Arthur LNG already holds long‑term permits for exporting domestically produced LNG (Docket Nos. 15‑53‑LNG, 18‑162‑LNG, 15‑96‑LNG).
  
• NEPA Compliance: DOE must assess environmental impacts before issuing a final decision.
  
• Public Comment Window: 30 days, closing July 6, 2026; protests, motions to intervene, or comments must reference Docket No. 26‑50‑LNG.
  
• DOE Review Process: Evaluation under the Natural Gas Act, DOE regulations, and any relevant policy considerations; final order to be issued after considering all submissions.

Sawmill Hydroelectric Project Seeks Temporary Reservoir Lowering to Facilitate Gate Replacement

Overview
Great Lakes Hydro America, LLC has filed a request with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) for a temporary variance to lower the operating level of its Sawmill Hydroelectric Project on the Androscoggin River in Coos County, New Hampshire. The variance would reduce the reservoir elevation from 1,094.5 ft to 1,093.5 ft for a period of two months (August 1–October 1, 2026) to allow safe replacement of two waste gates at the DC Dam. During this time the plant would continue to operate in a run‑of‑river mode, maintaining minimum bypass flows through the remaining gates and ensuring that downstream water quality and flow requirements are met.

The applicant plans to draw down the reservoir at a maximum rate of six inches per 24 hours, complete the gate repairs in roughly eight weeks, and then refill the reservoir by releasing 90 % of the inflow downstream while using the remaining 10 % to restore the reservoir to its normal level. The variance is intended to provide sufficient evacuation time for workers in the event of a station trip, thereby enhancing safety without significantly impacting river hydrology.

FERC has opened a public comment period ending June 29, 2026, inviting federal, state, local, and tribal agencies with environmental expertise to file comments, motions to intervene, or protests. Electronic filing is encouraged, and all submissions must follow FERC’s rules of procedure, including service to listed parties and evidentiary support.

Key Elements

• Temporary variance request: Lower reservoir elevation by 1 ft for 2 months to facilitate waste gate replacement.
  
• Project location: Sawmill Hydroelectric Project, Androscoggin River, Coos County, New Hampshire.
  
• Operational plan: Maintain run‑of‑river operations; provide minimum bypass flow through remaining gates; refill reservoir after repairs.
  
• Safety focus: Reduced water level gives workers extra evacuation time during potential station trips.
  
• Environmental considerations: 90 % of inflow released downstream during refill; 10 % used to restore reservoir per water‑quality certification.
  
• Public participation: Comment period until June 29, 2026; electronic filing via FERC eComment/eFiling; paper filings accepted.
  
• Intervention rules: Agencies may file motions to intervene but cannot cooperate in environmental document preparation.
  
• Compliance: Filing must include project number (P‑2422‑066), applicant name, contact info, and evidentiary basis.
  
• Timeline: Variance requested for August 1–October 1, 2026; repair work expected to last ~8 weeks.

Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement Seeks Renewal of Well‑Operation Data Collection

Overview

The U.S. Department of the Interior’s Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement (BSEE) has issued a notice under the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) to renew its approval for an ongoing information‑collection program that tracks well operations and equipment in the Outer Continental Shelf (OCS). The program, governed by 30 CFR 250 Subpart G, requires oil, gas, and sulfur operators to submit detailed reports on rig movements, well designs, blowout preventer (BOP) status, and other safety‑critical data.

The renewal request, identified by OMB Control Number 1014‑0028, invites public comment until August 3, 2026. BSEE emphasizes that the data collected are essential for ensuring safe drilling, workover, completion, and decommissioning activities, and for protecting marine and coastal environments from spills and accidents. By refining the collection process, the agency aims to reduce paperwork burdens while maintaining rigorous oversight of well‑site safety.

Respondents—approximately 60 OCS oil and gas operators—must submit reports such as the Rig Movement Notification Report (Form BSEE‑0144) on a schedule that can range from daily to biennial, depending on activity. The estimated annual burden ranges from 15 minutes to 2,160 hours per respondent, with a total projected cost of $6.7 million for the federal government.

Key Elements

• Renewal under the Paperwork Reduction Act – BSEE seeks to extend its current information‑collection program with OMB approval.
  
• OMB Control Number 1014‑0028 – Validates the collection and allows respondents to comply.
  
• Comment Period – Public and agency stakeholders can submit feedback by August 3, 2026, via electronic portal or mail.
  
• Primary Form: BSEE‑0144 (Rig Movement Notification Report) – Captures rig arrival/departure dates, well details, helideck status, and BOP information.
  
• Scope of Data – Includes rig tracking, well design reviews, BOP fit‑for‑service checks, casing repairs, and engineering documentation.
  
• Purpose – Enhances safety oversight, reduces risk of incidents like Deepwater Horizon, and supports regulatory approvals and inspections.
  
• Respondent Burden – Estimated 15 min to 2,160 hrs per year; total annual cost projected at $6.7 million.
  
• Potential Respondents – Federal OCS oil, gas, and sulfur lessees/operators and pipeline right‑of‑way holders.
  
• Regulatory Basis – 30 CFR 250 Subpart G, with BSEE’s Notices to Lessees (NTLs) and Operators providing guidance.
  
• Data Use – Inform BSEE’s inspection scheduling, permit approvals, and emergency response planning.

Trump Tightens U.S. Metal Import Tariffs to Protect National Security

Overview

President Donald J. Trump’s June 4, 2026 proclamation revises the tariff regimes that were first imposed in 2018 and 2025 to curb imports of aluminum, steel, and copper that could threaten U.S. national security. The new rules build on the earlier 50 % and 25 % duties on primary metal products and derivative articles, adding a 15 % duty on a broader set of industrial and agricultural equipment that is largely made from these metals.

The proclamation expands the category of derivative products that receive the reduced 15 % duty to include agricultural machinery and residential HVAC components, recognizing their essential role in U.S. food production, construction, and logistics. It also temporarily lowers duties on mobile industrial equipment to support domestic manufacturing while maintaining the overall security objective.

Key technical changes include lowering the U.S.‑content threshold from 95 % to 85 % for products to be considered “made entirely from American aluminum, steel, or copper,” adding aluminum lithographic plates and steel racks to the derivative tariff list, and establishing new guidance for Customs to assess U.S. content. The Secretary of Commerce will continue to monitor imports and report to the President on any need for further action.

Key Elements

• Tariff rates:
  
  • 50 % on primary aluminum, steel, and copper articles.
    
  • 25 % on derivative products that are predominantly composed of these metals.
    
  • 15 % on a subset of derivative products, now expanded to include agricultural equipment and residential HVAC systems.
    
• Expanded derivative coverage:
  
  • Agricultural machinery (e.g., tractors, harvesters).
    
  • HVAC components for residential use.
    
  • Mobile industrial equipment and machinery receive temporary duty adjustments.
    
• New product inclusions:
  
  • Aluminum lithographic plates and steel racks are now subject to the derivative tariff.
    
• U.S. content threshold:
  
  • Reduced from 95 % to 85 % of the metal weight to qualify as “made entirely from American aluminum, steel, or copper.”
    
• Enforcement and monitoring:
  
  • Customs and Border Protection will assess U.S. content and impose penalties for fraud.
    
  • The Secretary of Commerce, in consultation with the Trade Representative and other officials, will review import flows and advise the President on potential further actions.
    
• Legal framework:
  
  • The proclamation operates under Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act and Section 604 of the Trade Act of 1974, allowing the President to adjust duties and amend the Harmonized Tariff Schedule.
    
• Duration:
  
  • The 15 % duty on selected derivative products applies until December 31, 2027; subsequent rates are set for 2028 and beyond.

EU Court Rules Greece Must Fix 150+ Municipal Wastewater Systems or Face Penalties

Overview
On 4 June 2026 the European Court of Justice (E‑CJEU) delivered judgment C‑841/24, finding that Greece has failed to meet its obligations under Directive 91/271/EC on the treatment of urban wastewater. The Court confirmed that the Hellenic Republic had not installed the required sewer networks in 153 municipalities, nor ensured secondary or equivalent treatment in 143 of those areas. It also found non‑compliance with stricter requirements for sensitive zones (e.g., Gerakas) and coastal waters in 13 municipalities.

The ruling reiterates the EU’s hard deadlines—31 December 2000 for towns over 15 000 inhabitants, 31 December 2005 for those with 2 000–15 000, and 31 December 1998 for sensitive zones with more than 10 000 inhabitants—and the necessity of meeting Annex I standards for effluent quality. Greece’s failure to provide adequate collection systems and treatment plants means that untreated or inadequately treated sewage is being discharged into receiving waters, posing risks to water quality, ecosystems, and public health.

The Court stressed that post‑deadline improvements cannot excuse earlier breaches. Greece is therefore required to bring all affected municipalities into compliance with the Directive’s technical and operational requirements, or face further legal and financial consequences.

Key Elements

• Non‑compliance with Article 3 – 153 municipalities lack central sewer networks; no justification provided for using individual systems.
• Failure to meet Article 4 – 143 municipalities do not provide secondary or equivalent treatment before discharge.
• Violation of Article 5 and 7 – Sensitive zones (Gerakas) and coastal waters (13 municipalities) receive untreated or inadequately treated effluent.
• Annex I standards unmet – Effluent quality does not satisfy the stringent limits required for sensitive and coastal waters.
• Deadlines enforced – EU deadlines (2000, 2005, 1998) have passed; late improvements do not absolve earlier breaches.
• Implications for water quality – Untreated sewage threatens aquatic ecosystems, groundwater, and public health.
• Legal and financial consequences – Greece must pay the Commission’s costs and may face further sanctions if compliance is not achieved.
• Broader regulatory context – The decision reinforces the EU’s commitment to enforce environmental legislation across member states, emphasizing the interdependence of collection, treatment, and monitoring provisions.

EU‑Backed €900 M Aid to Cushion Austrian Industries from Carbon‑Pricing Costs

Overview
In May 2026 the European Commission approved Austria’s request for state aid to compensate industrial firms for the higher electricity prices that will result from the inclusion of greenhouse‑gas emission costs in the EU Emissions Trading System (ETS) from 31 October 2025. The aid, authorised under Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, is a direct grant scheme that will run until 31 December 2030.

The programme is designed to preserve the competitiveness of Austria’s energy‑intensive sectors—such as aluminium, steel, chemicals, mining and manufacturing—while the country transitions to a lower‑carbon economy. By covering 75 % of the additional costs, the aid aims to mitigate the financial impact of the ETS on production and employment, thereby supporting the broader objective of energy and sectorial development.

The decision reflects the EU’s commitment to balancing environmental goals with economic stability. While the aid eases the burden of carbon pricing for Austrian firms, it also underscores the need for continued investment in cleaner technologies and energy efficiency to reduce long‑term dependence on fossil‑fuel‑derived electricity.

Key Elements

• Legal basis: Austrian Federal Act on temporary support for electricity‑price increases due to ETS (SAG 2025) and support guidelines for electricity cost compensation.
  
• Objective: Energy and sectorial development; protect competitiveness of high‑energy‑intensity industries.
  
• Form of aid: Direct grant (state‑funded payments).
  
• Budget: €900 million total, with a 75 % intensity of support.
  
• Duration: 5 years, from 2025 to 31 December 2030.
  
• Covered sectors:
  
  • Manufacturing of leather, aluminium, inorganic chemicals, metals (lead, zinc, tin, copper, non‑ferrous), pulp, paper, glass, plastics, industrial gases, synthetic rubber, textiles, ceramics, dyes, batteries, fertilizers, oils, malt, wood‑based panels, glass products, metal drawing, and other chemical and mineral products.
    
  • Mining of non‑ferrous and iron ores.
    
• Granting authority: Federal Ministry for Economy, Energy and Tourism (Bundesministerium für Wirtschaft, Energie und Tourismus), Vienna.
  
• Commission stance: No objections; decision authorised under Article 107(1) and Article 108(1) of the TFEU.
  
• Relevance to the EEA: Text available on the European Commission’s competition cases portal.

Czech Republic Opens 63 km² for Natural‑Gas Extraction: New Opportunity for Mining Operators

Overview
The Czech Ministry of the Environment has announced that it has received an application for prior consent to establish the Trojanovice I natural‑gas extraction site on a 63.17 km² area in the Moravian‑Silesian Region. The proposal targets the gas deposit associated with the Frenštát‑West and Frenštát‑East coal seam (deposit registration number 3144301). Under Directive 94/22/EC and the national Mining Act, the Ministry invites other authorized mining entities to submit competing applications for the same extraction site within 90 days of this notice.

The notice outlines the legal framework, the criteria for approval, and the decision timeline: a final decision will be issued no later than 12 months after the application deadline. Interested parties must submit their applications to the Geology Department of the Ministry of the Environment in Prague. Applications received after the deadline will not be considered.

This announcement signals a potential expansion of natural‑gas production in the Czech Republic, offering a competitive bidding process for operators and stakeholders in the energy and mineral resources sectors.

Key Elements

• Project: Trojanovice I natural‑gas extraction site, linked to the Frenštát‑West/East coal seam (deposit 3144301).
  
• Area: Approximately 63.17 km² across 11 municipalities (Kozlovice, Kunčice pod Ondřejníkem, Veřovice, Trojanovice, Rožnov pod Radhoštěm, Tichá na Moravě, Pstruží, Čeladná, Frenštát pod Radhoštěm, Lhotka u Frýdku‑Místku, Bordovice).
  
• Legal Basis: Directive 94/22/EC (EU) and Czech Act No 44/1988 on mineral resources (Mining Act).
  
• Application Window: 90 days from publication in the Official Journal of the EU.
  
• Competition: The Ministry invites other authorized mining entities to submit competing prior‑consent applications.
  
• Decision Timeline: Final decision within 12 months after the application deadline.
  
• Contact: Mr Martin Holý, Head of the Geology Department, Ministry of the Environment, Prague (email: martin.holy@mzp.gov.cz).
  
• Implications: Opens a new natural‑gas extraction opportunity, potentially influencing regional energy supply, environmental assessments, and local economic development.

NOAA’s New Ocean‑Mapping Matching Fund: Partner with the Coast to Chart the Uncharted

Overview

The U.S. Department of Commerce’s National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) has opened a matching‑fund opportunity—named the Brennan Ocean Mapping Fund—to bring non‑Federal entities into the planning, contracting, and execution of ocean, coastal, and Great Lakes mapping projects. NOAA will match up to 70 % of a project’s cost, provided the partner contributes at least 30 %. The goal is to accelerate the acquisition of high‑quality hydrographic data that support maritime commerce, energy development, fisheries, tourism, and emergency response.

The program targets fiscal year 2028 mapping efforts, with projects expected to start between October 2027 and September 2028. NOAA will handle survey procurement, data quality assurance, and archiving at the National Centers for Environmental Information, ensuring that the resulting products are publicly available whenever possible. Partners benefit from NOAA’s expertise in survey planning, environmental compliance, and data stewardship.

Strategic priorities guide the selection of projects: filling gaps in U.S. ocean and Great Lakes bathymetry, advancing Alaska’s coastal mapping, and integrating emerging technologies into a coordinated national mapping framework. Eligible partners include state and local governments, tribal authorities, universities, NGOs, and private sector entities that can provide the required matching funds and demonstrate a clear need for the data.

Key Elements

• Matching structure: NOAA matches up to 70 % of project cost; partners must provide at least 30 %.
  
• Funding limits: Up to $1 million per project; NOAA plans to fund 2–5 projects in FY 2028.
  
• Timeline:
  
  • Informational webinar: Aug 13, 2026
    
  • Proposal deadline: Oct 16, 2026
    
  • NOAA decision: Dec 2026
    
  • Agreement drafting: Jan 2027
    
  • Partner fund transfer: Jun–Sep 2027 (must be in by Oct 1, 2027)
    
  • NOAA task orders: Jan–Sep 2028
    
• Data products: Bathymetry, side‑scan sonar, lidar, water‑column data, feature reports, and high‑resolution topographic maps.
  
• Public access: All data archived at NCEI and made available to the public to the greatest extent allowed by law.
  
• Strategic focus areas:
  
  1. Map U.S. waters deeper than 40 m by 2030 and shallower waters by 2040.
     
  2. Target Alaska’s coast to reduce costs and improve data quality.
     
  3. Leverage traditional and emerging survey technologies under NOAA’s Integrated Ocean and Coastal Mapping (IOCM) framework.
     
• Eligibility: Non‑Federal entities (state/local governments, tribal entities, universities, NGOs, private sector, philanthropic partners) that can provide the 30 % match.
  
• Submission requirements: ≤6 pages, executive summary, partner list, justification, budget, GIS files (SHP), PDF format, 12‑pt Times New Roman, single‑spaced, 1‑inch margins.
  
• Evaluation criteria: Alignment with national priorities, clarity of need, partner match feasibility, realistic budget, and likelihood of project success.
  
• Contact: Meredith Westington, NOAA Integrated Ocean and Coastal Mapping, 505‑278‑9851.

Charting the Ocean Economy: NOAA Extends Survey of Ocean‑Tech Businesses

Overview
The U.S. Department of Commerce, through NOAA’s Integrated Ocean Observing System (IOOS) Office, is extending a web‑based survey that tracks the “Ocean Enterprise” – businesses and organizations that provide services, infrastructure, or value‑added products for ocean measurement, observation, and forecasting. The survey, conducted in FY 2015, FY 2020, and FY 2025, will be repeated to monitor growth and economic impact of the marine sector.

Under the Paperwork Reduction Act, NOAA invites the public and federal agencies to comment on this information‑collection extension for 60 days before submitting it to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB). Comments are due by August 3, 2026, and will help NOAA refine the survey’s design, reduce respondent burden, and ensure the data collected is useful for policy and economic analysis.

The survey gathers demographic, financial, and functional data from approximately 300 business and non‑profit respondents, each expected to spend about half an hour completing the questionnaire. The resulting profile will quantify the size and economic contribution of the U.S. ocean‑related enterprise, informing future investment and policy decisions in ocean science and technology.

Key Elements

• OMB Control Number: 0648‑0712
  
• Purpose: Extend an approved web‑based survey of employers providing services or infrastructure to IOOS, and those adding value to IOOS data for specific end uses.
  
• Target Respondents: For‑profit businesses and not‑for‑profit institutions involved with IOOS.
  
• Estimated Burden: ~300 respondents, 0.5 hours each, no cost to respondents.
  
• Method of Collection: Electronic (internet) and via email.
  
• Legal Basis: Integrated Coastal and Ocean Observation System Act (2009) and reauthorization under the Coordinated Ocean Observations and Research Act (2020).
  
• Comment Period: 60 days; comments due by August 3, 2026.
  
• Contact for Comments: Adrienne Thomas, NOAA PRA Officer (OMB reference 0648‑0712).
  
• Contact for Information: Zack Baize, Program Manager, U.S. IOOS Office, National Ocean Service.
  
• Outcome: Data will be analyzed to produce a final report demonstrating the economic impact of IOOS data on the U.S. marine sector.

Georgia Power Eyes Safer, More Efficient Hydropower Spillway Upgrade on Savannah River

Overview

Georgia Power Company has filed a non‑capacity amendment with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) to replace the existing flashboards at its Yonah Development hydropower plant on the Savannah River basin with modern Obermeyer spillway gates. The change is intended to give operators finer control over reservoir levels, improving operational flexibility and reducing the risk of uncontrolled releases.

The proposed upgrade will be installed behind a bulkhead, eliminating the need for any drawdown of the reservoir. Construction is slated to begin in 2027 and take 18–24 months, with staging areas located on previously disturbed, gravelled land. Because the work will not disturb new ground, the project is expected to have minimal environmental impact and will continue to operate under its current license and water‑quality certification.

FERC has opened a public comment period, inviting federal, state, local, and tribal agencies—especially those with environmental expertise—to submit comments, protests, or motions to intervene by June 29, 2026. The notice outlines electronic filing procedures and emphasizes that cooperating agencies cannot intervene in the proceeding.

Key Elements

• Project Location: Savannah River basin on the Tallulah, Chattooga, and Tugalo Rivers (Rabun, Habersham, Stephens counties, GA; Oconee County, SC).
  
• Amendment Purpose: Replace flashboards with Obermeyer spillway gates to improve reservoir elevation control and operational safety.
  
• Technical Details: Gates installed behind a bulkhead; no drawdown required; control room to house new instrumentation.
  
• Environmental Impact: No new ground disturbance; staging on previously disturbed gravel areas; expected to maintain current water‑quality certification.
  
• Construction Timeline: Start in 2027, 18–24‑month duration.
  
• Public Participation: Comment, protest, or motion to intervene deadline: June 29, 2026, 5 p.m. Eastern Time.
  
• Filing Instructions: Electronic filing via FERC eFiling; paper filings accepted; must include docket number P‑2354‑221.
  
• Agency Cooperation: Agencies may assist in environmental documentation but cannot intervene in the proceeding.
  
• Regulatory Framework: Governed by the Federal Power Act and FERC Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385).

Glen Hydroelectric Project: New FERC Filing Opens Door for Public Input on Run‑of‑River Power and River Health

Overview
The U.S. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) has accepted a hydroelectric application from Green Mountain Power Corporation for the Glen Hydroelectric Project on the Mascoma River in New Hampshire. The project is a 1,485 kW run‑of‑river plant that has been operating since 2012, generating roughly 2,782 MWh per year. The application seeks to continue the plant’s current operations while enhancing environmental safeguards, including a continuous minimum flow of 40 cfs (or the lesser of inflow) to the bypassed river reach and a compliance monitoring plan.

The applicant proposes several protective measures: a 20‑inch minimum‑flow pipe to maintain river flow, a ban on removing trees larger than 3 inches in diameter during the bat‑active season (April 15–October 31) to safeguard northern long‑eared and tricolored bats, and a historic‑properties management plan. In addition, the notice invites the public to submit motions to intervene, protests, comments, recommendations, preliminary terms and conditions, and preliminary fishway prescriptions as part of the environmental analysis process.

The filing is now open for public review and comment. Interested parties have until July 28, 2026 to submit motions to intervene or protests, and until September 11, 2026 to file reply comments. All submissions must be filed electronically through FERC’s eFiling system or via paper, and must reference the project name and docket number (P‑8405‑024). The Commission will consider all comments and motions when determining whether to issue a license renewal or modification.

Key Elements

• Run‑of‑River Operation – The plant will continue to operate in instantaneous run‑of‑river mode, matching outflow to inflow.
  
• Minimum Flow Requirement – A continuous minimum flow of 40 cfs (or the lesser of inflow) will be released downstream of the dam.
  
• Capacity & Generation – 1,485 kW installed capacity; average annual generation 2,782 MWh (2012‑2024).
  
• Fishway Prescriptions – Preliminary fishway prescriptions are solicited to support aquatic life passage.
  
• Bat Protection – No tree removal of trees >3 inches DBH from April 15 to October 31 to protect bat populations.
  
• Historic Properties Plan – Development of a plan to manage historic resources on project lands.
  
• Environmental Analysis – The application is ready for environmental review under the Federal Power Act.
  
• Public Participation – Comment, protest, and intervention deadlines: July 28, 2026 (initial filings) and September 11, 2026 (reply comments).
  
• Compliance Monitoring – Proposed operations compliance monitoring plan to ensure adherence to environmental conditions.
  
• Water‑Quality Certification – Required by July 28, 2026, either a certification, request, or waiver must be filed.

Chignik’s New Hydroelectric Vision: From License Surrender to Environmental Assessment

Overview

The City of Chignik, Alaska, has decided to surrender its existing license for the Chignik Project (Project No. 620), a hydroelectric facility that has been inactive since about 2012. With support from the Alaska Native Tribal Health Consortium and the Lake and Peninsula Borough, the city plans to replace the old water supply line and build a new hydroelectric plant under state jurisdiction.

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) staff have determined that the redeveloped project will not require a federal license, and a Notice of Application for Surrender of License was issued in March 2026. No comments were received on that notice.

In line with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), FERC staff will prepare an Environmental Assessment (EA) for the proposed redevelopment, targeting a release by August 25 2026. The EA will be open for a 30‑day public comment period, and all feedback will be considered in the final decision. Public inquiries and participation can be directed to the Office of Public Participation or to FERC Secretary Rebecca Martin.

Key Elements

• License surrender: City of Chignik is relinquishing its 2012‑inactive hydroelectric license (Project No. 620).
  
• No federal license needed: FERC staff ruled that the new, state‑jurisdictioned project will not require a federal license.
  
• Project redevelopment: Replacement of the water supply line and construction of a new hydroelectric facility.
  
• Funding sources: Alaska Native Tribal Health Consortium and Lake and Peninsula Borough.
  
• NEPA compliance: An Environmental Assessment will be prepared and issued by August 25 2026, followed by a 30‑day comment period.
  
• Public participation: No comments were filed on the surrender notice; the EA will invite public input.
  
• Contact information: Office of Public Participation (202 502‑6595) and FERC Secretary Rebecca Martin (202 502‑6012).
  
• Unique document ID: EAXX‑019‑20‑000‑1777913740 for all related environmental review documents.

Oregon’s Storm‑Driven Disaster Aid: Presidential Declaration Amended to Expand Public Assistance

Overview
On May 28 2026 the U.S. Small Business Administration issued an amendment to the President’s major disaster declaration for Oregon, originally issued April 7 2026. The amendment broadens the scope of public assistance to include the counties of Clatsop and Wasco, which were identified as adversely affected by the recent severe storms, straight‑line winds, flooding, landslides, and mudslides that struck the state. The declaration remains focused on public assistance only, providing federal support for businesses and private non‑profit organizations to recover from the damage.

The amendment preserves all other provisions of the original declaration, including the eligibility criteria, funding mechanisms, and the authority under 13 CFR 123.3(b). It clarifies that the assistance will be available through the MySBA Loan Portal and outlines the relevant dates for application and disbursement. The notice also supplies contact information for the Office of Disaster Recovery and Resilience, ensuring that affected parties can obtain guidance and support.

For geoscientists, environmental planners, and natural resource professionals, the expanded coverage underscores the significant geologic and hydrologic impacts of the storm event—particularly landslides and mudslides—and signals federal recognition of the need for recovery resources in these vulnerable regions.

Key Elements

• Expanded Coverage – The amendment adds Clatsop and Wasco counties to the list of areas eligible for public assistance under the disaster declaration.
  
• Disaster Scope – Severe storms, straight‑line winds, flooding, landslides, and mudslides are the identified hazards triggering the declaration.
  
• Public Assistance Only – The declaration focuses on federal aid for businesses and private non‑profits; no private assistance is included.
  
• Funding Mechanism – Assistance is provided through SBA disaster loans available via the MySBA Loan Portal.
  
• Timeline – Amendment issued May 28 2026; key dates include December 15–21 2025, June 10 2026, and January 7 2027 for application and disbursement windows.
  
• Contact Point – Jennifer Talarico, Office of Disaster Recovery and Resilience, U.S. Small Business Administration, is the primary contact for inquiries.
  
• Authority – The amendment is authorized under 13 CFR 123.3(b) and references Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59008.
  
• Unchanged Provisions – All other aspects of the original declaration remain unchanged, ensuring continuity of support for affected entities.

Cape Cod Canal Pipeline Relocation: FERC Opens Public Comment on Gas Line Move

Overview

The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) has released an Environmental Assessment (EA) for Algonquin Gas Transmission’s proposed relocation of its interstate natural‑gas pipeline system in Bourne, Massachusetts. The project is designed to accommodate the Massachusetts Department of Transportation’s replacement of the Bourne and Sagamore bridges while ensuring uninterrupted gas service to the National Grid distribution network on both sides of the Cape Cod Canal.

The EA, prepared under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), evaluates potential impacts on the natural and human environment, explores reasonable alternatives, and recommends mitigation measures. FERC concludes that approving the relocation would not constitute a major federal action significantly affecting environmental quality. The assessment is available electronically, and the public is invited to submit comments by 5:00 p.m. on June 29, 2026.

The project involves abandoning and constructing several miles of pipeline and installing new metering and regulating stations. Cooperating agencies—including the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, the EPA, and the Massachusetts Army National Guard—have reviewed the EA and will issue their own decisions under applicable statutes such as the Clean Water Act and the Rivers and Harbors Act.

Key Elements

• Project Purpose: Relocate existing pipeline segments to align with new bridge structures, maintaining continuous natural‑gas service across the Cape Cod Canal.
• Pipeline Work:
  • Abandonment of ~2.5 mi of existing 8‑inch and 18‑inch lines and two metering stations.
  • Construction of ~1.1 mi of new 8‑inch lines, ~0.66 mi of 18‑inch lines, and ~5.2 mi of larger 16‑ and 18‑inch lines to replace bridge‑attached segments.
  • Installation of four new metering & regulating stations and pig launchers/receivers.
• Environmental Findings: EA indicates no major federal action; potential impacts are manageable with proposed mitigation.
• Regulatory Framework:
  • Natural Gas Act (NGA) – public convenience and necessity review.
  • NEPA – environmental analysis and public participation.
  • Clean Water Act & Rivers and Harbors Act – waterway and habitat considerations.
• Public Participation: Comments accepted electronically (eComment/eFiling) or by mail; deadline June 29, 2026.
• Cooperating Agencies: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, EPA, Massachusetts Army National Guard – each will issue separate decisions on their jurisdictional aspects.
• Next Steps: FERC will consider the EA and public comments before issuing a Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity for the relocation project.